UK and Europe · Public discussion

first metric century :)

Started by dailuggs · · Last activity · 172 posts · 6,421 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 June 2004
Last activity
22 June 2004
Original author
dailuggs
Posts
172
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
6,421
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 172
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5 hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased with myself

    well i thought it was worth shouting about!

  2. Well done, I am also feelin pretty happy as I did my firsy 50 mile trip earlier, took me 3.25, not that quick but then 3 months ago I didnt own a bike! Still remember that first 5 mile run out and the 2 hours recovery thinkin I had done well!

    I think it will be a while before I can get over the 100 miles so well done again!

    Cheers

    Mattboy

  3. "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5 hours
    and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big hills at
    the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased with myself

    What is that in english?

    And why so slow?

    Alan

    Quoted message said:


    well i thought it was worth shouting about!

    --

  4. Alan Holmes said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    106.86km = 66.39 miles. But then, if you were really
    interested, you could've done your own conversion.

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    The speed at which someone rides is relative to his
    abilities, and according to his objectives. Don't you even
    know this? You some sort of newbie?

  5. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Alan Holmes <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    He wrote it in English.

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    Don't be rude. You have yet to get the hang of being polite
    on usenet yet. Please do so.

    Ambrose

  6. Alan Holmes said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    106.86km in 5 hours 5secs.

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    Why faster?

    Tony

  7. "Alan Holmes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What is that in english?

    You mean in English what? RP, Liverpudlian, Mancunian,
    Cockney? Or did you want Imperial measurements? (As used by
    those older than me who can't grasp something as simple as
    working in units of ten, clue: fingers and thumbs).

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    So I'll expect to see you hanging on Lances wheel again this
    year wearing your strip for The Wait At Top club.
    --
    Regards, Pete

  8. Alan Holmes said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    8/5 of a mile 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    because i'd never rode so far in a day, and all the hills! the last 15k i had to climb from sea level to way high, then drop down and do it again 3 times! dont know the actual height, but the easiest hill was 16%

    i could have used the totally flat cycle path but its not as satisfying

    i usually average 26kph, although over an 8k journey i have averaged 36k, which did have a hill init aswell, nothing major but still a drop down to 20 to go up it

    plus ive only had my bike 6 weeks, am aiming for 30kph before i go to uni and hopefully a bit quicker when i leave 3 years later, well thats the plan 🙂

    dyu mind me asking what speed you ride at? miles or km is fine 🙂

    cheers to everyone who stood up for my slowness anyway

  9. Quoted message said:

    What is that in english?

    95400 Saxon poles a day

    (more /usr/share/units.dat | grep axon)

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    Sounds a nice day out to me.

    AC

  10. "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    cheers to everyone who stood up for my slowness anyway

    It's not particularly slow for a leisure cyclist, and I
    think that term applies to most of us on this NG. Terrain
    and weather make a big difference too, for instance where
    I ride in SE Leicestershire my average may be about 17mph
    (used to be a tad higher but age has slowed me and it's
    not a race anyway) but riding around the Peak district
    this drops to 12.5 mph on the road and into single
    figures off-road.

    My road bike is the only one fitted with a computer and
    while it's a point of interest to see how far and how fast
    plus a gauge to my fitness, which I like to keep on top of,
    at the end of the day the figures are irrelevent to the
    wider world and the true measure of the ride is how much I
    enjoyed it.

    Enjoy your riding and ignore [censored].
    --
    Regards, Pete

  11. Congrats!

    I did my 1st 100km on Saturday as well! I managed an average
    of 20.4 km/h.

    I managed to work mine so the 1st 50 was uphill against the
    wind, the second downhill with wind behind.

    Of course the wind dropped at the 1/2 way point, and i still
    managed to find a 12% up on the way back!

    fragg

  12. Alan Holmes said:

    And why so slow?

    Why so insecure?

    -dan

    --
    "please make sure that the person is your friend before
    you confirm"

  13. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Fraggle
    Congrats!

    I did my 1st 100km on Saturday as well! I managed an average
    of 20.4 km/h.

    I managed to work mine so the 1st 50 was uphill against the
    wind, the second downhill with wind behind.

    Of course the wind dropped at the 1/2 way point, and i still
    managed to find a 12% up on the way back!

    fragg

    cul, seems like a few of us reached milestones on sat! 1 month and hopefully a 100miler! i always pla my route so the worst road is at the start, and love to end riding on the coast with the hills so i have more time to enjoy it! it was a double milestone for me aswell, firts time i'd totalled 200 miles in a week, this week the aims 248 (400k) but ill probably end up doing less, the wind didnt help today, added half an hour to my usual 2 hour ride so i didnt go that extra 5 miles.

    must be confusing for some this going between miles and k's! it onfuses me sometimes! although i like to know both and it helps me climb those horrible dual carriageway hills thinking what 5/8's of.., and if i drop down 2k in pace how will that affect my time over a mile!

    all good

    must say i dont really post here alot, but get a lot of useful info by searching through previous threads

    Ciao

  14. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Alan Holmes said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    106.86km in 5 hours 5secs.

