Looking forward to seeing the pics Stuart. (top and bottom posted to keep everyone (un)happy).
"Roger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The message <[email hidden]> from "Stuart" <[email hidden]> contains these words:
Quoted message said:
Failing that just post them onto this group as an attachment, some die hards will moan like f***, but so what, it will give them something to whine about and the rest of us something to look at.
Looking forward to seeing the pics Stuart. (top and bottom posted to keep everyone (un)happy).
Looking forward to seeing the pics Stuart. (top and bottom posted to keep everyone (un)happy).
I Posted a link to the pics on a post entitled "TR: Fannichs" Curiously this post did not arrive on my server, however it must of arrived elsewhere because their is a reply to it!
I also find it rather peculiar that their can be different posts and threads on the computer at work to the one at home!
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:45:28 -0000, "Stuart" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| I also find it rather peculiar that their can be different posts and threads | on the computer at work to the one at home!
The algorithm for propagating posts round the newsservers is absolute cr*p, these sorts of complaints appear periodically on most newsgroups.
Try NIN http://news.individual.net/ it is IMO the tops for text based newsgroups and at 10Euros per year worth every penny. Read the conditions and FAQ because they are a bit picky about what they will let you do.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
5.3 May I mangle my "From:" header address so that I do not get SPAM? We recommend creating a special e-mail address for use with Usenet articles only and protecting it with suitable filtering rules. This way your regular mailbox will stay untroubled, but you can still receive mail responses to your Usenet articles. Another option is using the Top Level Domain ".invalid" (see RFC 2606). The Top Level Domain ".invalid" is intended for construction of obviously invalid addresses like "[email hidden]". Such addresses do not disturb and pollute regular name space and can easily be identified as invalid by both humans and machines. <<<
Sorry, I just realised it was Martin's pics I was looking forward to seeing, I've got yours Stuart and they are fantastic.
"Stuart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I Posted a link to the pics on a post entitled "TR: Fannichs" Curiously this post did not arrive on my server, however it must of arrived elsewhere because their is a reply to it!
I also find it rather peculiar that their can be different posts and threads on the computer at work to the one at home!
Sorry, I just realised it was Martin's pics I was looking forward to seeing, I've got yours Stuart and they are fantastic.
Another option is using the Top Level Domain ".invalid" (see RFC 2606). The Top Level Domain ".invalid" is intended for construction of obviously invalid addresses like "[email hidden]". Such addresses do not disturb and pollute regular name space and can easily be identified as invalid by both humans and machines. <<<
I must admit that I consider it to be poor practice when people post to usenet and leave no way for people to contact them via email. On more than one occasion I have wanted to give someone a response to a question and have been faced with a dilema due to the fact that the post was perhaps a couple of weeks old and I couldn't garauntee that they would see the response (bearing in mind that they may have joined the group, posted a question, waited two weeks and then unsubbed).