"Mike & Heather Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Stev Not all herbalists are charlatans. I had a colleague who worked part time
in
Quoted message said:the lab doing legitimate medical research and also ran his own herbal medicine practice.
No doubt there are some herbs that do have beneficial effects. The problem is that they are poorly
standardized, little researched, and unregulated (with a lot of batch to batch variation). For the
relief of certain symptoms where the therapeutic index is wide they may be appropriate.
In situations like the prevention of stroke the therapeutic index is tiny and herbal products
currently could not rise to that level of precision even if they are effective in theory.
Quoted message said:On the other hand there were a number of remarkably successful treatments
of
Quoted message said:asthma and eczema by Chinese herbs reported here a few years ago. At the same time there were
other reports of the analysis of herbs which had been sold for treatment of asthma which were
actually effective only because
they
Quoted message said:had been soaked in solutions of corticosteroids which had then been
allowed
Quoted message said:to dry on the outside of the herbs. So if you choose to go to a herbalist and avoid western
medicine you may end up being treated by the very drugs you are trying to avoid.
Red rice yeast is another example. It is billed as a cholesterol agent with the implied supposition
that it must be safer because it is natural. The main active ingredient is lovostatin (Mevacor,
Altocor), a drug that has come to be little used by doctors because there are more effective
versions available.
I wonder how often the herbalists who prescribe it check the liver enzymes or screen for myositis.
--
CBI, MD