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    5 h is fairly standard for all the Audax 100's I have done,
    most of the field come in at about that time. Well done ;-)

  15. "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Alan Holmes said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    8/5 of a mile 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    because i'd never rode so far in a day, and all the hills!
    the last 15k i had to climb from sea level to way high,
    then drop down and do it again 3 times! dont know the
    actual height, but the easiest hill was 16%

    i could have used the totally flat cycle path but its not
    as satisfying

    i usually average 26kph, although over an 8k journey i
    have averaged 36k, which did have a hill init aswell,
    nothing major but still a drop down to 20 to go up it

    plus ive only had my bike 6 weeks, am aiming for 30kph
    before i go to uni and hopefully a bit quicker when i
    leave 3 years later, well thats the plan 🙂

    dyu mind me asking what speed you ride at? miles or km
    is fine 🙂

    Nowadays, not so fast, but about 55 years ago I was cycling
    home from work one evening and a motorist started to tail
    me, after a little while it was begining to iritate me and I
    was just about to stop and say something when he drew
    anlongside and shorted at me that I was travelling at 30
    mph, I didn't know what to say as a response.

    Have you noticed that journeys home are always faster than
    the journey out?

    On another occassion I was going on holiday YHAing and I was
    going from Ealing to Stow-on-the-Wold, I left home at 2.00
    oclock intending to get there at about 7.00 oclock when I
    would have prepared my evening meal then sat for a while and
    then retired. When I arrived at the hostel the doors were
    closed and there was a queue waiting to entre, the hostels
    normally opened at 5.00 oclock so I was a bit puzzled. I
    asked one of the people why the hostel was not open and I
    was told that it was
    4.50pm when I checked the milage and it was 84 miles, which
    means I had travelled 84 miles in 2 hours 50 minutes,
    which was an average of (if my arithmetic is up to date)
    29.5 mph. Bearing in mind that the bike was loaded for a
    fortnights holiday, self catering and clothing for that
    time, primus stove, paraffin, meths, water container, milk
    and etc, that wasn't a bad average, especially as the trip
    was across the Cotswolds.

    I would doubt that with the restrictions on traffic today
    whether if I was the same age and fitness I would be able to
    make that time.

    Quoted message said:


    cheers to everyone who stood up for my slowness anyway

    I was being a bit facecious, don't take it to heart!(:-)

    Alan

    Quoted message said:

    --

  16. "Ambrose Nankivell" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In "]news:[email hidden], Alan Holmes <alan@holmes-
    g4crw.freeserve.co.uk> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    "dailuggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    done it, at last, have had to put it off for a month
    because of weather. actual distance was 106.86, in 5
    hours and 5 secs, took it fairly easy cos all the big
    hills at the end, but aim was 20kph so felling pleased
    with myself

    What is that in english?

    He wrote it in English.

    You may not be aware that this country still measures
    distance in miles!

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    Don't be rude. You have yet to get the hang of being
    polite on usenet yet. Please do so.

    It was not rude, you must have a very short fuse!

    Alan

    Quoted message said:


    Ambrose

  17. "Peter B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Alan Holmes" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What is that in english?

    You mean in English what? RP, Liverpudlian, Mancunian,
    Cockney? Or did you want Imperial measurements? (As used
    by those older than me who can't grasp something as simple
    as working in units of ten, clue: fingers and thumbs).

    Well as I've said in another post, in England distances are
    measured in miles.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    So I'll expect to see you hanging on Lances wheel again
    this year wearing your strip for The Wait At Top club.

    Who is Lance?

    Alan
    --
    Reply to alan(at)windsor-berks(dot)freeserve(dot)co(dot)uk

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Regards,
    Pete

  18. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Alan Holmes <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    "Ambrose Nankivell"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    He wrote it in English.

    You may not be aware that this country still measures
    distance in miles!

    And plenty of English speaking countries don't.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And why so slow?

    Don't be rude. You have yet to get the hang of being
    polite on usenet yet. Please do so.

    It was not rude, you must have a very short fuse!

    You don't know how you come across. I'm suggesting you try
    and imagine it, because you do have to behave differently on
    usenet to keep it like a conversation.

    A

  19. On 14/6/04 10:02 pm, in article [email hidden], "Alan

    Holmes said:

    Well as I've said in another post, in England distances
    are measured in miles.

    And in kilometers as well. Furlongs, chains, poles and
    perches if you really want.

    In fact I prefer kilometers as they make me feel like I'm
    going faster than I probably am when I look at the psycho
    computer...

    ..d

  20. Alan Holmes said:

    I had travelled 84 miles in 2 hours 50 minutes, which was
    an average of (if my arithmetic is up to date) 29.5 mph.
    Bearing in mind that the bike was loaded for a fortnights
    holiday, self catering and clothing for that time, primus
    stove, paraffin, meths, water container, milk and etc,
    that wasn't a bad average, especially as the trip was
    across the Cotswolds.

    Oh, I remember you. You popped in here a few years ago with
    your ridiculous exploits, impervious to reason, and
    insisted that you really had done this journey at that
    impossible speed.

    You didn't. There neve has been, and probably never will be,
    a human capable of that feat. It's not close enough to
    reality to be remotely plausible.

    Being generous, I suppose it is possible that you simply
    misremembered some aspect (either the distance or the
    time, or the mode of transport!). Either that, or you
    just made the whole thing up. Your call. In any case, it
    didn't happen.

    James

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.