Whatcha got? It was intended primarily to multiply the utility of an Xtracycle (http://xtracycle.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=real_loads), letting people haul those sorts of loads in hills, heat, longer distances, higher speeds, etc. It's also useful for longer, faster commutes. See the site for detail: http://cleverchimp.com/ . (Disclaimer: commercial interest.)
Pete, why do you say that? If you ever drive a car to carry less than 200 pounds of people or cargo besides yourself less than 20 miles or so, does that mean you're not "particularly into biking"? I designed Stokemonkey as an alternative to driving cars, not to riding bikes, for people who like to ride bikes. If you don't like riding bikes, you probably wouldn't like it as well as some other electric designs, and I wouldn't recommend it. I've been posting sporadically to r.b.t since 1998, have never owned a car, have house and kid, bike more miles unassisted than otherwise and will always choose biking over other ways of getting around, by whatever means necessary.
I was seeing it as a positive, not a negative.
Seems like some guy who is just thinking about getting to work quickly and cheaply but isn't into biking for any other reason would find it attractive.
More attractive than a dedicated "electric motorcycle" because of the stealth aspect (mostly nobody will know you're under power) and because of backup inerrant in the ability to just pedal if the batteries run out.
sorry i sounded so defensive. i do bristle at the common opinion that it can have no appeal for passionate cyclists, so am probably too quick to argue otherwise.
Quoted message said:
Seems like some guy who is just thinking about getting to work quickly and cheaply but isn't into biking for any other reason would find it attractive.
The fact that the motor compels the rider to pedal, that shifting to maintain a steady cadence and so on are required for best results, and that it's more expensive than other kits suited for merely personal transportation would make it less attractive to indifferent cyclists, I think.
Two questions - both kind of subjective: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1) If the rider sets the "assist" to zero - or the battery is flat - how much additional load is there on the pedaling? Worst case, I guess somebody could just drop the chain on the assist chain wheel... but if the chain is in place is there any rotation of the motor going on?
2) How much noise/whine does the motor make when assisting? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- PeteCresswell
1) If the rider sets the "assist" to zero - or the battery is flat - how much additional load is there on the pedaling? Worst case, I guess somebody could just drop the chain on the assist chain wheel... but if the chain is in place is there any rotation of the motor going on?
There is no rotation of the motor in unassisted pedaling; there is a freewheel on the motor. The extra load of turning the drive chain around the freewheel is imperceptible.
Quoted message said:
2) How much noise/whine does the motor make when assisting?
It makes only a low hum under heavy load, more felt than heard. Some describe it as silent, but that's a stretch. It's a direct-drive motor with no reduction gearing or other internal moving parts apart from bearings. The ticking of the freewheel while pedaling unassisted is considerably louder than the motor when engaged, leading to the odd circumstance that the system is louder while idle than engaged.