MICHAEL JACKSON NOT GUILTY

Dave Smith said:

notbob said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

That does it. If I ever get the urge to go out and kill some one or
have sleepovers with little boys, I am going to go to California, the
place where you can get away with murder if you have enough money.

I think Robert Blake said it best: "You're guilty until proven broke."

These high profile cases make a lot of people rich and boost a lot of
careers. I guess those involved hate to gain so much and actually convict
the bad guy, too. Maybe they think that losing a couple of mil is adequate
punishment. Ahhhh, capitalism... where everything is for sale.

Elaine, too

sf said:

You don't remember why he wore that extra pair of gloves? It was to
protect him from the cooties of the "real murderer" (it was something
contagious, like HIV, which the jury understood as well as they
understood the DNA evidence).

No. I was so disgusted by the whole [censored] defense, I could barely
stand to watch. Sure, we all know ...*NOW*... that no one can get
HIV from gloves, but even then it was just so much [censored]. I'm
forever stunned by the gullibility of the average citizen. Case in
point.

One of my closest friends served on a jury. The defendent was charged
with 1st degree murder. He paid a hit man to kill his partner. The
crime took place in the defendents car when the hit man, riding
shotgun, turned around and blasted both the company's secretary
(killed instantly) and his partner in the back seat. The car stopped
and the still living partner clawed his way out the back door and made
a break for it, running for his life down the street. The defendent
grabbed the gun from the hit man and started chasing his partner.
After several blocks chase and running his partner down, the defendent
emptied the gun into his partner.

But surprise, the victim lived!! He testified against the defendent
and the hit man. End of story, the perp was found guilty of 1st deg
murder. Comes the penalty phase. The jury votes to life in prison
instead of the death penalty. Why? I asked my friend why he voted
for life instead of he death penalty. Turns out the defendent had
done a couple nice things in his life like funding a Little League
team. Arrrhggg....

It's no wonder perps think they can get away with anything. They
usually can!!

nb

Nexis said:

any better than the rest of us in the general public if he is guilty of
anything more than a disconnection from reality.

If you truly believe that, I think you are suffering from a
disconnection from reality.

nb

"Nexis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:YJqre.117$X71.61@fed1read07...

Quoted message said:

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"BeautyBuyNature.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

NOT GUILTY

He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly
guilty of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a total
mystery how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are almost
the definition of bad.

--
Peter Aitken

I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world
who find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious
therapy, but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not be
your cup of tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.

Yes, and lots of people eat at McDonalds but that does not make it good
food. Lots of people read romance novels but that does not make them good
writing. Lots of people watch soap operas but that does not make them good
drama. Need I continue?

--
Peter Aitken

sf said:

You don't remember why he wore that extra pair of gloves? It was to
protect him from the cooties of the "real murderer" (it was something
contagious, like HIV, which the jury understood as well as they
understood the DNA evidence).

Well obviously he didn't like to get the blood of other people on his hands,
which explains why he used the gloves in the first place. If I had a snug
fitting pair of gloves that had been wet with blood, dried out and then a year
and a half later I tried to put them on over top of a dry latex glove I can
guarantee that I would not be able to get them on without great effort.

He's GUILTY...he just got away with it.....

Gene said:

He's GUILTY...he just got away with it.....

He finally got off :-)

Dave Smith said:

Gene said:

He's GUILTY...he just got away with it.....

He finally got off :-)

LOL 🙂
Cathy

--
I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Nexis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:YJqre.117$X71.61@fed1read07...

Quoted message said:

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"BeautyBuyNature.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> NOT GUILTY
>
He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly
guilty of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a

total

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

mystery how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are almost
the definition of bad.

--
Peter Aitken

I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world
who find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious
therapy, but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not

be

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

your cup of tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.

Yes, and lots of people eat at McDonalds but that does not make it good
food. Lots of people read romance novels but that does not make them good
writing. Lots of people watch soap operas but that does not make them good
drama. Need I continue?

