OT: political leanings are half genetic



On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:46:24 -0700, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Big difference: all those groups tried to assimilate in to US culture and
>were profoundly proud to become /Americans/. Not at all true of current
>torrent of illegal immigrants.


Who told you this? I can't imagine you having any dark-skinned
friends.

What it some loudmouth ranting on the radio or TV?

>Go to Mexico and boo the government and see what happens to you.


So what?

--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Are Liberal governments more likely
>> to install bike facilities?

>
> In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
> A stately pleasure-dome decree:
> Where Alph, the sacred river, ran
> Through caverns measureless to man
> Down to a sunless sea.
>
> band i guess?


Paris Hilton.


cheers,
tom


--
Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Tom Keats) writes:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> Are Liberal governments more likely
>>> to install bike facilities?

>>
>> In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
>> A stately pleasure-dome decree:
>> Where Alph, the sacred river, ran
>> Through caverns measureless to man
>> Down to a sunless sea.
>>
>> band i guess?

>
> Paris Hilton.


Oh, yeah ...

meow.

grrr.

Whatever. ;-)


--
Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca
 
Tom Keats wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes:
>>> Are Liberal governments more likely
>>> to install bike facilities?

>> In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
>> A stately pleasure-dome decree:
>> Where Alph, the sacred river, ran
>> Through caverns measureless to man
>> Down to a sunless sea.
>>
>> band i guess?

>
> Paris Hilton.


Shaggable, but what are you going to talk about after the act.
Wall-mart, where she thinks they sell walls?
She is giving dumb blonds a bad name.
Bill Baka
>
>
> cheers,
> tom
>
>
 
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:08:34 -0500, Tim McNamara
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> Go to Mexico and boo the government and see what happens to you.

>
>Which has what to do with anything?


It's simple: fail to support Bush and his policies and we will all
end up living in a third world nation!

Jesus H., do I have to explain everything to you?
 
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:11:45 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Tim McNamara" <[email protected]> wrote in message


>> There are many times as many legal immigrants as illegal ones. 10% of
>> American residents are legal immigrants. The vast majority of those
>> work and pay taxes. You can see what a certain conservative think tank
>> has to say on the matter:
>>
>> http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/pr-imnative.html

>
>The fact is that we do not need any more immigrants whatsoever. Very many
>American Blacks are not gainfully employed as it is, including loads and
>loads of White trash.
>
>> "Immigrants have practically no negative effect in the labor
>> market on any person except other immigrants. The effect on wages
>> is modest by any appraisal, and the effect on unemployment
>> apparently is zero."

>
>The above defies common sense.


Have you been talking to Sorni? You seem to have picked up his trait
of sticking with "common sense" in the face of more rigorous study.

That's a sign of a weak or closed mind BTW.

--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
 
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:23:44 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:46:24 -0700, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Big difference: all those groups tried to assimilate in to US culture and
>>>were profoundly proud to become /Americans/. Not at all true of current
>>>torrent of illegal immigrants.

>>
>> Who told you this? I can't imagine you having any dark-skinned
>> friends.

>
>I charge Forrest (with the 2 r's) with being a racist and a bigot.


Hahaha. I may be high-handed and obnoxious, but I'm surely less racist
than Sorni or you.

Ask Sorni if he has any African-America or Mexican or Mexican-American
friends. Ask him.

--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
 
On Jun 3, 2:19 am, Edward Dolan wrote:
> "still me" wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:08:34 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:

>
> >>> Go to Mexico and boo the government and see what happens to you.

>
> >>Which has what to do with anything?

>
> > It's simple: fail to support Bush and his policies and we will all
> > end up living in a third world nation!

>
> > Jesus H., do I have to explain everything to you?

>
> Still Me is quite right on this point. I do not understand Bush's advocacy
> for immigration to this nation. The net effect of it will be to create a new
> downtrodden class of people....


The upper classes have always hated the middle class.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
On Jun 3, 6:17 pm, Bill Baka wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > "still me" wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:08:34 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:

>
> >>>> Go to Mexico and boo the government and see what happens to you.
> >>> Which has what to do with anything?
> >> It's simple: fail to support Bush and his policies and we will all
> >> end up living in a third world nation!

