Can you make it to the market on a bike?



In article <qE%[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

> Where I live the only roads prohibited for bicycles are interstate
> highways; every other road is legal and free.


Even the limited-access freeway near me has its shoulder open to
bicycles -- bikes are allowed on many miles of Interstates, boring and
noisy, but safe and direct.

> Get a good rear-view
> mirror, get out there, and get in the way. Every motorist that gets
> ****** off at you for slowing them down is one more "advocate" for bike
> lanes.


I'd prefer not to have bike lanes, I'd much rather have wide curb lanes
without the magical paint stripe.

Paint doesn't actually stop reckless drivers from hitting things, but it
does stop careful drivers from driving to the right when there isn't a
bike present. That means the bike lane doesn't get swept by passing
cars, so it builds up broken glass and radial tire wires.

--
[email protected] is Joshua Putnam
<http://www.phred.org/~josh/>
Updated Infrared Photography Gallery:
<http://www.phred.org/~josh/photo/ir.html>
 
On Aug 1, 11:12 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 11:54 am, William <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 1, 10:25 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > > On Aug 1, 10:43 am, donquijote1954 <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:

>
> > > > On Aug 1, 4:00 am, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > > > > Yes, there are some idiots who'll sit behind you and honk at you, but
> > > > > they won't run you down, because it might scratch the paintwork. If you
> > > > > push people off into bike lanes as a rule they will be far more maligned
> > > > > and looked down upon on the instances where they have no choice to use
> > > > > the roads, if they're typically in a bike lane instead.

>
> > > > > They don't help. We know they don't help as we can see them not
> > > > > helping. *HAVE YOU GOT THAT YET?*

>
> > > > You still avoiding my question: BIKE LANES OR NO BIKE LANES, HOW DO WE
> > > > BRING BIKE RIDERSHIP FROM THE AMERICAN OR BRITISH LEVES TO THE DUTCH
> > > > OR DANISH LEVELS?

>
> > > You see, you are thinking about the problem from the wrong direction.
> > > You are saying "biking is great, what is wrong with everyone else".
> > > Instead, you need to examine why other people don't bike and address
> > > that.

>
> > > Predominantly, I would think it is the combination of "no time to bike
> > > & no place to bike to". Most people won't bike to work if they get
> > > sweaty or if they work the night shift, etc. Bike lanes might
> > > partially address the "no place to bike to" issue, but not really.

>
> > > For example, I need to run out and get my kid some things for football
> > > practice. While we're at it we need to do some back-to-school
> > > shopping. Okay, that's simple and the kid is in great shape. I just
> > > need to run to the nearest sporting goods store. Fortunately, there's
> > > a small mall across the street. This trip is a bit unusually because
> > > I do 90% of my shopping at the nest Walmart. So ideally, this is
> > > bikeable. But the problem is, the nearest sporting goods store is
> > > about 45 miles away. That's about 15 miles past the Walmart. So at
> > > 10 mph (because of the hills and the purchases), you're talking at 9
> > > hour bike ride.

>
> > I don't blame you, biking works best
> > when everything is
> > more central and dense like a metro area.

>
> > > So I think your idea has merit, it just needs to be tweeked. The
> > > community didn't allow a Walmart because of a DOT right-of-way issue.
> > > But maybe if we had more Walmarts, so that they were closer to people,
> > > the people could bike to them easier. Plus if they put in
> > > SuperCenters with groceries, then more shopping could be done in 1
> > > trip.

>
> > > So I guess bike lanes are part of the problem, but having a place to
> > > go is the other part. Therefore, maybe you should lobby for more
> > > Walmarts -- and have them tied into bikeways -- to encourage shopping
> > > by bike.

>
> > Have you no sense of quality Pat? I guess that is implied when your
> > from nowhere land.

>
> I don't follow your logic. Of course I am from the middle of
> nowhere. That's great. Clean air. Clean water. Mountains in the
> background (okay, the Allegany's aren't exactly the Rockies). It is a
> nice, simple life. What else to I need. This is a great lifestyle.
> What "quality" am I missing? The Kleenex from Walmart is somehow
> worst than the Kleenex from the Kleenex Boutique? The $18 Harry
> Potter book I bought last week has different words in it than $32
> version in your corner bookstore? My backyard swimming pool is
> somehow less wet than your municipal one? My fruit-of-the-loom
> underwear are somehow less fruity than yours from the mall. Does a
> Timex keep different time than a Rolex -- it doesn't really matter to
> me, because I don't wear a watch.
>
> You might crave some imported, organic, fresh pasta only made by
> virgins on the hillsides of Italy. But regular pasta is fine by me.
> You don't need that stuff to live well. You only need it to fill the
> hollow spots in your sole. There's nothing wrong with simplicity.
> I'm not exactly a monk, but this definitely isn't Madison Ave. But
> that's what makes it nice.
>
> On Friday, a friend and I are thinking of throwing a canoe on the
> Allegany River and going a few miles, just for the heck of it. That's
> excitement around here.
>
> Besides, the Walmarts around here are pretty generous when it comes to
> youth sports. We'll hit up each of them during fundraising for each
> of the sports. It's not a lot, but they'll throw in $25 to $50 (each)
> any time they are asked -- and we ask them quite often. That buys
> stuff for the concession stand or for a raffle.
>
> So what about this "quality" thing?


Pat, Walmart is McDonalds of fast food. In *every* way. If you wanna
call that quality go right ahead. Just keep that bull **** out of the
city.
 
donquijote1954 wrote:

> Are you saying that those committed cyclists are stupid and that they
> don't know what they are asking for?


It's not a matter of intelligence, it's a matter of knowledge.
"Common sense" suggests segregated facilities will improve one's
lot (and in /some/ limited cases I agree they do), but just like
"common sense" indicating helmets substantially reduce serious head
injuries and compulsory seat belts must reduce road casualties it
turns out the effect in the real world doesn't know much about your
"common sense" and it is contarry to popular assumption and belief.

> Remember they are not kids, but
> real cyclists that tell you the real problems out there. How more real
> can you get?


The accident figures from segregated facilities that show us that
Real Cyclists suffer just as many Real Accidents on segregated
facilties (or rather, where they meet roads, as they inevitably do)
are just as real, and are far more representative than your small
sample quoted.

You really need to find out the effects of things before you start
proclaiming to the rooftops that they're The Answer.

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email protected] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
 
donquijote1954 wrote:

> Would you tell the people going into Iraq that it's a piece of cake?
> No, I guess... You tell them IT'S A WAR ZONE, and then you give them
> proper armor and ammunition to survive, right?


Certainly, on the grounds that Iraq is indeed a war zone, what with
the, ummmm, war going on there.

OTOH, I've just cycled down to the store to get a trolley load of
shopping. I used the road, I didn't wear any special clothing
aside from a cotton cap with a peak to keep the sun out of my eyes.
I didn't have any near misses, I wasn't scared. So saying it's a
war zone is total and utter bollocks.

You want to get people riding? Is telling them it's a war zone
going to help? If so, how? Going on about how dangerous cycling
is puts people off. We know that from helmet promotion campaigns
consistently putting people off. We know that from people citing
safety as a reason not to cycle. Do you think these people will
increase their /perceived/ danger fighting your "war" for you? I
don't.

You want to get people out of cars and onto bikes? Is
characterising them as morons with homicidal tendencies going to
win them over to your way of thinking? I doubt it.

My strategy is demonstrating that cycling is a safe, normal thing
that normal people can do in safety and without special armour.
Doesn't **** anyone much off, doesn't call people idiots and
antagonise them, doesn't characterise what I'm doing with
ridiculous and self evidently non-sensical hyperbole, doesn't
deamnd that they put themselves out and into perceived danger for
some cause. I think all of those things it doesn't do makes it a
positive way to proceed, unlike calling for things that don't help
and stridently getting on folks' cases.

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email protected] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
 
On Aug 1, 11:42 am, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:
> donquijote1954 wrote:
> > In other words, we need an identifying, conspicuous and explanatory T-
> > shirt that makes us part of an ORGANIZED CAMPAIGN. "In union there's
> > strength," you know.

>
> Within the union, yes, but you're trying to address people outside it.
> One way of putting off "normal people", IME, is being a strident
> activist. Look at recycling: green evangelists go on about it and not
> much happens, but if the Normal People next door are doing it then other
> Normal People will join in.


