Lass Chance_2 <[email hidden]> wrote:
:> Right, Roger....if you hate your flabby arms, work your chest and
:> back. Maybe the arms will get a little, too, if only by accident.
tisk, tisk. Can you work your chest/back without using your arms? Most
movements for those muscle groups involve arms.
Obviously, you're never done any serious training.
flab = fat, not lack of muscle.
:>
:> Aerobics will burn fat, wherever it is.
:>
:> Targeting a specific muscle to tone it just simply works best. That's
:> why they call it, "body sculpting", Roger----changing specific
:> muscles to be the way we want them to be.
And what does that do for the fat - nothing. The problem is the wings, not
so much the muscles.
And, without much
:> testosterone, women dont build much in the way of muscle mass.
Which is why working on the fat makes the most sense.
:> Models often work their tris and avoid working bi's to keep a 'thin"
:> arm with a noticable cut above the triceps, for shape. Ever notice
:> Goldie Hawn's beautiful arms? No trace of bicep---well defined tris.
The tris are the bigger muscle group, so building them will make the arms
appear bigger.
:> For sculpting, targeting specific muscles is everything.
This is not about sculpting, it's about losing fat. Her tris and bis will
get plenty of work without any special effort.
:>
:> >"In short, there really isn't any need to
:> >focus specifically on triceps for the
:> >purpose of improving the look of the >back of the arms."
:>
:> not unless you actually want to solve the flabby arm problem.
You're simply stupid. Just go smoke another doobie.
:>
:> LassChance
:>
:> 5-16-05 202/182/162