Billy Fish said:
Again davidmc, that all sounds like great workers of the world unite stuff but it really has no relevance to current economic conditions. The fact that Bill Gates is worth an obscene amount of money doesn't necessarily mean that everyone else employed at Microsoft is working for substandard pay. Generally speaking, your employers at your big blue chip corporations are making a pretty good buck.
You conveniently picked a well managed co. to further your arguument. How many buisinessmen give away 8 billion dollars to a foundation
Not many. It still stands that ceo/worker pay is at @300-350/1 (
extrememly higher for other companies). This is unparalelled in American history. I worked for a company that had a self-imposed cieling pay for ceo's not to go above a certain ratio.
"Executive compensation has soared over the last twenty-five years, especially in the 1990s. In contrast, the typical worker’s wage fell in the early 1990s and rose from the mid-1990s until the recent recession. From 1989 to 2000, the compensation of the average chief executive officer
grew 342%. CEO compensation was lower in 2003 than in 2000, yet CEOs in major companies still earned 185 times more than the average worker, up from 71 times in 1989.
This rising extravagance of executive pay is a distinctly American phenomenon: U.S. CEOs make about three times as much as their counterparts abroad.
CEO Pay & CEO-Worker Ratios
CEOs at the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles saw increases in
compensation (16.1% at the median) from 2000 to 2003. From 1992 (the first
year of data for all but the average CEO) to 2003,
the median CEO received an 80.8% raise. In contrast,
the median workers’ hourly wage rose 8.7%. In 1965, it took a CEO two weeks to earn a worker’s annual pay. The ratio of CEO to worker compensation tumbled from 2000 to 2002 as CEO compensation fell, then rose to 185 in 2003, a lower ratio than at the 2000 peak (300) but still far higher than the pay gap between CEOs and average workers that prevailed in the mid-1960s (24) or late 1970s (35)."
As for Rome, there were a lot of things that contributed to its downfall, overindulgence was probably low on the totem pole of factors. As for CAFTA or NAFTA, free trade is what makes the world go round and protectionism simply doesn't work. Never has and never will.
Protectionism worked for along time, up until the 20th cen., in this country