how come the the guys up front ( besides Cavendish who is well bult ) of the tour guys and so "unbuilt" they have arms of my 12 year old nephew. And the skinny light guys that seem on top of cyclocross? I'm curious to see the top 10 tour leaders and thier weights.
Results of 2023 Stage 19 Giro 113 miles, 17,712 ft climbing (Top 5):
Rider | Weight (kg) | Time |
Santiago Buitrago | 59 | 5:28:07 |
Derek Gee | 76 | + 0:51 |
Magnus Cort Nielsen | 68 | + 1:46 |
Primoz Roglic | 65 | + 1:46 |
Geraint Thomas | 70 | + 1:49 |
The lightest weight rider in the top 35 is Matthew Riccitello at 55 kg and he finished at + 7:48 minutes. Well behind these guys.
The heaviest rider in the top 35 is Derek Gee at 76 kg finishing second place 51 seconds behind the winner.
Based on the results on this mountain stage, the lightweight riders have only marginal advantage. It isn't even clear it's the rider's weight the factor for the winner but the fact, the winning rider is Colombian. Colombians do excel at climbing due to having lots of big climbs to train at their home country and lifelong exposure and adaptation to high altitudes!
While we lightweight riders are known to possess higher power-to-weight ratio. We can only take advantage of it in shorter periods like in short Cyclocross races or attacking in the last few miles of a mountain race with a climbing finish. In short hill climb events, this is where the lightweight guys have clear and decisive advantage.
In amateur long climb events, the quality of your training will matter more than your weight.
In Tour de France everybody gets top-notch quality training, that's why weight can make a difference in seconds whether you end up in the podium or not but in terms of absolute performance, the differences over a long stage is only marginal at best.