J
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Guest
K_S_ONeill wrote:
> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> > Kevin O'Neill wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:16:27 -0400, "Al K" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi Jim,
> > > >Ed D clearly has contributed to diverting arbr from cycling. But Tom S,
> > > >with his political views expressed on arbr, initiated politics on arbr. Ed
> > > >challenged Tom's political views, and arbr got diverted. This used to be a
> > > >nice recumbent cycling news group, not a political vent.
> > > >Al K
> > >
> > > Have any of you heard of killfiles, for god's sake? You've got a few
> > > high volume knuckleheads, killfile 'em and get on with life. Sheesh.
>
> For the record, that second sentence was intended to be an if-then, not
> a statement of fact. I don't know the group well enough to say anyone
> is or is not a troll. I guess. I dunno, this Dolan chap does seem to
> be much more noise than signal. Onwards;
>
> > Some people would rather complain and post revisionist history about
> > past events.
>
> Oh sure, arguing, changing history, all that is good fun. The first
> few messages I read seemed to be in a dispairing tone, and made me
> wonder if perhaps a liberal application of kf might raise the happiness
> level.
>
> > The Google archives will reveal that political arguments occurred on
> > alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent before I posted my first message.
>
> My point was more that if anyone, me, you, whomever, is galling anyone,
> him, her, whoever, so much that they feel the need to have long threads
> about how much me or you or whomever are bugging him or her or whoever,
> him or her or whoever might be better served by killfiling me or you or
> whomever than endlessly arguing, since that's not called "feeding the
> troll" for nothing. If you see what I mean.
If someone posts something untrue about me that is a matter of fact and
not opinion (i.e. libel), I will certainly rebut is. In this case, it
was stupid to post something that can be easily disproved with a simple
search of the Google Group archives.
--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
> Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
> > Kevin O'Neill wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:16:27 -0400, "Al K" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi Jim,
> > > >Ed D clearly has contributed to diverting arbr from cycling. But Tom S,
> > > >with his political views expressed on arbr, initiated politics on arbr. Ed
> > > >challenged Tom's political views, and arbr got diverted. This used to be a
> > > >nice recumbent cycling news group, not a political vent.
> > > >Al K
> > >
> > > Have any of you heard of killfiles, for god's sake? You've got a few
> > > high volume knuckleheads, killfile 'em and get on with life. Sheesh.
>
> For the record, that second sentence was intended to be an if-then, not
> a statement of fact. I don't know the group well enough to say anyone
> is or is not a troll. I guess. I dunno, this Dolan chap does seem to
> be much more noise than signal. Onwards;
>
> > Some people would rather complain and post revisionist history about
> > past events.
>
> Oh sure, arguing, changing history, all that is good fun. The first
> few messages I read seemed to be in a dispairing tone, and made me
> wonder if perhaps a liberal application of kf might raise the happiness
> level.
>
> > The Google archives will reveal that political arguments occurred on
> > alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent before I posted my first message.
>
> My point was more that if anyone, me, you, whomever, is galling anyone,
> him, her, whoever, so much that they feel the need to have long threads
> about how much me or you or whomever are bugging him or her or whoever,
> him or her or whoever might be better served by killfiling me or you or
> whomever than endlessly arguing, since that's not called "feeding the
> troll" for nothing. If you see what I mean.
If someone posts something untrue about me that is a matter of fact and
not opinion (i.e. libel), I will certainly rebut is. In this case, it
was stupid to post something that can be easily disproved with a simple
search of the Google Group archives.
--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.