Re: liquid nutrition



Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> I think I perhaps could have been a good teacher except that I have
> >> always
> >> hated young people. Hells Bells, I didn't even like myself much when I
> >> was
> >> young.
> >
> > Frankly, I don't see why your attitude changed. - Jim McNamara
>
> It changed after I became Great.

Then I repeat ... frankly, I don't see why your attitude changed. - Jim
McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
> > When you've run clean out of content (and you obvioulsy have), you just
> > senselessly repeat yourself hoping that no one will even notice and to
> > think you are fond of referring to others as a one note Johnny.
>
> The only one-note Johnny here is Jim McNamara who doe not know how to be
> anything other than a blood sucking leech and a stalker, that most pitiful
> of all Usenet creatures. I actually feel sorry for him. It would be better
> if he were a troll - which he is not far from being in any event. But he
> only trolls me. Go figure!

Quit your whining, already. You have only yourself to blame for the
"stalking" that you have fallen victim of from your many adversaries.
You intentionally go trolling for fights. When you encounter a
tenacious, formidable adversary, and find yourself hopelessly embroiled
in an embarrassing no-win cyber-skirmish, in desperation, you move to
disencumber yourself by seeking to discredit and dismiss your adversary
by labeling him or her as a stalker. This thinly disguised ploy of
yours has failed countless times. If you really want to escape your
self-inflicted dilemma, then turn tail, crawl on out of here. Return
to the rock that you slithered out from under.

> If you
> > hadn't offfered up your unsubstantiated opinions, or if you at least
> > had the fortitude to defend your errant assertions, I wouldn't have had
> > to jump in your ****, but as you are fond of saying, I was just doing a
> > bit of housekeeping ... not allowing your outrageous remarks to go
> > uncontested. A few observations are in order here...
> >
> > Readers, Usenet newsgroups serve as Ed Dolan's chosen, but constraining
> > social communication conduit. He is a Usenet newsgroup "homesteader".
> > ARBR has become his cyber-playpen ... a showcase for his unruly ego. A
> > geriatric juvenile, Ed's social interaction skills can best be
> > described as vestigial and his fatuous, loquacious drivel are his
> > cyber-trademark. Disenfranchised from reality, this lonesome loon is
> > possessed by an unrestrained and enormously distended sense of
> > self-importance. He is a cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool
> > ... an incorrigible curmudgeon intoxicated by his own flatulence.
> > Usenet newsgroups, and ARBR in particular, are the source from which he
> > garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem, the source from
> > which he derives meaning for his pathetic, shallow existence. It must
> > really suck to be head swollen ... Ed Dolan!!!
>
> The above is pure drivel and no one in their right mind is going to bother
> to read it - and that most definitely includes me.

Opinion stated as fact ... a bad habit of yours, exemplified throughout
this entire thread.

Jim McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> [...]
>> > When you've run clean out of content (and you obvioulsy have), you just
>> > senselessly repeat yourself hoping that no one will even notice and to
>> > think you are fond of referring to others as a one note Johnny.
>>
>> The only one-note Johnny here is Jim McNamara who doe not know how to be
>> anything other than a blood sucking leech and a stalker, that most
>> pitiful
>> of all Usenet creatures. I actually feel sorry for him. It would be
>> better
>> if he were a troll - which he is not far from being in any event. But he
>> only trolls me. Go figure!
>
> Quit your whining, already. You have only yourself to blame for the
> "stalking" that you have fallen victim of from your many adversaries.
> You intentionally go trolling for fights. When you encounter a
> tenacious, formidable adversary, and find yourself hopelessly embroiled
> in an embarrassing no-win cyber-skirmish, in desperation, you move to
> disencumber yourself by seeking to discredit and dismiss your adversary
> by labeling him or her as a stalker. This thinly disguised ploy of
> yours has failed countless times. If you really want to escape your
> self-inflicted dilemma, then turn tail, crawl on out of here. Return
> to the rock that you slithered out from under.
[...]