>
> We are going down that road anyway by giving all our money to China for
> consumer goods. This country used to be the manufacturing powerhouse but
> that is long gone and we owe most of it to China. I tried to buy
> American until it became impossible and now you have China-mart, umm,
> Wal-mart and the only jobs they have created are mostly minimum wage.


Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
support this manufacturing.

> >> Jesus H., do I have to explain everything to you?

>
> > Still Me is quite right on this point. I do not understand Bush's advocacy
> > for immigration to this nation. The net effect of it will be to create a new
> > downtrodden class of people.

>
> We do need to change the sign on the Statue of Liberty to say "We're
> full, now go home.". Mexicans are getting here illegally by the millions
> yet I have known British professionals who have been kicked out for
> overstaying their time. I was born here yet native whites are becoming
> the new minority. My country is becoming their country.


So, movement of labor should be restricted while capital is free to
move to the countries with the lowest wages, lowest environmental
standards and least freedom?

> > America should no longer be a magnet for immigrants. We should do everything
> > in our power to discourage them from coming here - except for Ph.D's of
> > course and other highly skilled intellectuals. We do not want or need
> > peasants from Mexico.

>
> Yet there is still no wall on the Mexican border, Bush is talking
> amnesty for Illegals (Mexicans), and it is harder than hell for an
> educated European to come over here legally. The idiot in the oval
> office has not done anything for this country except to blow a ton of
> money on Iraq. Does anybody else think this stinks?


Why would educated Europeans want to come to the US in large numbers?
Quality of life (which involves more than net income, size of house,
car and flat screen TV) is worse for all but the very rich.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> On Jun 3, 6:17 pm, Bill Baka wrote:
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "still me" wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:08:34 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
>>>>>> Go to Mexico and boo the government and see what happens to you.
>>>>> Which has what to do with anything?
>>>> It's simple: fail to support Bush and his policies and we will all
>>>> end up living in a third world nation!

>> We are going down that road anyway by giving all our money to China for
>> consumer goods. This country used to be the manufacturing powerhouse but
>> that is long gone and we owe most of it to China. I tried to buy
>> American until it became impossible and now you have China-mart, umm,
>> Wal-mart and the only jobs they have created are mostly minimum wage.

>
> Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
> support this manufacturing.


Which is why I am an underemployed engineer. The most 'in your face'
example of this was a temp job I took an 1998 as a software 'tester'.
When I found a bug I documented it and at the end of the day the total
bug report was sent via Internet to the programmers in India. I wasn't
allowed to even make a suggestion on how to fix the code. It's no wonder
American kids are not taking engineering in college, since anything that
can be outsourced over seas is being done.
>
>>>> Jesus H., do I have to explain everything to you?
>>> Still Me is quite right on this point. I do not understand Bush's advocacy
>>> for immigration to this nation. The net effect of it will be to create a new
>>> downtrodden class of people.

>> We do need to change the sign on the Statue of Liberty to say "We're
>> full, now go home.". Mexicans are getting here illegally by the millions
>> yet I have known British professionals who have been kicked out for
>> overstaying their time. I was born here yet native whites are becoming
>> the new minority. My country is becoming their country.

>
> So, movement of labor should be restricted while capital is free to
> move to the countries with the lowest wages, lowest environmental
> standards and least freedom?


I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies
to make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
own.".
>
>>> America should no longer be a magnet for immigrants. We should do everything
>>> in our power to discourage them from coming here - except for Ph.D's of
>>> course and other highly skilled intellectuals. We do not want or need
>>> peasants from Mexico.

>> Yet there is still no wall on the Mexican border, Bush is talking
>> amnesty for Illegals (Mexicans), and it is harder than hell for an
>> educated European to come over here legally. The idiot in the oval
>> office has not done anything for this country except to blow a ton of
>> money on Iraq. Does anybody else think this stinks?

>
> Why would educated Europeans want to come to the US in large numbers?
> Quality of life (which involves more than net income, size of house,
> car and flat screen TV) is worse for all but the very rich.


