OT:The Perfect Political Campaign Button '06

[ST]

On 11/5/06 7:23 PM, in article [email protected],
"Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> ST wrote:
>> On 11/5/06 6:21 PM, in article
>> [email protected], "John Forrest Tomlinson"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:00:05 GMT, ST <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> how about you.....
>>>> "Minimum Wage, Datsun pick-up driving, tree huggin, fake
>>>> hamburger-eatin, flat-changin 2nd rate Bike shop mechanic, hemp
>>>> apron wearin Socialist FREAK!!"
>>>>
>>>> The government does not create jobs.. Industry does, and they do it
>>>> well when they are not overtaxed/over regulated by the government.
>>>> IF you think government is here to support many that do not take
>>>> personal responsibility for what they achieve in life you my be a
>>>> redneck!! (progressive liberal ******..) WHY do you think many that
>>>> come to this country do well in the next 5-10 years! They take
>>>> ADVANTAGE of many opportunities available to those that GET OFF
>>>> THEIR ASS AND TURN THE DAMN TV OFF.
>>>
>>> What's hilarious about these sort of simplistic rants is that the
>>> people saying them grossly underestimate, hide or are ignorant of the
>>> massive amount of government spending that favors particular
>>> industries and particular companies.
>>>
>>> "Free market"? Ha, ha ha. Not if **** Cheney can do anything about
>>> it.
>>
>> I love the way you snip out the FACTS that was in this ENTIRE post!!
>
> Dude (dude?), welcome to "debating" Just Freaking Flogittodeathlinson!
> He'll snip out something you /just wrote/ and then flame you for its
> absence! LOL It's actually pretty funny, in a
> makes-you-want-to-eat-your-liver kinda way.
>
>> Do you mean like??
>>
>> Entitlements?
>> Welfare?
>> Government Union Pensions?
>> Defense spending??
>> Trying to rebuild Iraq before the indigenous terrorist FREAKS blow it
>> up again??
>>
>> Your (progressive liberals) philosophy of giving government resources
>> as HANDOUTS to people instead of breaks to business so they CAN
>> EMPLOY THE PEOPLE AND MAKE MONEY FOR A STRONG ECONOMY will never work!
>>
>> Hell... Even China is learning that!
>
> Trust me: plonking him is a lot easier than trying to get him to see even
> the most obvious fact staring him (and everyone) in the face.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Bill "poor bastid <eg> " S.
>
>

Hell! He even works in the non-profit (after they get their big cut!!)
leftist, public sector.

 

[damyth]

ST wrote:
> On 11/4/06 6:46 PM, in article
> [email protected], "damyth"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > di wrote:
> >> "John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:23:37 -0600, "di" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>> news:[email protected]...
> >>>>> Sorni,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If these guys can see through Bushco, how come you can't?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://movies.crooksandliars.com/TSR-SullivanHitchens.wmv
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Better late than never.
> >>>> Wow, from CNN, that must really be unbiased
> >>>
> >>> Question for Di: Do you think the war in Iraq is going well, or can
> >>> ever go well?
> >>>
> >>> Oh yeah, I forgot -- reality has a liberal bias....
> >>> --
> >>> JT
> >>
> >> I don't think it's going as well as it could, but It's not going as bad as
> >> you are duped into believing, it depends who you talk to if it's going well
> >> or not. Talk to the soldiers that have been there, it's going pretty well,
> >> listen to the American Media, it's a disaster. Turn off NBC, ABC, CBS,
> >> CNN, & New York Times, talk to people, you just may be surprised.
> >
> > You are so freaking out of touch with reality it's not even funny. The
> > war in Iraq is going so swimmingly well:
> >
> > "'Army Times' calls for Rumsfeld to Quit:
> >
> > The Military Times Media Group, which publishes the influential Army
> > Times and other military periodicals, is calling for Defense Secretary
> > Donald Rumsfeld to resign. In a coming editorial, the papers say
> > active-duty military officers have misgivings about war planning in
> > Iraq."
> > http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6435503
> >
> > This is the SECOND time that the Army Times has called for Rumsfeld's
> > resignation. The first time was after Abu Ghraib.
> >
>
> Yo ****-for-brains!
> That is just a civilian owned conglomerate own by USA today. There is a big
> stink on their blog page about them saying this. There are 100,000 members
> involved in this operation OF COURSE their will be disagreements from
> some...
>
> http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2006/11/more_on_the_military_times_
> edi.html

Guess my last post really hit home for you. Resorting to insults just
makes you look desperate. Since when have conservatives resented
private ownership? Privatize this, privatize that, seems to be the
Republican mantra. And when some civilian organization criticize
Rumsfeld for poor planning for the Iraq War, all the sudden private
ownership is no longer gravy?