Nope, nothing but a stalker.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> [...]
> >> > When you've run clean out of content (and you obvioulsy have), you just
> >> > senselessly repeat yourself hoping that no one will even notice and to
> >> > think you are fond of referring to others as a one note Johnny.
> >>
> >> The only one-note Johnny here is Jim McNamara who doe not know how to be
> >> anything other than a blood sucking leech and a stalker, that most
> >> pitiful
> >> of all Usenet creatures. I actually feel sorry for him. It would be
> >> better
> >> if he were a troll - which he is not far from being in any event. But he
> >> only trolls me. Go figure!
> >
> > Quit your whining, already. You have only yourself to blame for the
> > "stalking" that you have fallen victim of from your many adversaries.
> > You intentionally go trolling for fights. When you encounter a
> > tenacious, formidable adversary, and find yourself hopelessly embroiled
> > in an embarrassing no-win cyber-skirmish, in desperation, you move to
> > disencumber yourself by seeking to discredit and dismiss your adversary
> > by labeling him or her as a stalker. This thinly disguised ploy of
> > yours has failed countless times. If you really want to escape your
> > self-inflicted dilemma, then turn tail, crawl on out of here. Return
> > to the rock that you slithered out from under.
> [...]
>
> Nope, nothing but a stalker.

Nope, nothing but a troll who has run out of content and turns tail and
runs rather then put up a good fight when outwitted.

Jim McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
> > Liquid nutrition (i.e. Beer) is the ideal food to consume before a
> > pissing match. ;)
>
> Beer is for barbarians and wine is for cultivated and civilized folks.

As usual .... I mmean what do you expect???? Opinion stated as fact
from the man wh does it best. Now for the FACTS. Ed, Enough of your
pretentious, self-referential appeal to status, already. Beer was
known to be staple in the ancient civilization of Egypt. Now, word has
is that the Egypt was an advanced and revered civilization. Now if one
were to subscribe to your inane contention, then one would have to
conclude that beer consumption in ancient Egypt would qualify the
Egyptians as barbarians. Many would disagree adn I am among them.
Over the ages, wine was consumed by many a barbarian and you should
count yourself among them. As is often the case, you are once again
running your mouth when you don't know what the hell you're talking
about and this reflects poorly on you ... oh GRATE one.

Jim McNamara

I
> don't think much of hard liquor either. Hells Bells, if you can't find a
> wine that is just perfect for you, then I suggest you get out of America and
> join those beer drinking slobs in England. You can forget about emigrating
> to France if you don't like wine as that is pretty much all they drink.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. What are you doing up at 4 o'clock in the morning. These are my hours,
> not yours!
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
> > Liquid nutrition (i.e. Beer) is the ideal food to consume before a
> > pissing match. ;)
>
> Beer is for barbarians and wine is for cultivated and civilized folks.

As usual .... I mean what do you expect???? Opinion stated as fact
from the man wh does it best. Now for the FACTS. Ed, Enough of your
pretentious, self-referential appeal to status, already. Beer was
known to be staple in the ancient civilization of Egypt. Now, word has
is that the Egypt was an advanced and revered civilization. Now if one
were to subscribe to your inane contention, then one would have to
conclude that beer consumption in ancient Egypt would qualify the
Egyptians as barbarians. Many would disagree adn I am among them.
Over the ages, wine was consumed by many a barbarian and you should
count yourself among them. As is often the case, you are once again
running your mouth when you don't know what the hell you're talking
about and this reflects poorly on you ... oh GRATE one.

Jim McNamara

I
> don't think much of hard liquor either. Hells Bells, if you can't find a
> wine that is just perfect for you, then I suggest you get out of America and
> join those beer drinking slobs in England. You can forget about emigrating
> to France if you don't like wine as that is pretty much all they drink.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. What are you doing up at 4 o'clock in the morning. These are my hours,
> not yours!
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
> [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>
> > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....
>
> I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> using the bottle as a resonator.

"If people thought they could appreciate the taste of bottled beers,
they were wrong. When you drink from a bottle you cut your nose out of
the equation entirely. The beer goes straight from the bottle to your
mouth, with no chance for the aroma to waft in front of your nostrils.
You might not have thought much about the aroma of beer before, but
think about the way food tastes when you have a blocked nose compared to
when you are clear. This is the difference between drinking beer from a
bottle and drinking it from an open glass. Professional beer tasters
insist you lose about 80 per cent of the individual taste of a beer when
you drink from the bottle. Next time you're drinking a pint, hold your
nose while taking a swig and you'll see what they mean." Pete Brown,
"Man Walks Into A Pub - A Sociable History Of Beer"

> [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.

