Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Electric bicycles: Viable or not?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 69 posts · 1,921 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 August 2006
Last activity
17 August 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,921
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–69 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted post said:

    Whatcha got? It was intended primarily to multiply the utility of an
    Xtracycle
    (http://xtracycle.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=real_loads),
    letting people haul those sorts of loads in hills, heat, longer
    distances, higher speeds, etc. It's also useful for longer, faster
    commutes. See the site for detail: http://cleverchimp.com/ .
    (Disclaimer: commercial interest.)

    I have a Habanero ti mt bike

    17" frame

    26" wheels

  2. Per [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Pete, why do you say that? If you ever drive a car to carry less than
    200 pounds of people or cargo besides yourself less than 20 miles or
    so, does that mean you're not "particularly into biking"? I designed
    Stokemonkey as an alternative to driving cars, not to riding bikes, for
    people who like to ride bikes. If you don't like riding bikes, you
    probably wouldn't like it as well as some other electric designs, and I
    wouldn't recommend it. I've been posting sporadically to r.b.t since
    1998, have never owned a car, have house and kid, bike more miles
    unassisted than otherwise and will always choose biking over other ways
    of getting around, by whatever means necessary.

    I was seeing it as a positive, not a negative.

    Seems like some guy who is just thinking about getting to work quickly and
    cheaply but isn't into biking for any other reason would find it attractive.

    More attractive than a dedicated "electric motorcycle" because of the stealth
    aspect (mostly nobody will know you're under power) and because of backup
    inerrant in the ability to just pedal if the batteries run out.

    --
    PeteCresswell

  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted post said:

    Whatcha got? [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    I have a Habanero ti mt bike

    I meant "watcha got?" in answer to your question about what stokemonkey
    was designed for. By which I meant that it can wear many hats.

  4. (PeteCresswell) said:

    I was seeing it as a positive, not a negative.

    sorry i sounded so defensive. i do bristle at the common opinion that
    it can have no appeal for passionate cyclists, so am probably too quick
    to argue otherwise.

    Quoted message said:

    Seems like some guy who is just thinking about getting to work quickly and
    cheaply but isn't into biking for any other reason would find it attractive.

    The fact that the motor compels the rider to pedal, that shifting to
    maintain a steady cadence and so on are required for best results, and
    that it's more expensive than other kits suited for merely personal
    transportation would make it less attractive to indifferent cyclists, I
    think.

  5. Quoted post said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a Habanero ti mt bike

    I meant "watcha got?" in answer to your question about what stokemonkey
    was designed for. By which I meant that it can wear many hats.

    Oh I see....sorry

    Well I'm not sure what I "got".

    I'm not sure what KIND of cargo Id need to haul in a
    car free lifestyle actually

    I guess it would be groceries, maybe laundry back and
    forth to laundromat, books, not sure what else

  6. Per [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    (http://xtracycle.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=real_loads),
    letting people haul those sorts of loads in hills, heat, longer
    distances, higher speeds, etc.

    Two questions - both kind of subjective:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1) If the rider sets the "assist" to zero - or the battery is flat - how
    much additional load is there on the pedaling? Worst case, I guess
    somebody could just drop the chain on the assist chain wheel... but if
    the chain is in place is there any rotation of the motor going on?

    2) How much noise/whine does the motor make when assisting?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --
    PeteCresswell

  7. Tangential issue:

    I'm running Windows XP Pro with automatic updates enabled.

    It is unable to play any of the files listed on

    http://xtracycle.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=movies
    --
    PeteCresswell

  8. (PeteCresswell) said:

    Tangential issue:

    I'm running Windows XP Pro with automatic updates enabled.

    It is unable to play any of the files listed on

    http://xtracycle.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=movies

    I got one short one to play as a Quicktime clip; I get the error message
    with Win Media, too.

  9. (PeteCresswell) said:

    1) If the rider sets the "assist" to zero - or the battery is flat - how
    much additional load is there on the pedaling? Worst case, I guess
    somebody could just drop the chain on the assist chain wheel... but if
    the chain is in place is there any rotation of the motor going on?

    There is no rotation of the motor in unassisted pedaling; there is a
    freewheel on the motor. The extra load of turning the drive chain
    around the freewheel is imperceptible.

    Quoted message said:

    2) How much noise/whine does the motor make when assisting?

    It makes only a low hum under heavy load, more felt than heard. Some
    describe it as silent, but that's a stretch. It's a direct-drive motor
    with no reduction gearing or other internal moving parts apart from
    bearings. The ticking of the freewheel while pedaling unassisted is
    considerably louder than the motor when engaged, leading to the odd
    circumstance that the system is louder while idle than engaged.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.