"DoD spokeman Whitman (in response to the Army Times editorial) said
Rumsfeld has 'clearly and accurately' described the the challenges
facing US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan."
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/03/rumsfeld.resign/

Let me remind you at this point Rumsfeld was responsible for General
Shinseki's early "retirement:"

"The idea that it would take several hundred thousand U.S. forces I
think is far off the mark," Mr. Rumsfeld said. General Shinseki gave
his estimate in response to a question at a Senate Armed Services
Committee hearing on Tuesday: "I would say that what's been mobilized
to this point - something on the order of several hundred thousand
soldiers - are probably, you know, a figure that would be required."
He also said that the regional commander, Gen. Tommy R. Franks, would
determine the precise figure."
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/consequences/2003/0228pentagoncontra.htm

Shinseki is the only one who has been "let go" so far, and his words
now seem prophetic. It's about time for Rumsfeld to be accountable.
"Clearly and accurately," yeah right, who is Whitman trying to fool??

Oh, least I forget, Military Times Media Group is owned by Gannett.
Gannett also happens to own USA Today. You can see which operations
Gannett runs here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gannett

As has already been stated, the editorial board of a publication must
largely reflect the views of its audience (the US military in the case
of Army times), or otherwise they wouldn't sell any papers because
nobody would bother subscribing.

 

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>,
"Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote:

> ST wrote:

Wrote? Hmm, try "plagiarized".

> > The government does not create jobs.. Industry does, and they do it well
> > when they are not overtaxed/over regulated by the government. IF you think
> > government is here to support many that do not take personal responsibility
> > for what they achieve in life you my be a redneck!! (progressive liberal
> > ******..) WHY do you think many that come to this country do well in the
> > next 5-10 years! They take ADVANTAGE of many opportunities available to
> > those that GET OFF THEIR ASS AND TURN THE DAMN TV OFF.
> >
> > There are natural cycles in the economy. A recession was beginning prior to
> > bush's admin. Add 9/11 and you have the recipe for a slow economy coupled
> > with a slow recovery..
> >
> > Recent gains in the GDP and reductions in unemployment show that a strong
> > recovery is in process. If you are not benefitting from it, perhaps you
> > should review/upgrade your qualifications from changing flat tires on
> > bikes!! Might I suggest you start with community college??
> >
> > In any event, if you really believe that government creates jobs, find a
> > country that actually does that and you may be happier.. Better hurry
> > though, they don't seem to last long. The best one in recent history was
> > the
> > USSR. You can go to work in Venezuela as long as you are a ra-ra
> > cheerleader
> > for Chavez!

http://www.musicforamerica.org/comment/reply/1323/2534

As for the rest:

> > Job Creation Continues ­ More Than 6.8 Million Jobs Created Since August
> > 2003
> >
> > Today, The Government Released New Jobs Figures ­ 92,000 Jobs Created In
> > October. The unemployment rate decreased to 4.4 percent, the lowest rate
> > since May 2001. Payrolls have now increased 470,000 over the past 3 months
> > and more than 1.9 million over the past 12 months. Since August 2003, more
> > than 6.8 million jobs have been created - more jobs than all the other
> > major
> > industrialized countries combined. Our economy has now added jobs for 38
> > straight months.
> >
> > The American Economy Remains Strong And Continues To Grow
> >
> > € Real Wages Grew 2.4 Percent Over The Past 12 Months. This means an
> > extra $755 for the average full-time production worker or about $1,327 for
> > the typical family of four with two wage earners.
> >
> > € Real After-Tax Income Per Person Has Risen By 9.8 Percent ­ $2,660 ­
> > Since The President Took Office.
> >
> > € Our Economy Has Grown A Solid 2.9 Percent Over The Past Four
> > Quarters
> > ­ Faster Than Any Other Major Industrialized Country.
> >
> > € Productivity Has Grown At An Annual Rate Of 3 Percent Since The
> > First
> > Quarter Of 2001, Up From A 2.4 Percent Annual Rate During The Preceding
> > Five
> > Years.
> >
> > € Gas Prices Have Fallen Almost 82 Cents A Gallon Since Early August.
> >
> > € Employment Has Increased In All But One State Over The Past 12
> > Months
> > Ending In September.

Straight off the Whitehouse.gov site. No bias there, eh?

