No Helmets Needed?



Edward Dolan wrote:

>
>>I would be happy to continue the conversation, but I suggest we take it
>>off list, it's no longer on topic here......

>
>
> Why would I want to take anything off list with you. You are a typical
> Canadian, a liberal who has been brainwashed by your liberal media. I would
> sooner talk to the wall than talk to you.
>


Thread ended.

W
 
"The Wogster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>>
>>>I would be happy to continue the conversation, but I suggest we take it
>>>off list, it's no longer on topic here......

>>
>>
>> Why would I want to take anything off list with you. You are a typical
>> Canadian, a liberal who has been brainwashed by your liberal media. I
>> would sooner talk to the wall than talk to you.
>>

>
> Thread ended.
>
> W


A thread only ends when the Great Ed Dolan decides to end it, not some
Canadian jerk who names himself The Wogster and sings off with a freaking W.

By and large, I do not have any time for those who do not use their real
names. I have ever found them to be scoundrels and knaves (a few exceptions)
and almost without exception to be know-nothing liberals. They eat, drink
and sleep liberal pabulum all their miserable lives.

So what is a freaking wogster? I guess if I were him I would want to remain
anonymous and nondescript as best I could too, buy why choose a name that
will not resonate with anyone except yourself. I refer you to my signature
for a real person who does not run and hide behind an idiotic user name and
then sign off with a single pitiful letter.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>
> It is a question of ethics, but decorum is even more important. In fact,
> when you get to be my age you will realize that appearances are everything.
> Who knows or cares what anyone is really like? Even married couples are
> strangers to one another.


So it really doesn't matter how we style ourselves here.

> Truth to tell, I do not even think my cats
> understand me.


What do you expect from a brain the size of a walnut?

> They look at me very cross much of the time even though I
> dote on them. Why is that I wonder!


I hear they're very sensitive to smell.

> No, when he gets fired up he will say really outrageous things that no one
> else would dare say. That in my book is entertainment!


Haw haw haw! "No one else dares!" Reminds me of the time howie stern
had to apologize to the hispanics for making fun of
selena-what's-her-face's death...gee, who would have thought that 80%
of the market for flatulence, fake tits, and ethnic humor made by a Jew
is...hispanic! I bet most of bush limhog's fans are transvestites.

> It is somewhat interesting to me that someone living in NYC would find
> Keillor at all entertaining. His humor is quite countrified, even folk like.
> He is far removed from the canyons of NYC.
> [...]


Y'all are very quaint to us. We marvel at life in Wonder Bread
Country.

> But that would quickly reduce to being nothing but a blog as I can't imagine
> anyone coming to visit me when I all I would ever do is tell them about all
> their shortcomings, like I am doing with you.
> [...]


Did I have a shortcoming? Where?

> OK, so be just another ghost on Usenet. Who cares? I guess maybe if my name
> were Jack I would not want anyone one to know about it either. Who ever
> heard of King Jack? On the other hand, King Edward is well known. Yes, it is
> nice to a have a name you can be proud of and wear with distinction.


Funny you say distinction...I could never tell one long-haired fat guy
in tights from another.

> I wonder if I shouldn't drop the Ed in my signature in favor of Edward? I
> mean, it is just such a Great Name! However, there are still some few souls
> on Usenet who do not think I am such a bad fellow and Ed is more familiar
> than Edward. Less off-putting you know, even though I do regard myself as
> worthy of being placed along side all those King Edwards. I really should be
> addressed as Your Highness or Your Majesty accompanied by much bowing and
> scraping.


Nah, they wouldn't really mean it. That's the trouble with servants --
you never know if they really mean "good morning."

> I have never for the life of me been able to figure out what I am
> doing living in the 21st century when I am clearly a man of the 18th century
> and of a royal personage no less.


Me myself, I've always felt that I was born five hundred years too
early. Trolling usenet will be nothing compared to bothering people
from your jet-pack.

> No "hey there" for me!


You prefer "yo' highness"?

> More importantly, one liners will not cut it here in the long run. Try to
> enlarge on your thoughts. Most particularly, try to avoid just one sentence
> per paragraph. This marks you as a quipper (is this a word - one who makes
> quips), but not necessarily a wit. Most of us should never strive for wit.
> It is clearly beyond us as it requires a very high order of intelligence.
> Even I, the Great Ed Dolan, am not capable of wit. Alas, I can only do low
> grades of parody.


