"jtaylor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Otis B. Driftwood" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> >FINA rules only govern competitions that are sanctioned by FINA.
This
Quoted message said:a
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> >tiny fraction of all meets; and to almost all competitiors, FINA
rules
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:are
> >irrelevant.
>
> That's news to me. Everywhere I've competed subscribed to FINA rules.
>
You've only swum in international meets?
Don't think I ever have.
Would you please give us the names of some of the competitions you have
attended recently, so that we can check to see if they used FINA rules, or
those of the local authority?
Folks, I've done Martin's homework for him, in a way...
Martin recently claimed to have competed in the Pacific Northwest.
The meet information for the "Annual Age Seattle Open Swim Meet" states:
"Current USA Swimming rules will govern the meet."
The "Senior Seattle Open" meet package states:
"Current USA Swimming rules will govern the meet."
The "Pacific Rim Classic" (held at the Weyerhauser Aquatic Centre, nice big
box of a building) meet package states:
"Current USA Swimming rules will govern the meet."
The "Summer Grand Challenge", hosted by the Tacoma Swim Club, has a meet
package that states (no points for guessing):
"Current USA Swimming rules will govern the meet."
Now, Martin says he swam in that area in or around 1970. The state of
swimming regulation was much more of a hodge-podge then than it is now - the
NCAA, for instance, allowed swimmers in the Backstroke events not only to do
any stroke they wished to on their back, but as well to place their toes
over the gutter on the start. If the Washington area meets did run under
FINA rules way back then, I wonder why they have changed over to USS rules?