Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- UK and Europe
- Published
- 27 April 2004
- Last activity
- 30 April 2004
- Original author
- Paul
- Posts
- 63
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,369
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 61–63 of 63
Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
#61
In article <[email hidden]>,
Simon Brooke said:If you're serious, any standards-compliant XML parser is
required to be able to validate;
Nope, that's only a validating parser. You meant of course
something about wellformedness.
Quoted message said:but I could easily hang one off a URL if you'd like.
Bonus points for getting the fine detail right: for example
when rules regarding HTTP transmission override any charset
declaration within XML.
--
Nick Kew
Nick's manifesto: htmlhelp.com~nickOpen ↗
-
Philip Taylor -
Archived post
#62
Simon Brooke said:If you're serious, any standards-compliant XML parser is
required to be able to validate; but I could easily hang
one off a URL if you'd like.
No, was just my (weak) attempt at humour; sorry! ** Phil.
-
James Hodson
Archived post
#63
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:01:35 +0100, Jon Senior
jon@restlesslemon_DOT_co_DOT_uk.remove said:In article <5hu4m1-
[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:Most joiners now would say 'one metre seven sixty'.
No. Most joiners now would say "one thousand, seven hundred
and sixty mils", since they mostly work in millimetres now.
But they'd probably suck air in through pursed lips first.
James
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
·0 bots
·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.
