afgahnis did come to dc to visit clinton in black limos, the deals for their resources were not to be cut to their liking. no preferential treatment was extended as to the "legit" govt's like the saudi's.
this ****** a lot of us supported "freedom fighters" off, just one of the instigating factors the us faces today.
for the us to fight terroism, it must look inward,
where are un sanctions ignored?
where is the us supporting anti arab military?
what punitive us sanctions are being applied?
where are oppresive gov'ts being given favored status for oil?
where is the us applying religious discrimination?
what are the human rights matters reported by amnesty international against the us?
how can an enemy be not of a nation but of "insurgents" within a nation?
how can the us truly want what is best for a nation yet refuse to cease occupation?
true diplomacy means more than coercing a "coalition of the willing" to invade and occupy under false pretense...
until these issues are addressed, the us cannot claim moral high ground as an example of freedom, and remains led by a quasi-imperialist fascist syndicate.
Colorado Ryder said:
Yes Clinton did so well at apprehending the perpetrators that they came back and did it again. But then I guess that was another of your memory lapses.