It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?
Phil Holman
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?
Phil Holman
Phil Holman said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?Phil Holman
Usenet just isn't Usenet when there is a moderator.
However, participants in this newsgroup can probably reduce the flaming
if they choose to use the proper channels to complain about those
anonymous posters who only have axes to grind. Looking these characters
up on Google and seeing their past history of posting usually helps one
make this determination.
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
"Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?Phil Holman
If you had conscientious moderators who would quickly pass through questions
from newcomers looking for help that would be OK. I'm not sure of the
mechanics of how to make such a thing happen.
I wish the people involved in these flame wars would realize that there are
only two sets of people that read this stuff. 1. The people involved in the
flame war. 2. Those who are not - usually new people looking for help and
trying to figure out what this group is all about.
That's really the unfortunate thing. People may be seeking help and are
repelled by what they see. It's sad because of the lost potential.
If it is a matter of who gets the last word in a flame war, could that not be
done via Email?
Bill
x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂
Quoted message said:x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂
I have more items in my Agent killfilter from this newsgroup in the
last few months than I had in it from the previous 8 years, for all
the other newsgroups combined. This morning I downloaded 49 posts for
this group. After the filter raked over the crud, I had 14 left to
read. 🙂
Bob
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 5:45:54 -0400, Bob Cardone wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:
Quoted message said:From: Bob Cardone <cardone1!@!mindspring.com>
Reply-To: cardone1!@!mindspring.com
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiologyQuoted message said:x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂I have more items in my Agent killfilter from this newsgroup in the
last few months than I had in it from the previous 8 years, for all
the other newsgroups combined. This morning I downloaded 49 posts for
this group. After the filter raked over the crud, I had 14 left to
read. 🙂Bob
Great tip, Bob! Thanks! Here's one for you: If you cover your eyes and put
your fingers in your ears you will neither see nor hear evil.
Loading "Bob" in the kill filter cannon...
Cocking the kill filter cannon...
Priming the kill filter cannon...
Aiming the kill filter cannon....
Looking down the barrel of the kill filter cannon...
Whoops! Bang!
Damn!
Steve
Bill said:"Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?Phil Holman
If you had conscientious moderators who would quickly pass through questions
from newcomers looking for help that would be OK. I'm not sure of the
mechanics of how to make such a thing happen.I wish the people involved in these flame wars would realize that there are
only two sets of people that read this stuff. 1. The people involved in the
flame war. 2. Those who are not - usually new people looking for help and
trying to figure out what this group is all about.
Because most posts are archived, there are all sorts of people who will
eventually read everything posted.
Quoted message said:
That's really the unfortunate thing. People may be seeking help and are
repelled by what they see.
Yes, they choose to be and to remain "lurkers."
And, if they have a cardiology type question, they are more likely to email a
cardiologist rather than post their query here.
Quoted message said:It's sad because of the lost potential.
Perhaps.
Quoted message said:
If it is a matter of who gets the last word in a flame war, could that not be
done via Email?
Can't email anonymously, now can you?
Quoted message said:
Bill
Appreciate your civility, Bill. Quite refreshing.
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
Quoted message said:x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂
Killfiles are a good thing.
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
MD/PhD said:Killfiles are a good thing.
Too bad your little buddy insists of changing his posting name to get his
drivel out to those who've killfiled him. Why do you suppose he does that?
Do you think it's because he seeks to avoid the truth?
Bob Cardone said:Quoted message said:x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂I have more items in my Agent killfilter from this newsgroup in the
last few months than I had in it from the previous 8 years, for all
the other newsgroups combined. This morning I downloaded 49 posts for
this group. After the filter raked over the crud, I had 14 left to
read. 🙂Bob
Good for you Bob :-)
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
Steve said:<tripe snipped>
You have my pity.
