Bill Sornson wrote:
> di wrote:
>> "Ozark Bicycle" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> message news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> damyth wrote:
>>>> di wrote:
>>>>> "John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>> message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:23:37 -0600, "di" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>> message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>> Sorni,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If these guys can see through Bushco, how come you can't?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://movies.crooksandliars.com/TSR-SullivanHitchens.wmv
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Better late than never.
>>>>>>> Wow, from CNN, that must really be unbiased
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question for Di: Do you think the war in Iraq is going well, or
>>>>>> can ever go well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh yeah, I forgot -- reality has a liberal bias....
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> JT
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think it's going as well as it could, but It's not going
>>>>> as bad as
>>>>> you are duped into believing, it depends who you talk to if it's
>>>>> going well
>>>>> or not. Talk to the soldiers that have been there, it's going
>>>>> pretty well,
>>>>> listen to the American Media, it's a disaster. Turn off NBC,
>>>>> ABC, CBS,
>>>>> CNN, & New York Times, talk to people, you just may be surprised.
>>>>
>>>> Heh, just heard on NPR:
>>>> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6427388
>>>
>>> NPR?? Who will be the first right wing nutjob to scream "Liberal
>>> bias! Liberal Bias!" ?
>>>
>>> We all know you can only get the real truth from Faux News. ;-)
>>
>> don't have to claim biased, you just did it for us, Thanks. You're
>> the only one to mention Fox, worrying about something?.
>
> Well, hell, the NYT is sure unbiased! Read this...and note the
> references to Saddam's ACTIVE (in 2002) nuke programs:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper&oref=slogin
>
> Maybe it WAS vital to take him out, after all, just like Kerry and
> Hillary said! LOL
For those who don't wish to register if it won't display as is, a few
snippets:
"Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the
1990s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure
Iraq had abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf
war. Experts say that at the time, Mr. Hussein's scientists were on the
verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away."
"Some of the first posted documents dealt with Iraq's program to make germ
weapons, followed by a wave of papers on chemical arms.
At the United Nations in New York, the chemical papers raised alarms at the
Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, which had been in charge
of searching Iraq for all unconventional arms, save the nuclear ones."
"On Sept. 20, the site posted a much larger document, "Summary of technical
achievements of Iraq's former nuclear program." It runs to 51 pages, 18
focusing on the development of Iraq's bomb design. Topics included physical
theory, the atomic core and high-explosive experiments. By early October,
diplomats and officials said, United Nations arms inspectors in New York and
their counterparts in Vienna were alarmed and discussing what to do."
No wonder Bill Clinton made regime change in Iraq the official policy of the
U.S.
