Re: Impotence



"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:eek:[email protected]:

>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> GaryG wrote:
>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> >
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> > news:[email protected]...
>>> > > Not a problem for me.
>>> > >
>>> > > First, let me assure you that I'm not gay.
>>> > >
>>> > > I just don't like women anymore. Having a wife or a girlfriend
>>> > > involves 'WAY too many compromises, as far as I am concerned.
>>> > > They are
>>> > > just a pain in the ass, always complaining about something or
>>> > > other, and always quick to criticize you but think their own
>>> > > **** doesn't stink. The small amount of time that you spend
>>> > > having sex with them isn't worth it.
>>> > >
>>> > > Plus, let's face it, most women are as dumb as a brick. They
>>> > > never learned anything in school; they are anti-intellectual as
>>> > > a defense mechanism, and they are resentful of men who did well
>>> > > in school, went to college and graduate school, and who are
>>> > > successful.
>>> > >
>>> > > All women want is a man who is going to follow around behind
>>> > > them, cleaning up their messes like the guy in the circus parade
>>> > > who follows
>>> > > along behind the elephants. Oh, how could I have almost
>>> > > forgotten, they want the man to give them a lot of money. Of
>>> > > course they don't appreciate it because they are resentful that
>>> > > the man is successful and
>>> > > has the money to give them. And even if you do give them all
>>> > > the money
>>> > > they want, they probably won't want to have sex with you anyway.
>>> > >
>>> > > To make matters worse, even though they are dumb and
>>> > > overly-emotional,
>>> > > they want to call all the shots in the relationship! And they
>>> > > want to
>>> > > buy, buy, buy. "I feel inadequate. I'd better buy something."
>>> > >
>>> > > And if you marry one, she'll use you as a sperm donor until it
>>> > > becomes
>>> > > too much of a hassle to deal with you, and then she'll kick your
>>> > > ass out so you lose your family. But keep sending those support
>>> > > checks!
>>> > >
>>> > > Women are really evil and screwed up.
>>> > >
>>> > > In short, who needs women? I just avoid them like the plague,
>>> > > and have
>>> > > never been happier.
>>> >
>>> > Folson, you are a genius almost on my level. I have not had your
>>> experience
>>> > of women, but I KNOW everything you say about them is true. So
>>> > very many
>>> > poor men slobs seem not to have a clue about women. It just
>>> > sickens me
>>> that
>>> > men can be such fools and all-around dumbbells. Well, it all has
>>> > to do
>>> with
>>> > the sex angle and nothing else. Men want sex and women want
>>> > children. From
>>> > that springs all the misunderstandings between the sexes. Unless
>>> > men also
>>> > want children, they are better off staying as far away from the
>>> > female sex
>>> > as they can get.
>>>
>>> ED, please don't project your fears of intimacy and sexuality upon
>>> the rest
>>> of the male gender. You're a well-documented misanthrope and
>>> misogynist, with well-documented fears of intimacy (of any kind).
>>>
>>> For most normal men, physical and social intimacy with women is part
>>> of the
>>> definition of a life well lived. Of course, you're free to live
>>> your lonely
>>> life as you see fit. But insulting all women just because you fear
>>> them, and insulting most men who would prefer their company, just
>>> makes you look
>>> like even more of a weirdo and misfit.
>>>
>>> BTW - When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation
>>> excluded)? I'm
>>> guessing it's been a very long time. Perhaps you've simply
>>> forgotten, or never learned, what a pleasant experience it can be.
>>
>> Gary, et. al. - A lack of knowledge, experience or expertise has
>> never curtailed Ed's enthusiasm to impose his unfounded, errant
>> "wisdom" ... "wisdom" derived solely from myopic, twisted
>> misconceptions. A closet-queen, paralyzed by sexual hang-ups and
>> shackled by self-imposed celibacy; Ed has no credibility in this
>> particular area of discussion.
>
> Anyone who is into sexual behavior without the express intent of
> creating new life (babies) is nothing but human scum. God abhors all
> such and the Devil is waiting for you in Hell!


