Re: liquid nutrition



Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
> >> >> I
> >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> >> >> opinions
> >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
> >> >
> >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
> >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
> >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
> >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to be
> >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
> >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think I'll
> >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
> >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested, unrefuted
> >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote, I'd
> >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses and
> >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
> >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
> >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
> >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability to
> >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
> >>
> >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions. I
> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> >> opinions
> >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
> >
> > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
> > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one who wins nothing
> > but recogniton of his exasperation.
>
> And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
> cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to bother
> to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> paste.

ED ... Ed ... Ed ... I should be thankful that you continue to reading
my messages and respond??? Your delusional, Dolan. You must have
skippe your med dagain.

TRANSLATION: Jim would you please advance this conversation (read move
on to another taopc) since it is obvious that I cannot advance let
alone win this argument and I need for you to spare me the public
embarrassment.

FACT: This thread was never been about logic or debate, at least not
from Ed Dolan's peculiar perspective. In the past, Ed wrote ... "I
will stand by anything I say and defend it no matter how outrageous it
might first appear. All I ever want to do is to defeat and humiliate
you". Having failed to refute the facts I presented ... having failed
to address or counter the argument I submitted ... having failed to
defeat or humiliate me, the defeated and humiliated Mr. Dolan was
strategically reduced to defending his unsubstantiated opinions with
mere fiction ... a hyperbolized value assessment of his errant
opinions. Now this certainly meets Ed's "no matter how outrageous"
criteria I'd have to say. Ed's motto should be ... If you can't dazzle
'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with ********! In the past, Ed also
wrote ... "There is always substance in my posts no matter how I craft
them". This is a fallible and preposterous postulate at best. For
instance, this particular thread was a showcase for Ed's obstinance and
a conduit for opinions lacking in the very "substance" that Ed asserts
can always be found in his posts. A single word can best summarize
much of what he struggled to scribble ... ********. Enough said!!!

Jim McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
[email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > [...]
> > >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
> > >> >> I
> > >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> > >> >> opinions
> > >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
> > >> >
> > >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
> > >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
> > >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
> > >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to be
> > >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
> > >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think I'll
> > >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
> > >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested, unrefuted
> > >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote, I'd
> > >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses and
> > >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
> > >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
> > >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
> > >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability to
> > >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
> > >>
> > >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions. I
> > >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> > >> opinions
> > >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
> > >
> > > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
> > > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one who wins nothing
> > > but recogniton of his exasperation.
> >
> > And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> > conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
> > cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to bother
> > to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> > paste.
>
> ED ... Ed ... Ed ... I should be thankful that you continue to reading
> my messages and respond??? Your delusional, Dolan. You must have
> skippe your med dagain.
>
> TRANSLATION: Jim would you please advance this conversation (read move
> on to another taopc) since it is obvious that I cannot advance let
> alone win this argument and I need for you to spare me the public
> embarrassment.
>
> FACT: This thread was never been about logic or debate, at least not
> from Ed Dolan's peculiar perspective. In the past, Ed wrote ... "I
> will stand by anything I say and defend it no matter how outrageous it
> might first appear. All I ever want to do is to defeat and humiliate
> you". Having failed to refute the facts I presented ... having failed
> to address or counter the argument I submitted ... having failed to
> defeat or humiliate me, the defeated and humiliated Mr. Dolan was
> strategically reduced to defending his unsubstantiated opinions with
> mere fiction ... a hyperbolized value assessment of his errant
> opinions. Now this certainly meets Ed's "no matter how outrageous"
> criteria I'd have to say. Ed's motto should be ... If you can't dazzle
> 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with ********! In the past, Ed also
> wrote ... "There is always substance in my posts no matter how I craft
> them". This is a fallible and preposterous postulate at best. For
> instance, this particular thread was a showcase for Ed's obstinance and
> a conduit for opinions lacking in the very "substance" that Ed asserts
> can always be found in his posts. A single word can best summarize
> much of what he struggled to scribble ... ********. Enough said!!!

AP - Chicago, Illinois

The Chicago Police Department Punctuation Task Force raided the Forest
Glen neighborhood home of James McNamara, based on a tip from a Usenet
cycling group reader identified as "Johnny ReBike". Mr. McNamara was
arrested for exceeding the legal limit of four ellipses per paragraph.
A statement from the District Attorney's office indicated that
additional charges relating to putting leading spaces in front of the
ellipses may be brought as the investigation proceeds.

--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
I am supporting cannibalism by eating more nuts.
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
> >> >> I
> >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> >> >> opinions
> >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
> >> >
> >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
> >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
> >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
> >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to be
> >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
> >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think I'll
> >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
> >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested, unrefuted
> >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote, I'd
> >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses and
> >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
> >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
> >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
> >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability to
> >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
> >>
> >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions. I
> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> >> opinions
> >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
> >
> > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
> > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one wns nothing
> > but recogniton of his exasperation.
>
> And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
> cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to bother
> to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> paste.

How lame!!! Do you really expect me to submissively become your
scapegoat??? You're just never to blame are you, or at least you are
unwilling to be held accountable when you are obviously to blame???
The bottom line is that I tenaciously attempted to ADVANCE this
conversation by challenging your errant opinions. I persisted in
insisting that you to debate the issues, rather than parrot opinions,
but your failure to accept the challenge resulted in the thread's
stagnation ... stagnation for which ONLY you can be held responsible.
No matter what spin you vainly attempt to put on this, your opinions
still remain unsubstantiated ... my arguments still remain unchallenged
.... my logic still remains to be refuted, and your attempt to redirect
blame is as pitiful as were your lackluster "skills" of engagement.
You failed miserably GRATE one. I know that. You know that. Everyone
who followed this thread knows that and nothing you can add will change
any of that. It is time for you to limit you losses and call it done
and over with.

Jim McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > > "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
> > > >> >> I
> > > >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> > > >> >> opinions
> > > >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
> > > >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
> > > >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
> > > >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to be
> > > >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
> > > >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think I'll
> > > >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
> > > >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested, unrefuted
> > > >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote, I'd
> > > >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses and
> > > >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
> > > >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
> > > >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
> > > >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability to
> > > >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
> > > >>
> > > >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions. I
> > > >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> > > >> opinions
> > > >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
> > > >
> > > > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
> > > > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one who wins nothing
> > > > but recogniton of his exasperation.
> > >
> > > And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> > > conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
> > > cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to bother
> > > to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> > > paste.
> >
> > ED ... Ed ... Ed ... I should be thankful that you continue to reading
> > my messages and respond??? Your delusional, Dolan. You must have
> > skippe your med dagain.
> >
> > TRANSLATION: Jim would you please advance this conversation (read move
> > on to another taopc) since it is obvious that I cannot advance let
> > alone win this argument and I need for you to spare me the public
> > embarrassment.
> >
> > FACT: This thread was never been about logic or debate, at least not
> > from Ed Dolan's peculiar perspective. In the past, Ed wrote ... "I
> > will stand by anything I say and defend it no matter how outrageous it
> > might first appear. All I ever want to do is to defeat and humiliate
> > you". Having failed to refute the facts I presented ... having failed
> > to address or counter the argument I submitted ... having failed to
> > defeat or humiliate me, the defeated and humiliated Mr. Dolan was
> > strategically reduced to defending his unsubstantiated opinions with
> > mere fiction ... a hyperbolized value assessment of his errant
> > opinions. Now this certainly meets Ed's "no matter how outrageous"
> > criteria I'd have to say. Ed's motto should be ... If you can't dazzle
> > 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with ********! In the past, Ed also
> > wrote ... "There is always substance in my posts no matter how I craft
> > them". This is a fallible and preposterous postulate at best. For
> > instance, this particular thread was a showcase for Ed's obstinance and
> > a conduit for opinions lacking in the very "substance" that Ed asserts
> > can always be found in his posts. A single word can best summarize
> > much of what he struggled to scribble ... ********. Enough said!!!
>
> AP - Chicago, Illinois
>
> The Chicago Police Department Punctuation Task Force raided the Forest
> Glen neighborhood home of James McNamara, based on a tip from a Usenet
> cycling group reader identified as "Johnny ReBike". Mr. McNamara was
> arrested for exceeding the legal limit of four ellipses per paragraph.
> A statement from the District Attorney's office indicated that
> additional charges relating to putting leading spaces in front of the
> ellipses may be brought as the investigation proceeds.

Real Cute. You just must have too much time on you hands. Regardless,
speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer.
That would make me a barbarian in Dola'ns eyes, but then again I had a
glass of wine earlier. That should confuse him as to what camp I blong
in. A song comes to mind here ... Two faces have I...

Jim McNamara

> Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
> I am supporting cannibalism by eating more nuts.
 
[email protected] wrote:
> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> > [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
> > > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > > > "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > >
> > > > > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
> > > > >> >> I
> > > > >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> > > > >> >> opinions
> > > > >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
> > > > >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
> > > > >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
> > > > >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to be
> > > > >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
> > > > >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think I'll
> > > > >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
> > > > >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested, unrefuted
> > > > >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote, I'd
> > > > >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses and
> > > > >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
> > > > >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
> > > > >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
> > > > >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability to
> > > > >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions. I
> > > > >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> > > > >> opinions
> > > > >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
> > > > >
> > > > > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
> > > > > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one who wins nothing
> > > > > but recogniton of his exasperation.
> > > >
> > > > And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> > > > conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
> > > > cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to bother
> > > > to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> > > > paste.
> > >
> > > ED ... Ed ... Ed ... I should be thankful that you continue to reading
> > > my messages and respond??? Your delusional, Dolan. You must have
> > > skippe your med dagain.
> > >
> > > TRANSLATION: Jim would you please advance this conversation (read move
> > > on to another taopc) since it is obvious that I cannot advance let
> > > alone win this argument and I need for you to spare me the public
> > > embarrassment.
> > >
> > > FACT: This thread was never been about logic or debate, at least not
> > > from Ed Dolan's peculiar perspective. In the past, Ed wrote ... "I
> > > will stand by anything I say and defend it no matter how outrageous it
> > > might first appear. All I ever want to do is to defeat and humiliate
> > > you". Having failed to refute the facts I presented ... having failed
> > > to address or counter the argument I submitted ... having failed to
> > > defeat or humiliate me, the defeated and humiliated Mr. Dolan was
> > > strategically reduced to defending his unsubstantiated opinions with
> > > mere fiction ... a hyperbolized value assessment of his errant
> > > opinions. Now this certainly meets Ed's "no matter how outrageous"
> > > criteria I'd have to say. Ed's motto should be ... If you can't dazzle
> > > 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with ********! In the past, Ed also
> > > wrote ... "There is always substance in my posts no matter how I craft
> > > them". This is a fallible and preposterous postulate at best. For
> > > instance, this particular thread was a showcase for Ed's obstinance and
> > > a conduit for opinions lacking in the very "substance" that Ed asserts
> > > can always be found in his posts. A single word can best summarize
> > > much of what he struggled to scribble ... ********. Enough said!!!
> >
> > AP - Chicago, Illinois
> >
> > The Chicago Police Department Punctuation Task Force raided the Forest
> > Glen neighborhood home of James McNamara, based on a tip from a Usenet
> > cycling group reader identified as "Johnny ReBike". Mr. McNamara was
> > arrested for exceeding the legal limit of four ellipses per paragraph.
> > A statement from the District Attorney's office indicated that
> > additional charges relating to putting leading spaces in front of the
> > ellipses may be brought as the investigation proceeds.
>
> Real Cute. You just must have too much time on you hands. Regardless,
> speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer.
> That would make me a barbarian in Dola'ns eyes, but then again I had a
> glass of wine earlier. That should confuse him as to what camp I blong
> in. A song comes to mind here ... Two faces have I...

That should have read "Dolan's" and "belong" and "in what camp I
belong". Just thought I'd make the corrections before Tom did. -
JimmyMac

> Jim McNamara
>
> > Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
> > I am supporting cannibalism by eating more nuts.
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are
>> >> >> opinions.
>> >> >> I
>> >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
>> >> >> opinions
>> >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
>> >> >
>> >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
>> >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
>> >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
>> >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to
>> >> > be
>> >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
>> >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think
>> >> > I'll
>> >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
>> >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested,
>> >> > unrefuted
>> >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote,
>> >> > I'd
>> >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses
>> >> > and
>> >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
>> >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
>> >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
>> >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability
>> >> > to
>> >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
>> >>
>> >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
>> >> I
>> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
>> >> opinions
>> >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
>> >
>> > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
>> > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one wns nothing
>> > but recogniton of his exasperation.
>>
>> And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
>> conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
>> cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to
>> bother
>> to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
>> paste.
>
> How lame!!! Do you really expect me to submissively become your
> scapegoat??? You're just never to blame are you, or at least you are
> unwilling to be held accountable when you are obviously to blame???
> The bottom line is that I tenaciously attempted to ADVANCE this
> conversation by challenging your errant opinions. I persisted in
> insisting that you to debate the issues, rather than parrot opinions,
> but your failure to accept the challenge resulted in the thread's
> stagnation ... stagnation for which ONLY you can be held responsible.
> No matter what spin you vainly attempt to put on this, your opinions
> still remain unsubstantiated ... my arguments still remain unchallenged
> ... my logic still remains to be refuted, and your attempt to redirect
> blame is as pitiful as were your lackluster "skills" of engagement.
> You failed miserably GRATE one. I know that. You know that. Everyone
> who followed this thread knows that and nothing you can add will change
> any of that. It is time for you to limit you losses and call it done
> and over with.

Jim, your writing is a mess. No one is reading you and even I find it
tedious.

Long paragraphs will not cut it on Usenet. You need to break everything down
in order to make it easy for the casual reader to follow what it is that you
are saying. Note how neither I nor Tom (the two best writers on this group)
go on and on like you do.

You are hung up on words and seem not to have a glimmer of what ideas are in
play. This thread never had any substance to begin with except what I gave
it. To want to debate over nothing is absurd. Most of these threads on
Usenet do not have much substance and are mostly about a play of humor and
wit. For you not to realize this is a major deficiency on your part. You
need to lighten up and get with the program.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
>> conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
>> cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to
>> bother
>> to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
>> paste.
[...]
> FACT: This thread was never been about logic or debate, at least not
> from Ed Dolan's peculiar perspective. In the past, Ed wrote ... "I
> will stand by anything I say and defend it no matter how outrageous it
> might first appear. All I ever want to do is to defeat and humiliate
> you". Having failed to refute the facts I presented ... having failed
> to address or counter the argument I submitted ... having failed to
> defeat or humiliate me, the defeated and humiliated Mr. Dolan was
> strategically reduced to defending his unsubstantiated opinions with
> mere fiction ... a hyperbolized value assessment of his errant
> opinions. Now this certainly meets Ed's "no matter how outrageous"
> criteria I'd have to say. Ed's motto should be ... If you can't dazzle
> 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with ********! In the past, Ed also
> wrote ... "There is always substance in my posts no matter how I craft
> them". This is a fallible and preposterous postulate at best. For
> instance, this particular thread was a showcase for Ed's obstinance and
> a conduit for opinions lacking in the very "substance" that Ed asserts
> can always be found in his posts. A single word can best summarize
> much of what he struggled to scribble ... ********. Enough said!!!

These posts to Usenet are always and forever about nothing but opinions,
opinions, opinions. Not to realize this marks you as an ignoramus of the
first rank. Those who pretend Usenet is about anything else are very funny
creatures indeed.

The fact is that my opinions are superior to everyone else's. Opinions can
be just chock full of substance as mine always are. I will consider others'
opinions if and when they make any sense, and who knows, I may even adopt
them for my own.

The real trick is to express your opinions with some force and, if possible,
some wit. Try it sometime yourself, why don't you?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate [Great] wrote:
[...]
>> PS. What are you doing up at 4 o'clock in the morning. These are my
>> hours,
>> not yours!
>
> I was posting a few messages before leaving for work.

Nobody gets up 4 o'clock in the morning unless he has a very long commute
ahead of him. You are a single guy and there is no need for you to live way
out in the boondocks of some suburb. Live close in even if it costs more.
Time is money and anyone who wastes it commuting when he doesn't have to is
a blooming idiot.

I lived in New York City (Brooklyn) for many years in my long lost youth and
I always managed to live within a 5 minute walk to work. Hells Bells, I
would get up at 8:45 and be to work by 9:00. I don't believe it ever gets
any better than that!

> Tom Sherman - Here, not there.

Yes, but exactly where?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> >> Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are
> >> >> >> opinions.
> >> >> >> I
> >> >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> >> >> >> opinions
> >> >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not another opinion about opinions??? Most of what I stated was not
> >> >> > opinion, but rather argument supporterd by fact. I have come to the
> >> >> > conclusion that you are so wrapped up in yourself, so subjectively
> >> >> > intertwined with your delicate ego, that it is impossible for you to
> >> >> > be
> >> >> > objective. When you can offer nothing else, you offer more flimsy
> >> >> > opinion to justify you previously stated flimsy opinions. I think
> >> >> > I'll
> >> >> > get off this merry-go-round and let the readership decide who stated
> >> >> > what best ... your opinion or my unchallenged, uncontested,
> >> >> > unrefuted
> >> >> > facts and argument. I am confident that if we put this to a vote,
> >> >> > I'd
> >> >> > win hands down. You just wouldn't accept the opinion of the masses
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > would merely dismiss their opinions as having come from morons,
> >> >> > imbeciles and idiots. The fact remains that you are incapable of
> >> >> > admitting that you are ever wrong as if such admission were an
> >> >> > intolerable flaw ... a sign of weakenss when actually your inability
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > make such an admission is a flaw and a sign of weakness.
> >> >>
> >> >> "Nope, why should I when all that counts on these forums are opinions.
> >> >> I
> >> >> value my opinions and I don't much value yours. Whoever states his
> >> >> opinions
> >> >> best wins. It is really just that simple." - Ed Dolan
> >> >
> >> > He who has nothing left to offer but incessant cut and paste
> >> > regurgitation is, in effect, defeated ... a loser ... one wns nothing
> >> > but recogniton of his exasperation.
> >>
> >> And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> >> conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
> >> cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to
> >> bother
> >> to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> >> paste.
> >
> > How lame!!! Do you really expect me to submissively become your
> > scapegoat??? You're just never to blame are you, or at least you are
> > unwilling to be held accountable when you are obviously to blame???
> > The bottom line is that I tenaciously attempted to ADVANCE this
> > conversation by challenging your errant opinions. I persisted in
> > insisting that you to debate the issues, rather than parrot opinions,
> > but your failure to accept the challenge resulted in the thread's
> > stagnation ... stagnation for which ONLY you can be held responsible.
> > No matter what spin you vainly attempt to put on this, your opinions
> > still remain unsubstantiated ... my arguments still remain unchallenged
> > ... my logic still remains to be refuted, and your attempt to redirect
> > blame is as pitiful as were your lackluster "skills" of engagement.
> > You failed miserably GRATE one. I know that. You know that. Everyone
> > who followed this thread knows that and nothing you can add will change
> > any of that. It is time for you to limit you losses and call it done
> > and over with.
>
> Jim, your writing is a mess. No one is reading you and even I find it
> tedious.
>
> Long paragraphs will not cut it on Usenet. You need to break everything down
> in order to make it easy for the casual reader to follow what it is that you
> are saying. Note how neither I nor Tom (the two best writers on this group)
> go on and on like you do.
>
> You are hung up on words and seem not to have a glimmer of what ideas are in
> play. This thread never had any substance to begin with except what I gave
> it. To want to debate over nothing is absurd. Most of these threads on
> Usenet do not have much substance and are mostly about a play of humor and
> wit. For you not to realize this is a major deficiency on your part. You
> need to lighten up and get with the program.

What we have here is your trademark copout thinly desquised as a
sincere lecture.

Jim McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> And that is all you ever going to get unless and until you advance the
> >> conversation. So far you have proven that you are the greatest whiner and
>> >> cry baby Usenet has ever known, Be thankful I am still continuing to
> >> bother
> >> to read your messages, let alone to respond to them even with a cut and
> >> paste.
> [...]
> > FACT: This thread was never been about logic or debate, at least not
> > from Ed Dolan's peculiar perspective. In the past, Ed wrote ... "I
> > will stand by anything I say and defend it no matter how outrageous it
> > might first appear. All I ever want to do is to defeat and humiliate
> > you". Having failed to refute the facts I presented ... having failed
> > to address or counter the argument I submitted ... having failed to
> > defeat or humiliate me, the defeated and humiliated Mr. Dolan was
> > strategically reduced to defending his unsubstantiated opinions with
> > mere fiction ... a hyperbolized value assessment of his errant
> > opinions. Now this certainly meets Ed's "no matter how outrageous"
> > criteria I'd have to say. Ed's motto should be ... If you can't dazzle
> > 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with ********! In the past, Ed also
> > wrote ... "There is always substance in my posts no matter how I craft
> > them". This is a fallible and preposterous postulate at best. For
> > instance, this particular thread was a showcase for Ed's obstinance and
> > a conduit for opinions lacking in the very "substance" that Ed asserts
> > can always be found in his posts. A single word can best summarize
> > much of what he struggled to scribble ... ********. Enough said!!!
>
> These posts to Usenet are always and forever about nothing but opinions,
> opinions, opinions.

And this is just another one of your errant opinions ... this one an
opnion about Usenet and opinions. You said it best ... "I frankly do
not have the slightest idea what newsgroups are all about". Since you
admittedly don't have the slighest idea what newsgroups are all about,
why bother to offer an opinion regardiing what they are about??? The
conundrum continues.

> Not to realize this marks you as an ignoramus of the
> first rank.

Not to realize that Usenet can and has been otherwise and not to
realize that your opinion are subjective personal sentiment subect to
error, marks you as an ingnoramous who is beyond category..

> Those who pretend Usenet is about anything else are very funny
> creatures indeed.

Those wo pretend that Usenet is ALL about opinion are funner still. "I
frankly do not have the slightest idea what newsgroups are all about"
.... Ed Dolan. The conundrum continues..

> The fact is that my opinions are superior to everyone else's. Opinions can
> be just chock full of substance as mine always are. I will consider others'
> opinions if and when they make any sense, and who knows, I may even adopt
> them for my own.

Slow down ther eold-timer. This is an opiinion stated as fact about
opinion. Follw me??? Your opinions are superior to everyone else's
was emphatically stated as fact. You are confusing FACT with OPINION,
once again. Concan the Librarian, even you should know that the two
are not synonymous. An opinion is a personal belief or sentiment that
is not founded on positive proof; an unsubstantiated conclusion. What
you have stated here is basically an opinoin regarding your opinion and
an opinion does not a fact make. A fact is a concept whose truth has
been or can be proved. You have yet to prove that your opinons are
superior to everyone else's and to even make such a statement is
indicative of your outlandish arrogance..

> The real trick is to express your opinions with some force and, if possible,
> some wit. Try it sometime yourself, why don't you?

Oh I think force was not the issue. I stated my argument with
forcefully. What does with have to do with the equation??? Math hs no
wit. I repeat ... my math remains valid and your assertion remains
uncorroborated and unfounded. Regardless of the length of stay, the
exact same mass is transported the exact same distance, burning the
exact same amount of jet fuel. No more of earth's resources are wasted
on a short trip than on a longer one. You are really stubborn and thick
headed ... one of your less than
endearing trademarks. You never challenged my arguent when I
challenged your assertions (read opiinions). You did not, and cannot,
refute my argument. Opinion are not synonymous with refutation. You
are long overdue to lick you wounds, put your tail between your legs
and skulk on out of here.

Jim McNamara


> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate [Great] wrote:
> [...]
> >> PS. What are you doing up at 4 o'clock in the morning. These are my
> >> hours,
> >> not yours!
> >
> > I was posting a few messages before leaving for work.
>
> Nobody gets up 4 o'clock in the morning unless he has a very long commute
> ahead of him. You are a single guy and there is no need for you to live way
> out in the boondocks of some suburb. Live close in even if it costs more.
> Time is money and anyone who wastes it commuting when he doesn't have to is
> a blooming idiot.

Well, the longer commute is a temporary condition, and I was at work by
5 AM.

> I lived in New York City (Brooklyn) for many years in my long lost youth and
> I always managed to live within a 5 minute walk to work. Hells Bells, I
> would get up at 8:45 and be to work by 9:00. I don't believe it ever gets
> any better than that!
>
> > Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
>
> Yes, but exactly where?

The land of Beer, cheese, sausage and Holstein/Friesians.

--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
 
[email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:

> ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....

I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
using the bottle as a resonator.

[1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.

--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
 
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate [Great] wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> PS. What are you doing up at 4 o'clock in the morning. These are my
>> >> hours,
>> >> not yours!
>> >
>> > I was posting a few messages before leaving for work.
>>
>> Nobody gets up 4 o'clock in the morning unless he has a very long commute
>> ahead of him. You are a single guy and there is no need for you to live
>> way
>> out in the boondocks of some suburb. Live close in even if it costs more.
>> Time is money and anyone who wastes it commuting when he doesn't have to
>> is
>> a blooming idiot.
>
> Well, the longer commute is a temporary condition, and I was at work by
> 5 AM.
>
>> I lived in New York City (Brooklyn) for many years in my long lost youth
>> and
>> I always managed to live within a 5 minute walk to work. Hells Bells, I
>> would get up at 8:45 and be to work by 9:00. I don't believe it ever gets
>> any better than that!
>>
>> > Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
>>
>> Yes, but exactly where?
>
> The land of Beer, cheese, sausage and Holstein/Friesians.

Are you back in your boyhood home state then - Wisconsin?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> The real trick is to express your opinions with some force and, if
>> possible,
>> some wit. Try it sometime yourself, why don't you?
>
> Oh I think force was not the issue. I stated my argument with
> forcefully. What does with have to do with the equation??? Math hs no
> wit. I repeat ... my math remains valid and your assertion remains
> uncorroborated and unfounded. Regardless of the length of stay, the
> exact same mass is transported the exact same distance, burning the
> exact same amount of jet fuel. No more of earth's resources are wasted
> on a short trip than on a longer one. You are really stubborn and thick
> headed ... one of your less than
> endearing trademarks. You never challenged my arguent when I
> challenged your assertions (read opiinions). You did not, and cannot,
> refute my argument. Opinion are not synonymous with refutation. You
> are long overdue to lick you wounds, put your tail between your legs
> and skulk on out of here.

"The real trick is to express your opinions with some force and, if
possible,
some wit. Try it sometime yourself, why don't you?" - Ed Dolan

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> Jim, your writing is a mess. No one is reading you and even I find it
>> tedious.
>>
>> Long paragraphs will not cut it on Usenet. You need to break everything
>> down
>> in order to make it easy for the casual reader to follow what it is that
>> you
>> are saying. Note how neither I nor Tom (the two best writers on this
>> group)
>> go on and on like you do.
>>
>> You are hung up on words and seem not to have a glimmer of what ideas are
>> in
>> play. This thread never had any substance to begin with except what I
>> gave
>> it. To want to debate over nothing is absurd. Most of these threads on
>> Usenet do not have much substance and are mostly about a play of humor
>> and
>> wit. For you not to realize this is a major deficiency on your part. You
>> need to lighten up and get with the program.
>
> What we have here is your trademark copout thinly desquised as a
> sincere lecture.

I think I perhaps could have been a good teacher except that I have always
hated young people. Hells Bells, I didn't even like myself much when I was
young.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> [email protected] aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>
> > ...speaking of time and liquid nutrition, I think I'll pour myself a beer....
>
> I drink Beer from the bottle [1]. This has the advantages of less
> agitation of the Beer (and therefore less foam generated) and no glass
> to wash when you are done. A side benefit is you can entertain yourself
> using the bottle as a resonator.
>
> [1] Real Beer comes in bottles, not cans.

Real beer comes straight from the tap and the barkeep has to wash the
glass. Bottles can be a good second chance, but only when brown (ask
if you don't know why) and a can is a synonym for a toilet. - Jim
McNamara

> Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> Jim, your writing is a mess. No one is reading you and even I find it
> >> tedious.
> >>
> >> Long paragraphs will not cut it on Usenet. You need to break everything
> >> down
> >> in order to make it easy for the casual reader to follow what it is that
> >> you
> >> are saying. Note how neither I nor Tom (the two best writers on this
> >> group)
> >> go on and on like you do.
> >>
> >> You are hung up on words and seem not to have a glimmer of what ideas are
> >> in
> >> play. This thread never had any substance to begin with except what I
> >> gave
> >> it. To want to debate over nothing is absurd. Most of these threads on
> >> Usenet do not have much substance and are mostly about a play of humor
> >> and
> >> wit. For you not to realize this is a major deficiency on your part. You
> >> need to lighten up and get with the program.
> >
> > What we have here is your trademark copout thinly desquised as a
> > sincere lecture.
>
> I think I perhaps could have been a good teacher except that I have always
> hated young people. Hells Bells, I didn't even like myself much when I was
> young.