The Brits I have known came here for the money and less taxation but
hate the crowding. Apparently they pay a lot more taxes in Europe.
I can't answer that one.
Bill Baka
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
> The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
>
 

>> Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
>> support this manufacturing.

>


Yeah, but Bush and his neo-con friends are making lots of money from
this - what's your beef? How are CEO's supposed to churn a $40 million
salary if you don't let them import labor to cut costs. Sheesh. You
must all be a friggin communists.

In addition, right now there are six different bills pending in
Congress that would raise the H1B limits in dramatic ways. Most H1B
visas are granted to imported techies who typically work for 20% less
than their American counterparts. So, while we have a glut of American
technical labor due to outsourcing, they are importing more engineers.
Any guesses who benefits by this?

>I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies
>to make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
>import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
>dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
>cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
>own.".


No $hit. They tariff a lot of imported goods to protect American
industries. It's long past time to tariff "imported labor" that's done
by outsourcing support and development to India and beyond.
 
still me wrote:
>>> Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
>>> support this manufacturing.

>
> Yeah, but Bush and his neo-con friends are making lots of money from
> this - what's your beef? How are CEO's supposed to churn a $40 million
> salary if you don't let them import labor to cut costs. Sheesh. You
> must all be a friggin communists.
>
> In addition, right now there are six different bills pending in
> Congress that would raise the H1B limits in dramatic ways. Most H1B
> visas are granted to imported techies who typically work for 20% less
> than their American counterparts. So, while we have a glut of American
> technical labor due to outsourcing, they are importing more engineers.
> Any guesses who benefits by this?


Not me. I'm one of those engineers who has been squarely hit by the
import of cheap foreign engineers with H1-B work visas.

>
>> I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies
>> to make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
>> import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
>> dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
>> cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
>> own.".

>
> No $hit. They tariff a lot of imported goods to protect American
> industries. It's long past time to tariff "imported labor" that's done
> by outsourcing support and development to India and beyond.
>
>

Too bad the government was so busy playing war games in Viet Nam when
Honda started to import baby motorcycles. By the time we 'lost' the war
in Viet Nam we were losing the vehicle war to Japan. What we have now is
Iraq and Bush with his one track mind ignoring our manufacturing base
going to hell. If China ever decides to go hard line Communist and exert
their own super power status, we are screwed, but we did it to ourselves.
Bill Baka
 
On Jun 3, 8:10 pm, still me wrote:
> >> Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
> >> support this manufacturing.

>
> Yeah, but Bush and his neo-con friends are making lots of money from
> this - what's your beef? How are CEO's supposed to churn a $40 million
> salary if you don't let them import labor to cut costs. Sheesh. You
> must all be a friggin communists.


By the currents standards of economic punditry in the US mainstream
media, Eisenhower was a communist, and Goldwater and Nixon were
borderline socialists.

> In addition, right now there are six different bills pending in
> Congress that would raise the H1B limits in dramatic ways. Most H1B
> visas are granted to imported techies who typically work for 20% less
> than their American counterparts. So, while we have a glut of American
> technical labor due to outsourcing, they are importing more engineers.
> Any guesses who benefits by this?
>
> >I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies
> >to make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
> >import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
> >dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
> >cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
> >own.".

>
> No $hit. They tariff a lot of imported goods to protect American
> industries. It's long past time to tariff "imported labor" that's done
> by outsourcing support and development to India and beyond.


Maybe the Chinese will use all the trade deficit income to buy the
corporations and outsource management. I am sure they could replace
the $40M/year US CEO's with equally competent $400K/year Chinese
CEO's.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
On Jun 3, 6:58 pm, Bill Baka wrote:
> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
>
> > On Jun 3, 6:17 pm, Bill Baka wrote:
> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >>> "still me" wrote in message
> >>>news:[email protected]...
> >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:08:34 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
> >>>>>> Go to Mexico and boo the government and see what happens to you.
> >>>>> Which has what to do with anything?
> >>>> It's simple: fail to support Bush and his policies and we will all
> >>>> end up living in a third world nation!
> >> We are going down that road anyway by giving all our money to China for
> >> consumer goods. This country used to be the manufacturing powerhouse but
> >> that is long gone and we owe most of it to China. I tried to buy
> >> American until it became impossible and now you have China-mart, umm,
> >> Wal-mart and the only jobs they have created are mostly minimum wage.