Pffft. It comes in pint glasses, either hand-drawn from a barrel in the
cellar or, for preference, directly from a barrel on the counter behind
the bar.

--
Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
This Unit is a productive Unit.
 
Dave Larrington wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> >
> > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> >
> > > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....
> >
> > I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> > agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> > to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> > using the bottle as a resonator.
>
> "If people thought they could appreciate the taste of bottled beers,
> they were wrong. When you drink from a bottle you cut your nose out of
> the equation entirely. The beer goes straight from the bottle to your
> mouth, with no chance for the aroma to waft in front of your nostrils.
> You might not have thought much about the aroma of beer before, but
> think about the way food tastes when you have a blocked nose compared to
> when you are clear. This is the difference between drinking beer from a
> bottle and drinking it from an open glass. Professional beer tasters
> insist you lose about 80 per cent of the individual taste of a beer when
> you drink from the bottle. Next time you're drinking a pint, hold your
> nose while taking a swig and you'll see what they mean." Pete Brown,
> "Man Walks Into A Pub - A Sociable History Of Beer"
>
> > [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.
>
> Pffft. It comes in pint glasses, either hand-drawn from a barrel in the
> cellar or, for preference, directly from a barrel on the counter behind
> the bar.

I presume that you realize you were responding to Tom Sherman who made
this claim. I couldn't agree with you more. In response, I wrote ...
Real beer comes straight from the tap and the barkeep has to wash the
.... bottles can be a good second chance, but only when brown (ask if
you don't know why) and a can is a synonym for a toilet. I neglected
to add that one should not drink beer directly from the bottle for the
very reasons you cited. Thanks for putting your two cents in where I
was remiss. - Jim McNamara

> Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
> This Unit is a productive Unit.
 
Dave Larrington wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> >
> > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> >
> > > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....
> >
> > I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> > agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> > to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> > using the bottle as a resonator.
>
> "If people thought they could appreciate the taste of bottled beers,
> they were wrong. When you drink from a bottle you cut your nose out of
> the equation entirely. The beer goes straight from the bottle to your
> mouth, with no chance for the aroma to waft in front of your nostrils.
> You might not have thought much about the aroma of beer before, but
> think about the way food tastes when you have a blocked nose compared to
> when you are clear. This is the difference between drinking beer from a
> bottle and drinking it from an open glass. Professional beer tasters
> insist you lose about 80 per cent of the individual taste of a beer when
> you drink from the bottle. Next time you're drinking a pint, hold your
> nose while taking a swig and you'll see what they mean." Pete Brown,
> "Man Walks Into A Pub - A Sociable History Of Beer"
>
> > [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.
>
> Pffft. It comes in pint glasses, either hand-drawn from a barrel in the
> cellar or, for preference, directly from a barrel on the counter behind
> the bar.

Let's see: In a drinking establishment, one typically pays a unit price
of 3 to 5 times more than that of purchasing said fermented beverage at
a store. Fine for the overcompensated, but not for the rest of us.

Secondly, at most drinking establishments, one must smell tobacco
smoke, which contributes to DISTASTE of anything one is eating
drinking.

Thirdly, at most drinking establishments, one must put up with the
highly annoying babble of multiple conversations (at the few
establishments that do not add noise electronically, which is even
worse). As the evening goes on, the increasing likelihood of having to
deal with belligerent drunks increases rapidly.

Finally, if one does not cover the entire opening of the bottle while
imbibing, one can easily smell the Beer while drinking from the bottle.

--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
 
[email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> >
> > > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....
> >
> > I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> > agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> > to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> > using the bottle as a resonator.
> >
> > [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.
>
> Real beer comes straight from the tap and the barkeep has to wash the
> glass....

For which service, one typically pays two (2) or (3) dollars over the
retail price of the Beer.

--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
 
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> > Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> > > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> > >
> > > > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....
> > >
> > > I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> > > agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> > > to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> > > using the bottle as a resonator.
> > >
> > > [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.
> >
> > Real beer comes straight from the tap and the barkeep has to wash the
> > glass....
>
> For which service, one typically pays two (2) or (3) dollars over the
> retail price of the Beer.

I'm not much of a bar person myself, but I do like to visit my local
brewpub now and then and I go for the food as much as I do the craft
brewed beer, but I judiciously select the time when I go.
Consequently, it is not crowded, smoke filled and even when crowded the
clientele that patronize the brewup are not your typical rouwdy drunks
and no bouncer is reguired. In addition I have establish a rapport
with a couple of bartenders such that I always get "comped" a beer and
some additional samples. I am also a Master of Beer Appreciation at
Goose Island (a little complicated to briefly explain here), but I pay
for a 16 "ouncer" and get a 20 "ouncer". The bottom line is that if I
drink two 20 oz. glasses of beer, I end up paying a 16 ounce price for
a total 40 ounces (more like 50 ounces including smaples). One doesn't
have to do the math to realize that this makes for a respectable price.
You just have to know when and where to go and establishing a rapport
with a bartender helps too ... just a thought.

Jim McNamara

> Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
 
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Dave Larrington wrote:
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> [email protected] says...
>> >
>> > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>> >
>> > > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a
>> > > beer....
>> >
>> > I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
>> > agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
>> > to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
>> > using the bottle as a resonator.
>>
>> "If people thought they could appreciate the taste of bottled beers,
>> they were wrong. When you drink from a bottle you cut your nose out of
>> the equation entirely. The beer goes straight from the bottle to your
>> mouth, with no chance for the aroma to waft in front of your nostrils.
>> You might not have thought much about the aroma of beer before, but
>> think about the way food tastes when you have a blocked nose compared to
>> when you are clear. This is the difference between drinking beer from a
>> bottle and drinking it from an open glass. Professional beer tasters
>> insist you lose about 80 per cent of the individual taste of a beer when
>> you drink from the bottle. Next time you're drinking a pint, hold your
>> nose while taking a swig and you'll see what they mean." Pete Brown,
>> "Man Walks Into A Pub - A Sociable History Of Beer"
>>
>> > [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.
>>
>> Pffft. It comes in pint glasses, either hand-drawn from a barrel in the
>> cellar or, for preference, directly from a barrel on the counter behind
>> the bar.
>
> Let's see: In a drinking establishment, one typically pays a unit price
> of 3 to 5 times more than that of purchasing said fermented beverage at
> a store. Fine for the overcompensated, but not for the rest of us.
>
> Secondly, at most drinking establishments, one must smell tobacco
> smoke, which contributes to DISTASTE of anything one is eating
> drinking.
>
> Thirdly, at most drinking establishments, one must put up with the
> highly annoying babble of multiple conversations (at the few
> establishments that do not add noise electronically, which is even
> worse). As the evening goes on, the increasing likelihood of having to
> deal with belligerent drunks increases rapidly.
>
> Finally, if one does not cover the entire opening of the bottle while
> imbibing, one can easily smell the Beer while drinking from the bottle.

The ONLY way too drink is at HOME ALONE, and then it should be vino, not
beer. Only barbarians drink beer. Thus spake Zarathustra.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Dave Larrington wrote:
> >> In article <[email protected]>,
> >> [email protected] says...
> >> >
> >> > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a
> >> > > beer....
> >> >
> >> > I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> >> > agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> >> > to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> >> > using the bottle as a resonator.
> >>
> >> "If people thought they could appreciate the taste of bottled beers,
> >> they were wrong. When you drink from a bottle you cut your nose out of
> >> the equation entirely. The beer goes straight from the bottle to your
> >> mouth, with no chance for the aroma to waft in front of your nostrils.
> >> You might not have thought much about the aroma of beer before, but
> >> think about the way food tastes when you have a blocked nose compared to
> >> when you are clear. This is the difference between drinking beer from a
> >> bottle and drinking it from an open glass. Professional beer tasters
> >> insist you lose about 80 per cent of the individual taste of a beer when
> >> you drink from the bottle. Next time you're drinking a pint, hold your
> >> nose while taking a swig and you'll see what they mean." Pete Brown,
> >> "Man Walks Into A Pub - A Sociable History Of Beer"
> >>
> >> > [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.
> >>
> >> Pffft. It comes in pint glasses, either hand-drawn from a barrel in the
> >> cellar or, for preference, directly from a barrel on the counter behind
> >> the bar.
> >
> > Let's see: In a drinking establishment, one typically pays a unit price
> > of 3 to 5 times more than that of purchasing said fermented beverage at
> > a store. Fine for the overcompensated, but not for the rest of us.
> >
> > Secondly, at most drinking establishments, one must smell tobacco
> > smoke, which contributes to DISTASTE of anything one is eating
> > drinking.
> >
> > Thirdly, at most drinking establishments, one must put up with the
> > highly annoying babble of multiple conversations (at the few
> > establishments that do not add noise electronically, which is even
> > worse). As the evening goes on, the increasing likelihood of having to
> > deal with belligerent drunks increases rapidly.
> >
> > Finally, if one does not cover the entire opening of the bottle while
> > imbibing, one can easily smell the Beer while drinking from the bottle.
>
> The ONLY way too drink is at HOME ALONE, and then it should be vino, not
> beer. Only barbarians drink beer. Thus spake Zarathustra.