You want to aim at the average Joe and Jane out there. The Jane that
want's to do something about the environment and the Joe that wants to
save the buck in gas and insurance.

>
> > You want to make friends, not enemies.

>
> Absolutely. See above.
>
> > As for the profits, we can set up ALL of it to create more bike lanes
> > --adjacent or separated from the road.

>
> Even though we know they don't help. You still haven't taken that on
> board, but it's still true. Bike lanes are not the answer to anyone
> except the road paint industry.


The road paint industry doesn't have powerful lobbies up there. That's
why we don't have bike lanes.
 
On Aug 1, 12:12 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Have you no sense of quality Pat? I guess that is implied when your
> > from nowhere land.

>
> I don't follow your logic. Of course I am from the middle of
> nowhere. That's great.


Can you be in the middle of nowhere and have a Walmart next door?

I bet they got a section on bear hunting gear. ;)
 
On Aug 1, 12:59 pm, "Clive George" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "donquijote1954" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > On Aug 1, 11:07 am, "Clive George" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> >> There are other ways, but most are not what would be acceptable in a
> >> civilised culture - eg the one which was responsible for a large increase
> >> in
> >> riding in London unfortunately involved killing 52 people...

>
> > In what way? It sounds like terrorism to me...

>
> There's a good reason for that...
>
> (what it did was put people off using PT, so they gave bikes a try - it was
> summer.)


Letting bikes loose out on the roads can be dangerous. Better channel
them through bike lanes.
 
[email protected] wrote:


> I'd prefer not to have bike lanes, I'd much rather have wide curb lanes
> without the magical paint stripe.
>
> Paint doesn't actually stop reckless drivers from hitting things, but it
> does stop careful drivers from driving to the right when there isn't a
> bike present. That means the bike lane doesn't get swept by passing
> cars, so it builds up broken glass and radial tire wires.
>


Bike lanes collect debris? Preposterous!

http://www.humantransport.org/bicycledriving/library/Debris.pdf (2.34 MB)

Wayne
 
On Aug 1, 1:13 pm, Mike Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> In message <[email protected]>
> donquijote1954 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 11:02 am, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > > >http://www.streetfilms.org/archives/physically-separated-bike-lanes/

>
> > > They don't really help. And they've been shown not to help and we can
> > > see them not helping in practice.

>
> > Are you saying that those committed cyclists are stupid and that they
> > don't know what they are asking for? Remember they are not kids, but
> > real cyclists that tell you the real problems out there. How more real
> > can you get?

>
> Lessons in life are often counter-intuitive.
>
> Separated bike lanes are fine where they are separated, it's just that
> sooner or later you have to have a junction and if you have more
> separated lanes you end up with more complex junctions and that's where
> the accidents happen.
>
> What good is it if you decrease the accident rate at point 'a' along
> a route and at the same time increase it at point 'b' along a route such
> that the overall accident rate is higher?
>
> In contrast to the 'idea' of ever more separate lanes being good for
> improved safety there is the contradictory data that shows that in
> places where you remove all the lane markings, signs and junction
> priorities you often get a measurable increase in safety.


Should we erase the car lanes too? I think we could have bike lanes
and still enforce those breaking the law, so they can pay for more
bike lanes. Are you parked in the bike lane? You got a fine for 100
bucks...
 
On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:
> donquijote1954 wrote:
> > Are you saying that those committed cyclists are stupid and that they
> > don't know what they are asking for?

>
> It's not a matter of intelligence, it's a matter of knowledge.
> "Common sense" suggests segregated facilities will improve one's
> lot (and in /some/ limited cases I agree they do), but just like
> "common sense" indicating helmets substantially reduce serious head
> injuries and compulsory seat belts must reduce road casualties it
> turns out the effect in the real world doesn't know much about your
> "common sense" and it is contarry to popular assumption and belief.
>
> > Remember they are not kids, but
> > real cyclists that tell you the real problems out there. How more real
> > can you get?

>
> The accident figures from segregated facilities that show us that
> Real Cyclists suffer just as many Real Accidents on segregated
> facilties (or rather, where they meet roads, as they inevitably do)
> are just as real, and are far more representative than your small
> sample quoted.
>
> You really need to find out the effects of things before you start
> proclaiming to the rooftops that they're The Answer.


