What is the ideal cycling jacket (for UK commuting)



ship wrote:
>
> How come I can see my red flashing bike LED in the very corner of my
> eye - and yes it's very clearly red - if there are NO cones in my
> peripheral vision area!


At a guess ...

An image is not constructed in your eyes. They just collect the light.
The image construction and how you see it are done in the brain and that
adds in bits that it "knows" but are missing. In this case it adds the
red to the light.

BICBW.

--
Don Whybrow

Sequi Bonum Non Time

"I suppose they are vicious rascals, but it scarcely matters what they
are. I'm after what they know." (Gibson-Sterling, The Difference Engine)
 
Ryan Cousineau writes:

>>>> I'm with you on that except that I use my parka on my summer tour
>>>> in the Alps where it can snow any day of the year and often does as
>>>> you can see from the pictures at:


http://www.paloaltobicycles.com/alps_photos/f83.html

>>>> For that reason I have a more stringent rule on what works.


>>>> 1. It must be water proof.


>>>> 2. It must have a hood that can be cinched down so that only eyes
>>>> and nose are exposed.


>>>> 3. It should be double layered, the inner layer can be mesh but
>>>> must insulate the outer skin from the rider's arms to prevent
>>>> freezing hands.


>>>> 4. Velcro closure on sleeves and over the zipper down the front.


>>>> 5. No vents or slots. Climbing can be done with the front
>>>> partially open even in rain.


>>>> 6. No Gore-Tex, the outer layer of which gets wet and doesn't dry
>>>> readily, and the same goes for condensation on the inside.
>>>> Breathing is illusory for someone climbing hills on a bicycle.


>>>> 7. Bonus: Stiff and tight fitting enough so it does not flap in
>>>> the wind when descending.


>>>> Flapping sleeves and body is the greatest loss of warmth from
>>>> forced convection. Next time when descending, hold the arms so
>>>> the jacket remains still and notice how much warmer it is.


>>>> Unfortunately, the people who make bicycle jackets haven't tried
>>>> descending a 20km alpine pass when it's snowing... or at least
>>>> not with an understanding of why it is as cold as it is. Most
>>>> jackets have no adequate neck and head covering and have a body
>>>> to hold Santa Clause with many layers of clothing.


>>> I have been very happy with my "racing" jacket (a Louis Garneau
>>> Windtex), which is a form-fitting jacket with no vents, elastic
>>> cuffs, and a collar (but no hood). On its own, it is remarkably
>>> warm, rain-resistant, and combined with a jersey, is warm down to
>>> at least zero.


>> http://louisgarneau.com/eng/ctm_catalog.asp?catalogue=C7


>> The main page of this web site is a compendium of grimacing posing
>> racers as is common in today's bicycling press. That's too bad,
>> because there are many imitators out there emulating that
>> appearance, even looking over their shoulder to see if an imagined
>> chase group is catching up. Can't we just ride bike instead of so
>> much posturing?


> You have a strong opinion of posing. It must be said that the
> splash page you object to is for Garneau's "Custom" line, which is
> to say, directly aimed at clubs doing bulk orders of team kit. I
> can't vouch for the tri-guy, but all the other pics I can identify
> as being one of the elite teams LG sponsors: Jittery Joe's (US Div
> III, I think), Garneau Optik (Quebec team, possibly espoir-level),
> and Boyuges Telecom (recently seen contesting the Tour de France).
> In fact, except for one training-ride shot of Jittery Joe's, I'm
> pretty sure all those pictures were taken in the heat of
> competition.


So what are you getting at? Riders today spend much time looking right
just cruising around or racing. It's all Hollywood and they don't even
recognize it anymore.

>>> I like this jacket so much (and note that mine is in my club's
>>> colours) that I occasionally wear it on non-cycling occasions. My
>>> wife thinks this is weird.


>> Well I didn't find your team colors on that web site, but if the
>> jacket is as garish as most, I would agree with your wife. There
>> is more to life than bicycle racing and hanging it out in other
>> venues.


> Red and white:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/rcousine/53270926/
http://escapevelocity.bc.ca/

> My wife is right. But honest: it's strictly a comfort thing.


>>> Full disclosure: Garneau is a major sponsor of my club. I really do
>>> like this jacket, though.


>> Well, that may well be, but I qualified my description for touring in
>> high country, be that Mt. Evans CO or the Alps. Without a hood, the
>> jacket is not good enough and from your description I cannot tell
>> whether it flaps on descents, another major failing of most jackets
>> for the reason I mentioned.


> It fits racer-jersey tight. It does not flap, and indeed, it is highly
> conformal. I have worn it in especially cold and wet races.


