"Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Mark Probert-February 26, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]>
wrote in message news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Rich Shewmaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> "Coleah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:O3w%b.419678$na.809238@attbi_s04...
> >
> > "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:[email hidden]...
> > > You should know this about Rich Shewmaker.
> > >
> > > He posted:
> > > I believe that God does not exist. And I believe that all
alternativeQuoted message said:> > medicine
> > > is quackery. And I believe that these are both reasonable
assumptionsQuoted message said:> > until I
> > > am proven wrong.
> >
> >
> > This Rich fellow is entitled to his beliefs and assumptions, of
course.Quoted message said:> > No one is obligated to 'prove' anything differently to him.
> >
> > If he is over 18, he surely understands that other people also
> > are entitled to be honored for their own beliefs and reasonable
> > assumptions, and he is not required to prove anything
> > to them either.
>
> I do not hold others "obligated" to prove or disprove, but I do
reserveQuoted message said:Quoted message said:the
> right to point out error when people post statements that contradict
ourQuoted message said:Quoted message said:> current scientific body of knowledge. Assertions that olive oil and
citrusQuoted message said:> juice can flush stones from the gallbladder or that ginseng
"strengthensQuoted message said:Quoted message said:the
> immune system" will be challenged, because these things are known to
beQuoted message said:Quoted message said:> untrue. And no, I do not think anyone is entitled to be "honored"
for
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> believing such nonsense.
>
> --RichProve it wrong then .
Proponents of the flushes are required to show that the gall bladder has
fewer stones after a flush. In another post you claim that your doctor
recommended them. Did you have their existence determined by pre-flush
ultrasound and did a post-flush ultrasound show that they were gone? If
not,they you really do not know if the flush was effective in
eliminating
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:them.
I have already stated my experience and the experience of others I know
personaly . Don't try and twist it around to me having to prove anything
to
Quoted message said:you , you are the one who is telling me it doesn't work when from personal
experience I know it does , so you prove your arguement .
Sorry, sweetums, but your personal experience proves NOTHING unless you can
show that there were stones prior to the flush, and there were no stones
after the flush. The only way to do this, absent surgery, is to use
ultrasound.
As for twisting around, the usenet standard, execept in AltWorld is to have
the propenent of some point, etc. provide the proof.
Thus, either prove it..or....your claims are worth what a flush produces....