WHATEVER GETS PEOPLE OUT IS GOOD, then we polish it up along the way.
 
On Aug 1, 2:28 pm, William <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 11:12 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 1, 11:54 am, William <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > > On Aug 1, 10:25 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > > > On Aug 1, 10:43 am, donquijote1954 <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:

>
> > > > > On Aug 1, 4:00 am, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > > > > > Yes, there are some idiots who'll sit behind you and honk at you, but
> > > > > > they won't run you down, because it might scratch the paintwork. If you
> > > > > > push people off into bike lanes as a rule they will be far more maligned
> > > > > > and looked down upon on the instances where they have no choice to use
> > > > > > the roads, if they're typically in a bike lane instead.

>
> > > > > > They don't help. We know they don't help as we can see them not
> > > > > > helping. *HAVE YOU GOT THAT YET?*

>
> > > > > You still avoiding my question: BIKE LANES OR NO BIKE LANES, HOW DO WE
> > > > > BRING BIKE RIDERSHIP FROM THE AMERICAN OR BRITISH LEVES TO THE DUTCH
> > > > > OR DANISH LEVELS?

>
> > > > You see, you are thinking about the problem from the wrong direction.
> > > > You are saying "biking is great, what is wrong with everyone else".
> > > > Instead, you need to examine why other people don't bike and address
> > > > that.

>
> > > > Predominantly, I would think it is the combination of "no time to bike
> > > > & no place to bike to". Most people won't bike to work if they get
> > > > sweaty or if they work the night shift, etc. Bike lanes might
> > > > partially address the "no place to bike to" issue, but not really.

>
> > > > For example, I need to run out and get my kid some things for football
> > > > practice. While we're at it we need to do some back-to-school
> > > > shopping. Okay, that's simple and the kid is in great shape. I just
> > > > need to run to the nearest sporting goods store. Fortunately, there's
> > > > a small mall across the street. This trip is a bit unusually because
> > > > I do 90% of my shopping at the nest Walmart. So ideally, this is
> > > > bikeable. But the problem is, the nearest sporting goods store is
> > > > about 45 miles away. That's about 15 miles past the Walmart. So at
> > > > 10 mph (because of the hills and the purchases), you're talking at 9
> > > > hour bike ride.

>
> > > I don't blame you, biking works best
> > > when everything is
> > > more central and dense like a metro area.

>
> > > > So I think your idea has merit, it just needs to be tweeked. The
> > > > community didn't allow a Walmart because of a DOT right-of-way issue.
> > > > But maybe if we had more Walmarts, so that they were closer to people,
> > > > the people could bike to them easier. Plus if they put in
> > > > SuperCenters with groceries, then more shopping could be done in 1
> > > > trip.

>
> > > > So I guess bike lanes are part of the problem, but having a place to
> > > > go is the other part. Therefore, maybe you should lobby for more
> > > > Walmarts -- and have them tied into bikeways -- to encourage shopping
> > > > by bike.

>
> > > Have you no sense of quality Pat? I guess that is implied when your
> > > from nowhere land.

>
> > I don't follow your logic. Of course I am from the middle of
> > nowhere. That's great. Clean air. Clean water. Mountains in the
> > background (okay, the Allegany's aren't exactly the Rockies). It is a
> > nice, simple life. What else to I need. This is a great lifestyle.
> > What "quality" am I missing? The Kleenex from Walmart is somehow
> > worst than the Kleenex from the Kleenex Boutique? The $18 Harry
> > Potter book I bought last week has different words in it than $32
> > version in your corner bookstore? My backyard swimming pool is
> > somehow less wet than your municipal one? My fruit-of-the-loom
> > underwear are somehow less fruity than yours from the mall. Does a
> > Timex keep different time than a Rolex -- it doesn't really matter to
> > me, because I don't wear a watch.

>
> > You might crave some imported, organic, fresh pasta only made by
> > virgins on the hillsides of Italy. But regular pasta is fine by me.
> > You don't need that stuff to live well. You only need it to fill the
> > hollow spots in your sole. There's nothing wrong with simplicity.
> > I'm not exactly a monk, but this definitely isn't Madison Ave. But
> > that's what makes it nice.

>
> > On Friday, a friend and I are thinking of throwing a canoe on the
> > Allegany River and going a few miles, just for the heck of it. That's
> > excitement around here.