> I'm surprised at your insistence on a hood, but suggest again that it
> has a lot to do with your preference for riding without a helmet, too.
> Not that there's anything wrong with that, but my local jurisdiction
> treats adults like children, and all local races are helmets-mandatory.
> Between those two rules, I don't end up bare-headed except for daring
> forays a few blocks from my house. Which I sometimes do on my 7-speed
> BMX, but that's another story.


The hood is needed to cover the neck and cheeks or you can get off the
bicycle and quit as many riders did when Andy Hampsten got a change of
clothes and a hooded parka on the Gavia summit for his GdI win. I
take it you have not descended in snow or you would know that the hood
is essential to stay on the bicycle.

I watched the GdI come over the Stelvio in the 1970's and on that day
there was no broom wagon nor any check on how riders other than the
leaders finished, in a car or otherwise. Charley Gaul had a hooded
jacket but others didn't and finished in Bormio not on the bicycle.

My friend and I descended to the east with appropriate parkas and
gloves. On my first such endeavor on Mt. Evans CO, I could not
descend from for lack of a hood, there being a biting wind with light
snow on my neck. We were able to get a ride in a car. That's were I
learned my lesson.

> Perhaps a balaclava?


Oh you comedian!

Jobst Brandt
 
[email protected] wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau writes:
>> Perhaps a balaclava?

>
> Oh you comedian!


Why is that so funny?

--
Dave "humor-impaired" who?
dvt at psu dot edu
 
ship wrote:
>>> What about the 'use a t-shirt to ride in rather than your work
>>> shirt' option?

>>
>> A merino wool t-shirt, obviously. Otherwise you'll get cold in the
>> rain.
>>

> Isnt it a bit prickly next to the skin?


Definitely not.

> And are you sure that there isnt anything that
> wicks better without actually absorbing water
> than merino wool?


Possibly. The wool really doesn't give up the water at all, though, so you
won't feel damp even though it's pretty much saturated.

I wear a merino jumper over (ordinary) shirts when cycling to places where I
have to look not scruffy, and even when my hair's soaked through and my
thighs are embarassingly sodden, I don't have to do anything with my jumper,
and the shirt's only at the stage of feeling damp, not at the stage of being
uncomfortable.

When I was out for 9 hours in constant drizzle in The Highlands a couple of
weeks ago, I was wearing a thin merino roll-neck top (which I've managed not
to wear out in 5 years) with a merino jumper over it, and had no problems
with warmth at all.

That said, I've not tried what it is I think you may be asking about, which
is a merino t-shirt under work clothes with a waterproof on top.

> Do you have to keep oiling it?


No, it needs no special treatment.

> Does it smell bad?


As long as all the washing powder gets rinsed away, no. ;)

A more evangelical supplier of merino and other natural fibres is Howies

A slightly gross quote from:
http://www.howies.co.uk/content.php?xSecId=40
is:

"Oh, and in tests people have worn for 90 days in a row without getting up
anyone's nose."

They might be helpful people to talk to about this problem. Their catalogues
give the impression that they're very happy to talk about their products,
and they sell a full range of cycling stuff, including waterproofs.

> Can you throw it into the washing machine?


It'll need a wool wash, but apart from that, it should be fine. Check before
you buy, of course.

> Will the clothes moths gobble it up?


I assume not.

Hopefully that'll help with your problems.

Cheers,

Ambrose
 
On 19 Oct 2006 11:52:00 -0700, "ship" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Isnt it a bit prickly next to the skin?
>And are you sure that there isnt anything that
>wicks better without actually absorbing water
>than merino wool?
>Do you have to keep oiling it?
>Does it smell bad?
>Can you throw it into the washing machine?
>Will the clothes moths gobble it up?


I've got some merino wool from Icebreaker and it feels great against
the skin. It does feel heavier compared to synthetics when wet.

Smell's not a problem. Machine wash, dry flat. Nice stuff.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
 
Ship ahoy writes:

>>> I read an article several years ago stating that bright red was a
>>> TERRIBLE colour for fire engines because the red cones in the eye
>>> take longest to respond - albeit that red is the colour that most
>>> jolts/shocks/alerts/stimulates us. The article went on to state
>>> that a bright red fast moving obect across our vision was as good
>>> as invisible.


>> Sounds like a red herring. The cones are only in a small central
>> part of the vision and are relatively slow responding.


> How come I can see my red flashing bike LED in the very corner of my
> eye - and yes it's very clearly red - if there are NO cones in my
> peripheral vision area!


You are imagining that you can do that. Your peripheral vision may be
quick and receptive but it cannot distinguish colors. If you want to
test that, look straight airhead at a target and have someone hold up
white, yellow and red pieces of paper and try to identify them.

No cheating either!

