Bush biking toward nowhere?

[Zoot Katz]

Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:32:07 -0700,
<[email protected]>, Chris Neary
<[email protected] > wrote:

>>Bird kill is a red herring regularly trotted out by the oily ones.
>>Don't fall for it.
>
>One of the oily ones:
>
>http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/index.html
>
>
I'll take your word for it since they don't say where their funding
comes from.
--
zk

 

[Chris Neary]

>>>Bird kill is a red herring regularly trotted out by the oily ones.
>>>Don't fall for it.
>>
>>One of the oily ones:
>>
>>http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/index.html
>>
>>
>I'll take your word for it since they don't say where their funding
>comes from.

Sorry, I should have put a smily face in my reply.

Since the CBD files lawsuits against just about anything which impact
habitat (including road building, Alaskan oil development, *and* windmills),
I think it's safe to say they're not bosum-buddies with the "oily ones".



Chris Neary
[email protected]

"Prize the doubt, low kinds exist without"
- Inscription at Ramsmeyer Hall, Ohio State University

 

[Zoot Katz]

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:50:53 -0700,
<[email protected]>, Chris Neary
<[email protected] > wrote:

>>>>Bird kill is a red herring regularly trotted out by the oily ones.
>>>>Don't fall for it.
>>>
>>>One of the oily ones:
>>>
>>>http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>I'll take your word for it since they don't say where their funding
>>comes from.
>
>Sorry, I should have put a smily face in my reply.
>
>Since the CBD files lawsuits against just about anything which impact
>habitat (including road building, Alaskan oil development, *and* windmills),
>I think it's safe to say they're not bosum-buddies with the "oily ones".

I caught the sarcasm and replied in kind.

The only credible thing about them is they're on the Capital Research
Center's list of "bad" greens along with Greenpeace and PETA.
--
zk

 

[Sock Puppet]

On 28-Aug-2005, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sock Puppet wrote:
> > On 18-Aug-2005, "Bill Sornson"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> If David Duke agreed with me because of an anti-Semitic stance I
> >> took, I'd
> >>
> >> deserve to be painted with a pretty harsh brush.
> >
> > Only a dumb ass equates criticism of Zionist conquest with prejudice
> > against Jews in general.
>
> Read some of her comments, anonymous mouse potato troll.
>
> ".(Sheehan) voiced vaguely anti-Semitic rhetoric when she alleged that the
>
> Iraq War was all about protecting Israel, i.e. a Jewish conspiracy (a
> similar opinion is frequently expressed by David Duke and his ilk)." -
> From
> the Lonestar Times August, 13, 2005
>
> There's lots more if you care to Google...but what do Jews know about
> Anti-Semitism?!?

The State of Israel is a Zionist creation - there is no logical
contradiction of being against colonization/conquest by Europeans of Arab
lands (i.e. the creation of Israel) but not having general prejudice against
ethnic Jews and/or practitioners of Judaism.

Prejudice against Palestinian Arabs is anti-Semitism, since the Arabs are
also a Semitic people.

--
Sock Puppet

 

[Sock Puppet]

On 29-Aug-2005, "Cheto" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Sock Puppet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > Oral sex among teenagers is OK, and will not result in unwanted
> > pregnancies.
>
> How many teenage daughters do you have?

Less than one, not that it matters.

If I had teenage daughters, I would tell them that sex was OK as long as it
was what they really wanted to do if they took reasonable precautions
against STD transmission and unplanned pregnancy.

--
Sock Puppet