> Thank you for your reply. Your application to the Right Wingnut
> Simpleton Hall of Fame has been approved. You will be enshrined shortly.

Oh, you're way too late on that one.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

 

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>,
"damyth" <[email protected]> wrote:

> More evidence that the the Iraq War is going swimmingly well:
> http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/15929013.htm
>
> Even neo-cons like Richard Perle have stopped drinking the kool-aid
> concocted by Bush. It's about time you did too.

Well, it's more complicated than that. Guys like Perle, Ledeen and the rest of
the neocons in the Vanity Fair article who are now saying that they wouldn't support
the war if they'd known how badly it would be run are simply trying to distance
themselves from the war that they clamored for so they can continue to play a part
in our foreign policy. "It wasn't us!" Sickening. Funny how rightwingers always want
to say that liberals can't take responsibility for their actions - here's a great
example of hypocritical rightwingers not wanting to take responsibiity for their
actions. They own it, goddamn it. Laughable to see Ledeen try to claim that he was
against the war from the get go. Yeah, right. Straight out of Front Page magazine
(August, 2002):

Question #2: Okay, well if we are all so certain about the dire need to invade Iraq,
then when do we do so?

Ledeen: Yesterday.

Courtesy: Glenn Greenwald at http://tinyurl.com/yyydfh

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

 

[damyth]

di wrote:
> "John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:23:37 -0600, "di" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>news:[email protected]...
> >>> Sorni,
> >>>
> >>> If these guys can see through Bushco, how come you can't?
> >>>
> >>> http://movies.crooksandliars.com/TSR-SullivanHitchens.wmv
> >>>
> >>> Better late than never.
> >>Wow, from CNN, that must really be unbiased
> >
> > Question for Di: Do you think the war in Iraq is going well, or can
> > ever go well?
> >
> > Oh yeah, I forgot -- reality has a liberal bias....
> > --
> > JT
>
> I don't think it's going as well as it could, but It's not going as bad as
> you are duped into believing, it depends who you talk to if it's going well
> or not. Talk to the soldiers that have been there, it's going pretty well,
> listen to the American Media, it's a disaster. Turn off NBC, ABC, CBS,
> CNN, & New York Times, talk to people, you just may be surprised.

More evidence that the the Iraq War is going swimmingly well:
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/15929013.htm

Even neo-cons like Richard Perle have stopped drinking the kool-aid
concocted by Bush. It's about time you did too.

 

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>,
"damyth" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey, you know that, and I know that. Rats are deserting the sinking
> ship, every rat for himself.

Nice that they chose to wait until the ship was already at the bottom to bail.

> But let's not over-complicate the issue for the right wingnuts on this
> board. Judging by their responses to this thread, there are many times
> where I wonder if these wingnuts are capable of walking and chewing gum
> at the same time.

But *we're* the brainwashed ones... (snicker)

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

 

[damyth]

Howard Kveck wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "damyth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > More evidence that the the Iraq War is going swimmingly well:
> > http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/15929013.htm
> >
> > Even neo-cons like Richard Perle have stopped drinking the kool-aid
> > concocted by Bush. It's about time you did too.
>
> Well, it's more complicated than that. Guys like Perle, Ledeen and the rest of
> the neocons in the Vanity Fair article who are now saying that they wouldn't support
> the war if they'd known how badly it would be run are simply trying to distance
> themselves from the war that they clamored for so they can continue to play a part
> in our foreign policy. "It wasn't us!" Sickening. Funny how rightwingers always want
> to say that liberals can't take responsibility for their actions - here's a great
> example of hypocritical rightwingers not wanting to take responsibiity for their
> actions. They own it, goddamn it. Laughable to see Ledeen try to claim that he was
> against the war from the get go. Yeah, right. Straight out of Front Page magazine
> (August, 2002):
>
> Question #2: Okay, well if we are all so certain about the dire need to invade Iraq,
> then when do we do so?
>
> Ledeen: Yesterday.
>
> Courtesy: Glenn Greenwald at http://tinyurl.com/yyydfh
>
> --
> tanx,
> Howard
>
> Never take a tenant with a monkey.
>
> remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Hey, you know that, and I know that. Rats are deserting the sinking
ship, every rat for himself.

But let's not over-complicate the issue for the right wingnuts on this
board. Judging by their responses to this thread, there are many times
where I wonder if these wingnuts are capable of walking and chewing gum
at the same time.