>
> > Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
> > support this manufacturing.

>
> Which is why I am an underemployed engineer. The most 'in your face'
> example of this was a temp job I took an 1998 as a software 'tester'.
> When I found a bug I documented it and at the end of the day the total
> bug report was sent via Internet to the programmers in India. I wasn't
> allowed to even make a suggestion on how to fix the code. It's no wonder
> American kids are not taking engineering in college, since anything that
> can be outsourced over seas is being done.


This is apparently what the people of the US want, since they keep
electing the politicians that support these policies. Who are we to
argue with the majority?

> >>>> Jesus H., do I have to explain everything to you?
> >>> Still Me is quite right on this point. I do not understand Bush's advocacy
> >>> for immigration to this nation. The net effect of it will be to create a new
> >>> downtrodden class of people.
> >> We do need to change the sign on the Statue of Liberty to say "We're
> >> full, now go home.". Mexicans are getting here illegally by the millions
> >> yet I have known British professionals who have been kicked out for
> >> overstaying their time. I was born here yet native whites are becoming
> >> the new minority. My country is becoming their country.

>
> > So, movement of labor should be restricted while capital is free to
> > move to the countries with the lowest wages, lowest environmental
> > standards and least freedom?

>
> I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies
> to make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
> import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
> dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
> cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
> own."


For many items there is little choice, since most consumer items are
no longer made in the US.

> >>> America should no longer be a magnet for immigrants. We should do everything
> >>> in our power to discourage them from coming here - except for Ph.D's of
> >>> course and other highly skilled intellectuals. We do not want or need
> >>> peasants from Mexico.
> >> Yet there is still no wall on the Mexican border, Bush is talking
> >> amnesty for Illegals (Mexicans), and it is harder than hell for an
> >> educated European to come over here legally. The idiot in the oval
> >> office has not done anything for this country except to blow a ton of
> >> money on Iraq. Does anybody else think this stinks?

>
> > Why would educated Europeans want to come to the US in large numbers?
> > Quality of life (which involves more than net income, size of house,
> > car and flat screen TV) is worse for all but the very rich.

>
> The Brits I have known came here for the money and less taxation but
> hate the crowding. Apparently they pay a lot more taxes in Europe.
> I can't answer that one.


Of course, the taxes have certain benefits - living in the US is NOT
nearly as good as Western Europe if one has problems such as chronic
medical conditions, loss of work, or other problems that are not
simply the result of "poor choices", due to the lack of a social
safety net.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
On Jun 3, 10:02 pm, Bill Baka wrote:
> ....
> Too bad the government was so busy playing war games in Viet Nam when
> Honda started to import baby motorcycles. By the time we 'lost' the war
> in Viet Nam we were losing the vehicle war to Japan. What we have now is
> Iraq and Bush with his one track mind ignoring our manufacturing base
> going to hell. If China ever decides to go hard line Communist and exert
> their own super power status, we are screwed, but we did it to ourselves.


Considering how lousy the products of the "Big 3" were in terms of
ergonomics, space efficiency, ride, handling and performance in the
1970's, the biggest hurdles the Japanese had to overcome were emotion
based brand loyalty and anti-Japanese prejudice [1]. Now most Honda's
(and many other Japanese brand vehicles) are made in the US and
Canada, with no loss in quality compared to Japanese made vehicles.

Does anyone else notice the decline in US industry occurred with the
change in management from those in product development to MBA's from
elite schools? Nepotism in management hiring certainly also bears its
share of the blame.

[1] Still seen today among certain cyclists who exhibit irrational
favor to Brand C and irrational dislike of Brand S.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:54:29 -0700, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:

>Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
>>>> On Jun 3, 6:17 pm, Bill Baka wrote:

>> [...]
>>>> So, movement of labor should be restricted while capital is free to
>>>> move to the countries with the lowest wages, lowest environmental
>>>> standards and least freedom?
>>> I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies to
>>> make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
>>> import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
>>> dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
>>> cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
>>> own.".

>>
>> Most of the stuff you can buy at Wal-Mart is crapola. I know because I shop
>> there all the time. We do not want to pay premium for stuff that can be
>> manufactured cheaply abroad. Hey, either get a skill or perish!

>
>I have a skill, electronics engineering, but damn, I'm not Chinese or
>Indian enough these days.
>Go figure.
>Bill Baka


Billy, you left out science fiction writing.
 
On Jun 3, 10:44 pm, Edward Dolan wrote:
> "still me" wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >>> Step 2 is outsourcing all the IT and engineering jobs needed to
> >>> support this manufacturing.

>
> > Yeah, but Bush and his neo-con friends are making lots of money from
> > this - what's your beef? How are CEO's supposed to churn a $40 million
> > salary if you don't let them import labor to cut costs. Sheesh. You
> > must all be a friggin communists.

>
> > In addition, right now there are six different bills pending in
> > Congress that would raise the H1B limits in dramatic ways. Most H1B
> > visas are granted to imported techies who typically work for 20% less
> > than their American counterparts. So, while we have a glut of American
> > technical labor due to outsourcing, they are importing more engineers.
> > Any guesses who benefits by this?

>
> Engineering is a very modest profession and we can churn out however many
> are needed. I wish we could do the same with doctors and lawyers but they
> seem to know how to keep the supply down so that they can garner their
> fantastic salaries.


The shortage of doctors is due to collusion that reduces the number of
medical school students below what the free market would produce, and
limits on foreign trained doctors working in the US. Funny how these
groups stop believing in the free market when it is to their personal
benefit.

> >>I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies
> >>to make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
> >>import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
> >>dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
> >>cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
> >>own.".

>
> > No $hit. They tariff a lot of imported goods to protect American
> > industries. It's long past time to tariff "imported labor" that's done
> > by outsourcing support and development to India and beyond.

>
> Yes, it is all about where whatever can be done needs to be done mostly
> cheaply anywhere in the world. It is all part of being part of the global
> economy.
>
> Americans need to acquire skills that third world nations have trouble with.
> In other words, anything that requires a college education. This is why we
> do not need Mexican illegal immigrants (peons and peasants) to this country.


There are plenty of college educated workers in China and India who
will work for what would be poverty level wages in the US. In the
state where I live, the decision has been made to favor foreign
students (particularly Chinese) over US students for admissions,
housing and financial aid in the public university system.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 
R Brickston wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:54:29 -0700, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 3, 6:17 pm, Bill Baka wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> So, movement of labor should be restricted while capital is free to
>>>>> move to the countries with the lowest wages, lowest environmental
>>>>> standards and least freedom?
>>>> I didn't say that. What we need is an outsourcing tax on big companies to
>>>> make it painful for them to send the work out of our country. Also an
>>>> import tax so the junk from China won't be so appealing to save a few
>>>> dollars. The way it is going there should be a warning about buying the
>>>> cheapest stuff from other countries, like "The job you save may be your
>>>> own.".
>>> Most of the stuff you can buy at Wal-Mart is crapola. I know because I shop
>>> there all the time. We do not want to pay premium for stuff that can be
>>> manufactured cheaply abroad. Hey, either get a skill or perish!

>> I have a skill, electronics engineering, but damn, I'm not Chinese or
>> Indian enough these days.
>> Go figure.
>> Bill Baka

>
> Billy, you left out science fiction writing.


Look in the mirror. That is imitation intelligence staring back at you.
I think Bush with his IQ of 91 is way above you.
Bill Baka
 
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:35:49 -0700, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:


>Actually I am going into inventing and collecting patents in the hope
>that one will be big enough to get bought out for some millions of
>dollars. All my research is going into energy efficiency and generation.
>Good place to be doing research. I am filing patent preliminaries right
>now and hope to get a few patents locked down and approved in the next
>year. Then it's collect royalties and relax or invent more stuff.
>I gave up working for someone else at some trivial job.


Bwaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha.......!!!