On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:30:55 +0100, Geoff Berrow <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I love map and compass theory, but for some reason I've always been
very good at getting it wrong. Bearing in mind how dangerous that can
be, I reckon it's worth paying extra for something that makes the
process simpler, and reduces the chance of getting lost/hurt/etc.
There'd be no point for someone who knows he/she will never make a
mistake with the standard version, though.
Quoted message said:Well I can see how a sighting compass would be more accurate, but mine
looks identical to the sixty quid one in that picture.
http://www.cotswold-outdoor.com/Cat/51316
My concern isn't accuracy: it's ease of use.
See that fuzzy bit on the picture of the compass housing? That's
actually a little window. To take a bearing on something you can see
on the ground, all you need to do is hold the compass flat at eye
level, look through the window (a lens) and read off the bearing.
Similarly, to transfer a bearing that you've taken from the map to the
ground, all you need to do is lift the compass as aforesaid, look
through the window and turn until you see the bearing appear.
I know there's nothing complicated about the Silva system, but I also
know that I regularly make stupid mistakes with it. The times when I
most need to be able to get it right - i.e. when I'm in the middle of
no-where, losing light, tired and cold - are the times when I'm most
likely to get it wrong. For that reason, I'm prepared to pay £60 to
use a compass that makes it easier for me. And after all, if I'd not
smashed the blasted thing last year I'd only ever have had to buy it
once :-)
Quoted message said:I don't walk far enough to get lost anyway <g>. I find the magnifying
glass the most handy thing about it.
Hey, I can get lost just walking to the shops! 🙂
Best wishes,
--
Peewiglet