i agree with Mørkeberg reasoning with regards to respecting the athletes privacy before definitive proof is found. Armstrong posting the values there like they mean something, like they are proof of not doping begs for scrutiny and comment.. to do otherwise would be an abdication of responsibility...
“As scientists, I think our job in this matter is that when something gets posted on the internet and is not normal, we need to say that this is the case,” said Belhage. “Otherwise, if you let it sit there and it is unchallenged, then it would [otherwise] be seen as perfect.
“After that, our job is done,” he added. “Any other action should be evaluated by the usual councils that are sitting and evaluating blood profiles and putting the data together.”
c'mon.. how do your values stay flat like that for the duration of the whole 3 weeks of the tour and even blip up a couple times?
“As scientists, I think our job in this matter is that when something gets posted on the internet and is not normal, we need to say that this is the case,” said Belhage. “Otherwise, if you let it sit there and it is unchallenged, then it would [otherwise] be seen as perfect.
“After that, our job is done,” he added. “Any other action should be evaluated by the usual councils that are sitting and evaluating blood profiles and putting the data together.”
c'mon.. how do your values stay flat like that for the duration of the whole 3 weeks of the tour and even blip up a couple times?