Jobst Brandt
 
Ship ahoy writes:

>>> I read an article several years ago stating that bright red was a
>>> TERRIBLE colour for fire engines because the red cones in the eye
>>> take longest to respond - albeit that red is the colour that most
>>> jolts/shocks/alerts/stimulates us. The article went on to state
>>> that a bright red fast moving obect across our vision was as good
>>> as invisible.


>> Sounds like a red herring. The cones are only in a small central
>> part of the vision and are relatively slow responding.


> How come I can see my red flashing bike LED in the very corner of my
> eye - and yes it's very clearly red - if there are NO cones in my
> peripheral vision area!


You are imagining that you can do that. Your peripheral vision may be
quick and receptive but it cannot distinguish colors. If you want to
test that, look straight ahead at a target and have someone hold up
white, yellow and red pieces of paper and try to identify them.

No cheating either!

Jobst Brandt
 
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:03:36 +0000, jobst.brandt wrote:

> Ryan Cousineau writes:


>> I have been very happy with my "racing" jacket (a Louis Garneau
>> Windtex), which is a form-fitting jacket with no vents, elastic cuffs,
>> and a collar (but no hood). On its own, it is remarkably warm,
>> rain-resistant, and combined with a jersey, is warm down to at least
>> zero.

>
> http://louisgarneau.com/eng/ctm_catalog.asp?catalogue=C7
>
> The main page of this web site is a compendium of grimacing posing
> racers as is common in today's bicycling press. That's too bad, because
> there are many imitators out there emulating that appearance, even
> looking over their shoulder to see if an imagined chase group is
> catching up. Can't we just ride bike instead of so much posturing?


Your point is well taken, but note that Louis Garneau's main business is
probably selling custom team and club jerseys, even though they make lots
of other stuff.

Still, I think the industry misses a lot with their one-note marketing
schtick. They don't seem to know how to sell anything, except with racer
imagery.

They also have no idea how the web works, which is why they have stupid
websites with no useful information, and that prevent deep-linking.

>> I like this jacket so much (and note that mine is in my club's colours)
>> that I occasionally wear it on non-cycling occasions. My wife thinks
>> this is weird.

>
> Well I didn't find your team colors on that web site, but if the jacket
> is as garish as most, I would agree with your wife. There is more to
> life than bicycle racing and hanging it out in other venues.


I resent that I can't buy good outdoor gear that doesn't scream "bike
geek" or "ski geek" or whatever.

Matt O.
 
dvt wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Ryan Cousineau writes:
> >> Perhaps a balaclava?

> >
> > Oh you comedian!

>
> Why is that so funny?
>
> --
> Dave "humor-impaired" who?
> dvt at psu dot edu


Theories:

-Jobst half-knows about Greek food, and thought I was suggesting he
wear a baklava. Mmm. Baklava.
-Jobst is afraid of being mistaken for a terrorist, as they routinely
travel the Alps on bicycles, wearing ski masks and waylaying tourists.
The Pyrenean bicycle gangs are notoriously the worst thugs in Europe.
When combined with the "This bike is a pipe bomb" sticker he has, a
balaclava would just be asking for trouble.
-Jobst is flirting with me. NTTAWWT, but I'm happily married.
-Jobst thinks dressing like Phil Laak is perfectly normal, but wearing
a balaclava would just be weird.
-In German, balaclava is a hilarious slang term for "bikini top,"
possibly the least appropriate garment for descending the Gavia that
would be possible.
-Jobst is easily amused.
-"Balaclava" is engineering shorthand for a solution that will fix the
problem, but at the cost of being in some way ridiculous. Example: any
Rube Goldberg machine would qualify as a balaclava.

It must be one of those,
 
[email protected] wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau writes:
>
> >>>> I'm with you on that except that I use my parka on my summer tour
> >>>> in the Alps where it can snow any day of the year and often does as
> >>>> you can see from the pictures at:

>
> http://www.paloaltobicycles.com/alps_photos/f83.html
>
> >>>> For that reason I have a more stringent rule on what works.

>
> >>>> 1. It must be water proof.

>
> >>>> 2. It must have a hood that can be cinched down so that only eyes
> >>>> and nose are exposed.

>
> >>>> 3. It should be double layered, the inner layer can be mesh but
> >>>> must insulate the outer skin from the rider's arms to prevent
> >>>> freezing hands.

>
> >>>> 4. Velcro closure on sleeves and over the zipper down the front.

>
> >>>> 5. No vents or slots. Climbing can be done with the front
> >>>> partially open even in rain.

>
> >>>> 6. No Gore-Tex, the outer layer of which gets wet and doesn't dry
> >>>> readily, and the same goes for condensation on the inside.
> >>>> Breathing is illusory for someone climbing hills on a bicycle.

>
> >>>> 7. Bonus: Stiff and tight fitting enough so it does not flap in
> >>>> the wind when descending.