Ahhhhhh Blow Me

>
>> His lack of knowledge, experience and expertise invalidate his
>> arguments as baseless. He condemns those who refuse to follow his
>> misguided path to enlightenment, but the fool himself remains
>> unenlightened. Ignore his random, incoherent babble. Have pity on
>> the misanthropic hermit for he knows not what he speaks and speaks of
>> what he knows not. Given to flights of fancy, Ed is a victim of his
>> own unrestrained imagination. He is on a delusional journey to
>> nowhere ... a quest and a realm of that no one is willing to share. -
>> Jim McNamara
>
> Follow in the footsteps of Saint Edward the Great and you will know
> what it is to be a self respecting human being. Any other path and all
> you will know are matters of the groin along with the lower animals of
> creation. However, the lower animals have the excuse that they do not
> have any higher powers of reasoning, something that we humans can
> never excuse ourselves from. Hence, we are many times worse than the
> beasts of the field. Yea, we are truly evil and deserving of
> everlasting Hellfire!
>
> It is my intention to come back after death as a Mighty Sequoia Tree.
> Yea, and then I shall lord it over all these pitiful humans who fancy
> themselves the lords of creation with all their pathetic sexual
> hang-ups. Ed Dolan, the Mighty Sequoia Tree - now there is thought to
> wrap your mind around!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
>
>>> God, I was so born out of my time! I want nothing else than to be a monk
>> of
>>> the Middle Ages, one of those who would take vows of eternal silence.
>>
>> Ah, yes...those simpler times when 90% of the population was illiterate,
>> when the average lifespan was about 35 years, when slavery and torture
>> were
>> commonplace, and when women (and men) could be burned in public for
>> "witchcraft" (meaning, they ****** off somebody with power).
>
> Yes, those were truly the good old days. I yearn for them every day of my
> life. Why was it my misfortune to be born into the 20th century in America
> when I should have been born in Medieval Germany where I could have had a
> mighty struggle with that Protestant heretic Martin Luther. He is like you
> in that he wanted to have his salvation and screw at the same time. He
> simply did not know what it was to be a good Catholic like me (even though
> I am now an atheist).
>
>> BTW - do you really think that people were less sexually active back
>> then?
>
> At least they knew they were sinning when they were sinning. That is a
> huge improvement over the likes of you.
>
>>> Yea, I
>>> only want to talk to God. I would like to only live in my monastic cell
>> and
>>> have mystic visions of God, the Saints and to taste Heaven! What is so
>> wrong
>>> about that?
>>
>> You would get a lot of heartfelt support if you were to take a vow of
>> silence with respect to Usenet (I'd put you on my Christmas card list if
>> you
>> did).
>
> I could see this coming - which is why I said it!
>
>> You could also join a monastery if you wanted to. I hear they're hiring,
>> but
>> your puffed up claims of "greatness" might not go over so well in that
>> environment.
>
> No, it is not possible to join a monastery when you no longer believe. I
> am an atheist and there is just no way I could hide this very significant
> fact about myself. They would boot me out in very short order because they
> would not know what I was praying about or meditating on.
>
The concept of "sin" comes from a religious connotation. If you are an
atheist, then you are nothing but an animal. A basic, soulless animal. You
should be having sex with abandon. Unless finding a partner was somehow too
difficult, forcing you to rationalize a load of **** about "creating new
life" and general sex being for "human scum" so you would not have to deal
with having no women.
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:4qAmg.10319$FR1.7398@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> God, I was so born out of my time! I want nothing else than to be
>>>>> a monk
>>>> of
>>>>> the Middle Ages, one of those who would take vows of eternal
>>>>> silence.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, yes...those simpler times when 90% of the population was
>>>> illiterate, when the average lifespan was about 35 years, when
>>>> slavery and torture were
>>>> commonplace, and when women (and men) could be burned in public for
>>>> "witchcraft" (meaning, they ****** off somebody with power).
>>>
>>> Yes, those were truly the good old days. I yearn for them every day
>>> of my life. Why was it my misfortune to be born into the 20th
>>> century in America when I should have been born in Medieval Germany
>>> where I could have had a mighty struggle with that Protestant
>>> heretic Martin Luther. He is like you in that he wanted to have his
>>> salvation and screw at the same time. He simply did not know what it
>>> was to be a good Catholic like me (even though I am now an atheist).
>>>
>>>> BTW - do you really think that people were less sexually active
>>>> back then?
>>>
>>> At least they knew they were sinning when they were sinning. That is
>>> a huge improvement over the likes of you.
>>>
>>>>> Yea, I
>>>>> only want to talk to God. I would like to only live in my monastic
>>>>> cell
>>>> and
>>>>> have mystic visions of God, the Saints and to taste Heaven! What
>>>>> is so
>>>> wrong
>>>>> about that?
>>>>
>>>> You would get a lot of heartfelt support if you were to take a vow
>>>> of silence with respect to Usenet (I'd put you on my Christmas card
>>>> list if you
>>>> did).
>>>
>>> I could see this coming - which is why I said it!
>>>
>>>> You could also join a monastery if you wanted to. I hear they're
>>>> hiring, but
>>>> your puffed up claims of "greatness" might not go over so well in
>>>> that environment.
>>>
>>> No, it is not possible to join a monastery when you no longer
>>> believe. I am an atheist and there is just no way I could hide this
>>> very significant fact about myself. They would boot me out in very
>>> short order because they would not know what I was praying about or
>>> meditating on.
>>>
>> The concept of "sin" comes from a religious connotation. If you are
>> an atheist, then you are nothing but an animal. A basic, soulless
>> animal. You should be having sex with abandon. Unless finding a
>> partner was somehow too difficult, forcing you to rationalize a load
>> of **** about "creating new life" and general sex being for "human
>> scum" so you would not have to deal with having no women.
>
> Even though I am NOT religious in the slightest and am in fact an
> atheist, I very much like the concept of sin. My whole life revolves
> around this concept. I see it (sin) in others everywhere I look and
> try to keep it from me as best I can. My only desire in life is to be
> a Great Saint. I want above all else to be Holy. To be smart is
> nothing; to be clever is nothing; but to be good is EVERYTHING!
>
> I very much like all women because they are essentially good. I very
> much hate all men because they are essentially evil. We men are
> nothing but murderers and rapists. Murder and rape, yea, that is what
> men are all about.
>
> Women should be put on pedestals and kept there by us men whether THEY
> like it or not. They deseve to be put on pedestals because they
> nourish life and are not murderers and rapists like men. All women are
> saints. But only men can be Great Saints. We can be Great Saints
> because it is so much against our natures to be any kind of saint at
> all.
>
> Curtiss should strive to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great
> instead of wanting to destroy (rape) nature by riding his mountain
> bike on hiking trails. This is a sin against life and he will surely
> spend all eternity in Hell for his desecration of God's creation.
> Curtiss, without even realizing it, is a Great Sinner!



Hey Ed

You will say almost anything to make yourself feel important, wont
you. Does putting him down make you feel better?