Sarcasm is indeed the laziest form of rebuttal.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


What you need is a website! Like so:

http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp
 
Curiously, no gift shoppe link.

But they are looking for a "carpet planner" at ~US$30K/yr.!


Then again, I wonder how much they pay their IRA moles, heh-heh.



Dave Larrington wrote:
>
>
> Gagh! My eyes! MY EYES!!
>
> (join republican movement)
>
> --
> Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
> The best way to confuse a Daily Mail reader is to tell it that
> paedophiles form the staple diet of asylum seekers.
 
"NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>
>> It is a question of ethics, but decorum is even more important. In fact,
>> when you get to be my age you will realize that appearances are
>> everything.
>> Who knows or cares what anyone is really like? Even married couples are
>> strangers to one another.

>
> So it really doesn't matter how we style ourselves here.


I have just told you above that appearances are everything. Therefore how we
style ourselves is the ONLY thing that matters. Jeez! Learn how to read why
don't you.
[...]

>> No, when he Rush L:imbaugh] gets fired up he will say really outrageous
>> things that no one
>> else would dare say. That in my book is entertainment!

>
> Haw haw haw! "No one else dares!" Reminds me of the time howie stern
> had to apologize to the hispanics for making fun of
> selena-what's-her-face's death...gee, who would have thought that 80%
> of the market for flatulence, fake tits, and ethnic humor made by a Jew
> is...hispanic! I bet most of bush limhog's fans are transvestites.


Stern is a scum bag which only other scum bags follow. Congratulations! I
have now got you down for a scum bag and that is how I will treat you from
now one. Are you also a Jew scumbag?
[...]

>> More importantly, one liners will not cut it here in the long run. Try to
>> enlarge on your thoughts. Most particularly, try to avoid just one
>> sentence
>> per paragraph. This marks you as a quipper (is this a word - one who
>> makes
>> quips), but not necessarily a wit. Most of us should never strive for
>> wit.
>> It is clearly beyond us as it requires a very high order of intelligence.
>> Even I, the Great Ed Dolan, am not capable of wit. Alas, I can only do
>> low
>> grades of parody.

>
> Sarcasm is indeed the laziest form of rebuttal.


Parody is not the same thing as sarcasm. Consult a dictionary for the
difference. Your sarcasm goes nowhere. Did you not read what I said above
about one liners?
[...]

> What you need is a website! Like so:
>
> http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp


I NEVER go to links referred to me by those I do not trust. Elementary, my
dear Watson!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>
> I have just told you above that appearances are everything. Therefore how we
> style ourselves is the ONLY thing that matters. Jeez! Learn how to read why
> don't you.
> [...]


You just told me that even couples are strangers to one another. So
appearances don't mean anything. As IBM used to say, "ThiMk!"

> Stern is a scum bag which only other scum bags follow. Congratulations! I
> have now got you down for a scum bag and that is how I will treat you from
> now one. Are you also a Jew scumbag?
> [...]


Hehe...I'd like to recommend Aristotelian Logic to you, but I'm afraid
you'd run out and shoot the part-time bookstore clerk.

> Parody is not the same thing as sarcasm. Consult a dictionary for the
> difference. Your sarcasm goes nowhere. Did you not read what I said above
> about one liners?
> [...]


Did I say they were one and the same?

As for appealing to dictionaries, how would you know if a word is
misspelled?

> I NEVER go to links referred to me by those I do not trust. Elementary, my
> dear Watson!


Oh, goodie, here's another one, then:

http://newyork.craigslist.org/brx/rnr/124975689.html

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


It's 2006...maybe you oughta add a .gif or something there.
 
The Wogster wrote:
>
>
> Ah, Paperclip, the program that takes a $3,000 computer with 512MB of
> ram, and a 4GHz processor and turns it into a Vic-20.
>
> W



LOL -- The Missing Link! Old Commodore users who subscribed to "Info"
mag reincarnated as 'bent riders!
 