>
> >>>> Flapping sleeves and body is the greatest loss of warmth from
> >>>> forced convection. Next time when descending, hold the arms so
> >>>> the jacket remains still and notice how much warmer it is.

>
> >>>> Unfortunately, the people who make bicycle jackets haven't tried
> >>>> descending a 20km alpine pass when it's snowing... or at least
> >>>> not with an understanding of why it is as cold as it is. Most
> >>>> jackets have no adequate neck and head covering and have a body
> >>>> to hold Santa Clause with many layers of clothing.

>
> >>> I have been very happy with my "racing" jacket (a Louis Garneau
> >>> Windtex), which is a form-fitting jacket with no vents, elastic
> >>> cuffs, and a collar (but no hood). On its own, it is remarkably
> >>> warm, rain-resistant, and combined with a jersey, is warm down to
> >>> at least zero.

>
> >> http://louisgarneau.com/eng/ctm_catalog.asp?catalogue=C7

>
> >> The main page of this web site is a compendium of grimacing posing
> >> racers as is common in today's bicycling press. That's too bad,
> >> because there are many imitators out there emulating that
> >> appearance, even looking over their shoulder to see if an imagined
> >> chase group is catching up. Can't we just ride bike instead of so
> >> much posturing?

>
> > You have a strong opinion of posing. It must be said that the
> > splash page you object to is for Garneau's "Custom" line, which is
> > to say, directly aimed at clubs doing bulk orders of team kit. I
> > can't vouch for the tri-guy, but all the other pics I can identify
> > as being one of the elite teams LG sponsors: Jittery Joe's (US Div
> > III, I think), Garneau Optik (Quebec team, possibly espoir-level),
> > and Boyuges Telecom (recently seen contesting the Tour de France).
> > In fact, except for one training-ride shot of Jittery Joe's, I'm
> > pretty sure all those pictures were taken in the heat of
> > competition.

>
> So what are you getting at? Riders today spend much time looking right
> just cruising around or racing. It's all Hollywood and they don't even
> recognize it anymore.


My point is that these are photos of actual racers in actual race
conditions advertising a clothing line specifically aimed at cycling
clubs, a great number of which (probably the majority of their orders)
are racing-oriented.

If we switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line, we
see this:

http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6

Okay, he's looking back, and he's riding a fancy bike, but I hardly
think you can accuse the rider of racer-posing, since he is in the
decidedly unnatural-for-racing postion of having one foot on the ground
and looking back. Also, no team colors on his jersey.

> >>> I like this jacket so much (and note that mine is in my club's
> >>> colours) that I occasionally wear it on non-cycling occasions. My
> >>> wife thinks this is weird.

>
> >> Well I didn't find your team colors on that web site, but if the
> >> jacket is as garish as most, I would agree with your wife. There
> >> is more to life than bicycle racing and hanging it out in other
> >> venues.

>
> > Red and white:

>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/rcousine/53270926/
> http://escapevelocity.bc.ca/
>
> > My wife is right. But honest: it's strictly a comfort thing.

>
> >>> Full disclosure: Garneau is a major sponsor of my club. I really do
> >>> like this jacket, though.

>
> >> Well, that may well be, but I qualified my description for touring in
> >> high country, be that Mt. Evans CO or the Alps. Without a hood, the
> >> jacket is not good enough and from your description I cannot tell
> >> whether it flaps on descents, another major failing of most jackets
> >> for the reason I mentioned.

>
> > It fits racer-jersey tight. It does not flap, and indeed, it is highly
> > conformal. I have worn it in especially cold and wet races.

>
> > I'm surprised at your insistence on a hood, but suggest again that it
> > has a lot to do with your preference for riding without a helmet, too.
> > Not that there's anything wrong with that, but my local jurisdiction
> > treats adults like children, and all local races are helmets-mandatory.
> > Between those two rules, I don't end up bare-headed except for daring
> > forays a few blocks from my house. Which I sometimes do on my 7-speed
> > BMX, but that's another story.

>
> The hood is needed to cover the neck and cheeks or you can get off the
> bicycle and quit as many riders did when Andy Hampsten got a change of
> clothes and a hooded parka on the Gavia summit for his GdI win. I
> take it you have not descended in snow or you would know that the hood
> is essential to stay on the bicycle.


Andy doesn't remember it that way:

http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=1827

"I did have a pair of neoprene diving gloves that I kept on for the
entire climb. Along the way my team car gave me a neck-gator and a wool
hat."

(the article goes on about his clothing choices)

The web photos of the Gavia climb that I can find are not very clear,
but they seem to show exposed ears.

