I have a fairly similar break, but very different story. I broke my right collar bone in Nov 2005 and went with the non-surgical option. After a while I was fine for doing most things, including biking, but the damned bones never did come together and I had strength limitations and had particular issues (e.g., using my right arm for overhead stuff like painting ceilings; driving long periods, say 2-3 hours or more, I think because my right arm was left to hang without the necessary support).santanaf said:Well, I am now at 1 month post op. Everything has been great for the last 2 weeks especially. As I stated in my previous post, surgery was good, somewhat painful in the short term, but has since been fine.
....l.
I just had surgery a week ago. A few points for others:
1. You've heard this before, but it bears repeating--if you aren't happy with your doctor, there are more out there! (And hopefully you have a medical plan that will allow you to see someone else.) The doctor who had put me in a sling, then many weeks later a figure-8 brace back near the time of the original injury told me some 20 months later when I clearly still had no union that if I did get surgery it would involve a hip bone graft and that's no good, so come back in 6 weeks... I found another doctor. This guy said we'll do the internal brace (my post-op x-ray looks like santanaf's), no grafting, no messing with the hip bone...
2. It is true what someone said way back in this tread about the treatment being tailored to the patient. However, it's also very true that the treatment is highly doctor dependent. As illustrated above, two doctors can have a very different approach. Unfortunately (a little for me, a lot for him and his loved-ones) my second doctor had a mild stroke before he could do the surgery mentioned above. I wasn't going to go back to number one, so it was on to yet another. This guy was also up for the no-graft, plate and screws option, but his post-op approach was very different (question about that below). The stroke doctor had said I'd have my arm fully immobilized for a month (not because the bone needed it but rather because all the soft tissues would need time to recover) but the doctor I ended up using just put me in a sling and said even that was more as a reminder to not do extreme movements or lift anything heavy, and I can and should go ahead and use my right hand for little things like typing, brushing my teeth, eating...
3. Concerning the question that names this thread, consider factors like age and displacement. I see lots of information posted by people about themselves or their children concerning breaks suffered by teenagers. Useful information, certainly, but if you're like me (40), maybe not applicable. If you're older, think about the fact that that makes union without surgery less likely. Also, displacement...I was told by the ER doctor and all the others I've seen since as well as a zillion web pages that "surgery is rarely necessary..." Well, that may be true if the bones are close together, but if you have significant displacement (mine was over 3 cm) and other complications surgery may be more likely what you're going to need. It's worth talking about this with your doctor, and it's really worth getting a second opinion.
My questions...for those who have had surgery, what has been your post-op experience? How long have you needed the sling? When did you start strength training? Were you told to be careful about anything that could impinge bone formation or cause the screws to come out or whatever?
I'm asking because I haven't gotten much good information from my doctor on this stuff, and what he has told me is so different than the information I had gotten from the doctor who was to have done the operation.
My operation was July 2, 2007, it's now July 11. I'm still in the sling some of the day, but find it such a bother and don't really feel like I need it. But I don't want to over-do things.
I wish that damned pedestrian had taken a glance before stepping into the bike lane I was racing down...