NYC XYZ wrote:
> The Wogster wrote:
>
>>
>>Ah, Paperclip, the program that takes a $3,000 computer with 512MB of
>>ram, and a 4GHz processor and turns it into a Vic-20.
>>
>>W

>
>
>
> LOL -- The Missing Link! Old Commodore users who subscribed to "Info"
> mag reincarnated as 'bent riders!
>

Naw, not a 'bent rider, although I wouldn't mind trying to ride one...
I remember the Vic-20 though, I actually worked for Commodore Business
Machines the summer they brought out the C-64, did some programming
with a demo that had serial number 6.

As for computer mags, kinda liked Byte myself....

W
 
"NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have just told you above that appearances are everything. Therefore how
>> we
>> style ourselves is the ONLY thing that matters. Jeez! Learn how to read
>> why
>> don't you.
>> [...]

>
> You just told me that even couples are strangers to one another. So
> appearances don't mean anything. As IBM used to say, "ThiMk!"


Yes, both are true. Therefore, appearances matter. Who we really are is
unknown, even to ourselves.

>> Stern is a scum bag which only other scum bags follow. Congratulations! I
>> have now got you down for a scum bag and that is how I will treat you
>> from
>> now one. Are you also a Jew scumbag?
>> [...]

>
> Hehe...I'd like to recommend Aristotelian Logic to you, but I'm afraid
> you'd run out and shoot the part-time bookstore clerk.


Aristotle was wrong about most things under the sun as was Plato and
Socrates. But still they were superior to the Orientals that had existed up
to that time. It took the Renaissance before man began to think at all
logically about things due to the emergence of scientific thinking.

Yup, he is Jew all right and a New York Jew too - the worst kind. He and
Howard Stern are birds of a feather - liberal and scummy!

>> Parody is not the same thing as sarcasm. Consult a dictionary for the
>> difference. Your sarcasm goes nowhere. Did you not read what I said above
>> about one liners?
>> [...]

>
> Did I say they were one and the same?


We will never know will we because you did not include the pertinent passage
to which reference was being made. Like all half-educated slobs, you do not
know how to edit.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>
> Yes, both are true. Therefore, appearances matter. Who we really are is
> unknown, even to ourselves.


Appearances only matter to fools.

> Aristotle was wrong about most things under the sun as was Plato and
> Socrates.


Actually, that's you.

It was a rediscovery of Aristotle that lead to the Renaissance. Prior
to that, the Church was all about Plato.

Like I said, I would...but I'm afraid you'd only go postal in a
bookstore.

> But still they were superior to the Orientals that had existed up
> to that time


Of course, that all depends on what the Dickens you mean by "superior"
in this case.

(Don't bother -- it's rhetorical. Was only reminded of a program last
night on PBS about that Egyptian Pharaoh who believed in one god, and
how the narrator used the most outlandish superlatives without
qualification or explanation: "the greatest empire ever," "changed the
world forever," etc. For your own much-needed information, you'll want
to remember Oxford don Joseph Needham's eleven-volume "Science and
Civilization in Ancient China.")

>. It took the Renaissance before man began to think at all
> logically about things due to the emergence of scientific thinking.


No, the ancient Greeks were already codifying formal logic. And as far
as the empiricism of scientific thinking, nothing could be done without
its actual practice, whatever the circumstances of its actual
codification as theory, so the fact is that it was already

> Yup, he is Jew all right and a New York Jew too - the worst kind. He and
> Howard Stern are birds of a feather - liberal and scummy!


Who's "he"? What are you talking about now?

> We will never know will we because you did not include the pertinent passage
> to which reference was being made.


Never heard of google?

> Like all half-educated slobs, you do not
> know how to edit.
> [...]


I was rather hoping that you wouldn't forget your own ******** so soon!

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


"Where all the men are weak, all the women are ugly, and the
children...below average!"
 
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >...
> > I NEVER go to links referred to me by those I do not trust. Elementary, my
> > dear Watson!

>
> Oh, goodie, here's another one, then:
>
> http://newyork.craigslist.org/brx/rnr/124975689.html


I get the point of the upper left and lower right quadrants, but what
does the "camel toe" have to do with Mr. Ed?

--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
 
The Wogster wrote:
> ...
> Ah, Paperclip, the program that takes a $3,000 computer with 512MB of
> ram, and a 4GHz processor and turns it into a Vic-20.