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 9:56:33 -0400, Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:
Quoted message said:Steve said:<tripe snipped>
<pity snipped>
Steve
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 9:56:33 -0400, Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:
Quoted message said:Steve said:<tripe snipped>
Aw, come on Chung... that was funny... looking down the barrel of Bob's kill
filter cannon?... come on... cut me some slack. Are you so sore that you
can't be generous? I stuck up for _you_ the other day.
Steve
<tripe reinstated>
Quoted message said:On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 5:45:54 -0400, Bob Cardone wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:Quoted message said:From: Bob Cardone <cardone1!@!mindspring.com>
Reply-To: cardone1!@!mindspring.com
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiologyQuoted message said:x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂I have more items in my Agent killfilter from this newsgroup in the
last few months than I had in it from the previous 8 years, for all
the other newsgroups combined. This morning I downloaded 49 posts for
this group. After the filter raked over the crud, I had 14 left to
read. 🙂Bob
Great tip, Bob! Thanks! Here's one for you: If you cover your eyes and put
your fingers in your ears you will neither see nor hear evil.Loading "Bob" in the kill filter cannon...
Cocking the kill filter cannon...
Priming the kill filter cannon...
Aiming the kill filter cannon....
Looking down the barrel of the kill filter cannon...
Whoops! Bang!
Damn!
Steve
Phil Holman said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?
Not much.
Fencer said:Too bad your little buddy insists of changing his posting name to get his
drivel out to those who've killfiled him. Why do you suppose he does that?
Do you think it's because he seeks to avoid the truth?
Why don't you ask me, you worthless TROLL.
Phil Holman said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?Phil Holman
Oh, wouldn't it be lovely!! How do we do it? Diana
Quoted message said:
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:x-no-archive: yes
I don't have any problems with the newsgroup anymore. I just use a good
KillFile (Fix News {it's free}) and soon as I see the silly stuff ..I
just kill the sender .. [censored] .. soon as another one pops up .. away they
go ! and I'm back to about 80% real stuff ! I consider this newsgroup
just too valuable to let that back and forth childish patter run me off
!
just my .02 worth 🙂
I just use the old fashioned "ignore them" strategy. You don't HAVE to read
the posts for every header in the group. Killfiling a sender only works
until someone replies to that sender....then you get the reply, usually with
the original post stuck in there somewhere. Unless you killfile the
respondant, then you're okay until a third person gets in on it...
You may even miss on-topic posts by killfiling individuals. Dr Chung has a
tendancy to respond to most of the flamebait that's dangled in front of him,
usually feeling the need to defend his character. It is, of course, his
right to defend himself. However, the only way to get rid of all the excess
threads is by killfiling Dr Chung, and then you would miss the good
information he provides when responding to an actual cardiology topic.
Some killfiles let you remove cross-posted headers. Again, you'd miss the
occasional honest question by someone posting both here and sci.med, say.
You can kill (or ignore) an entire thread, but the subjects change so much
that you're still adding things to your filter every day.
No, I say the best way to handle it is to simply ignore the trolls. They
will eventually go away.
Andrew
ps: I may have an advantage in that I have cable-internet so it takes only a
split second to download the headers. I know that for dial-up it's a pain to
download useless headers.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:16:44 -0400, [email hidden] wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:
Quoted message said:Phil Holman said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?Phil Holman
Oh, wouldn't it be lovely!! How do we do it? Diana
Quoted message said:
Here you go:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/moderated-ng-faq/preamble.html
Steve
Quoted message said:Phil Holman said:It's probably the only realistic way of getting this NG back on topic
and eliminating the flame wars.
What do you think?Phil Holman
Oh, wouldn't it be lovely!! How do we do it? Diana
Quoted message said:
Find a cardiologist with time to moderate. Wouldn't be me.
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
Crescent Mu_n said:Fencer said:Too bad your little buddy insists of changing his posting name to get his
drivel out to those who've killfiled him. Why do you suppose he does that?
Do you think it's because he seeks to avoid the truth?Why don't you ask me, you worthless TROLL.
Consider it asked.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.