UK and Europe · Public discussion

first metric century :)

Started by dailuggs · · Last activity · 172 posts · 6,445 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 June 2004
Last activity
22 June 2004
Original author
dailuggs
Posts
172
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
6,445
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 161–172 of 172
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Alan Holmes <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    "Ambrose Nankivell"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    BUYBT

    That's a new one on me!

    What does it mean?

    It means that you generate so many responses to your posts
    with your thought provoking comments that it's good for the
    telecommunications network, and thus recommending that
    people buy shares in BT [1]

    Ambrose
    [1] The value of shares may go down as well as up. Author is
    not a qualified investment consultant or regulated by
    the FSA, share price of telecommunications companies may
    be affected by factors other than Usenet traffic. This
    message is confidential and only for the readership of
    the general public to which it is addressed. Always
    consult with passersby on the street before making
    investments, etc, etc,

  2. in message <[email hidden]>, Alan Holmes

    (') said:


    "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:lir2q1-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Just zis Guy,

    you know? (') said:

    Alan Holmes wrote:

    > travelled 84 miles in 2 hours 50 minutes, which was an
    > average of (if my arithmetic is up to date) 29.5 mph.
    > Bearing in mind that the bike was loaded for a
    > fortnights holiday, self catering and clothing for
    > that time, primus stove, paraffin, meths, water
    > container, milk and etc, that wasn't a bad average,
    > especially as the trip was across the Cotswolds.

    See what happens when you get the decimal point in the
    wrong place? You look like an eejit!

    Many years ago I did Kirkcudbright to home - thirteen and
    a half miles - in a time I believed to be exactly thirty
    minutes. Or, I believed, 27 miles per hour. Which is over
    two hundred metre ridges, at sea level at both ends and
    at only about 20m above sea level in the middle.

    Quite good for that journey.

    And I see nothing wrong with that sort of time, there used
    to be a very large number of cyclists in Scotland, and
    they managed good times.

    Dear boy, I'm not surprised that you see nothing odd about
    this sort of time, seeing that on your own evidence we know
    that you are the holder of several cycling speed records. I,
    however, am a mere mortal, and the idea that at any age and
    any state of fitness I could have achieved that sort of
    sustained speed over that sort of terrain is frankly
    preposterous.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And I look at the journey now (it normally takes me an
    hour, even on my road bike, even when I'm going well and
    feeling good) and I just don't believe it. I think the
    heroic trips of our youth are remembered through a fog of
    golden self-delusion. OK, so I was a lot fitter then and
    covered a lot more miles and I was certainly faster. But
    that fast? I find it hard to believe.

    Why do you find it hard to believe, you knew how far it
    was and how long it took.

    I know how far it is and I know how long I remember I
    believed I had taken. My comment was attempting to indicate
    that it is possible for human memory to, uhhmmm, somewhat
    enhance one's recollections of one's own achievements. As,
    indeed, your own posts bear eloquent testimony.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke)
    jasmine.org.uk~simon

    ;; my other
    religion is Emacs

  3. "Alan Holmes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The french as individuals are lovely, it's when they act
    as a race they become objectionable!

    A French person said the same to me last week.

    Except they said "English" in place of "French".
    --
    "You are the most stupid [censored] I have yet encountered on
    this newsgroup. Congratulations. That is no small
    achievement as there are many other stupid [censored] on this
    newsgroup. But they can't hold a candle to you."
    - Ed Dolan in alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

  4. David Martin [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Two dozen on two hands surely? Far easier to keep tabs on
    as you can use the thumbs to point to the relevant number?

    Dozens make perfect sense, far more than tens..

    1 gross (+12) is the largest number you can count to on
    two hands in base
    12.

    I'm obviously missing the joke here, but... how!

    Jon

  5. Mark South [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    "Alan Holmes" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The french as individuals are lovely, it's when they act
    as a race they become objectionable!

    A French person said the same to me last week.

    Except they said "English" in place of "French".

    Or "American" instead of "English".