The last time I used a Vic-20, I was also riding a Peugeot P-8.

--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
 
Johnny Sunset wrote:
>
>
> I get the point of the upper left and lower right quadrants, but what
> does the "camel toe" have to do with Mr. Ed?
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley




The ride of your life!
 
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Johnny Sunset wrote:
> >
> >
> > I get the point of the upper left and lower right quadrants, but what
> > does the "camel toe" have to do with Mr. Ed?

>
> The ride of your life!


I don't think "Saint Ed Dolan" will be riding anything like that
anytime soon!

--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
 
Johnny Sunset wrote:
>
>
> I don't think "Saint Ed Dolan" will be riding anything like that
> anytime soon!
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley




Besides, the hills are too steep for him.
 
"NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, both are true. Therefore, appearances matter. Who we really are is
>> unknown, even to ourselves.

>
> Appearances only matter to fools.


You have so far appeared rather poorly here on these newsgroups.

>> Aristotle was wrong about most things under the sun as was Plato and
>> Socrates.

>
> Actually, that's you.
>
> It was a rediscovery of Aristotle that lead to the Renaissance. Prior
> to that, the Church was all about Plato.
>
> Like I said, I would...but I'm afraid you'd only go postal in a
> bookstore.
>
>> But still they were superior to the Orientals that had existed up
>> to that time

>
> Of course, that all depends on what the Dickens you mean by "superior"
> in this case.
>
> (Don't bother -- it's rhetorical. Was only reminded of a program last
> night on PBS about that Egyptian Pharaoh who believed in one god, and
> how the narrator used the most outlandish superlatives without
> qualification or explanation: "the greatest empire ever," "changed the
> world forever," etc. For your own much-needed information, you'll want
> to remember Oxford don Joseph Needham's eleven-volume "Science and
> Civilization in Ancient China.")


The Ancients were human beings of course, but sufficiently different from us
in their thinking that we need not concern ourselves with them. Even the
Greeks and the Romans were not much better.The only kind of civilization I
care about began with the West at about the time of the Renaissance in
Italy.

>>. It took the Renaissance before man began to think at all
>> logically about things due to the emergence of scientific thinking.

>
> No, the ancient Greeks were already codifying formal logic. And as far
> as the empiricism of scientific thinking, nothing could be done without
> its actual practice, whatever the circumstances of its actual
> codification as theory, so the fact is that it was already


Did you know that Aristotle thought women had fewer teeth in their mouth
than men. It apparently never occurred to him to look inside a woman's mouth
and count the teeth. What do you make of that? So much for logic!

The High Middle Ages were quite innovative in very many technical ways, but
still they lacked scientific thinking. Technology is not science and is
always severely limited in what it can know.

>> Yup, he is Jew all right and a New York Jew too - the worst kind. He and
>> Howard Stern are birds of a feather - liberal and scummy!

>
> Who's "he"? What are you talking about now?


You indicated that you thought Howard Stern was the cat's pajamas in
contradistinction to Rush Limbaugh. Stern is scum and Limbaugh is not. Need
more be said?

>> We will never know will we because you did not include the pertinent
>> passage
>> to which reference was being made.

>
> Never heard of google?


The main thing you need to know about me is that I am the laziest person in
the world. Not only that, but I take great pride in being so lazy.
Therefore, I will NEVER go back and look up anything. It either gets posted
right in the first place or it is lost forever as far as I am concerned.

>> Like all half-educated slobs, you do not
>> know how to edit.
>> [...]

>
> I was rather hoping that you wouldn't forget your own ******** so soon!


Nope, include everything that you want me to respond to and I will. I do not
bother to even remember what I say from one moment to the next. I am too
Great for that. I leave the trifling details of life to my inferiors, and
their numbers are legion.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>
> You have so far appeared rather poorly here on these newsgroups.


Which statement completes the syllogism with the conclusion that you
are, therefore, a fool.

> The Ancients were human beings of course, but sufficiently different from us
> in their thinking that we need not concern ourselves with them. Even the
> Greeks and the Romans were not much better.The only kind of civilization I
> care about began with the West at about the time of the Renaissance in
> Italy.