--
Peter Aitken

Ever hear of "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"? Sorry to have to inform
you of this, but your opinion doesn't carry much weight with the masses.
H

sf said:

BeautyBuyNature.com said:

NOT GUILTY

Good! The prosecution's witnesses were too weak.

I am not a MJ lover, but I know a feeding frenzy when I see one.
Unfortunately, he never grew up (he matured in age only) and that's
what took him to court.

I think he is so rich (and surrounded by sycophants) that no one has
ever dared tell him what is socially appropriate - considering the age
differences between him and his guests.

I'm sure some dared, they were dismissed.

Michael Jackson exhibits all the signs of a severely disturbed adult
afflicted with one or a combination of the many Regressive Behavioural
syndromes, he is as classic an example as there is, right down to the
self-mutilation. He lives 24/7 as a 12 year old, a severely disturbed
12 year old, and when in the presence of other 12 year olds, in his
depraved mind IS one of them (he is not acting), and they, so easily
manipulated as typical 12 year olds wont to be see him as one of
them... one and the other see each other as actual peers, and trust
among 12 year old males develops very rapidly and with great depth (ie.
there is no female equivalent of 'blood brothers'😉, call it early male
bonding, females do not ever truly bond, not even with their mothers.
Now try to put away your naiveties and think about what typically
occurs regarding sexual awakening/experimentation at nubile oriented
sleep-away camps, both male and female based... Michael Jackson has
created the ultimate sleep-away camp... he's created the best "little
boy, want a lolly pop?" the world has ever seen. Ordinary/regular
people with regressive behavioural diseases extremely rarely ever get
exposed (it's extremely rare that children will confide in anyone,
adult or their own peers, what sexual experimentation they engaged in
as youngsters (your own children wont, neither will you), someone with
Michael Jackson's charisma/celebrity/wealth even when exposed will
escape, and he'll do it again and escape again... mental illness of his
ilk does not go away... it's quite common but very rarely exposed, even
when right in your face does it get recognized for what it is and
therein lies the irony of Michael Jackson's disease. Mark my words,
one day the medical community will term it "Michael Jackson Syndrome".

Btw, watching the post verdict interviews, I've never before seen such
a conglomeration of low IQ pinheads as the Michael Jackson jury.

Obviously the prosecution couldn't (not didn't) make its case, gave it
a mighty effort, but were losers from the get go. Had they demanded
Michael Jackson undergo psychiatric examination before trial and then
geared their case on those results there's a very good liklihood
Michael Jackson would have been remanded to a mental institution rather
than released.

A more intelligent jury would have convicted Michael Jackson on all
counts... fear and lack of personal conviction was written all over
those juror's faces everytime they spoke

Sheldon

On Tue 14 Jun 2005 02:37:51a, notbob wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Nexis said:

any better than the rest of us in the general public if he is guilty of
anything more than a disconnection from reality.

If you truly believe that, I think you are suffering from a
disconnection from reality.

nb

Obviously, you must have been there. Maybe in his bed, too.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Peter Aitken said:

"Nexis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:YJqre.117$X71.61@fed1read07...

Quoted message said:

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"BeautyBuyNature.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

>NOT GUILTY
>
He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly
guilty of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a total
mystery how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are almost
the definition of bad.

--
Peter Aitken

I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world
who find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious
therapy, but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not be
your cup of tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.

Yes, and lots of people eat at McDonalds but that does not make it good
food. Lots of people read romance novels but that does not make them good
writing. Lots of people watch soap operas but that does not make them good
drama. Need I continue?

Lots of people like Shakespeare. Lots of people like Michaelangelo. Lots
of people like French cuisine. Lots of people like Palladian
architecture. Need I go on?

"Good" is a *subjective* evaluation. I don't especially like MJ's music,
but he sure does put on a show. That moon walk is pure poetry in motion.
But I also think he's irredeemably weird and wouldn't walk across the
street to go to a concert of his.

Pastorio

On Mon 13 Jun 2005 09:07:22p, Nexis wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

"Dave Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

notbob said:

On 2005-06-13, BeautyBuyNature.com <[email hidden]> wrote:

> NOT GUILTY

Oh swell! More reinforcement for Michael to continue his perverted
antics. That jury ...or perhaps the judge... should be put up on
charges.

That does it. If I ever get the urge to go out and kill some one or
have sleepovers with little boys, I am going to go to California, the
place where you can get away with murder if you have enough money.

I don't know about Michael or OJ....but apparently it is perfectly okay
to run someone over with your car in our lovely sunshine-filled state.

My husband was hit by a car almost 2 weeks ago. It was deliberate. My
daughter and his brother witnessed it. The police came, handcuffed the
guy, stayed until an ambulance took my husband to the hospital, then
uncuffed and released the guy. When my BIL asked why, the cop replied
"It wasn't like he did it on purpose".
Oddly enough, I was at the Farmer's Market in Hillcrest ( I bought some
luscious raspberries, does that count as OBFood??), and overheard
another couple recounting a similar experience...although the person hit
in that case was on a bike, not on foot.

kimberly

How is your husband doing, kimberly? Was the person who hit him someone
known to your family, or just a random act of intentional violence? I
can't believe the police simply let the guy go. Was he not charged with
hit and run?

I hope you husband is doind well.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

Sheldon wrote:

Oh, wait. Sheldon is giving us his considered psychological evaluation
of MJ. Wonder what book he copied this from.

Friends of irony, take note.

Pastorio

Quoted message said:

Michael Jackson exhibits all the signs of a severely disturbed adult
afflicted with one or a combination of the many Regressive Behavioural
syndromes, he is as classic an example as there is, right down to the
self-mutilation. He lives 24/7 as a 12 year old, a severely disturbed
12 year old, and when in the presence of other 12 year olds, in his
depraved mind IS one of them (he is not acting), and they, so easily
manipulated as typical 12 year olds wont to be see him as one of
them... one and the other see each other as actual peers, and trust
among 12 year old males develops very rapidly and with great depth (ie.
there is no female equivalent of 'blood brothers'😉, call it early male
bonding, females do not ever truly bond, not even with their mothers.
Now try to put away your naiveties and think about what typically
occurs regarding sexual awakening/experimentation at nubile oriented
sleep-away camps, both male and female based... Michael Jackson has
created the ultimate sleep-away camp... he's created the best "little
boy, want a lolly pop?" the world has ever seen. Ordinary/regular
people with regressive behavioural diseases extremely rarely ever get
exposed (it's extremely rare that children will confide in anyone,
adult or their own peers, what sexual experimentation they engaged in
as youngsters (your own children wont, neither will you), someone with
Michael Jackson's charisma/celebrity/wealth even when exposed will
escape, and he'll do it again and escape again... mental illness of his
ilk does not go away... it's quite common but very rarely exposed, even
when right in your face does it get recognized for what it is and
therein lies the irony of Michael Jackson's disease. Mark my words,
one day the medical community will term it "Michael Jackson Syndrome".

Btw, watching the post verdict interviews, I've never before seen such
a conglomeration of low IQ pinheads as the Michael Jackson jury.

Obviously the prosecution couldn't (not didn't) make its case, gave it
a mighty effort, but were losers from the get go. Had they demanded
Michael Jackson undergo psychiatric examination before trial and then
geared their case on those results there's a very good liklihood
Michael Jackson would have been remanded to a mental institution rather
than released.

A more intelligent jury would have convicted Michael Jackson on all
counts... fear and lack of personal conviction was written all over
those juror's faces everytime they spoke

Sheldon

On Tue 14 Jun 2005 05:51:34a, Peter Aitken wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

"Nexis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:YJqre.117$X71.61@fed1read07...

Quoted message said:

"Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"BeautyBuyNature.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> NOT GUILTY
>
He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly
guilty of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a
total mystery how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are
almost the definition of bad.