Why not use that space between your ears for something more than just a
wax storage facility???

With your absence, I really enjoyed the reduction of noise level here
at ARBR, but you just had to go and ruin it for everyone be returning
didn't you??? We now return you to your regularly scheduled newsgroup
drivel from the mypoic visionary and quintessential TROLL ... head
swollen ... Ed Dolan.

As usual .... I mean what do you expect???? Opinion stated as fact
from the man wh does it best. Now for the FACTS. Ed, enough of your
pretentious, self-referential appeal to status, already. Beer was
known to be staple in the ancient civilization of Egypt. Now, word has
is that the Egypt was an advanced and revered civilization. Now if one
were to subscribe to your inane contention, then one would have to
conclude that beer consumption in ancient Egypt would qualify the
Egyptians as barbarians. Many would disagree and I count myself am
among them. Over the ages, wine was consumed by many a barbarian and
you should count yourself among them. As is often the case, you are
once again running your mouth when you don't know what the hell you're
talking about ... oh GRATE one.

Jim McNamara


> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
[...]
> With your absence, I really enjoyed the reduction of noise level here
> at ARBR, but you just had to go and ruin it for everyone be returning
> didn't you??? We now return you to your regularly scheduled newsgroup
> drivel from the mypoic visionary and quintessential TROLL ... head
> swollen ... Ed Dolan.
[...]

Nothing but a stalker, that most pitiful of all Usenet creatures.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
> > With your absence, I really enjoyed the reduction of noise level here
> > at ARBR, but you just had to go and ruin it for everyone be returning
> > didn't you??? We now return you to your regularly scheduled newsgroup
> > drivel from the mypoic visionary and quintessential TROLL ... head
> > swollen ... Ed Dolan.
> [...]
>
> Nothing but a stalker, that most pitiful of all Usenet creatures.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> [...]
> > With your absence, I really enjoyed the reduction of noise level here
> > at ARBR, but you just had to go and ruin it for everyone be returning
> > didn't you??? We now return you to your regularly scheduled newsgroup
> > drivel from the mypoic visionary and quintessential TROLL ... head
> > swollen ... Ed Dolan.
> [...]
>
> Nothing but a stalker, that most pitiful of all Usenet creatures.
>
> Regards,

Whe hunting, one must stalk his quarry and it is always open season on
TROLLs, the most despised of al Usenet creatures. - Jim McNamara

> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> [...]
>> > With your absence, I really enjoyed the reduction of noise level here
>> > at ARBR, but you just had to go and ruin it for everyone be returning
>> > didn't you??? We now return you to your regularly scheduled newsgroup
>> > drivel from the mypoic visionary and quintessential TROLL ... head
>> > swollen ... Ed Dolan.
>> [...]
>>
>> Nothing but a stalker, that most pitiful of all Usenet creatures.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Whe hunting, one must stalk his quarry and it is always open season on
> TROLLs, the most despised of al Usenet creatures. - Jim McNamara


"Nothing but a stalker, that most pitiful of all Usenet creatures." - Ed
Dolan

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back