In fairness, Hampsten doesn't seem to have chosen his clothing options
perfectly, but his team was far better prepared than any other that
day, and unlike most of your alpine rides, his team got changes of
clothing and hot tea to him during the ride.

I did a modest experiment today which has little bearing on alpine
rides, but much to say about the original poster's "rides in rainy
London" request. I rode to work in my lightest jersey and my beloved
Windtex jacket. Bottom half was a pair of shorts, knee warmers,
middling-warm socks, and not-very-warm shoes. Weather was about 5-10C
and raining lightly. I was out for only 30 minutes. Headwear was an
airy helmet (Giro Boreas) and gloves were my neoprene things (just like
Andy).

On the first 7 minutes of my ride, my elbows were cooler than I would
have liked. My body was adequately warm. Then I hit the steep hill (1.8
km of climbing peaking at a grade of around 15% for, at most, a hundred
metres; about 300' of gain from bottom to top).

After that, I wasn't cold. I was riding a bike with full fenders, which
means that road splash was a non-issue. In retrospect, I would have
matched a set of arm warmers with my jersey and probably changed to a
warmer jersey for optimal comfort.

My crazy-conditions gear would be a poly-fleece long-sleeve "jersey",
over which I would put my magic jacket, and a plastic rain jacket over
that. Neoprene gloves, cap under helmet (my cap can cover most of my
ears when I pull it down) and maybe a neck-gaiter. On the bottom,
probably one or two pairs of shorts, and a set of leg-warmers. I have a
set of heavy-fronted fleece pants, but they become a sodden mess in the
rain. I still am looking for good cold/wet shoes, but I'm moderately
happy with my socks.

In this gear
 
ship wrote:

> Btw, I've often wondered about string-type construction vests - they
> may look cr*p but
> they would presumably:
> - keep the bulk of the wet clothing off your skin
> - offer quite a lot of insulation with used little ventilation
> - but minimal insulation when used with lots of ventilation


And if it's made of Coolmax any sweat will dry quickly too. Have a look at
the Briko Mesh Sleeveless Vest.

~PB
 
On 19 Oct 2006 17:41:54 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

[snip]

>If we switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line, we
>see this:
>
>http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6
>
>Okay, he's looking back, and he's riding a fancy bike, but I hardly
>think you can accuse the rider of racer-posing, since he is in the
>decidedly unnatural-for-racing postion of having one foot on the ground
>and looking back. Also, no team colors on his jersey.


[snip]

Dear Ryan,

Also, he's stopped in the traffic lane of what looks like a highway,
his rear wheel within inches of a yellow no-passing stripe.

Caption: Gee, I hope that pickup doing 80 mph swerves around me!

It's not quite as bad as posing in the middle of a 4-way intersection
beneath a traffic light, but it does support the theory that models
and fashion photographers are airheads.

Love the crisp-edged shadows from the artificial lighting on a cloudy
day.

Cheers,

Carl Fogel
 
Ryan Cousineau writes:

>>>>>> I'm with you on that except that I use my parka on my summer
>>>>>> tour in the Alps where it can snow any day of the year and
>>>>>> often does as you can see from the pictures at:


http://www.paloaltobicycles.com/alps_photos/f83.html

>>>>>> For that reason I have a more stringent rule on what works.


>>>>>> 1. It must be water proof.


>>>>>> 2. It must have a hood that can be cinched down so that only
>>>>>> eyes and nose are exposed.


>>>>>> 3. It should be double layered, the inner layer can be mesh but
>>>>>> must insulate the outer skin from the rider's arms to
>>>>>> prevent freezing hands.


>>>>>> 4. Velcro closure on sleeves and over the zipper down the front.


>>>>>> 5. No vents or slots. Climbing can be done with the front
>>>>>> partially open even in rain.


>>>>>> 6. No Gore-Tex, the outer layer of which gets wet and doesn't
>>>>>> dry readily, and the same goes for condensation on the
>>>>>> inside. Breathing is illusory for someone climbing hills on
>>>>>> a bicycle.


>>>>>> 7. Bonus: Stiff and tight fitting enough so it does not flap in
>>>>>> the wind when descending.


>>>>>> Flapping sleeves and body is the greatest loss of warmth from
>>>>>> forced convection. Next time when descending, hold the arms so
>>>>>> the jacket remains still and notice how much warmer it is.


>>>>>> Unfortunately, the people who make bicycle jackets haven't
>>>>>> tried descending a 20km alpine pass when it's snowing... or at
>>>>>> least not with an understanding of why it is as cold as it is.
>>>>>> Most jackets have no adequate neck and head covering and have a
>>>>>> body to hold Santa Clause with many layers of clothing.


>>>>> I have been very happy with my "racing" jacket (a Louis Garneau
>>>>> Windtex), which is a form-fitting jacket with no vents, elastic
>>>>> cuffs, and a collar (but no hood). On its own, it is remarkably
>>>>> warm, rain-resistant, and combined with a jersey, is warm down
>>>>> to at least zero.


http://louisgarneau.com/eng/ctm_catalog.asp?catalogue=C7

>>>> The main page of this web site is a compendium of grimacing
>>>> posing racers as is common in today's bicycling press. That's
>>>> too bad, because there are many imitators out there emulating
>>>> that appearance, even looking over their shoulder to see if an
>>>> imagined chase group is catching up. Can't we just ride bike
>>>> instead of so much posturing?


>>> You have a strong opinion of posing. It must be said that the
>>> splash page you object to is for Garneau's "Custom" line, which is
>>> to say, directly aimed at clubs doing bulk orders of team kit. I
>>> can't vouch for the tri-guy, but all the other pics I can identify
>>> as being one of the elite teams LG sponsors: Jittery Joe's (US Div
>>> III, I think), Garneau Optik (Quebec team, possibly espoir-level),
>>> and Boyuges Telecom (recently seen contesting the Tour de France).
>>> In fact, except for one training-ride shot of Jittery Joe's, I'm
>>> pretty sure all those pictures were taken in the heat of
>>> competition.


>> So what are you getting at? Riders today spend much time looking
>> right just cruising around or racing. It's all Hollywood and they
>> don't even recognize it anymore.


> My point is that these are photos of actual racers in actual race
> conditions advertising a clothing line specifically aimed at cycling
> clubs, a great number of which (probably the majority of their
> orders) are racing-oriented.


Yes, as I say they are emulating some movie star role grimacing as
they believe they should. Werther in actual combat or not, we know
how to look from our role models in the movies.

> If we switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line,
> we see this:


http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6

> OK, he's looking back, and he's riding a fancy bike, but I hardly
> think you can accuse the rider of racer-posing, since he is in the
> decidedly unnatural-for-racing position of having one foot on the
> ground and looking back. Also, no team colors on his jersey.


I see no bicycles on that web page.

Jobst Brandt
 
On 20 Oct 2006 04:12:24 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

[Ryan Cousineau wrote]

>> If we switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line,
>> we see this:

>
> http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6
>
>> OK, he's looking back, and he's riding a fancy bike, but I hardly
>> think you can accuse the rider of racer-posing, since he is in the
>> decidedly unnatural-for-racing position of having one foot on the
>> ground and looking back. Also, no team colors on his jersey.

>
>I see no bicycles on that web page.
>
>Jobst Brandt


Dear Jobst,

Ya gotta follow Ryan's directions for this link:

http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6

"Switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line."

That means click on "fall cycling" on the left-hand menu.

Cheers,

Carl Fogel
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> Ryan Cousineau writes:
>
> >>>>>> I'm with you on that except that I use my parka on my summer
> >>>>>> tour in the Alps where it can snow any day of the year and
> >>>>>> often does as you can see from the pictures at:

>
> http://www.paloaltobicycles.com/alps_photos/f83.html
>
> >>>>>> For that reason I have a more stringent rule on what works.

>
> >>>>>> 1. It must be water proof.

>
> >>>>>> 2. It must have a hood that can be cinched down so that only
> >>>>>> eyes and nose are exposed.

>
> >>>>>> 3. It should be double layered, the inner layer can be mesh but
> >>>>>> must insulate the outer skin from the rider's arms to
> >>>>>> prevent freezing hands.

>
> >>>>>> 4. Velcro closure on sleeves and over the zipper down the front.

>
> >>>>>> 5. No vents or slots. Climbing can be done with the front
> >>>>>> partially open even in rain.

>
> >>>>>> 6. No Gore-Tex, the outer layer of which gets wet and doesn't
> >>>>>> dry readily, and the same goes for condensation on the
> >>>>>> inside. Breathing is illusory for someone climbing hills on
> >>>>>> a bicycle.

>
> >>>>>> 7. Bonus: Stiff and tight fitting enough so it does not flap in
> >>>>>> the wind when descending.

>
> >>>>>> Flapping sleeves and body is the greatest loss of warmth from
> >>>>>> forced convection. Next time when descending, hold the arms so
> >>>>>> the jacket remains still and notice how much warmer it is.

>
> >>>>>> Unfortunately, the people who make bicycle jackets haven't
> >>>>>> tried descending a 20km alpine pass when it's snowing... or at
> >>>>>> least not with an understanding of why it is as cold as it is.
> >>>>>> Most jackets have no adequate neck and head covering and have a
> >>>>>> body to hold Santa Clause with many layers of clothing.