    Jon

  6. Captain's log. On StarDate Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:10:45 +0100 received comm from
    "Alan Holmes" <[email hidden]> on channel uk.rec.cycling:

    : The french as individuals are lovely, it's when they act
    : as a race they become objectionable!

    I absolutely agree (I know many very nice and friendly
    french persons!)...

    Best regards,

    martin törnsten

    --
    82.182.73.12682.182.73.126

  7. On 21/6/04 10:05 pm, in article [email hidden],

    Jon Senior' jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk said:

    David Martin [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Two dozen on two hands surely? Far easier to keep tabs on
    as you can use the thumbs to point to the relevant
    number?

    Dozens make perfect sense, far more than tens..

    1 gross (+12) is the largest number you can count to on
    two hands in base
    12.

    I'm obviously missing the joke here, but... how!

    Assuming you have a complete set of fingers..

    Each joint on the finger acts as a reference point so
    you can count three on the first finger, three on the
    second, three on the third and three on the fourth
    making a round dozen.

    With the other hand you count dozens.

    1 dozen, 2 dozen etc. till you get to a dozen dozen = 1
    gross and you still have a hand free to add 12 more.

    Having the units divided into four groups allows a quick
    reckoning of eg. 5 and a half dozen..

    Definitely not SI..

    ..d

  8. Simon Brooke said:

    A century in three hours is 33mph, which seems to me
    indecently quick.

    It is. Especially considering the RTTC hundred mile record
    currently stands at 3:23:33...

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, Dave Larrington

    (') said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    A century in three hours is 33mph, which seems to me
    indecently quick.

    It is. Especially considering the RTTC hundred mile record
    currently stands at 3:23:33...

    That would be Alan Holmes, I presume?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke)
    jasmine.org.uk~simon

    'Victories are not solutions.' ;; John Hume,
    Northern Irish politician, on Radio Scotland 1/2/95
    ;; Nobel Peace Prize laureate 1998; few have
    deserved it so much

  10. On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:35:19 GMT, Simon Brooke <[email hidden]>

    wrote in message : said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A century in three hours is 33mph, which seems to me
    indecently quick.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It is. Especially considering the RTTC hundred mile
    record currently stands at 3:23:33...

    Quoted message said:

    That would be Alan Holmes, I presume?

    With full panniers for a week's tour, obv.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  11. David Martin [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Assuming you have a complete set of fingers..

    Each joint on the finger acts as a reference point so
    you can count three on the first finger, three on the
    second, three on the third and three on the fourth
    making a round dozen.

    With the other hand you count dozens.

    1 dozen, 2 dozen etc. till you get to a dozen dozen = 1
    gross and you still have a hand free to add 12 more.

    Having the units divided into four groups allows a quick
    reckoning of eg. 5 and a half dozen..

    Depending on flexibility of the thumb, one could also count
    using the base of each finger, thus taking it to base 16. A
    convenient alpha- numerical system has already been worked
    out for this one. Thus one can count to FF.

    Quoted message said:

    Definitely not SI..

    Definately not.

    Jon

  12. "Jon Senior" <jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    David Martin [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    Assuming you have a complete set of fingers..

    Each joint on the finger acts as a reference point so
    you can count three on the first finger, three on the
    second, three on the third and three on the fourth
    making a round dozen.

    With the other hand you count dozens.

    1 dozen, 2 dozen etc. till you get to a dozen dozen = 1
    gross and you still have a hand free to add 12 more.

    Having the units divided into four groups allows a quick
    reckoning of eg. 5 and a half dozen..

    Depending on flexibility of the thumb, one could also
    count using the base of each finger, thus taking it to
    base 16. A convenient alpha- numerical system has already
    been worked out for this one. Thus one can count to FF.

    And if one uses one's elbows, and add the fact that one can
    wrinkle one's nose, bend one's knees, and clench one's butt?

    Don't say there isn't a description on a website somewhere!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Definitely not SI..

    Definately not.

    Could I just add, definitely not SI?

    :-)

    OBTW, Jon, you have mail.
    --
    Mark South: World Citizen, Net Denizen

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.