J
JimmyMac
Guest
JimmyMac wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > "Chris Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > news:[email protected]:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >> news:vg_ng.25197$FR1.14499@dukeread05...
> > >>>
> > >>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >>> news:[email protected]...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >>>> news:[email protected]...
> > >>>> [...]
> > >>>>> What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
> > >>>>> self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
> > >>>>> conundrum continues.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Poor Jim has never recovered from his Jesuit education. All that
> > >>>> brain washing that you undergo when young is hard to get rid of I
> > >>>> will admit, but it can be gotten rid of with some effort. After all,
> > >>>> why go through life believing in fairy tales. But fairy tales do
> > >>>> have their purpose nonetheless. It is what you beat believers over
> > >>>> the head with. I am very good at this if I do say so myself.
> > >>> Is that all you've got...? Such a pathetic little man to belittle
> > >>> someone on such a simple target as their faith.
> > >>> Of course, all you have is a "fairy tale" of an alter ego. St Edward
> > >>> the nonexistant. LOL
> > >>
> > >> Poor Curtiss, his invective is not up to my high standards. I think it
> > >> is because Vandeman has been far too kind to him in the past. He will
> > >> soon discover that I am anything but kind.
> > >>
> > >> Curtiss is nothing but a stalker. He needs to have the tables turned
> > >> on him and I am just the guy to do it. Imagine having this pip-squeak
> > >> trailing around after you for years like he has been doing to
> > >> Vandeman. He ought to be ashamed of himself, but that requires that
> > >> you have some insight. He has none. He only lives to stalk.
> > >>
> > >
> > > It appears that you are the one doing the stalking.
> >
> > Nope, I never stalk anyone.
>
> You admitted to stalking Tom Sherman. Your mixed messages do little
> to shore up your already sagging credibillity.
>
> >I am merely a responder. I soon grow weary of
> > everyone and leave them to themselves. Trust me on this, there is no one in
> > this world that I have enough interest in to want to stalk them, not on
> > Usenet and not in real life either.
> >
> > Curtiss is stalking Vandeman and Jim McNamara is stalking me.
Feeling picked on bunky? Leave and no one can "stalk" you ... paranoid
one..
> > How do you know whether you are a stalker or not? If all you are doing is
> > posting to a particular individual, then you are stalking. Draw your own
> > conclusions from this bit of wisdom by Ed Dolan the Great.
> >
> > The Great Ed Dolan has too much pride to ever stalk anyone since no one is
> > worthy of that much attention. I shall soon dispense of Jim and you unless
> > you provide me with new and interesting fodder. Why Vandeman has not gotten
> > rid of Curtiss is a mystery to me. Their dialogues are but a broken
> > phonograph record by now. It is probably because Vandeman is a kindly soul
> > and long-suffering.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > "Chris Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > news:[email protected]:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >> news:vg_ng.25197$FR1.14499@dukeread05...
> > >>>
> > >>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >>> news:[email protected]...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >>>> news:[email protected]...
> > >>>> [...]
> > >>>>> What we have here is the ravings of a lunatic. Why would a
> > >>>>> self-proclaimed atheist be talking about God and the Devil??? The
> > >>>>> conundrum continues.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Poor Jim has never recovered from his Jesuit education. All that
> > >>>> brain washing that you undergo when young is hard to get rid of I
> > >>>> will admit, but it can be gotten rid of with some effort. After all,
> > >>>> why go through life believing in fairy tales. But fairy tales do
> > >>>> have their purpose nonetheless. It is what you beat believers over
> > >>>> the head with. I am very good at this if I do say so myself.
> > >>> Is that all you've got...? Such a pathetic little man to belittle
> > >>> someone on such a simple target as their faith.
> > >>> Of course, all you have is a "fairy tale" of an alter ego. St Edward
> > >>> the nonexistant. LOL
> > >>
> > >> Poor Curtiss, his invective is not up to my high standards. I think it
> > >> is because Vandeman has been far too kind to him in the past. He will
> > >> soon discover that I am anything but kind.
> > >>
> > >> Curtiss is nothing but a stalker. He needs to have the tables turned
> > >> on him and I am just the guy to do it. Imagine having this pip-squeak
> > >> trailing around after you for years like he has been doing to
> > >> Vandeman. He ought to be ashamed of himself, but that requires that
> > >> you have some insight. He has none. He only lives to stalk.
> > >>
> > >
> > > It appears that you are the one doing the stalking.
> >
> > Nope, I never stalk anyone.
>
> You admitted to stalking Tom Sherman. Your mixed messages do little
> to shore up your already sagging credibillity.
>
> >I am merely a responder. I soon grow weary of
> > everyone and leave them to themselves. Trust me on this, there is no one in
> > this world that I have enough interest in to want to stalk them, not on
> > Usenet and not in real life either.
> >
> > Curtiss is stalking Vandeman and Jim McNamara is stalking me.
Feeling picked on bunky? Leave and no one can "stalk" you ... paranoid
one..
> > How do you know whether you are a stalker or not? If all you are doing is
> > posting to a particular individual, then you are stalking. Draw your own
> > conclusions from this bit of wisdom by Ed Dolan the Great.
> >
> > The Great Ed Dolan has too much pride to ever stalk anyone since no one is
> > worthy of that much attention. I shall soon dispense of Jim and you unless
> > you provide me with new and interesting fodder. Why Vandeman has not gotten
> > rid of Curtiss is a mystery to me. Their dialogues are but a broken
> > phonograph record by now. It is probably because Vandeman is a kindly soul
> > and long-suffering.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota