Kenny said:
gwhite <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Kenny wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:And that's where it goes wrong
No, that's where goes right.
??? why is that?
Don't believe you are going to convince the average American, who knows nothing of bike racing, the
rightness of your views regarding one-day classics. You could be right in a perfect world -- it
doesn't matter. If anything convinces those Americans to become "better" bike racing fans, it won't
be an argument that does so. It more likely will be they got more interested *because* of the only
mainstream hook to bike racing that exists in the American media. That hook is the TdF, like it or
not.
So the TdF hook, for whatever your perceived immediate disadvantages, has at least some chance of
piquing interest in the long term. The chances for "reasoned arguments" to increase interest are
likely slim to none. And with all this said, the TdF "is what it is" -- the most internationally
important race of the Grand Tours, and probably any race.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> Lemond and Armstrong are about 10 years apart. That said, Lance will probably get six on Sunday,
> and he'll be the only one in 100 years to do so. So "no suprise" that riders like that are not
> common.
we meet again in 10 years.
It doesn't matter in any case -- I don't personally care. It was only amusing that you said
something wouldn't happen that just has happened.
I repeat my words: not every 10 years. The same thing goes for the
Germans: a big cycling hype thanks to Ullrich. A lot of big companies
putting money in cycling, German teams... Now, Zabel is turning 34
and he is over the top, Jan ends his career in 2 years. It seems to
me they don't have anyone who can follow in their steps, not in
classic racing, not in stage racing. They have Sinkewitz and Kessler,
both good riders but no stars for whom people are going to see
cycling.
So what happens, the hype is gone and so is the money. And what's left
of German cycling?? not much cause they don't have a cycling
tradition.
So I ask you: do the US cycling world have someone who will be able of
winning 2.HC races in 4 or 5 years and who can compete in the GT's in
say 6 or 7 years (guys of 20-22 y old)?? That's my point. It's
possible two have two champions is such short amount of time, but is
it because the first was the beginning of the development of a new
sport, with an adequate youth project or is it just coincidence. if i
look back at the podia of the U23 WC since 1990, i can't find any
American youth rider
(http://www.uci.ch/modello.asp?1stlevelid=HH&level1=5&level2=0&idnews=1636)
Look at women's tennis: nowadays we have Clijsters and Henin, not
because we invest a lot in sports/tennis, not because we have
excellent youth coaches, but because it's a coincidence. Over here
everybody knows we will never have 2 players at No 1 and 2 of women's
tennis in the future.
You mistake me for someone who cares (much). If the US has some more great riders, that's nice. If
not, I am none the worse off. I really like bike racing, but there are more important things to
me. If I see a good race, I'm happy.
If the US interest in the TdF is aroused, then there is a decent pool of youngsters here to tap.
You see, the TdF is not all that bad after all, and it might just work against your 10 year idea.