J
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Guest
On May 30, 12:41 pm, Bill Sornson wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > John Forrest Tomlinson wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> On Tue, 29 May 2007 08:58:50 -0700, Bill Sornson
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> conservatives
> >>> SHOULD be more conscientious! I mean, it's time to indict/arrest
> >>> Sandy Berglar for stealing classified documents from the National
> >>> Archives; Valerie Plame for lying to Congress just weeks ago (memo
> >>> shows she did recommend her lying hubby for ***** after all);
> >>> William Jefferson (D LA) for
> >>> taking huge bribes on tape and hiding almost $100K in his freezer;
> >>> Diane Feinstein for funneling MILLIONS to her husband's defense
> >>> contracting business while serving on the Appropriations Committee,
> >>> etc etc etc etc.
>
> >> Do you really believe all of this?
>
> >> William Jefferson is in trouble and the FBI and federal prosecutors
> >> will probably get him, so that's good.
>
> >> But the rest?
>
> >> Try to think logically for a moment. Ask yourself, how is this stuff
> >> possible? How can it be that after six years of Republican control
> >> of Congress and the Executive Branch that there is some sort of cabal
> >> that is keeping people who have committed these "crimes" from
> >> prosecution. Is it Soros bribing government officials? Is it
> >> "die-hard liberals" controlling various parts of the executive
> >> branch? Is it hard-core left-left wing people getting on grand
> >> juries and protecting these people from indictments? Is it that
> >> guys like the head of the CIA are really so partisan or cowered by
> >> some vast liberal conspiracy so as to lie about Plame? Is it the
> >> "liberal media" exerting some sort of hypnotic control over US
> >> attorneys and district attorneys and the public as a whole?
>
> >> Where do you get this stuff?
>
> >>> But a middle-aged gay man who flirted (only, and only after being
> >>> enticed) with late-teenage pages? HIM they drum out.
>
> >> This is so rude on your part. Blaming teenagers for Foley s
> >> transgressions.
>
> > Conservatives are not really into government like liberals are.
> > Conservatives mainly just want to make some money and live the good
> > life. But liberals truly want to govern. Therein lies your
> > explanation.
>
> Flogittodeathlinson's so cute. I plonked him many months ago, but he still
> replies to my posts as if I'll read it first-hand. Once or twice, okay, but
> he's been doing it repeatedly ever since. (Blocked him because he's a liar
> and a libeler.)
>
> Short explanation why government hasn't cracked down on corrupt Dems: when
> Bush became President (controversy, FL, SCOTUS, etc.), he didn't "clean
> house" the way Presidents normally do. He left many Clinton appointees in
> place, and not just in hi-vis positions like head of CIA. Part of his
> attempt to unite and not divide, one supposes. (Terribly misguided, of
> course.) But because of the rabid, irrational hatred of him due to that
> disputed election, a "shadow government" started and continues to undermine
> him at every opportunity. (Liars Plame and Wilson to name just two.) Leak
> classified secrets to the NYT? No big deal. Rinse and repeat. And with a
> more-than-willing accomplice in the mainstream media magnifying any
> perceived transgression by the Right and completely ignoring and burying
> those by the Left, the public is left with distorted, biased misinformation.
> (AKA "Blog Food".)
>
> Ask yourself this: why has there been NO attention to Diane Feinstein's
> unethical and almost definitely illegal funneling of millions of dollars to
> her husband's defense contracting concerns while serving on the
> Appropriations Committee? Can anyone honestly say the same would be the
> case if a leading /Republican/ senator did that?
>
> Rinse and Repeat. It's all quite transparent.