Which looked back to Greece, which was inspired by the people of the
Levant, who drew from ancient Sumer....

> Did you know that Aristotle thought women had fewer teeth in their mouth
> than men. It apparently never occurred to him to look inside a woman's mouth
> and count the teeth. What do you make of that? So much for logic!


That was about RIBS, actually, and it didn't concern Aristotle.

> The High Middle Ages were quite innovative in very many technical ways, but
> still they lacked scientific thinking. Technology is not science and is
> always severely limited in what it can know.


And you're telling me this because...?

> You indicated that you thought Howard Stern was the cat's pajamas in
> contradistinction to Rush Limbaugh. Stern is scum and Limbaugh is not. Need
> more be said?


Yeah, for your own benefit, so that you get your own story straight:
limhog is not scummy and liberal like joo stern?

Then who the hell is "he"??

> The main thing you need to know about me is that I am the laziest person in
> the world. Not only that, but I take great pride in being so lazy.
> Therefore, I will NEVER go back and look up anything. It either gets posted
> right in the first place or it is lost forever as far as I am concerned.


Lemme guess...you only ride along in a tandem 'bent.

> Nope, include everything that you want me to respond to and I will. I do not
> bother to even remember what I say from one moment to the next. I am too
> Great for that. I leave the trifling details of life to my inferiors, and
> their numbers are legion.


And how many cats do you have?

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


Maybe you should wear a helmet next time!
 
The Wogster wrote:
>
> Naw, not a 'bent rider, although I wouldn't mind trying to ride one...
> I remember the Vic-20 though, I actually worked for Commodore Business
> Machines the summer they brought out the C-64, did some programming
> with a demo that had serial number 6.


Ah, those were the days, I hear, when a game could be totally designed
by the programmer, who raked in most of the cash! I hope you had your
Richard Garriot moments.

Me, I was still to be introduced to a Commodore PET in Sixth Grade!

> As for computer mags, kinda liked Byte myself....


No wonder you ain't no 'bent rider! Probably use an Apple now, too.

> W
 
"NYC XYZ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>
>> You have so far appeared rather poorly here on these newsgroups.

>
> Which statement completes the syllogism with the conclusion that you
> are, therefore, a fool.


See what happens when you don't edit properly. No one will know what you are
talking about, other than that you have called me a fool and I have called
you as one who appears poorly on newsgroups.

>> The Ancients were human beings of course, but sufficiently different from
>> us
>> in their thinking that we need not concern ourselves with them. Even the
>> Greeks and the Romans were not much better.The only kind of civilization
>> I
>> care about began with the West at about the time of the Renaissance in
>> Italy.

>
> Which looked back to Greece, which was inspired by the people of the
> Levant, who drew from ancient Sumer....


Jeez, I never realized that civilizations are just games where the old
football gets passed from one to the next. You mean no people ever had any
originality. It was just all influences?

>> Did you know that Aristotle thought women had fewer teeth in their mouth
>> than men. It apparently never occurred to him to look inside a woman's
>> mouth
>> and count the teeth. What do you make of that? So much for logic!

>
> That was about RIBS, actually, and it didn't concern Aristotle.


Nonsense, that was what a professor of philosophy told me once in a college
class and professors are never wrong about anything.

>> The High Middle Ages were quite innovative in very many technical ways,
>> but
>> still they lacked scientific thinking. Technology is not science and is
>> always severely limited in what it can know.

>
> And you're telling me this because...?


Who knows why I saying what I am saying, Even I don't know. That is because
you do not know how to edit.

>> You indicated that you thought Howard Stern was the cat's pajamas in
>> contradistinction to Rush Limbaugh. Stern is scum and Limbaugh is not.
>> Need
>> more be said?

>
> Yeah, for your own benefit, so that you get your own story straight:
> limhog is not scummy and liberal like joo stern?


So why didn't you just say that in the first place instead of telling me
what a great Jew Stern is?
[...]

One-liner responses are for idiots and that seems to be all you are capable
of. I would like to introduce you to a guy here on ARBR who signs himself
Slugger. He is like you and the two of you should get along perfectly. But I
require intelligence in a correspondent. Furthermore, why bore and insult
these honorable newsgroups, otherwise known as RBM and ARBR.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota