General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

4x4

Started by Paul Rooney · · Last activity · 89 posts · 3,461 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
12 April 2004
Last activity
25 April 2004
Original author
Paul Rooney
Posts
89
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,461
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 89
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Following up to Phil Cook

    Quoted message said:

    Pish. The man does talk nonsense! I have driven hundreds of
    km off tarmac in an ordinary front wheel drive 2x4. The
    trick is knowing the limitations of your vehicle.

    I have trouble with bottoming on the track to the allotment,
    let alone real off road! Also the tyres are not suitable.
    --
    Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso
    Walk-Photo-Wasdale-Thames- Walk-eat-drink-London
    "fellwalk.co.ukfellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Eat-walk-Spain "fell-walker.co.ukfell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@
    all, it's a spamtrap

  2. Following up to The Reids

    Quoted message said:

    Patrol, Land Cruiser, Pajero, Shogun, Terrano (or
    whatever called in UK) and all that top end Japanese
    stuff are all fine.

    Isusu Trooper also liked. All the big ones seemed to have
    stood up to hire use well. The long wheel base Nissan
    Terrano we had at Las Bardenas would probably suit
    camping etc.
    --
    Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso
    Walk-Photo-Wasdale-Thames- Walk-eat-drink-London
    "fellwalk.co.ukfellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Eat-walk-Spain "fell-walker.co.ukfell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@
    all, it's a spamtrap

  3. Following up to Paul Rooney

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks - it does look good.

    hey, how about a jacked up pickup with chrome roll over bars
    and lamps all across the cab?
    --
    Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso
    Walk-Photo-Wasdale-Thames- Walk-eat-drink-London
    "fellwalk.co.ukfellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Eat-walk-Spain "fell-walker.co.ukfell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@
    all, it's a spamtrap

  4. The Reids said:

    Following up to The Reids

    Quoted message said:

    Patrol, Land Cruiser, Pajero, Shogun, Terrano (or
    whatever called in UK) and all that top end Japanese
    stuff are all fine.

    Isusu Trooper also liked. All the big ones seemed to have
    stood up to hire use well. The long wheel base Nissan
    Terrano we had at Las Bardenas would probably suit
    camping etc.

    There are some bargain new Terranos around. Quite tempting.

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

  5. The Reids said:

    How far off road do you want to go? A 4x4 *car* will deal
    with snow fairly well (as will a set of chains) and grass
    but you need ground clearance for rutted tracks. I don't
    drive one in UK because they don't steer well on tarmac,
    brake poorly and are generally worse than a car, not being
    designed for the job of thrashing up motorways. The ones
    that do this fairly well, (the SUVs) don't really do the
    mud plugging well. Also I never come across anywhere I
    need one.

    I'm undecided - I'd probably push whatever vehicle I buy as
    far as it will go. I'll probably end up with an SUV. I
    rather like them. It's all about fun as well as function!

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

  6. The Reids said:

    Following up to Paul Rooney

    Quoted message said:

    Ha ha! In fact, one of our most eminent regulars drives a
    Beemer, and I might very well drive one if I had the dosh.

    I drive a "Beemer" (and would not change) but not sure
    eminent would fit :-)

    It was you I had in mind!

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

  7. The Reids said:

    Following up to Paul Rooney

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks - it does look good.

    hey, how about a jacked up pickup with chrome roll over
    bars and lamps all across the cab?

    I've just been looking at some 4x4 pickups. Doublecabs seem
    to be fairly car-like inside, with all mod cons, and some of
    them have seriously good offroad credentials. The downside
    is, I don't think they quite suit my personality - I don't
    particularly want to go bear-hunting.

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney

    url=''URL:/url said:

    On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:29:11 +0100, The Reids <dontuse@fell-

    walker.co.uk said:

    How far off road do you want to go? A 4x4 *car* will deal
    with snow fairly well (as will a set of chains) and grass
    but you need ground clearance for rutted tracks. I don't
    drive one in UK because they don't steer well on tarmac,
    brake poorly and are generally worse than a car, not
    being designed for the job of thrashing up motorways. The
    ones that do this fairly well, (the SUVs) don't really do
    the mud plugging well. Also I never come across anywhere
    I need one.

    I'm undecided - I'd probably push whatever vehicle I buy
    as far as it will go. I'll probably end up with an SUV. I
    rather like them. It's all about fun as well as function!

    As has been mentioned by others, tyre choice is a key factor
    in what the vehicle is most suitable for. The tyres most
    suitable for high speed motorway cruising are not the best
    for off road and vice-versa. For serious off-roading you
    need mud tyres, but these are often not rated for use at
    high speeds and they will show increased road noise, tyre
    wear and poorer road holding when cornering at speed.
    Equally for best traction in winter snow conditions you are
    better off changing to winter tyres, but again these then
    limit your maximum speeds on motorways and are best suited
    to use in areas where snow is predictably present throughout
    the winter.

    Ground clearance is also necessary for serious off road-use,
    but is a major problem for high speed on-road driving. With
    a high centre of gravity many 4x4s are very unsafe at high
    speed, particularly when making rapid manouvres such as lane
    changes or when cornering. I remember driving the Mk1 LR
    Discovery which was very pron to tempting the driver into an
    ever increasing over compensation of the steering when
    trying to make lane changes at motorway speeds. Also if you
    enter a corner too fast, whereas a saloon car may simply
    break into a slight skid, a 4x4 is much more likely to roll
    over on its side.

    Mike <URL:http://www.path.cam.ac.uk/~mrc7/>
    --
    o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "A
    mountain climbing, cycling, skiing, "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \>
    | immunology lecturer, antibody engineer and ` || (_)/
    (_) | \corn computer user"

  9. Paul Rooney said:

    I'm undecided - I'd probably push whatever vehicle I buy
    as far as it will go. I'll probably end up with an SUV. I
    rather like them. It's all about fun as well as function!

    Define "fun"... Having done longish distances (Edinburgh ->
    Yorkshire Dales and back) in a Landrover there's no way I
    would describe that particular vehicle as "fun" for typical
    distance driving. Slow, noisy and boring more like it,
    though I'm sure had we needed to take it off road it would
    have been far better than the car we hadn't taken ('cause it
    was ill, not because we thought the Landy would be better
    for the job in hand).

    And pushing a truly capable offroader "as far as it will go"
    requires dedicated offroad driving skills. You can't just
    climb into a Range Rover and suddenly know everything about
    how to get it "as far as it will go", any more than you'd
    keep up with Scumacher just by being behind the wheel of an
    F1 Ferrari!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext.
    33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177
    Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  10. Peter Clinch said:
    Paul Rooney said:

    I'm undecided - I'd probably push whatever vehicle I buy
    as far as it will go. I'll probably end up with an SUV. I
    rather like them. It's all about fun as well as function!

    Define "fun"... Having done longish distances (Edinburgh ->
    Yorkshire Dales and back) in a Landrover there's no way I
    would describe that particular vehicle as "fun" for typical
    distance driving. Slow, noisy and boring more like it,
    though I'm sure had we needed to take it off road it would
    have been far better than the car we hadn't taken ('cause
    it was ill, not because we thought the Landy would be
    better for the job in hand).

    I can think of all sorts of ways of having fun in a 4x4. But
    yes - I do a fair bit of motorway travel, so it won't be a
    Land Rover.

    Quoted message said:

    And pushing a truly capable offroader "as far as it will
    go" requires dedicated offroad driving skills. You can't
    just climb into a Range Rover and suddenly know everything
    about how to get it "as far as it will go", any more than
    you'd keep up with Scumacher just by being behind the wheel
    of an F1 Ferrari!

    Pete.

    Yes - I should have said I would push it as far as
    *my* limits.

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

  11. "The Reids" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Following up to Paul Rooney

    Quoted message said:

    Ha ha! In fact, one of our most eminent regulars
    drives a Beemer, and I might very well drive one if I
    had the dosh.

    I drive a "Beemer" (and would not change) but not sure
    eminent would fit :-)
    --
    Mike Reid

    Sorry Mike, but I know if a BMW appears in the rear view I'm
    in for an obnoxious and arrogant driving display. Obviously
    not yourself as I don't have you down as a Burberry baseball
    cap wearer. Have BMWs come down in price, or are they easily
    stolen :-)

    KRO

  12. In a recent message
    <[email hidden]>, The Reids <dontuse@fell-
    walker.co.uk> wrote.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    its a good idea to read a cross section of the press.

    Perhaps you meant a cross-section of the press? <g>. Or
    you'd be stuck with papers like the Mail and the Express.

    Regards, Nick.

    --
    Nick Hopton and Anne Hopton Caversham, Reading, England
    <[email hidden]

  13. Peter Clinch said:

    And pushing a truly capable offroader "as far as it will
    go" requires dedicated offroad driving skills. You can't
    just climb into a Range Rover and suddenly know everything
    about how to get it "as far as it will go", any more than
    you'd keep up with Scumacher just by being behind the
    wheel of an F1 Ferrari!

    I'm vague about the details but some years back one or two
    rally drivers had a show "race" against a top F1 driver (who
    gave them a big head start) at Silverstone I think. Anyone
    remember that? The rally driver(s) were hopeless, they
    couldn't even turn the corners properly, kept spinning the
    cars. Lucky they didn't wreck them.

    And the same is true in reverse. Racetrack drivers
    occasionally enter rally events. Toca champion James
    Thompson entered the UK rally last year and F1's Martin
    Brundle I think did so in the past as well. Neither got very
    far before wrecking their cars.

    Racetrack driving (road cars) and rallying (offroad) require
    very different driving skills.

    Paul
    --
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukwildwales.fsnet.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

  14. In a recent message
    <[email hidden]>, The Reids <dontuse@fell-
    walker.co.uk> wrote.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Frontera I liked.


    [...]

    We have to speak as we find, I guess. The Frontera I
    had was, in my opinion, unfit for the road and unfit
    for use off-road.

    Regards, Nick.

    --
    Nick Hopton and Anne Hopton Caversham, Reading, England
    <[email hidden]

  15. In a recent message
    <[email hidden]>, The Reids <dontuse@fell-
    walker.co.uk> wrote.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I didn't like the rock hard suspension of the little
    Susukis. Patrol, Land Cruiser, Pajero, Shogun, Terrano (or
    whatever called in UK) and all that top end Japanese stuff
    are all fine. Jeep Wrangler great fun but tiring on road,
    although still fun. Jeep Cherokee, three out of three broke
    down. Frontera I liked. Never driven any LRs as you dont
    get them as hire cars in Spain.


    [...]

    OT, but trying to be helpful here; if you drive hired 4WDs
    in Spain you ought to know about something I read in the
    Sunday Telegraph (I think) a few months ago.

    A lady was driving a hired 4WD along the gravel track
    leading to her rented villa and managed to write it off, by
    coming off the track, I believe. The hire firm informed her
    that she was liable for the full cost of replacement because
    the vehicle was not insured for use off the road ('off the
    tarmac' were the actual words, I think). The ST's man
    checked with several major car rental firms in Spain and
    found that they all had similar clauses in their rental
    agreements. As things then stood, the lady was indeed liable
    for the costs of replacement, but I don't know how things
    panned out for her in the end.

    Regards, Nick.

    --
    Nick Hopton and Anne Hopton Caversham, Reading, England
    <[email hidden]

  16. Nick Hopton said:

    In a recent message
    <[email hidden]>, The Reids <dontuse@fell-
    walker.co.uk> wrote.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Frontera I liked.


    [...]

    We have to speak as we find, I guess. The Frontera I had
    was, in my opinion, unfit for the road and unfit for use
    off-road.

    I thought the Frontera was called an off-roader was because
    it was always off the road at the garage being mended. :-)
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the
    "Westminster Gasworks"

  17. In a recent message
    <[email hidden]>, Phil Cook <u-r-walk@p-t-
    cook.RfErMeOeVsEeCrAvPeS.co.uk> wrote.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    We have to speak as we find, I guess. The Frontera I had
    was, in my opinion, unfit for the road and unfit for use
    off-road.

    I thought the Frontera was called an off-roader was because
    it was always off the road at the garage being mended. :-)

    Or 'off the road' as in being on the verge after one of the
    back wheels fell off. It came to the point where I stopped
    carrying my nearest and dearest in it, stopped using
    motorways and used it only to get to work and back.

    Regards, Nick.

    --
    Nick Hopton and Anne Hopton Caversham, Reading, England
    <[email hidden]

  18. In article <[email hidden]>, Paul
    Saunders <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Racetrack driving (road cars) and rallying (offroad)
    require very different driving skills.


    Actually Paul there's rallying and there's off-road driving.
    Totally different in the true sense.
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

  19. In article <[email hidden]>, W. D. Grey

    url=''URL:/url said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Paul
    Saunders <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Racetrack driving (road cars) and rallying (offroad)
    require very different driving skills.


    Actually Paul there's rallying and there's off-road
    driving. Totally different in the true sense.

    Yes I quite agree. I've never done any rallying but I have
    taken instruction on circuit driving and also in off-road
    driving skills. I imagine that rallying skills have much
    more in common with circuit racing events than they do with
    off-road driving skills. There is a complete difference in
    driving a vehicle against the clock compared to the concept
    of trying to negotiate difficult terrain in complete control
    and safety. A lot of of off-road driving involves going very
    slowly and cautiously and may even require reconnaissance on
    foot. The aim is to get from A to B with the vehicle and
    passengers intact. Within the rules of rallying it is
    acceptable to tolerate damage, repairs and replacement of
    major components of the vehicle such as transmission, wheels
    and suspension (but not the engine of course) so long as the
    fastest overall time is achieved.

    Mike
    --
    o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "A
    mountain climbing, cycling, skiing, "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \>
    | immunology lecturer, antibody engineer and ` || (_)/
    (_) | \corn computer user"

  20. The message <[email hidden]>
    from The Reids <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Who here drives a 4x4?

    I do. I think a good 4 x 4 is a safer bet than all
    those dreadful front wheel drive cars that the modern
    driver has been brainwashed into thinking are the bees
    knees. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Front wheel drive? Don't like it.

    Not clear what you mean but as a BMW driver I am assuming
    you agree with
    me. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Have you compared braking distances between a lot of 4x4s
    and cars? Then there is pedestrian safety and crumple
    zones. Those three together make me regard a 4x4 for a
    road car as seriously compromised.

    My current 4 x 4 is a car but in the past I have had both
    Range Rover and Land Rover and neither had poor handling.
    The RR stopped very well as well.

    The Land Rover was an old SWB 2A which had been registered
    as a commercial vehicle prior to my ownership. It had heavy
    duty springs which might have improved the road holding.
    With a top speed of little over 60 mph and limited
    acceleration one had to work really hard to overtake slow
    drivers on twisty roads. Long distance was also a pain -
    Stafford to Linn of Dee and return one Easter was the worst.

    The Range Rover (1979) was quite new when I got it (before
    the model moved seriously up market) and I had no problems
    getting about in that. It came in useful as a tin tent Munro
    Bashing. It was really thirsty and had a appetite for
    punctures like no other car I have had. It also survived
    what must be one of the most extreme manoeuvres I have ever
    undertaken when I swerved violently when a car failed to
    stop in time at a crossroads. The tail did wag severely
    though. AFAICR that was the only time either end lost
    adhesion on a dry road. Some of the cheaper off roaders
    would have fallen over if subject to that sort of treatment.

    --
    Roger Chapman so far this year 27 summits New - 16 (Marilyns
    4, Sweats 1, Outlying Fells 11) Repeats - 11( Marilyns 2,
    Sweats 6, Wainwrights 11) Knackered knee - 3 times

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.