[email protected] wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > Helmet fit is the first criteria. After that ventilation, then color.
> > Spending more doesn't increase protection, just comfort.
>
> Right. In fact, spending more almost always gets you _less_
> protection. More holes, less styrofoam, less impact protection. The
> most expensive helmets are the ones that barely pass the already low
> certification standards.
>
> Not that the advertisements will ever make _that_ clear!
>
>
Not to mention the fact that "more holes" doesn't necessarily equate to
better ventilation when actually riding (i.e., when there is actual
airflow). Nor does it necessarily equate to lighter weight (styrofoam
is pretty darn light, and the high-end, minimalist helmets are
necessarilly reinforced with heavier materials for structural reasons).
Helmets have become a fashion statement: "What does Lance (etc.)
ride?". And a conspicuous consumption issue: "Mine cost $189.99, what
did yours cost?".
IMO, spending close to $200 for a styrofoam and thin plastic shell
bucket that costs ~$10-15 (at most!) to manufacture and package is the
height of consumer suckerism.
IMO, YMMV (especially if you bought a "high-end" helmet ;-> ), etc.,
etc., etc.