>
> And no, Flog Man, I won't see your pathetic, whiny reply (at least not
> directly) so please don't address it to me. TYVM. LOL
Readers of rec.bicycles.misc, rec.bicycles.tech and
alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent:
Mr. Sherman is of the opinion that Mr. Sornson does much better when
he sticks to quips and avoids political commentary.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > John Forrest Tomlinson wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> On Tue, 29 May 2007 08:58:50 -0700, Bill Sornson
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> conservatives
> >>> SHOULD be more conscientious! I mean, it's time to indict/arrest
> >>> Sandy Berglar for stealing classified documents from the National
> >>> Archives; Valerie Plame for lying to Congress just weeks ago (memo
> >>> shows she did recommend her lying hubby for ***** after all);
> >>> William Jefferson (D LA) for
> >>> taking huge bribes on tape and hiding almost $100K in his freezer;
> >>> Diane Feinstein for funneling MILLIONS to her husband's defense
> >>> contracting business while serving on the Appropriations Committee,
> >>> etc etc etc etc.
>
> >> Do you really believe all of this?
>
> >> William Jefferson is in trouble and the FBI and federal prosecutors
> >> will probably get him, so that's good.
>
> >> But the rest?
>
> >> Try to think logically for a moment. Ask yourself, how is this stuff
> >> possible? How can it be that after six years of Republican control
> >> of Congress and the Executive Branch that there is some sort of cabal
> >> that is keeping people who have committed these "crimes" from
> >> prosecution. Is it Soros bribing government officials? Is it
> >> "die-hard liberals" controlling various parts of the executive
> >> branch? Is it hard-core left-left wing people getting on grand
> >> juries and protecting these people from indictments? Is it that
> >> guys like the head of the CIA are really so partisan or cowered by
> >> some vast liberal conspiracy so as to lie about Plame? Is it the
> >> "liberal media" exerting some sort of hypnotic control over US
> >> attorneys and district attorneys and the public as a whole?
>
> >> Where do you get this stuff?
>
> >>> But a middle-aged gay man who flirted (only, and only after being
> >>> enticed) with late-teenage pages? HIM they drum out.
>
> >> This is so rude on your part. Blaming teenagers for Foley s
> >> transgressions.
>
> > Conservatives are not really into government like liberals are.
> > Conservatives mainly just want to make some money and live the good
> > life. But liberals truly want to govern. Therein lies your
> > explanation.
>
> Flogittodeathlinson's so cute. I plonked him many months ago, but he still
> replies to my posts as if I'll read it first-hand. Once or twice, okay, but
> he's been doing it repeatedly ever since. (Blocked him because he's a liar
> and a libeler.)
>
> Short explanation why government hasn't cracked down on corrupt Dems: when
> Bush became President (controversy, FL, SCOTUS, etc.), he didn't "clean
> house" the way Presidents normally do. He left many Clinton appointees in
> place, and not just in hi-vis positions like head of CIA. Part of his
> attempt to unite and not divide, one supposes. (Terribly misguided, of
> course.) But because of the rabid, irrational hatred of him due to that
> disputed election, a "shadow government" started and continues to undermine
> him at every opportunity. (Liars Plame and Wilson to name just two.) Leak
> classified secrets to the NYT? No big deal. Rinse and repeat. And with a
> more-than-willing accomplice in the mainstream media magnifying any
> perceived transgression by the Right and completely ignoring and burying
> those by the Left, the public is left with distorted, biased misinformation.
> (AKA "Blog Food".)
>
> Ask yourself this: why has there been NO attention to Diane Feinstein's
> unethical and almost definitely illegal funneling of millions of dollars to
> her husband's defense contracting concerns while serving on the
> Appropriations Committee? Can anyone honestly say the same would be the
> case if a leading /Republican/ senator did that?
>
> Rinse and Repeat. It's all quite transparent.
>
> And no, Flog Man, I won't see your pathetic, whiny reply (at least not
> directly) so please don't address it to me. TYVM. LOL
Readers of rec.bicycles.misc, rec.bicycles.tech and
alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent:
Mr. Sherman is of the opinion that Mr. Sornson does much better when
he sticks to quips and avoids political commentary.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