Oh yeah, BTW Blow Me



>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:4qAmg.10319$FR1.7398@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>> [...]
>>
>>>> God, I was so born out of my time! I want nothing else than to be a
>>>> monk
>>> of
>>>> the Middle Ages, one of those who would take vows of eternal silence.
>>>
>>> Ah, yes...those simpler times when 90% of the population was illiterate,
>>> when the average lifespan was about 35 years, when slavery and torture
>>> were
>>> commonplace, and when women (and men) could be burned in public for
>>> "witchcraft" (meaning, they ****** off somebody with power).
>>
>> Yes, those were truly the good old days. I yearn for them every day of my
>> life. Why was it my misfortune to be born into the 20th century in
>> America when I should have been born in Medieval Germany where I could
>> have had a mighty struggle with that Protestant heretic Martin Luther. He
>> is like you in that he wanted to have his salvation and screw at the same
>> time. He simply did not know what it was to be a good Catholic like me
>> (even though I am now an atheist).
>>
>>> BTW - do you really think that people were less sexually active back
>>> then?
>>
>> At least they knew they were sinning when they were sinning. That is a
>> huge improvement over the likes of you.
>>
>>>> Yea, I
>>>> only want to talk to God. I would like to only live in my monastic cell
>>> and
>>>> have mystic visions of God, the Saints and to taste Heaven! What is so
>>> wrong
>>>> about that?
>>>
>>> You would get a lot of heartfelt support if you were to take a vow of
>>> silence with respect to Usenet (I'd put you on my Christmas card list if
>>> you
>>> did).
>>
>> I could see this coming - which is why I said it!
>>
>>> You could also join a monastery if you wanted to. I hear they're hiring,
>>> but
>>> your puffed up claims of "greatness" might not go over so well in that
>>> environment.
>>
>> No, it is not possible to join a monastery when you no longer believe. I
>> am an atheist and there is just no way I could hide this very significant
>> fact about myself. They would boot me out in very short order because
>> they would not know what I was praying about or meditating on.
>>
> The concept of "sin" comes from a religious connotation. If you are an
> atheist, then you are nothing but an animal. A basic, soulless animal. You
> should be having sex with abandon. Unless finding a partner was somehow
> too difficult, forcing you to rationalize a load of **** about "creating
> new life" and general sex being for "human scum" so you would not have to
> deal with having no women.

Even though I am NOT religious in the slightest and am in fact an atheist, I
very much like the concept of sin. My whole life revolves around this
concept. I see it (sin) in others everywhere I look and try to keep it from
me as best I can. My only desire in life is to be a Great Saint. I want
above all else to be Holy. To be smart is nothing; to be clever is nothing;
but to be good is EVERYTHING!

I very much like all women because they are essentially good. I very much
hate all men because they are essentially evil. We men are nothing but
murderers and rapists. Murder and rape, yea, that is what men are all about.

Women should be put on pedestals and kept there by us men whether THEY like
it or not. They deseve to be put on pedestals because they nourish life and
are not murderers and rapists like men. All women are saints. But only men
can be Great Saints. We can be Great Saints because it is so much against
our natures to be any kind of saint at all.

Curtiss should strive to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great
instead of wanting to destroy (rape) nature by riding his mountain bike on
hiking trails. This is a sin against life and he will surely spend all
eternity in Hell for his desecration of God's creation. Curtiss, without
even realizing it, is a Great Sinner!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Chris Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>>
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:4qAmg.10319$FR1.7398@dukeread05...
>>>
>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>> God, I was so born out of my time! I want nothing else than to be
>>>>>> a monk
>>>>> of
>>>>>> the Middle Ages, one of those who would take vows of eternal
>>>>>> silence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, yes...those simpler times when 90% of the population was
>>>>> illiterate, when the average lifespan was about 35 years, when
>>>>> slavery and torture were
>>>>> commonplace, and when women (and men) could be burned in public for
>>>>> "witchcraft" (meaning, they ****** off somebody with power).
>>>>
>>>> Yes, those were truly the good old days. I yearn for them every day
>>>> of my life. Why was it my misfortune to be born into the 20th
>>>> century in America when I should have been born in Medieval Germany
>>>> where I could have had a mighty struggle with that Protestant
>>>> heretic Martin Luther. He is like you in that he wanted to have his
>>>> salvation and screw at the same time. He simply did not know what it
>>>> was to be a good Catholic like me (even though I am now an atheist).
>>>>
>>>>> BTW - do you really think that people were less sexually active
>>>>> back then?
>>>>
>>>> At least they knew they were sinning when they were sinning. That is
>>>> a huge improvement over the likes of you.
>>>>
>>>>>> Yea, I
>>>>>> only want to talk to God. I would like to only live in my monastic
>>>>>> cell
>>>>> and
>>>>>> have mystic visions of God, the Saints and to taste Heaven! What
>>>>>> is so
>>>>> wrong
>>>>>> about that?
>>>>>
>>>>> You would get a lot of heartfelt support if you were to take a vow
>>>>> of silence with respect to Usenet (I'd put you on my Christmas card
>>>>> list if you
>>>>> did).
>>>>
>>>> I could see this coming - which is why I said it!
>>>>
>>>>> You could also join a monastery if you wanted to. I hear they're
>>>>> hiring, but
>>>>> your puffed up claims of "greatness" might not go over so well in
>>>>> that environment.
>>>>
>>>> No, it is not possible to join a monastery when you no longer
>>>> believe. I am an atheist and there is just no way I could hide this
>>>> very significant fact about myself. They would boot me out in very
>>>> short order because they would not know what I was praying about or
>>>> meditating on.
>>>>
>>> The concept of "sin" comes from a religious connotation. If you are
>>> an atheist, then you are nothing but an animal. A basic, soulless
>>> animal. You should be having sex with abandon. Unless finding a
>>> partner was somehow too difficult, forcing you to rationalize a load
>>> of **** about "creating new life" and general sex being for "human
>>> scum" so you would not have to deal with having no women.
>>
>> Even though I am NOT religious in the slightest and am in fact an
>> atheist, I very much like the concept of sin. My whole life revolves
>> around this concept. I see it (sin) in others everywhere I look and
>> try to keep it from me as best I can. My only desire in life is to be
>> a Great Saint. I want above all else to be Holy. To be smart is
>> nothing; to be clever is nothing; but to be good is EVERYTHING!
>>
>> I very much like all women because they are essentially good. I very
>> much hate all men because they are essentially evil. We men are
>> nothing but murderers and rapists. Murder and rape, yea, that is what
>> men are all about.
>>
>> Women should be put on pedestals and kept there by us men whether THEY
>> like it or not. They deseve to be put on pedestals because they
>> nourish life and are not murderers and rapists like men. All women are
>> saints. But only men can be Great Saints. We can be Great Saints
>> because it is so much against our natures to be any kind of saint at
>> all.
>>
>> Curtiss should strive to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great
>> instead of wanting to destroy (rape) nature by riding his mountain
>> bike on hiking trails. This is a sin against life and he will surely
>> spend all eternity in Hell for his desecration of God's creation.
>> Curtiss, without even realizing it, is a Great Sinner!
>
>
>
> Hey Ed
>
> You will say almost anything to make yourself feel important, wont
> you. Does putting him down make you feel better?
>
> Oh yeah, BTW Blow Me

Curtiss and I have had long discussions on various newsgroups and we
understand one another thoroughly. He knows all about my policy of *** for
tat. You have yet to learn it, but hang in there as I am a good teacher.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

PS. Thanks for posting my complete message for everyone to read a second
time. You are truly ingratiating yourself with all the denizens of these
newsgroups.
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>> Hey Ed
>>
>> You will say almost anything to make yourself feel important, wont
>> you. Does putting him down make you feel better?
>>
>> Oh yeah, BTW Blow Me
>
> Curtiss and I have had long discussions on various newsgroups and we
> understand one another thoroughly. He knows all about my policy of *** for
> tat. You have yet to learn it, but hang in there as I am a good teacher.
>
What WE understand is you apparently lacked attention as a child. Try not to
link me to your attempt to validate yourself. Your references to me in this
matter could damage my reputation as an off-road cyclist who enjoys sex with
women.
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> [newsgroups trimmed]
> >>
> >> [...]
> >> >> >For years you too have presented yourself in these forums as a
> >> >> >mentally
> >> >> >disturbed misanthrope, so I'll pose the same question for you (I'm an
> >> >> >equal
> >> >> >opportunity troll baiter):
> >> >> >
> >> >> >When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation and visits with
> >> >> >prostitutes excluded)?
> >>
> >> Mike Vandeman wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Sorry, you need to stick to relevant subjects. Or move to alt.****,
> >> >> where you belong.
> >> >
> >> > You will note that the frist post in this thread was made by you sick
> >> > buddy Ed ... dunderhead. Can't either of you two fight your own
> >> > battles???
> >> >
> >> > Jim McNamara
> >>
> >> Jim will always resort to sexual innuendo when he is at a loss for
> >> thought.
> >> It is ever the way of the scoundrel because it is so easy to do - and
> >> will
> >> elicit the usual sniggers from the peanut gallery. It amazes me that
> >> someone
> >> with a college education (and a Catholic one at that!) continually
> >> resorts
> >> to the lowest common denominator.
> >>
> >> Jim should try to elevate his thinking into the stratosphere where Ed
> >> Dolan
> >> the Great resides. My head has been in the clouds all of my life. Matters
> >> of
> >> the groin I leave to my inferiors like Jim who is apparently some kind of
> >> expert on such things.
> >
> > Ed, you dudnderhead ... what sexual innuendo???.
>
> "When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation and visits with
> prostitutes excluded)?" - Jim McNamara

I have no idea who wrote the above, but it was not me - Jim McNamaraa

> > For somone who goes
> > on an on about posting fromat, you can't even follow a thread. You are
> > attributing to me a suxual inuendo made by another poster . In
> > addressin Mike V (not you), I wrote ...You will note that the frist
> > post in this thread was made by you sick buddy Ed ... dunderhead.
> > Can't either of you two fight your own battles??? You are really
> > dense. - Jim McNamara
>
> Jim, I urge you do drop the sexual innuendoes. It is beneath you and is
> something that only the brain dead resort to. You have a Catholic liberal
> arts education and we all expect better things of you. I myself only do it
> as a last resort when I am dealing with a total asshole. I noticed you never
> even did it with your arch enemy Ed Gin and so there is no reason for you to
> do it with Mike Vandeman and myself since we are far superior types to Ed
> Gin.
>
> Perry Butler of Alexandria, Minnesota, another otherwise pretty good fellow
> here on ARBR, would resort to this kind of an attack too when he was at a
> loss for words. But Hells Bells, when you are at a loss for words, it is
> better to just say nothing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
GaryG wrote:
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > >> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >> news:[email protected]...
> > >>
> > >> [newsgroups trimmed]
> > >>
> > >> [...]
> > >> >> >For years you too have presented yourself in these forums as a
> > >> >> >mentally
> > >> >> >disturbed misanthrope, so I'll pose the same question for you (I'm
> an
> > >> >> >equal
> > >> >> >opportunity troll baiter):
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation and visits
> with
> > >> >> >prostitutes excluded)?
> > >>
> > >> Mike Vandeman wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >> Sorry, you need to stick to relevant subjects. Or move to alt.****,
> > >> >> where you belong.
> > >> >
> > >> > You will note that the frist post in this thread was made by you sick
> > >> > buddy Ed ... dunderhead. Can't either of you two fight your own
> > >> > battles???
> > >> >
> > >> > Jim McNamara
> > >>
> > >> Jim will always resort to sexual innuendo when he is at a loss for
> > >> thought.
> > >> It is ever the way of the scoundrel because it is so easy to do - and
> > >> will
> > >> elicit the usual sniggers from the peanut gallery. It amazes me that
> > >> someone
> > >> with a college education (and a Catholic one at that!) continually
> > >> resorts
> > >> to the lowest common denominator.
> > >>
> > >> Jim should try to elevate his thinking into the stratosphere where Ed
> > >> Dolan
> > >> the Great resides. My head has been in the clouds all of my life.
> Matters
> > >> of
> > >> the groin I leave to my inferiors like Jim who is apparently some kind
> of
> > >> expert on such things.
> > >
> > > Ed, you dudnderhead ... what sexual innuendo???.
> >
> > "When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation and visits with
> > prostitutes excluded)?" - Jim McNamara
>
> ED, you idiot...Jim did *not* write that. I did. Try reading for
> comprehension.

Gary, thanks for clarifying that. By the way, the only prostitute Ed
would patronize is of his own gender. OK Ed, now I've made a sexual
innuendo (my first I think). I didn't want to see you make yourself
out to be a liar or a fool. You owe me Ed.

Jim McNamara

> FWIW, what I wrote was not "innuendo"...it was a simple, direct question
> that you've chosen to ignore. I asked the question only to establish a
> frame of reference. You often harp on issues of sexuality (apparently this
> subject makes you uncomfortable), but many of us suspect you have little to
> no experience in this arena.
>
> GG
>
> >
> > For somone who goes
> > > on an on about posting fromat, you can't even follow a thread. You are
> > > attributing to me a suxual inuendo made by another poster . In
> > > addressin Mike V (not you), I wrote ...You will note that the frist
> > > post in this thread was made by you sick buddy Ed ... dunderhead.
> > > Can't either of you two fight your own battles??? You are really
> > > dense. - Jim McNamara
> >
> > Jim, I urge you do drop the sexual innuendoes. It is beneath you and is
> > something that only the brain dead resort to. You have a Catholic liberal
> > arts education and we all expect better things of you. I myself only do it
> > as a last resort when I am dealing with a total asshole. I noticed you
> never
> > even did it with your arch enemy Ed Gin and so there is no reason for you
> to
> > do it with Mike Vandeman and myself since we are far superior types to Ed
> > Gin.
> >
> > Perry Butler of Alexandria, Minnesota, another otherwise pretty good
> fellow
> > here on ARBR, would resort to this kind of an attack too when he was at a
> > loss for words. But Hells Bells, when you are at a loss for words, it is
> > better to just say nothing.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> >
> >
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> [...]
> >> "When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation and visits with
> >> prostitutes excluded)?" - Jim McNamara
> >
> > ED, you idiot...Jim did *not* write that. I did. Try reading for
> > comprehension.
>
> Well, if Jim did not write that then everything I said to him now applies to
> you.

Ed, is that the best you can do in the way of an apolgy??? - Jim
McNamara

> > FWIW, what I wrote was not "innuendo"...it was a simple, direct question
> > that you've chosen to ignore. I asked the question only to establish a
> > frame of reference. You often harp on issues of sexuality (apparently this
> > subject makes you uncomfortable), but many of us suspect you have little
> > to
> > no experience in this arena.
>
> When you reference sex it is all about innuendo and nothing else. I only
> reference holiness and take to task those who are into sex for any other
> reason than creating new life. This has been the stance of the Holy Roman
> Catholic Church (the one true church) from time immemorial and I am in damn
> good company, if I do say so myself.
>
> In my youth I actually plowed my way through the works of St. Thomas
> Aquinas, one of the great Church Fathers. Yes it seems quaint to have done
> that now, but I lived in another era from the present one. I am now an
> atheist, but I love the teachings of the old Church Fathers.
>
> God, I was so born out of my time! I want nothing else than to be a monk of
> the Middle Ages, one of those who would take vows of eternal silence. Yea, I
> only want to talk to God. I would like to only live in my monastic cell and
> have mystic visions of God, the Saints and to taste Heaven! What is so wrong
> about that?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
> >> For somone who goes
> >> > on an on about posting fromat, you can't even follow a thread. You are
> >> > attributing to me a suxual inuendo made by another poster . In
> >> > addressin Mike V (not you), I wrote ...You will note that the frist
> >> > post in this thread was made by you sick buddy Ed ... dunderhead.
> >> > Can't either of you two fight your own battles??? You are really
> >> > dense. - Jim McNamara
> >>
> >> Jim, I urge you do drop the sexual innuendoes. It is beneath you and is
> >> something that only the brain dead resort to. You have a Catholic liberal
> >> arts education and we all expect better things of you. I myself only do
> >> it
> >> as a last resort when I am dealing with a total asshole. I noticed you
> > never
> >> even did it with your arch enemy Ed Gin and so there is no reason for you
> > to
> >> do it with Mike Vandeman and myself since we are far superior types to Ed
> >> Gin.
> >>
> >> Perry Butler of Alexandria, Minnesota, another otherwise pretty good
> > fellow
> >> here on ARBR, would resort to this kind of an attack too when he was at a
> >> loss for words. But Hells Bells, when you are at a loss for words, it is
> >> better to just say nothing.
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> [...]
>
> >> God, I was so born out of my time! I want nothing else than to be a monk
> > of
> >> the Middle Ages, one of those who would take vows of eternal silence.
> >
> > Ah, yes...those simpler times when 90% of the population was illiterate,
> > when the average lifespan was about 35 years, when slavery and torture
> > were
> > commonplace, and when women (and men) could be burned in public for
> > "witchcraft" (meaning, they ****** off somebody with power).
>
> Yes, those were truly the good old days. I yearn for them every day of my
> life. Why was it my misfortune to be born into the 20th century in America
> when I should have been born in Medieval Germany where I could have had a
> mighty struggle with that Protestant heretic Martin Luther. He is like you
> in that he wanted to have his salvation and screw at the same time. He
> simply did not know what it was to be a good Catholic like me (even though I
> am now an atheist).

A saintly atheist who desires to be at the right hand of a deity that
he longs to converse with but does not believe in??? The conuhndrum
continues.

> > BTW - do you really think that people were less sexually active back then?
>
> At least they knew they were sinning when they were sinning. That is a huge
> improvement over the likes of you.
>
> >> Yea, I
> >> only want to talk to God. I would like to only live in my monastic cell
> > and
> >> have mystic visions of God, the Saints and to taste Heaven! What is so
> > wrong
> >> about that?
> >
> > You would get a lot of heartfelt support if you were to take a vow of
> > silence with respect to Usenet (I'd put you on my Christmas card list if
> > you
> > did).
>
> I could see this coming - which is why I said it!
>
> > You could also join a monastery if you wanted to. I hear they're hiring,
> > but
> > your puffed up claims of "greatness" might not go over so well in that
> > environment.
>
> No, it is not possible to join a monastery when you no longer believe. I am
> an atheist and there is just no way I could hide this very significant fact
> about myself. They would boot me out in very short order because they would
> not know what I was praying about or meditating on.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
GaryG wrote:
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "GaryG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:p[email protected]...
> > > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > [...]
> > >> GaryG is a libertine
> > >
> > > Meaning, "anyone who's normal, and not afraid of sexuality".
> >
> > Main Entry: lib·er·tine
> > Pronunciation: 'li-b&r-"tEn
> > Function: noun
> > Etymology: Middle English libertyn freedman, from Latin libertinus, from
> > libertinus, adjective, of a freedman, from libertus freedman, from liber
> > 1 usually disparaging : a freethinker especially in religious matters
> > 2 : a person who is unrestrained by convention or morality; specifically :
> > one leading a dissolute life
> > - libertine adjective
>
> That's pretty funny...my friends think I'm a pretty conventional guy.
>
> >
> > Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
> >
> > I mean of course the second definition to apply to you.
> >
> > >> and can therefore never understand what it means to be
> > >> pure and holy like me. Let me repeat so it will perhaps finally sink
> in:
> > >
> > > Do "pure and holy" people consider 99% of the rest of the world "human
> > > scum", as you seem to imply?
> >
> > What 99% would that be? Just because you are dissolute does not mean that
> > everyone else is.
>
> My point was that it's highly ironic for someone who claims to be "pure and
> holy" to even use the terms "human scum". Just another clear indication of
> how warped your thinking really is.
>
> >
> > >> "Anyone who is into sexual behavior without the express intent of
> > >> creating
> > >> new life (babies) is nothing but human scum." - Ed Dolan
> > >
> > > You've stated this before...it amounts to a statement of self-loathing
> and
> > > fear. I strongly recommend repeating it to a qualified mental health
> > > provider...perhaps it's not too late for you to get some help.
> >
> > In a more sane age it is GaryG who would seeing a mental health expert.In
> > my chosen time he would be before the Spanish Inquisition to be burned at
> > the stake in order that his immortal soul be saved.
>
> You're funny when you're angry, ED.
>
> > >> Libertinism is now the accepted norm of the era we are living in, but
> it
> > > was
> > >> not always so.
> > >
> > > Do you have any evidence that the overall rate of sexual expression, or
> > > the
> > > forms thereof, or the purposes for which people engage in it, has
> changed
> > > significantly from what it was in the past? Or, do you simply have a
> > > fantasy of a "purer" time in the distant past when your fears would not
> > > have
> > > made you look so bizarre?
> >
> > It is how it is regarded that matters, not whether it is engaged in or
> not.
> > You are a libertine because you do not regard it as immoral. You are worse
> > than the worst sinner because the worst sinner knows that he sins.
> >
> > >> Anyone who is capable of rational thought knows that the only
> > >> purpose of sex is to create new life. Any other purpose is clearly a
> > >> perversion.
> > >
> > > If you really believe this, you're a sick man, ED.
> >
> > Nope, you are perverted if you believe sex is all about fun and games.
>
> I've never said that sex is "all about fun and games"...it's way more
> significant than that. It's also about closeness, bonding, intimacy, love,
> making babies (at some points in life), and yes...fun and games too.
>
> Once again, your statements reveal much about your fears, and your lack of
> experience in this area.
>
>
> > >> I had a sociology professor at the University of Minnesota who triedto
> > > tell
> > >> us that sex is also useful as a bonding mechanism between the parents -
> > >> to
> > >> keep them together long enough to ensure the survival of their
> children.
> > >> God, I just about threw up when I heard that. I didn't believe it for a
> > >> moment. It is nothing but a rationalization for perversion. The one and
> > > only
> > >> purpose of sex is to create new life - period! Thus spake Zarathustra!
> > >>
> > >> > Have you ever discussed your fears of sexuality and intimacy with a
> > >> > qualified mental health professional?
> > >>
> > >> What fear? A better word is contempt for a biological function whichis
> > > only
> > >> important (and indeed sacred) if and when you want to create new life.
> > >
> > > Contempt for a perfectly normal biological and emotional function =
> Fear.
> >
> > "Nope, you are perverted if you believe sex is all about fun and games." -
> > Ed Dolan
>
> See above...it's about much more than that (though that's part of it).
>
> > >> [...]
> > >>
> > >> >> Any other path and all you will know
> > >> >> are matters of the groin along with the lower animals of creation.
> > >> >
> > >> > Earth to ED - Believe it or not, it's possible to lead a life rich
> with
> > >> > intellectual and physical challenges, creativity and joy, and alsoto
> > >> > experience love, intimacy, and (gasp!) sex (both for pleasure, and
> for
> > >> > procreative purposes).
> > >>
> > >> No, pleasure is forbidden. What the hell do you think the Garden of
> Eden
> > > was
> > >> all about?
> > >
> > > There was no Garden of Eden, ED. Just as there was no "original sin".
> > > And
> > > pleasure is only "forbidden" by virtue of your screwed up mental state.
> >
> > Try to learn to think in symbols. It matters not whether there was a
> Garden
> > of Eden or not. It does matter that we can know what it represents.
>
> So, if it wasn't real, then why should we continue to be ruled by Bronze Age
> mythology? If there was no "Garden of Eden", and no "original sin", why do
> we have to deny ourselves pleasure in this life (assuming consenting
> adults)?
>
> Again, the answer is clear...your disgust with intimacy and sexuality is
> nothing more than your own deep-seated fears (and possibly some form of
> mental illness).
>
> BTW - this has been fun, but I have to sign off for the next couple of
> weeks. I'm off to Colorado for a business trip, and a week of cycling in
> the Rockies. Have a good time while I'm gone...and try to get laid if you
> can (it might improve your outlook on life...you won't know until you try
> it).

Gary, Ed will miss your voice of reason. He will miss arguing with you
in the absendce of his beloved Tom Sherman, but truth be told your
rationality is wasted on the irrational Mr. Dolan. - Jim McNamara.

> GG
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> >
> >
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > GaryG wrote:
> >> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >> > > Not a problem for me.
> >> > >
> >> > > First, let me assure you that I'm not gay.
> >> > >
> >> > > I just don't like women anymore. Having a wife or a girlfriend
> >> > > involves 'WAY too many compromises, as far as I am concerned. They
> >> > > are
> >> > > just a pain in the ass, always complaining about something or other,
> >> > > and always quick to criticize you but think their own **** doesn't
> >> > > stink. The small amount of time that you spend having sex with them
> >> > > isn't worth it.
> >> > >
> >> > > Plus, let's face it, most women are as dumb as a brick. They never
> >> > > learned anything in school; they are anti-intellectual as a defense
> >> > > mechanism, and they are resentful of men who did well in school, went
> >> > > to college and graduate school, and who are successful.
> >> > >
> >> > > All women want is a man who is going to follow around behind them,
> >> > > cleaning up their messes like the guy in the circus parade who
> >> > > follows
> >> > > along behind the elephants. Oh, how could I have almost forgotten,
> >> > > they want the man to give them a lot of money. Of course they don't
> >> > > appreciate it because they are resentful that the man is successful
> >> > > and
> >> > > has the money to give them. And even if you do give them all the
> >> > > money
> >> > > they want, they probably won't want to have sex with you anyway.
> >> > >
> >> > > To make matters worse, even though they are dumb and
> >> > > overly-emotional,
> >> > > they want to call all the shots in the relationship! And they want
> >> > > to
> >> > > buy, buy, buy. "I feel inadequate. I'd better buy something."
> >> > >
> >> > > And if you marry one, she'll use you as a sperm donor until it
> >> > > becomes
> >> > > too much of a hassle to deal with you, and then she'll kick your ass
> >> > > out so you lose your family. But keep sending those support checks!
> >> > >
> >> > > Women are really evil and screwed up.
> >> > >
> >> > > In short, who needs women? I just avoid them like the plague, and
> >> > > have
> >> > > never been happier.
> >> >
> >> > Folson, you are a genius almost on my level. I have not had your
> >> experience
> >> > of women, but I KNOW everything you say about them is true. So very
> >> > many
> >> > poor men slobs seem not to have a clue about women. It just sickens me
> >> that
> >> > men can be such fools and all-around dumbbells. Well, it all has to do
> >> with
> >> > the sex angle and nothing else. Men want sex and women want children.
> >> > From
> >> > that springs all the misunderstandings between the sexes. Unless men
> >> > also
> >> > want children, they are better off staying as far away from the female
> >> > sex
> >> > as they can get.
> >>
> >> ED, please don't project your fears of intimacy and sexuality upon the
> >> rest
> >> of the male gender. You're a well-documented misanthrope and misogynist,
> >> with well-documented fears of intimacy (of any kind).
> >>
> >> For most normal men, physical and social intimacy with women is part of
> >> the
> >> definition of a life well lived. Of course, you're free to live your
> >> lonely
> >> life as you see fit. But insulting all women just because you fear them,
> >> and insulting most men who would prefer their company, just makes you
> >> look
> >> like even more of a weirdo and misfit.
> >>
> >> BTW - When was the last time you had sex (solo masturbation excluded)?
> >> I'm
> >> guessing it's been a very long time. Perhaps you've simply forgotten, or
> >> never learned, what a pleasant experience it can be.
> >
> > Gary, et. al. - A lack of knowledge, experience or expertise has never
> > curtailed Ed's enthusiasm to impose his unfounded, errant "wisdom" ...
> > "wisdom" derived solely from myopic, twisted misconceptions. A
> > closet-queen, paralyzed by sexual hang-ups and shackled by self-imposed
> > celibacy; Ed has no credibility in this particular area of discussion.
>
> Anyone who is into sexual behavior without the express intent of creating
> new life (babies) is nothing but human scum. God abhors all such and the
> Devil is waiting for you in Hell!

What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
conundrum continues.

Jim McNamara

> > His lack of knowledge, experience and expertise invalidate his
> > arguments as baseless. He condemns those who refuse to follow his
> > misguided path to enlightenment, but the fool himself remains
> > unenlightened. Ignore his random, incoherent babble. Have pity on the
> > misanthropic hermit for he knows not what he speaks and speaks of what
> > he knows not. Given to flights of fancy, Ed is a victim of his own
> > unrestrained imagination. He is on a delusional journey to nowhere ...
> > a quest and a realm of that no one is willing to share. - Jim McNamara
>
> Follow in the footsteps of Saint Edward the Great and you will know what it
> is to be a self respecting human being. Any other path and all you will know
> are matters of the groin along with the lower animals of creation. However,
> the lower animals have the excuse that they do not have any higher powers of
> reasoning, something that we humans can never excuse ourselves from. Hence,
> we are many times worse than the beasts of the field. Yea, we are truly evil
> and deserving of everlasting Hellfire!
>
> It is my intention to come back after death as a Mighty Sequoia Tree. Yea,
> and then I shall lord it over all these pitiful humans who fancy themselves
> the lords of creation with all their pathetic sexual hang-ups. Ed Dolan, the
> Mighty Sequoia Tree - now there is thought to wrap your mind around!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:8HWmg.13606$FR1.3403@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]

>>> Hey Ed
>>>
>>> You will say almost anything to make yourself feel important, wont
>>> you. Does putting him down make you feel better?
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, BTW Blow Me
>>
>> Curtiss and I have had long discussions on various newsgroups and we
>> understand one another thoroughly. He knows all about my policy of ***
>> for tat. You have yet to learn it, but hang in there as I am a good
>> teacher.
>>
> What WE understand is you apparently lacked attention as a child. Try not
> to link me to your attempt to validate yourself. Your references to me in
> this matter could damage my reputation as an off-road cyclist who enjoys
> sex with women.

But you know about my policy of *** for tat. Other than that I agree with
you 100% - we have absolutely nothing in common! You are a jackass and a
scoundrel (a despoiler of wilderness and a despoiler of women) and I am a
Great Saint. But everyone already knows that about us, so why should I have
to keep harping on it.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
[...]
> What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
> self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
> conundrum continues.

Poor Jim has never recovered from his Jesuit education. All that brain
washing that you undergo when young is hard to get rid of I will admit, but
it can be gotten rid of with some effort. After all, why go through life
believing in fairy tales. But fairy tales do have their purpose nonetheless.
It is what you beat believers over the head with. I am very good at this if
I do say so myself.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:8HWmg.13606$FR1.3403@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>
>>>> Hey Ed
>>>>
>>>> You will say almost anything to make yourself feel important,
>>>> wont
>>>> you. Does putting him down make you feel better?
>>>>
>>>> Oh yeah, BTW Blow Me
>>>
>>> Curtiss and I have had long discussions on various newsgroups and we
>>> understand one another thoroughly. He knows all about my policy of
>>> *** for tat. You have yet to learn it, but hang in there as I am a
>>> good teacher.
>>>
>> What WE understand is you apparently lacked attention as a child. Try
>> not to link me to your attempt to validate yourself. Your references
>> to me in this matter could damage my reputation as an off-road
>> cyclist who enjoys sex with women.
>
> But you know about my policy of *** for tat. Other than that I agree
> with you 100% - we have absolutely nothing in common! You are a
> jackass and a scoundrel (a despoiler of wilderness and a despoiler of
> women) and I am a Great Saint. But everyone already knows that about
> us, so why should I have to keep harping on it.
>
Because it makes you feel good to stroke your HUGE ego. Im sure that you
have to stoke every thing else by your self. No self respecting woman
would do it for you.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>> What WE understand is you apparently lacked attention as a child. Try not
>> to link me to your attempt to validate yourself. Your references to me in
>> this matter could damage my reputation as an off-road cyclist who enjoys
>> sex with women.
>
> But you know about my policy of *** for tat. Other than that I agree with
> you 100% - we have absolutely nothing in common! You are a jackass and a
> scoundrel (a despoiler of wilderness and a despoiler of women) and I am a
> Great Saint. But everyone already knows that about us, so why should I
> have to keep harping on it.
>
You haven't said anything of consequence because you are of no consequence.
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
>> What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
>> self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
>> conundrum continues.
>
> Poor Jim has never recovered from his Jesuit education. All that brain
> washing that you undergo when young is hard to get rid of I will admit,
> but it can be gotten rid of with some effort. After all, why go through
> life believing in fairy tales. But fairy tales do have their purpose
> nonetheless. It is what you beat believers over the head with. I am very
> good at this if I do say so myself.
Is that all you've got...? Such a pathetic little man to belittle someone on
such a simple target as their faith.
Of course, all you have is a "fairy tale" of an alter ego. St Edward the
nonexistant. LOL
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:37_ng.25196$FR1.7235@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>> What WE understand is you apparently lacked attention as a child. Try
>>> not to link me to your attempt to validate yourself. Your references to
>>> me in this matter could damage my reputation as an off-road cyclist who
>>> enjoys sex with women.
>>
>> But you know about my policy of *** for tat. Other than that I agree with
>> you 100% - we have absolutely nothing in common! You are a jackass and a
>> scoundrel (a despoiler of wilderness and a despoiler of women) and I am a
>> Great Saint. But everyone already knows that about us, so why should I
>> have to keep harping on it.
>>
> You haven't said anything of consequence because you are of no
> consequence.

Now he is sounding exactly like Jim McNamara. It seems to be my karma to
reduce those about me to blithering idiots, provided they are not already
that to begin with.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:vg_ng.25197$FR1.14499@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> [...]
>>> What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
>>> self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
>>> conundrum continues.
>>
>> Poor Jim has never recovered from his Jesuit education. All that brain
>> washing that you undergo when young is hard to get rid of I will admit,
>> but it can be gotten rid of with some effort. After all, why go through
>> life believing in fairy tales. But fairy tales do have their purpose
>> nonetheless. It is what you beat believers over the head with. I am very
>> good at this if I do say so myself.
> Is that all you've got...? Such a pathetic little man to belittle someone
> on such a simple target as their faith.
> Of course, all you have is a "fairy tale" of an alter ego. St Edward the
> nonexistant. LOL

Poor Curtiss, his invective is not up to my high standards. I think it is
because Vandeman has been far too kind to him in the past. He will soon
discover that I am anything but kind.

Curtiss is nothing but a stalker. He needs to have the tables turned on him
and I am just the guy to do it. Imagine having this pip-squeak trailing
around after you for years like he has been doing to Vandeman. He ought to
be ashamed of himself, but that requires that you have some insight. He has
none. He only lives to stalk.

Death to stalkers!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:vg_ng.25197$FR1.14499@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> [...]
>>>> What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
>>>> self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
>>>> conundrum continues.
>>>
>>> Poor Jim has never recovered from his Jesuit education. All that
>>> brain washing that you undergo when young is hard to get rid of I
>>> will admit, but it can be gotten rid of with some effort. After all,
>>> why go through life believing in fairy tales. But fairy tales do
>>> have their purpose nonetheless. It is what you beat believers over
>>> the head with. I am very good at this if I do say so myself.
>> Is that all you've got...? Such a pathetic little man to belittle
>> someone on such a simple target as their faith.
>> Of course, all you have is a "fairy tale" of an alter ego. St Edward
>> the nonexistant. LOL
>
> Poor Curtiss, his invective is not up to my high standards. I think it
> is because Vandeman has been far too kind to him in the past. He will
> soon discover that I am anything but kind.
>
> Curtiss is nothing but a stalker. He needs to have the tables turned
> on him and I am just the guy to do it. Imagine having this pip-squeak
> trailing around after you for years like he has been doing to
> Vandeman. He ought to be ashamed of himself, but that requires that
> you have some insight. He has none. He only lives to stalk.
>

It appears that you are the one doing the stalking.


> Death to stalkers!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Re: Impotence
Replies
0
Views
334
Recumbent bicycles
Edward Dolan
E
Top Bottom Back