wheelist said:
Yea, you did, he was.
Democratic John KERRY 57,288,974
Republican George BUSH 60,608,582
Independent Ralph NADER 406,924
http://election.cbsnews.com/election2004/
"President" George Walker Bush needs to be shot in the head.
- Thread starter BimmsAndBices
- Start date
Yea, you did, he was.
Democratic John KERRY 57,288,974
Republican George BUSH 60,608,582
Independent Ralph NADER 406,924
http://election.cbsnews.com/election2004/
MODERATOR ROLE :
I HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO REMOVE THIS THREAD BY ONE MEMBER BECAUSE THAT MEMBER IS OF THE VIEW THAT THIS THREAD IS DEROGATORY.
WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBERS HERE I WILL BIN THIS THREAD IF THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS?
I HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO REMOVE THIS THREAD BY ONE MEMBER BECAUSE THAT MEMBER IS OF THE VIEW THAT THIS THREAD IS DEROGATORY.
WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBERS HERE I WILL BIN THIS THREAD IF THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS?
I object.If george walker bush feels that this thread is derogatory of him,he has the right to logon and explain why.If anyone else feels it's derogatory they also have the right to publicly explain why.Noone is forcing them to read it.limerickman said:
Hell, I don't care. I was just testing the first amendment. And no, I am not going to kill Bush. It would be better for some homeless, deranged, diseased 95 year old with nothing to lose to do it.limerickman said:
in addition, bush has publicly stated he reserves this right of puttin' one in someone's ear for himself and his minions!
if they be "high value". this has recently been expanded in scope and re-stated as well. in flagrant violation of international law:
http://newsfromrussia.com/usa/2003/03/25/44961.html
maybe he does log on, anyone noticed a poster with chronic syntax impediment?
if they be "high value". this has recently been expanded in scope and re-stated as well. in flagrant violation of international law:
http://newsfromrussia.com/usa/2003/03/25/44961.html
maybe he does log on, anyone noticed a poster with chronic syntax impediment?
stevebaby said:I object.If george walker bush feels that this thread is derogatory of him,he has the right to logon and explain why.If anyone else feels it's derogatory they also have the right to publicly explain why.Noone is forcing them to read it.
ptlwp said:
If someone was to punch you in the face repeatedly that would be an act of violence, even if they never said that they were going to hit you. Furthermore Bush has repeatedly labelled this these exercises in mass murder as being part of "The War on Terror" - his words, not mine. Clearly GWB would have us believe that he is fighting a war.
Furthermore attacking and invading another country is an act of War as (as defined by the Nuremburg trials and subsequent conventions and UN charter). For the purposes of interpreting the laws of the land the US Administration has already successfully asserted that the President can act with impunity. I think GWB would be an idiot to try for a third term, but then again I thought he was an idiot to attack Afghanistan and a bigger idiot to attack Iraq.
bush has repeatedly made these hostile "we are at war" statements, even in delusional moments absurdly comparing his invasive agressions to wwII.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3771401.stm
as for a third term, why not? in the preying on of a nation's fear reflex, the exploitation of misguided patriotism, and in the interest of what is irrationaly defined as national security, just look what has been foisted upon us thus far in the way of unlawfuly disregarding the us constitution as well as international law!
with the full support of the propaganda of the corporate sponsored government censored media, and both parties of what passes for the us
"two party" system, i must add...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3771401.stm
as for a third term, why not? in the preying on of a nation's fear reflex, the exploitation of misguided patriotism, and in the interest of what is irrationaly defined as national security, just look what has been foisted upon us thus far in the way of unlawfuly disregarding the us constitution as well as international law!
with the full support of the propaganda of the corporate sponsored government censored media, and both parties of what passes for the us
"two party" system, i must add...
darkboong said:
Similar threads
