Originally Posted by
Driver72 .
Thanks BSBS. What you wrote last is the essence of the question I'm asking myself: could my activities have produced this result on their own, i.e. assuming no medical error and a good healing of the bone? It seems unlikely to my mind but perhaps I don't understand. In other words, did they contribute the final 10% to an underlying medical problem with the bone or can this sort of light activity produce such result even when everything is fine otherwise? All my doctor warned me of was the risk of high-energy impacts, such as when you fall while skiing. He never said I have to behave like I was made of porcelaine for a month, you see...
As to the second plate, it doesn't give me any problems for the time being, it's just that I have to re-do some of the rehab I've already had once
. But they (an assembly of the clinic's doctors) actually say it's fine to remove that one too, just wait a year this time. I'm thinking, I'll wait even more than that, just to be on the safe side and maybe I'll have tomography or something before I do it.
What actually surprises me in your previous post is that you continue to suffer 3 years on. Me, I've had no problem while carrying the plate, either the first or the second one. Except for the premature removal, I've felt quite fine, I gave up on painkiller the day after the op each time. It's true that the muscle mass on the affected side is somewhat reduced but that should come back easily with some gym exercise...