 

[John Forrest Tomlinson]

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:58:29 GMT, ST <[email protected]> wrote:

>Your (progressive liberals) philosophy of giving government resources as
>HANDOUTS to people instead of breaks to business so they CAN EMPLOY THE
>PEOPLE AND MAKE MONEY FOR A STRONG ECONOMY will never work!

What I'm saying is that there is almost no one in the government right
now who doesn't give handouts. The current administration (Bushco)
does massive handouts. They give handouts to the rich and powerful.

So which do you think are better -- handouts to the mega-rich or
handouts to people in real need?
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

 

[John Forrest Tomlinson]

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:23:28 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Dude (dude?), welcome to "debating" Just Freaking Flogittodeathlinson!
>He'll snip out something you /just wrote/ and then flame you for its
>absence! LOL It's actually pretty funny, in a
>makes-you-want-to-eat-your-liver kinda way.

How about stopping being a coward and actually addressing me directly?

Or is it that you can't handle that? Get's you down huh? Reality and
it's liberal bias, right?

PS -- how's the math going? Did you get a new calculator yet? LOL
you dope.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

 

[John Forrest Tomlinson]

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:29:44 GMT, ST <[email protected]> wrote:

>I will say it again. IF you want to go to Russia, China, Valenzuela, Cuba,
>NK or elsewhere to spew your socialist ****, by all means..

That pretty much sums up the wingnuts. There are lots of countries
worse than the US, so don't complain!
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

 

[John Forrest Tomlinson]

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:33:05 GMT, ST <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 11/5/06 7:23 PM, in article [email protected],
>"Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ST wrote:
>>> On 11/5/06 6:21 PM, in article
>>> [email protected], "John Forrest Tomlinson"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:00:05 GMT, ST <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> how about you.....
>>>>> "Minimum Wage, Datsun pick-up driving, tree huggin, fake
>>>>> hamburger-eatin, flat-changin 2nd rate Bike shop mechanic, hemp
>>>>> apron wearin Socialist FREAK!!"
>>>>>
>>>>> The government does not create jobs.. Industry does, and they do it
>>>>> well when they are not overtaxed/over regulated by the government.
>>>>> IF you think government is here to support many that do not take
>>>>> personal responsibility for what they achieve in life you my be a
>>>>> redneck!! (progressive liberal ******..) WHY do you think many that
>>>>> come to this country do well in the next 5-10 years! They take
>>>>> ADVANTAGE of many opportunities available to those that GET OFF
>>>>> THEIR ASS AND TURN THE DAMN TV OFF.
>>>>
>>>> What's hilarious about these sort of simplistic rants is that the
>>>> people saying them grossly underestimate, hide or are ignorant of the
>>>> massive amount of government spending that favors particular
>>>> industries and particular companies.
>>>>
>>>> "Free market"? Ha, ha ha. Not if **** Cheney can do anything about
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> I love the way you snip out the FACTS that was in this ENTIRE post!!
>>
>> Dude (dude?), welcome to "debating" Just Freaking Flogittodeathlinson!
>> He'll snip out something you /just wrote/ and then flame you for its
>> absence! LOL It's actually pretty funny, in a
>> makes-you-want-to-eat-your-liver kinda way.
>>
>>> Do you mean like??
>>>
>>> Entitlements?
>>> Welfare?
>>> Government Union Pensions?
>>> Defense spending??
>>> Trying to rebuild Iraq before the indigenous terrorist FREAKS blow it
>>> up again??
>>>
>>> Your (progressive liberals) philosophy of giving government resources
>>> as HANDOUTS to people instead of breaks to business so they CAN
>>> EMPLOY THE PEOPLE AND MAKE MONEY FOR A STRONG ECONOMY will never work!
>>>
>>> Hell... Even China is learning that!
>>
>> Trust me: plonking him is a lot easier than trying to get him to see even
>> the most obvious fact staring him (and everyone) in the face.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Bill "poor bastid <eg> " S.
>>
>>
>
>Hell! He even works in the non-profit (after they get their big cut!!)
>leftist, public sector.

I don't work in a private business sector and I don't work in the
public sector either. You're too dopey to know that there are two
other sectors of the economy than those two. Think about it a little.
If you can't figure it out, I'll tell you the other two and where I
work.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

 

[Tom Keats]

In article <[email protected]>,
John Forrest Tomlinson <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:23:28 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Dude (dude?), welcome to "debating" Just Freaking Flogittodeathlinson!
>>He'll snip out something you /just wrote/ and then flame you for its
>>absence! LOL It's actually pretty funny, in a
>>makes-you-want-to-eat-your-liver kinda way.
>
> How about stopping being a coward and actually addressing me directly?
>
> Or is it that you can't handle that? Get's you down huh? Reality and
> it's liberal bias, right?
>
> PS -- how's the math going? Did you get a new calculator yet? LOL
> you dope.

