Originally Posted by tonyzackery .
One of many ancillary benefits of having an on-the-bike power meter is being able to conduct ad hoc tests of different pedaling styles and observing the power numbers reflected. Critical to good power production, for me anyway, is consistently starting to apply pressure on the pedals before either pedal reaches TDC - say, around 11 or 1130. Waiting until the pedal is at 12 or a little past is too late in my observation. As such, I'm obviously a neutral or heels down pedaler versus having an 'ankling' style.
Striving for a relatively even distribution of force throughout the revolution is a worthwhile thing. Think about the fastest runners. You don't see the fast guys/gaals mashing the ground. There is an evenness to their gait - a relatively equal (appearing) push against the track, and pulling up of the leg via the hamstrings, et al. I think the same concept of effort can be applied to cycling. The lower and more even the forces required by the muscles, the better.
But in the end, I think it to be more a matter of individual physiology and anatomy (femur to lower leg ratio - the higher the ratio, the more a cyclist will tend to be a 'masher', other things being equal) that dictates the most powerful/efficient/economic style of pedaling a cyclist employs. And this is done at a subconscious level - the brain knows without having to be told or coached. We've all seen the most fluid pedalers on the pro circuit sometimes 'pedaling squares' due to fatigue regardless of the fact they would rather 'spin'. Take these opinions for what they're worth...
edit: Needed to also add that more important than a circular, or even, pedaling action, I find right/left power balance to be of greater influence on higher/lower sustainable power production. In my observation and YMMV, of course...