--
Peter Aitken

I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world
who find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious
therapy, but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not
be your cup of tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.

Yes, and lots of people eat at McDonalds but that does not make it good
food. Lots of people read romance novels but that does not make them
good writing. Lots of people watch soap operas but that does not make
them good drama. Need I continue?

Yes, perhaps you should. You haven't convinced me yet.

--
Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬
____________________________________________

Give me a smart idiot over a stupid genius any day.
Sam Goldwyn, 1882-1974

"Sheldon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Michael Jackson exhibits all the signs of a severely disturbed adult
afflicted with one or a combination of the many Regressive Behavioural
syndromes, he is as classic an example as there is, right down to the
self-mutilation. He lives 24/7 as a 12 year old, a severely disturbed
12 year old, and when in the presence of other 12 year olds, in his
depraved mind IS one of them (he is not acting), and they, so easily
manipulated as typical 12 year olds wont to be see him as one of
them... one and the other see each other as actual peers, and trust
among 12 year old males develops very rapidly and with great depth (ie.
there is no female equivalent of 'blood brothers'😉, call it early male
bonding, females do not ever truly bond, not even with their mothers.
Now try to put away your naiveties and think about what typically
occurs regarding sexual awakening/experimentation at nubile oriented
sleep-away camps, both male and female based... Michael Jackson has
created the ultimate sleep-away camp... he's created the best "little
boy, want a lolly pop?" the world has ever seen. Ordinary/regular
people with regressive behavioural diseases extremely rarely ever get
exposed (it's extremely rare that children will confide in anyone,
adult or their own peers, what sexual experimentation they engaged in
as youngsters (your own children wont, neither will you), someone with
Michael Jackson's charisma/celebrity/wealth even when exposed will
escape, and he'll do it again and escape again... mental illness of his
ilk does not go away... it's quite common but very rarely exposed, even
when right in your face does it get recognized for what it is and
therein lies the irony of Michael Jackson's disease. Mark my words,
one day the medical community will term it "Michael Jackson Syndrome".

Btw, watching the post verdict interviews, I've never before seen such
a conglomeration of low IQ pinheads as the Michael Jackson jury.

Obviously the prosecution couldn't (not didn't) make its case, gave it
a mighty effort, but were losers from the get go. Had they demanded
Michael Jackson undergo psychiatric examination before trial and then
geared their case on those results there's a very good liklihood
Michael Jackson would have been remanded to a mental institution rather
than released.

A more intelligent jury would have convicted Michael Jackson on all
counts... fear and lack of personal conviction was written all over
those juror's faces everytime they spoke

Sheldon

Well said - As you mentioned he should have had his head examined.

I also believe the mother of the boy should have been thrown in jail for "Child
endangerment" the one question to ask yourself is: Would you let your child have
a sleep-over with a 42 year old person in their bedroom?

I don't know about you but I think not.

Dimitri

Dave Smith said:

sf said:

You don't remember why he wore that extra pair of gloves? It was to
protect him from the cooties of the "real murderer" (it was something
contagious, like HIV, which the jury understood as well as they
understood the DNA evidence).

Well obviously he didn't like to get the blood of other people on his hands,
which explains why he used the gloves in the first place. If I had a snug
fitting pair of gloves that had been wet with blood, dried out and then a year
and a half later I tried to put them on over top of a dry latex glove I can
guarantee that I would not be able to get them on without great effort.

He was a bad actor in that scene too! How did you react when you saw
that grimmace on his face and the fakeness of how hard he tried to
"pull" on the gloves? It's a good thing I wasn't on the jury because
I would have gotten into trouble for laughing out loud.

Sheldon said:

Had they demanded
Michael Jackson undergo psychiatric examination before trial and then
geared their case on those results there's a very good liklihood
Michael Jackson would have been remanded to a mental institution rather
than released.

That's a good idea, but the prosecution didn't even approach it.

Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

Dimitri said:

"Sheldon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Michael Jackson exhibits all the signs of a severely disturbed adult
afflicted with one or a combination of the many Regressive Behavioural
syndromes, he is as classic an example as there is, right down to the
self-mutilation. He lives 24/7 as a 12 year old, a severely disturbed
12 year old, and when in the presence of other 12 year olds, in his
depraved mind IS one of them (he is not acting), and they, so easily
manipulated as typical 12 year olds wont to be see him as one of
them... one and the other see each other as actual peers, and trust
among 12 year old males develops very rapidly and with great depth (ie.
there is no female equivalent of 'blood brothers'😉, call it early male
bonding, females do not ever truly bond, not even with their mothers.
Now try to put away your naiveties and think about what typically
occurs regarding sexual awakening/experimentation at nubile oriented
sleep-away camps, both male and female based... Michael Jackson has
created the ultimate sleep-away camp... he's created the best "little
boy, want a lolly pop?" the world has ever seen. Ordinary/regular
people with regressive behavioural diseases extremely rarely ever get
exposed (it's extremely rare that children will confide in anyone,
adult or their own peers, what sexual experimentation they engaged in
as youngsters (your own children wont, neither will you), someone with
Michael Jackson's charisma/celebrity/wealth even when exposed will
escape, and he'll do it again and escape again... mental illness of his
ilk does not go away... it's quite common but very rarely exposed, even
when right in your face does it get recognized for what it is and
therein lies the irony of Michael Jackson's disease. Mark my words,
one day the medical community will term it "Michael Jackson Syndrome".

Btw, watching the post verdict interviews, I've never before seen such
a conglomeration of low IQ pinheads as the Michael Jackson jury.

Obviously the prosecution couldn't (not didn't) make its case, gave it
a mighty effort, but were losers from the get go. Had they demanded
Michael Jackson undergo psychiatric examination before trial and then
geared their case on those results there's a very good liklihood
Michael Jackson would have been remanded to a mental institution rather
than released.

A more intelligent jury would have convicted Michael Jackson on all
counts... fear and lack of personal conviction was written all over
those juror's faces everytime they spoke

Sheldon

Well said - As you mentioned he should have had his head examined.

I also believe the mother of the boy should have been thrown in jail for "Child
endangerment" the one question to ask yourself is: Would you let your child have
a sleep-over with a 42 year old person in their bedroom?

I don't know about you but I think not.

Dimitri

There is less and less competent parenting these days. In more than
half the American househlds there is no parent at home most of the
time, an absentee parent is more detrimental to a child's development
than no parent at all... a foster home or addoption is a far better
choice for those who'd bring children into the world but choose not to
parent full time. And with so many single parent households or with
both mother and father working, chidren are effectively abandoned...
day care centers are a cop-out rationalization, they're no different
from kennels... it's no wonder so many of today's youth ends up in
prison, they are from the cradle made used to a cage. When you foist
your child upon a Child Day-Care Institution you are still the
mother/father but you are NOT a parent.

Dave Smith said:

sf said:

You don't remember why he wore that extra pair of gloves? It was to
protect him from the cooties of the "real murderer" (it was something
contagious, like HIV, which the jury understood as well as they
understood the DNA evidence).

Well obviously he didn't like to get the blood of other people on his hands,
which explains why he used the gloves in the first place. If I had a snug
fitting pair of gloves that had been wet with blood, dried out and then a year
and a half later I tried to put them on over top of a dry latex glove I can
guarantee that I would not be able to get them on without great effort.

Then there is that factor that leather "draws up" when it is soaking wet
and then allowed to dry - no matter what the "wet" was. The finer the
cure, the finer the leather, and the more the shrinkage.

He couldn't have gotten that glove on his hand with the jaws of life. If
the prosecution had really been trying the case, they would have had a new
pair of gloves of the same make, model, and size to show the difference.
The "bloody glove" was distorted from its original shape and size so
drastically that it was easily discernable on my tv screen.

Elaine, too