>
> >>>>> I have been very happy with my "racing" jacket (a Louis Garneau
> >>>>> Windtex), which is a form-fitting jacket with no vents, elastic
> >>>>> cuffs, and a collar (but no hood). On its own, it is remarkably
> >>>>> warm, rain-resistant, and combined with a jersey, is warm down
> >>>>> to at least zero.

>
> http://louisgarneau.com/eng/ctm_catalog.asp?catalogue=C7
>
> >>>> The main page of this web site is a compendium of grimacing
> >>>> posing racers as is common in today's bicycling press. That's
> >>>> too bad, because there are many imitators out there emulating
> >>>> that appearance, even looking over their shoulder to see if an
> >>>> imagined chase group is catching up. Can't we just ride bike
> >>>> instead of so much posturing?

>
> >>> You have a strong opinion of posing. It must be said that the
> >>> splash page you object to is for Garneau's "Custom" line, which is
> >>> to say, directly aimed at clubs doing bulk orders of team kit. I
> >>> can't vouch for the tri-guy, but all the other pics I can identify
> >>> as being one of the elite teams LG sponsors: Jittery Joe's (US Div
> >>> III, I think), Garneau Optik (Quebec team, possibly espoir-level),
> >>> and Boyuges Telecom (recently seen contesting the Tour de France).
> >>> In fact, except for one training-ride shot of Jittery Joe's, I'm
> >>> pretty sure all those pictures were taken in the heat of
> >>> competition.

>
> >> So what are you getting at? Riders today spend much time looking
> >> right just cruising around or racing. It's all Hollywood and they
> >> don't even recognize it anymore.

>
> > My point is that these are photos of actual racers in actual race
> > conditions advertising a clothing line specifically aimed at cycling
> > clubs, a great number of which (probably the majority of their
> > orders) are racing-oriented.

>
> Yes, as I say they are emulating some movie star role grimacing as
> they believe they should. Werther in actual combat or not, we know
> how to look from our role models in the movies.


Jobst, I don't know how they did it in your day, but they all look like
they're pulling about the same ridiculous race faces that, I assure you,
come quite naturally to me after about five minutes in the red zone.

Most of them are wearing sunglasses, which may be what makes them look
more posed than you'd expect, but could you please name which of these
riders seems, well, unnaturally race-facey to you?

Here's some pictures from a recent B-group cyclocross race:

http://descantes.com/slideshow/20060923EVCROSS/MEN B/

I apologize for the rotten interface. I would give you the hint that
clicking on the "next" button repeatedly pretty much as fast as you can
will fast-forward the slideshow about as fast as you can click.

I encourage you to pause a moment on slides 46 and 47 in that show:
you'll see a bunch of pretty classic race-face poses: open mouths
(because you get more air that way), eyes focused on an object of
interest which is not the camera (because it's a race, and you're
interested in not crashing), and bodies in fluid but frenzied motion
(because it's a race).

I can assure you that the subject in slides 46 and 47 was not trying to
put on a face. That same open-mouthed, looking-up-the-road face appears
in virtually every picture of that rider I have been able to find.

Look through all 90 of those photos: they look like virtually every
heat-of-the-race photo I've ever seen, including ones dating back to the
fixed-gear era of road racing, and at every level from Novice Women to
ProTour champions.

Don't believe me? Here's the Women's C race:

http://descantes.com/slideshow/20060923EVCROSS/WOMEN C/

Note the open mouths, eyes focused off in the distance, and general
sense of exertion.

The only difference I see on the Louis Garneau page is that the
photographer or the creative director or the web designer has selected
for photos with a minimum of dopey looks on their faces. I can't
particularly think that riders caught with goofy looks is emblematic of
anything. Any photographer who takes a reasonable number of candid
photos is going to have an awful lot of pictures where a half-

Actually, here's a photo where the rider has a very distinctive look on
his face:

http://descantes.com/2005/HarrisRoubaix/

I don't see Garneau seeking such pictures out to advertise his apparel.
It doesn't really say "nice jersey" to me.

> > If we switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line,
> > we see this:

>
> http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6
>
> > OK, he's looking back, and he's riding a fancy bike, but I hardly
> > think you can accuse the rider of racer-posing, since he is in the
> > decidedly unnatural-for-racing position of having one foot on the
> > ground and looking back. Also, no team colors on his jersey.

>
> I see no bicycles on that web page.
>
> Jobst Brandt


Whoops. As Carl points out, there's no direct link for the Fall Cycling
splash page, which one must activate separately. I am apparently cursed
by bad web navigation today.

By the way, I looked through your photos, and there is very little
race-face in them. However, this is because the pictures mostly fall
into three categories:

1) rider facing away from the camera
2) rider a small part of a wide shot designed to feature the gorgeous
scenery. Indeed, in some of these shots one can play "where's the
cyclist?" for a few moments. This makes for pretty pictures, but not
ones likely to feature in a bicycle clothing catalog.
3) riders posed smiling beside mountain pass signs. Also fun, but you're
not riding.

