Simon Mason said:
"Pyromancer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
Arrghh - yes, that drives me up the wall! Whenever I know I'll be
stopped for more than a minute or so I switch the engine off (and if the
jam is on a slope, leave it off and roll slowly down using the
footbrake), but everyone else just seems to sit there, idling away,
engines turning over at 900-ish RPM, burning fuel to no purpose and
pumping out huge quantities of exhaust.
I do the same, but you have to be careful with modern brakes that are servo
assisted since once the engine is off, you need a lot more foot pressure to
keep the car still. Also, if you leave your ignition on you will dazzle rear
traffic with the high intensity brake lights.
In The Netherlands there is a sign before bridges and railway lines that
says "bridge up?, motor off!". It might even be an offence there to idle
your engine to excess IIRC.
I think it is in the UK as well:
From the CCN:
Legislation introduced on 2nd February 1998 made it an
offence to cause unnecessary emissions by leaving a
vehicle's engine running unnecessarily whilst stationary.
This extended an existing offence of causing
unnecessary noise by the same means. Enforcement is
predominantly by the police and the offence carries a
maximum fine on conviction of £1,000.
In addition, regulations in December 1997 enabled
seven local authorities – Birmingham, Bristol,
Canterbury, Glasgow, Middlesbrough, Swansea and
Westminster – to issue fixed penalty notices in relation
to any vehicle with an engine running unnecessarily
whilst stationary. The fixed penalty is £20. It is proposed
that these powers by extended more widely in England
and Wales.
Apparently Scotland's ahead of the game:
http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=376682004
Never heard of anyone getting done, though.