Frankly, I don't see why your attitude changed. - Jim McNamara

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> The real trick is to express your opinions with some force and, if
> >> possible,
> >> some wit. Try it sometime yourself, why don't you?
> >
> > Oh I think force was not the issue. I stated my argument with
> > forcefully. What does with have to do with the equation??? Math hs no
> > wit. I repeat ... my math remains valid and your assertion remains
> > uncorroborated and unfounded. Regardless of the length of stay, the
> > exact same mass is transported the exact same distance, burning the
> > exact same amount of jet fuel. No more of earth's resources are wasted
> > on a short trip than on a longer one. You are really stubborn and thick
> > headed ... one of your less than
> > endearing trademarks. You never challenged my arguent when I
> > challenged your assertions (read opiinions). You did not, and cannot,
> > refute my argument. Opinion are not synonymous with refutation. You
> > are long overdue to lick you wounds, put your tail between your legs
> > and skulk on out of here.
>
> "The real trick is to express your opinions with some force and, if
> possible,
> some wit. Try it sometime yourself, why don't you?" - Ed Dolan

I presented facts in the form of an argument. Opinions reagrdless of
how expressed pale in comparison. How's that for wit ... twit???

When you've run clean out of content (and you obvioulsy have), you just
senselessly repeat yourself hoping that no one will even notice and to
think you are fond of referring to others as a one note Johnny. If you
hadn't offfered up your unsubstantiates opinions, or if you at least
had the fortitude to defend your errant assertions, I wouldn't have had
to jump in youf ****, but as you are fond of saying, I was just doing a
bit of housekeeping ... not allowing your outrageous remarks to go
uncontested. A few observations are in order here...

Readers, Usenet newsgroups serve as Ed Dolan's chosen, but constraining
social communication conduit. He is a Usenet newsgroup "homesteader".
ARBR has become his cyber-playpen ... a showcase for his unruly ego. A
geriatric juvenile, Ed's social interaction skills can best be
described as vestigial and his fatuous, loquacious drivel are his
cyber-trademark. Disenfranchised from reality, this lonesome loon is
possessed by an unrestrained and enormously distended sense of
self-importance. He is a cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool
.... an incorrigible curmudgeon intoxicated by his own flatulence.
Usenet newsgroups, and ARBR in particular, are the source from which he
garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem, the source from
which he derives meaning for his pathetic, shallow existence. It must
really suck to be head swollen ... Ed Dolan!!!

Jim McNamara




> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> I think I perhaps could have been a good teacher except that I have
>> always
>> hated young people. Hells Bells, I didn't even like myself much when I
>> was
>> young.
>
> Frankly, I don't see why your attitude changed. - Jim McNamara

It changed after I became Great.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
[...]
> When you've run clean out of content (and you obvioulsy have), you just
> senselessly repeat yourself hoping that no one will even notice and to
> think you are fond of referring to others as a one note Johnny. ....

The only one-note Johnny here is Jim McNamara who doe not know how to be
anything other than a blood sucking leech and a stalker, that most pitiful
of all Usenet creatures. I actually feel sorry for him. It would be better
if he were a troll - which he is not far from being in any event. But he
only trolls me. Go figure!

If you
> hadn't offfered up your unsubstantiates opinions, or if you at least
> had the fortitude to defend your errant assertions, I wouldn't have had
> to jump in youf ****, but as you are fond of saying, I was just doing a
> bit of housekeeping ... not allowing your outrageous remarks to go
> uncontested. A few observations are in order here...
>
> Readers, Usenet newsgroups serve as Ed Dolan's chosen, but constraining
> social communication conduit. He is a Usenet newsgroup "homesteader".
> ARBR has become his cyber-playpen ... a showcase for his unruly ego. A
> geriatric juvenile, Ed's social interaction skills can best be
> described as vestigial and his fatuous, loquacious drivel are his
> cyber-trademark. Disenfranchised from reality, this lonesome loon is
> possessed by an unrestrained and enormously distended sense of
> self-importance. He is a cantankerous, misguided, quintessential fool
> ... an incorrigible curmudgeon intoxicated by his own flatulence.
> Usenet newsgroups, and ARBR in particular, are the source from which he
> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem, the source from
> which he derives meaning for his pathetic, shallow existence. It must
> really suck to be head swollen ... Ed Dolan!!!

The above is pure drivel and no one in their right mind is going to bother
to read it - and that most definitely includes me.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back