I found one or two photos where a cyclist's face was discernible, and
they do seem to be smiling. They also don't seem to be going all-out,
but I wouldn't expect that, given that these are fun jaunts through the
Alps rather than serious attempts to win the Men's "C" fourth prize
(which, at the last race I attended, was not even enough money to cover
the entry fee -- either way, I didn't place in the money).

--
Ryan Cousineau [email protected] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> On 19 Oct 2006 17:41:54 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >If we switch to the splash page for the generic "Fall cycling" line, we
> >see this:
> >
> >http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6
> >
> >Okay, he's looking back, and he's riding a fancy bike, but I hardly
> >think you can accuse the rider of racer-posing, since he is in the
> >decidedly unnatural-for-racing postion of having one foot on the ground
> >and looking back. Also, no team colors on his jersey.

>
> [snip]
>
> Dear Ryan,
>
> Also, he's stopped in the traffic lane of what looks like a highway,
> his rear wheel within inches of a yellow no-passing stripe.
>
> Caption: Gee, I hope that pickup doing 80 mph swerves around me!


Heh. My proposal: Does this contrast stitching make my butt look fat?

Actually, I quite like the contrast stitching. But I also own a blue
bicycle with red bar tape on one side, and black bar tape on the other.

> It's not quite as bad as posing in the middle of a 4-way intersection
> beneath a traffic light, but it does support the theory that models
> and fashion photographers are airheads.
>
> Love the crisp-edged shadows from the artificial lighting on a cloudy
> day.


That shadow came from all-natural lightning, I'm sure.

Ooh! Ooh! I found that most of the products have a "link to this page"
link. Here's one that I think illustrates that, plus some other
important factors:

http://louisgarneau.com/eng/catalog.asp?catalogue=HH6&section=FC&subsecti
on=043&style_no=1493294

Note that this is a cap which I think meets all of Jobst's hood-based
requirements, and I also think he will approve of the look on the
model's face.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email protected] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
 

>I am looking for something that is:
>
>b) HIGHLY BREATHABLE
>a) Bright in colour /reflective at night
>c) ultra-Compact
>d) nearly(+) waterproof
>e) COOL
>
>Plus ideally:
>f) aerodyamic/elastic??
>g) fairly durable?



As far as I know, elastic and waterproof are mutually
exclusive, unless you want to bike in neoprene. Hmmm, maybe. If you
then had any tire problems, you could cut out pieces for patches and
boots.

J&G makes jackets for police bike divisions. Their breathable
rain jacket is streamlined and looks a lot better than it does in
their picture. It has tons of vents, which is important, since
breathable doesn't keep you from sweating or overheating, it just
keeps the inside surface from getting slick.

J&G:
http://www.bicycleclothing.com/Waterproof-Breathable-Rain-Jackets.html


I personally don't care for a racing cut in a waterproof covering, as
I find it's good to have some air circulation. A bit of wind flapping
is tolerable; it's a commute, not the Tour de France. It's also nice
to be able to get off the bike and walk around without looking like a
member of a UFO flight crew. For such reasons my preference is the
Burley Rock Point.

Burley:
http://www.burley.com/products/raingear/default.html


In colder weather, a blaze orange water and wind resistant fleece
hunting jacket does the trick. Mine came from Cabela's, but they sadly
no longer make any like it.






You got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there.


- Yogi Berra
 
Snortley wrote:

> As far as I know, elastic and waterproof are mutually
> exclusive


Not so, there are quite a few laminate and coated waterproofs that are
elastic, though we're not talking lycra-type stretchiness here.

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email protected] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
 
[email protected] wrote:
>
> The hood is needed to cover the neck and cheeks or you can get off the
> bicycle and quit as many riders did when Andy Hampsten got a change of
> clothes and a hooded parka on the Gavia summit for his GdI win. I
> take it you have not descended in snow or you would know that the hood
> is essential to stay on the bicycle.
>
> I watched the GdI come over the Stelvio in the 1970's and on that day
> there was no broom wagon nor any check on how riders other than the
> leaders finished, in a car or otherwise. Charley Gaul had a hooded
> jacket but others didn't and finished in Bormio not on the bicycle.
>
> My friend and I descended to the east with appropriate parkas and
> gloves. On my first such endeavor on Mt. Evans CO, I could not
> descend from for lack of a hood, there being a biting wind with light
> snow on my neck. We were able to get a ride in a car. That's were I
> learned my lesson.
>


Hmmm, you must be a weather wimp. I've done long descents in the snow
many times never having owned a jacket with a hood.

Greg

--
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons