MICHAEL JACKSON NOT GUILTY

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

nb

notbob said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

That does it. If I ever get the urge to go out and kill some one or
have sleepovers with little boys, I am going to go to California, the
place where you can get away with murder if you have enough money.

notbob said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

nb

It's been said before, but only in America where a black man can grow
up to become a white woman.

"notbob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

nb

You are a USA Citizen...Notbob...Aren't you ?....If so...Don't you believe
in your own Justice System ?....He has been tried by a court ..Judge, 12
person Jury...What's wrong then with the American system ??....I don't like
him myself...I am not a fan of his..but if you can't believe in your own
'Justice System'....there's not much hope then...is there ?

He is just a very foolish person and very 'Naive' at that !!

--
Bigbazza (Barry)..Oz

"Bigbazza" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

He is just a very foolish person and very 'Naive' at that !!

I think "naive" pretty much nails it. He's not living in reality at all. Not
talented? His stuff isn't my cup of tea but he's very charismatic and has
been performing all his life. He has tremendous ability but it's too bad he
lives in fantasyland.

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"BeautyBuyNature.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

NOT GUILTY

He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly guilty
of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a total mystery
how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are almost the
definition of bad.

--
Peter Aitken

I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world who
find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious therapy,
but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not be your cup of
tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.

As to the not guilty, there's plenty of evidence that the general public did
not see that the jury did, so I have to believe there is a reason he was
acquitted based on that.

It's easy to say that people with money get acquitted, and it is true, but
not for the reasons most people would think. It happens because people with
money can afford a good defense. They can afford to have good attorneys,
invesitgators, rebuttal witnesses, etc. The problem lies not with them but
with the way trials are filled with witnesses and experts that are there
solely because they are being paid to be.

kimberly

Quoted message said:

"rmg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Bigbazza" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

He is just a very foolish person and very 'Naive' at that !!

I think "naive" pretty much nails it. He's not living in reality at all.
Not
talented? His stuff isn't my cup of tea but he's very charismatic and has
been performing all his life. He has tremendous ability but it's too bad
he
lives in fantasyland.

That is and always has been his problem..He lives in his own fantasy
land...Why...look at what he has created in 'Neverland'..as far away from
reality as one could get....I have never understood just 'why' he has
surgically destroyed himself !....He was always a good looking kid...there
was nothing wrong with his looks...To be white...or Negroid...so what
!!...He now looks just so 'stupid'...I really do feel sorry for him...He has
been found 'not Guilty' by a unanimous decision of the jury...Let him alone
now I say...I know that the public though 'will not' leave him alone...As I
have already said...I am far from a fan of his...But that is just because
his type of singing and (except for his dancing) and entertainment is not my
cup of tea !!

--
Bigbazza (Barry)..Oz

"Nexis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:YJqre.117$X71.61@fed1read07...

Quoted message said:

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"BeautyBuyNature.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

NOT GUILTY

He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly
guilty of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a total
mystery how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are almost
the definition of bad.

--
Peter Aitken

I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world
who find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious
therapy, but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not be
your cup of tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.

As to the not guilty, there's plenty of evidence that the general public
did not see that the jury did, so I have to believe there is a reason he
was acquitted based on that.

It's easy to say that people with money get acquitted, and it is true, but
not for the reasons most people would think. It happens because people
with money can afford a good defense. They can afford to have good
attorneys, invesitgators, rebuttal witnesses, etc. The problem lies not
with them but with the way trials are filled with witnesses and experts
that are there solely because they are being paid to be.

kimberly

Quoted message said:

I agree with your statements 100%....Kimberly

--
Bigbazza (Barry)..Oz

notbob said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

I wasn't a juror who was presented with all the evidence and testimony
available and neither were you, but I've thought all along that
Jackson isn't guilty as this prosecutor has presented the charges.
From what I can infer, he is likely asexual and so disconnected with
reality, so unable to exercise good judgment that he really thinks he
can be playmates with these kids. The bit where he said - and proudly
- in a national interview that he slept platonically with the boys
was more or less a "tell," as they say in gambling, for me. He
actually sees no problem with an adult male sleeping with juvenile
males b/c he's just "one of the boys" himself with no sexual agenda.
And he *has* no sexual agenda b/c he is asexual, IMHO.

I actually have used the term "Michael Jackson Syndrome" to define a
person who is so wealthy and famous that they have no one around them
with the power to give him or her a reality check, just a bunch of
flunkies on his or her payroll. Who in Michael Jackson's entourage is
gonna say, "Hey, Michael, maybe putting young boys in your bed is a
reeeally bad idea and sends out reeeally bad signals..." YMMV, but I
think the only thing MJ is likely guilty of is being an idiot and
surrounding himself with more idiots.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

think the only thing MJ is likely guilty of is being an idiot and
surrounding himself with more idiots.

I think this isn't the last time we're going to see Michael in the
courtroom for this kind of thing. ...nuff said...

nb

notbob said:

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

think the only thing MJ is likely guilty of is being an idiot and
surrounding himself with more idiots.

I think this isn't the last time we're going to see Michael in the
courtroom for this kind of thing. ...nuff said...

Hopefully, if he wants to have another slumber party it will be with
people above the age of consent.

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Good! The prosecution's witnesses were too weak.

I am not a MJ lover, but I know a feeding frenzy when I see one.
Unfortunately, he never grew up (he matured in age only) and that's
what took him to court.

I think he is so rich (and surrounded by sycophants) that no one has
ever dared tell him what is socially appropriate - considering the age
differences between him and his guests.

Dave Smith said:

notbob said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

That does it. If I ever get the urge to go out and kill some one or
have sleepovers with little boys, I am going to go to California, the
place where you can get away with murder if you have enough money.

Dave Smith said:

That does it. If I ever get the urge to go out and kill some one or
have sleepovers with little boys, I am going to go to California, the
place where you can get away with murder if you have enough money.

"If the glove don't fit, you must aquit!" That was smoke/mirrors and
a lot of bad acting that the jury swallowed hook line and sinker.

rmg said:

He has tremendous ability but it's too bad he
lives in fantasyland.

He lives in Neverland... Peter Pan - get the picture?
He knows he hasn't grown up.

"notbob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

think the only thing MJ is likely guilty of is being an idiot and
surrounding himself with more idiots.

I think this isn't the last time we're going to see Michael in the
courtroom for this kind of thing. ...nuff said...

nb

Perhaps not. But it won't prove he is any more or less guilty of any actual
sexual behavior. He's an easy target. He acts in a manner that most people
find, at best, to be odd. He surrounds himself with children, (and I agree
with Terry here that he does so because he can't relate to adults, and is
essentially a kid himself), which--particularly in these times--is suspect
in and of itself.

The bottom line is, it is easy to armchair quarterback, but you don't know
any better than the rest of us in the general public if he is guilty of
anything more than a disconnection from reality.

kimberly

"Dave Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

notbob said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

That does it. If I ever get the urge to go out and kill some one or
have sleepovers with little boys, I am going to go to California, the
place where you can get away with murder if you have enough money.

I don't know about Michael or OJ....but apparently it is perfectly okay to
run someone over with your car in our lovely sunshine-filled state.

My husband was hit by a car almost 2 weeks ago. It was deliberate. My
daughter and his brother witnessed it. The police came, handcuffed the guy,
stayed until an ambulance took my husband to the hospital, then uncuffed and
released the guy. When my BIL asked why, the cop replied "It wasn't like he
did it on purpose".
Oddly enough, I was at the Farmer's Market in Hillcrest ( I bought some
luscious raspberries, does that count as OBFood??), and overheard another
couple recounting a similar experience...although the person hit in that
case was on a bike, not on foot.

kimberly

sf said:

"If the glove don't fit, you must aquit!" That was smoke/mirrors and
a lot of bad acting that the jury swallowed hook line and sinker.

Tell 'em, sf. That was the most blatant pile of steaming dung
presented in the whole trial. What the Hell were the oversized ill
fitting pvc gloves on OJ's hands he was trying to slip the evidence
gloves over? What was the pretext for their use? Gee, can I arch my
hands to make it look like gloves don't fit, specially over another
pair of oversized high-friction gloves! "Smoke/mirror" is an
understatemnt. It was pure [censored] and the jury and judge should
have seen through it.

nb

notbob said:

sf said:

"If the glove don't fit, you must aquit!" That was smoke/mirrors and
a lot of bad acting that the jury swallowed hook line and sinker.

Tell 'em, sf. That was the most blatant pile of steaming dung
presented in the whole trial. What the Hell were the oversized ill
fitting pvc gloves on OJ's hands he was trying to slip the evidence
gloves over? What was the pretext for their use? Gee, can I arch my
hands to make it look like gloves don't fit, specially over another
pair of oversized high-friction gloves! "Smoke/mirror" is an
understatemnt. It was pure [censored] and the jury and judge should
have seen through it.

You don't remember why he wore that extra pair of gloves? It was to
protect him from the cooties of the "real murderer" (it was something
contagious, like HIV, which the jury understood as well as they
understood the DNA evidence).