I like women. Especially if they like to dance, and have
positive outlooks. Heck, I pretty much like everybody.
People are often pretty good, when you give 'em half a
fair chance. But I have more yesterdays than tomorrows,
and I guess I can no longer afford to waste my tomorrows
as much as I used to. /You/ can, if ya wanna. It's a
free country.


--
-- Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing.
-- Pogo
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

 

[Donald Munro]

John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
> PS -- how's the math going? Did you get a new calculator yet? LOL
> you dope.

http://www.amazon.com/TI-83-Plus-Graphing-Calculator-Dummies/dp/0764549707
It even draws little pictures - perfect for the idiot savant in your life.

 

[[email protected]]

damyth wrote:

> Even neo-cons like Richard Perle have stopped drinking the kool-aid
> concocted by Bush. It's about time you did too.

Despite the damage control that is now being offered, I think that
it was Bush who was drinking the kool-aid concocted by Perle,
Kristol, et al., not the other way 'round.

Robert

 

[[email protected]]

ST wrote:

> Dickweed!
> I will say it again. IF you want to go to Russia, China, Valenzuela, Cuba,
> NK or elsewhere to spew your socialist ****, by all means..

Valenzuela?

http://tinyurl.com/vokx5

<http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060818&content_id=1616342&vkey=news_la&fext=.jsp&c_id=la>

Robert

 

[Ozark Bicycle]

[email protected] wrote:
> ST wrote:
>
> > Dickweed!
> > I will say it again. IF you want to go to Russia, China, Valenzuela, Cuba,
> > NK or elsewhere to spew your socialist ****, by all means..
>
> Valenzuela?

Didn't he pitch for the Dodgers ~20 years ago? ;-)
>
> http://tinyurl.com/vokx5
>
> <http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060818&content_id=1616342&vkey=news_la&fext=.jsp&c_id=la>
>
> Robert

 

[Ozark Bicycle]

Ozark Bicycle wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > ST wrote:
> >
> > > Dickweed!
> > > I will say it again. IF you want to go to Russia, China, Valenzuela, Cuba,
> > > NK or elsewhere to spew your socialist ****, by all means..
> >
> > Valenzuela?
>
> Didn't he pitch for the Dodgers ~20 years ago? ;-)
> >

Oooops! I didn't see your link. Never mind!

> > http://tinyurl.com/vokx5
> >
> > <http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060818&content_id=1616342&vkey=news_la&fext=.jsp&c_id=la>
> >
> > Robert

 

[Ozark Bicycle]

[email protected] wrote:
> damyth wrote:
>
> > Even neo-cons like Richard Perle have stopped drinking the kool-aid
> > concocted by Bush. It's about time you did too.
>
> Despite the damage control that is now being offered, I think that
> it was Bush who was drinking the kool-aid concocted by Perle,
> Kristol, et al., not the other way 'round.
>
>

IMO, this is a chicken and egg situation. There's a good possibilty
they were just telling Dim Dub and The Head **** what they wanted to
hear.

 

[Tom Keats]

In article <[email protected]>,
"Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>> ST wrote:
>>
>> > Dickweed!
>> > I will say it again. IF you want to go to Russia, China, Valenzuela, Cuba,
>> > NK or elsewhere to spew your socialist ****, by all means..
>>
>> Valenzuela?
>
> Didn't he pitch for the Dodgers ~20 years ago? ;-)

Yup. And he had this interesting propensity to not look at
where he was hucking the ball, looking down at the rubber instead.
It was all very Zen. Maybe too Zen for MLB (which presents an
interesting conundrum.)

Hey, I remember Jesse Orosco, too. That guy had, if nothing else,
a Style which I admired.

Charlie Hough -- now, there was a good ol' workhorse. Maybe he
didn't have the high-falootin' numbers, but career-wise he did
pretty good.

I believe Valenzuela was also Ritchie Valens' (La Bamba) real name.

I wonder how the name: "Valenzuela" translates into English?


cheers,
Tom

--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

 

[Rob Perkins]

Ozark Bicycle wrote:
> Rob Perkins wrote:

> But, put on your Nomex, the pseudo-cons will be out to flame you.
>

Bring 'em on.


I couldn't resist. Sorry.

Rob