>
> > Besides, the Walmarts around here are pretty generous when it comes to
> > youth sports. We'll hit up each of them during fundraising for each
> > of the sports. It's not a lot, but they'll throw in $25 to $50 (each)
> > any time they are asked -- and we ask them quite often. That buys
> > stuff for the concession stand or for a raffle.

>
> > So what about this "quality" thing?

>
> Pat, Walmart is McDonalds department stores. In every way. If you wanna
> call that quality go right ahead. Just keep that bull **** out of the
> city.


To be more specific, ever notice how a lot of things, not
ALL things but a lot, are a heck of a lot crappier at walmart as
apposed to the other extreme like William-sanoma or crate and barrel?
I'm not saying that every place should be as expensive and *high tech*
for a lack of a better word as those places are. But ever notice how
theres a lot of poor people at Walmart? I guess you would'nt since
thats all you have in nowhere land but here in the cities when people
have more options then the lowest and crappiest, we tend to shoot for
the happy medium between excessive and contemptible.

I prove via internet: http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=2403033

Wal*Mart:Lowest Common Denominator
Look at this cool set of pots and pans and the mounted rack. Only
34.32!!!
But in reality,look at cheap and thin the metal on the cooking
utensils and the pots is. Don't expect those to get through a
thanksgiving dinner....


Kohls: A Happy Medium
http://www.kohls.com/products/produ...LDER<>folder_id=440616035&bmUID=1186004381433
A good medium, not to bad it gets the job done. 170$ is pretty
reasonable, closer on the low end of things but again it will get the
job done.






William-Sonoma: When brains collide with class and stlye Bet you don't
have one of these at "The Rez" do you Pat?
http://www.williams-sonoma.com/products/sku9639873/index.cfm?pkey=cckwseti
600 dollars and just for the pots. Yea I would say this would out live
the competition in ever way by a large margin. Still, nothing to there
1,400$$$ one. ttp://www.williams-sonoma.com/products/sku8991465/index.cfm?pkey=cckwseti
Hey, you get what ya pay for!

Now, cheap prices may seem all good, but why not just pay a little
extra for the one that will last?
(Ahem* because your either poor or have no options or you just have no
sense of quality)

Now Pat, you may be saying to yourself that those other sets of pots
are expensive only for more profit, but if that was true, do you
REALLY think William-Sonoma would still be around?
 
On Aug 1, 4:26 pm, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> My strategy is demonstrating that cycling is a safe, normal thing
> that normal people can do in safety and without special armour.
> Doesn't **** anyone much off, doesn't call people idiots and
> antagonise them, doesn't characterise what I'm doing with
> ridiculous and self evidently non-sensical hyperbole, doesn't
> deamnd that they put themselves out and into perceived danger for
> some cause. I think all of those things it doesn't do makes it a
> positive way to proceed, unlike calling for things that don't help
> and stridently getting on folks' cases.


OK, your strategy doesn't motivate anyone because people are no
fools. They know cars fly by too close for comfort. That's why there's
no significant number of people riding bikes on busy thoroughfares. It
just doesn't make sense to push people onto roads and then having to
say, "Sorry, **** happens."
 
On Aug 1, 5:55 pm, [email protected] (Bill Z.) wrote:
> Wayne Pein <[email protected]> writes:


> > Zauman lives on Bike Lane Fantasy Island. None of those words above
> > address the real world where the presence of a bike lane creates
> > "motor vehicle lanes" that motorists then vigorously defend.

>
> Pein has a serious emotional problem and should seek professional help
> for it, as this sort of outburst from him shows. He apparently didn't
> like my post even though I merely quoted official California state
> government publications.


He fits the profile of a Hummer driver (too aggressive)...

"The industry has come to some unflattering conclusions about the
people who buy its SUVs. As summarized by Bradsher:

They tend to be people who are insecure and vain. They are frequently
nervous about their marriages and uncomfortable about parenthood. They
often lack confidence in their driving skills. Above all, they are apt
to be self-centered and self-absorbed, with little interests in their
neighbors and communities.

They are more restless, more sybaritic, and less social than most
Americans are."

and...

"SUV owners want to be more like, 'I'm in control of the people around
me.'"

http://savefuel.tribe.net/thread/45bad811-c1a9-498b-989f-228e221cb482

Cylists are more social, you know. In other words, Pein fits the
profile of the lion, and us, cycists, are more like social monkeys.
 
"donquijote1954" who? wrote:
> ...
> Thank you for explaining so well what I have in mind. Actually that's
> the idea behind...
>
> http://www.cafepress.com/burncalories


I think a better solution would be two jerseys [1]. In the morning [2],
the jersey worn would say in large letters on the back "RIDING TO WORK".
The afternoon jersey would say "RIDING HOME FROM WORK".

[1] Or a reversible sign for recumbents.
[2] Reverse for night shift workers.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"donquijote1954" who? wrote:
> ...
> You still avoiding my question: BIKE LANES OR NO BIKE LANES, HOW DO WE
> BRING BIKE RIDERSHIP FROM THE AMERICAN OR BRITISH LEVE[L]S TO THE DUTCH
> OR DANISH LEVELS?...


The Danes have almost a 100% tax on new automobiles, high gas taxes, and
(in the cities) very limited and expensive parking. They also have a
beautiful cool spring to fall climate, and winters that can be mostly
handled with proper raingear.

Ride to work even a short distance at a slow pace in much of the U.S.
during summer and you will be soaked in sweat.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
[email protected] aka Frank Krygowski wrote:
> On Aug 1, 11:02 am, Peter Clinch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> One thing you can do to encourage more people onto bikes is stop
>> routinely exaggerating the dangers. Why are people going to want to go
>> cycling if it's a "war zone"?
>>
>> What you need to do is tell it like it /actually is/: a relatively safe
>> and remarkably efficient, cheap and healthy way to get about. As
>> opposed to some ridiculous story where folks will run over them for the
>> sake of it, where they need to be civilly disobedient to get their
>> rights, and where there's a war going on. That really sounds like a
>> good reason to start using a bike! (not)

>
> Peter Clinch is absolutely right.
>
> "Donquijote1954" returns time and again, whining loudly about the
> terrible dangers of riding a bicycle. He cries and pleads for a
> complete redesign of the world's infrastructure. Meanwhile, millions
> of us are using this existing world, riding our bikes for
> transportation and recreation, enjoying it immensely, and suffering
> none of the horrors he imagines.
>
> What is it that makes characters like "Donquijote" portray bicycling
> as dangerous? How can they remain so ignorant of the real data
> showing how safe it is? Why do they try so hard to scare people away
> from a beneficial activity they pretend to love?
>
> Since I can't think of a gentler metaphor, pardon me - but
> "Donquijote," you need to grow some balls! Some people are going to
> occasionally honk their horns at you or yell at you, whether you walk,
> ride your bicycle, ride your motorcycle or drive your car. It's true
> whether there are bike lanes or no, whether the road is wide or
> narrow, whether you're on a street or path or bike lane or crosswalk
> or sidewalk.
>
> Don't expect the police to take the role of your Mommy, to hold your
> hand and tell the other guy he's being bad. You've got a right to the
> road. Use it! Don't give any satisfaction to the jerks, and don't
> let them worry you.
>
> And for God's sake, stop whining!


HOT DOG! WE HAVE ANOTHER WEINER!

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Pat WHO? wrote:
> ...The $18 Harry
> Potter book I bought last week has different words in it than $32
> version in your corner bookstore?...


Actually, it might well have. The U.S. published versions have some of
the British English spellings and words changed to American English
equivalents. The corner bookstore may carry or would special order the
unbastardized Commonwealth version - good luck with that at Wal-Mart. :(

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
William who? wrote:
> ...Just keep that bull **** out of the city.


These people would likely have some if you really need it:
<http://www.absglobal.com/>.

[indefinite pronouns intentional]

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
[email protected] aka Joshua Putnam wrote:
> ...
> Even the limited-access freeway near me has its shoulder open to
> bicycles -- bikes are allowed on many miles of Interstates, boring and
> noisy, but safe and direct....


Do the drivers look for cyclists crossing their path when merging and
exiting?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Pat who? wrote:
> ...If you don't like it, go talk to the lawmakers.


That is not a practical suggestion for those of us who can not afford to
attend $1000/plate fund-raising dinners.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com