UK and Europe · Public discussion

Prat Warning

Started by Morton Burner · · Last activity · 76 posts · 3,545 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
5 June 2004
Last activity
10 June 2004
Original author
Morton Burner
Posts
76
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,545
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–76 of 76
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. in message <[email hidden]>, Graeme

    (') said:

    Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in news:t3sep1-
    0u2.ln1 @gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk:

    Quoted message said:

    You mean 'Perceived Order of Social Hierarchy', surely?

    Is that one of the explanations for the origin of "posh"?

    No, it's one I made up on the spur of the moment.

    Quoted message said:

    The one I've heard many times is that it was to do with
    P&O cruises travelling past somewhere (in the Med I think)
    which one side of the boat (port) had a good view on the
    way out and the other side (starboard) had the good view
    on the way back, i.e. port out, starboard home.

    That's the only one I've ever heard, too.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke)
    jasmine.org.uk~simon

    Do not sail on uphill water.
    - Bi
    ll
    Le
    e

  2. in message <[email hidden]>, Graeme

    (') said:

    Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in news:lrrep1-
    0u2.ln1 @gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk:

    Quoted message said:

    There was a publican of a drinking dive in the West Bow
    in my youth who drove around in a white Ferrari with the
    registration number '50BER'

    I remember that one (which wasn't *that* long ago, I hope
    you're fairly young Simon). Apparently he (or a subsequent
    owner) sold the registration as he was sick of getting
    pulled over by the police to be breathalysed.

    He might conceivably have had it a long time. I last lived
    in Edinburgh in 1976, but I think I remember the Ferrari
    from around 1972, when I was one of a group producing an
    'underground' magazine, and hawking it round the pubs.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke)
    jasmine.org.uk~simon

    ;; when in the [censored], the wise man plants
    courgettes

  3. Mark South <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : There is no problem with the flag per se.

    I dunno. I always get very wary when big groups of blokes
    get very patriotic myself. But I'm Irish, what would I know?

    : White van Bad. White van flying flag Worse.

    Seen on the way to work today - mum taking kid to school on
    a trailer bike (little boy - 7-8 ish?). Big St. George's
    Cross on the trailer bike 🙂

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  4. Simon Brooke said:

    Mind you, in the same period one of Edinburgh's drug squad
    drove arounf in a convertible white Triumph Vitesse with a
    pink flying pig painted on each door. As the car was
    exceedingly well known it scarcely counted as 'plain
    clothes'.

    Thank you, Simon. Please send new keyboard to:

    Mr Larrington The Nut Mines London Town Devine

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  5. Simon Brooke said:
    Quoted message said:

    Mind you, in the same period one of Edinburgh's drug squad
    drove arounf in a convertible white Triumph Vitesse with a
    pink flying pig painted on each door. As the car was
    exceedingly well known it scarcely counted as 'plain
    clothes'.

    and Dave Larrington responded:

    Quoted message said:

    Thank you, Simon. Please send new keyboard to:

    Quite. Perhaps it indicates that I'm spending too much time
    on urc when someone describes a car that then appears in my
    dreams that night.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my
    reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/> "He who
    dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  6. Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in news:857gp1-k44.ln1
    @gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk:

    Quoted message said:

    He might conceivably have had it a long time. I last lived
    in Edinburgh in 1976, but I think I remember the Ferrari
    from around 1972, when I was one of a group producing an
    'underground' magazine, and hawking it round the pubs.

    Ah, so you are old ;-) I last remember seeing it in the
    early/mid nineties. (can't remember what vehicle it was
    attached to, nothing particularly memorable obviously). I
    was never around the centre of town much after that so it
    may still be kicking about.

    Graeme

  7. Graeme said:

    Is that one of the explanations for the origin of "posh"?
    The one I've heard many times is that it was to do with
    P&O cruises travelling past somewhere (in the Med I think)
    which one side of the boat (port) had a good view on the
    way out and the other side (starboard) had the good view
    on the way back, i.e. port out, starboard home.

    The one wot I heard ran thusly: If you were a wealthy toff
    travelling from the BRITONS' England to Indiah, where the
    Tigers come from, then having one's cabin on the port side
    of the ship placed it away from the midday sun, thus
    rendering it cooler and less likely to be invaded by Mad
    Dogs. And vice-versa upon the return journey.

    Wordorigins.org maintains that "This etymology of 'posh' is
    probably incorrect, but its origin is somewhat in doubt."

    Wikipedia.org sez: "However extensive searching of shipping
    company records and tickets from that period has failed to
    reveal any evidence for this claim. The fact that this folk
    etymology is only recorded 17 years after the term's
    earliest known appearance (in the 25th September 1918 issue
    of Punch) also lends weight to the theory that this
    etymology is apocryphal."

    So:

    horse, albeit plausible horse. My friend M. Smautf, a well-
    read and raddled posho himself, maintains:

    slang for 'dandy' (1890) from meaning 'money' (1830)
    originally 'coin of small value, halfpenny', possibly from
    the Romany posh meaning 'half'.

    But then again, he also maintains that Maffeo Barberini (1568-
    1644) was made entirely of salmon.

    --

    Pettifogger Jarnoyce, B.Sc.
    ===========================================================
    Professor of Applied Linguistics Leicester Institute of Brick-
    Throwing Telford
    ===========================================================

  8. In message <[email hidden]>,
    Simonb <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    And the blue lights under the car to illuminate the road
    surface. _Most_ necessary.

    I saw 'XR3i' in big, white, 20cm letters on a _windscreen_
    the other day.

    Remind me of the old joke:

    What's the difference between a Hedgehog and an XR3i?

    With the XR3i the [censored] are on the inside.
    --
    John B Wilkinson

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morton Burner said:

    Now the lighter nights are here, we no longer have the
    luxury of "Prat-Warning Lights" (i,e. always-on fog-
    lights) to alert us to the approaching Prat.

    The sainted Colin Schiller wrote in ``Which [Motor] Bike?''
    magazine in the mid-eighties that if you see a car in which
    all the occupants are wearing hats, you should immediately
    pull over to the side of the road. And isn't that just as
    true today, laygennulmen?

    ian

  10. John B Wilkinson said:

    In message <[email hidden]>,
    Simonb <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    And the blue lights under the car to illuminate the road
    surface. _Most_ necessary.

    I saw 'XR3i' in big, white, 20cm letters on a _windscreen_
    the other day.

    Remind me of the old joke:

    What's the difference between a Hedgehog and an XR3i?

    With the XR3i the [censored] are on the inside.

    No, the joke predates XR3i's. It used to be a 'police car'.
    --
    Michael MacClancy Random putdown - "He is not only dull
    himself, he is the cause of dullness in others." -Samuel
    Johnson www.macclancy.demon.co.uk www.macclancy.co.uk

  11. On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:35:03 GMT someone who may be Simon Brooke
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    <macenroe> You _cannot_ be serious! </macenroe>

    Please say you're not!

    Sadly I am. news.bbc.co.uk919030.stm

    As I understand it [1] the "human rights" case has not been
    heard and is now unlikely to be heard as Lafarge claim to
    have dropped the idea.

    In parallel with the "human rights" case there was also a
    "planning" case. Lafarge lost this in January
    news.bbc.co.uk3383515.stm and it
    appears that this caused them to retire
    news.bbc.co.uk3594229.stm.

    [1] My knowledge of the issue is very limited.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number
    F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK
    government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.

  12. In message <[email hidden]>, Ian G Batten
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Morton

    Burner said:

    Now the lighter nights are here, we no longer have the
    luxury of "Prat-Warning Lights" (i,e. always-on fog-
    lights) to alert us to the approaching Prat.

    The sainted Colin Schiller wrote in ``Which [Motor] Bike?''
    magazine in the mid-eighties that if you see a car in which
    all the occupants are wearing hats, you should immediately
    pull over to the side of the road. And isn't that just as
    true today, laygennulmen?

    Especially trilby's. This was the mark of the complete prat
    in the 60's when people still wore hats.

    Equivalent to 4+ flags today
    --
    John B Wilkinson

  13. David Hansen said:

    As I understand it [1] the "human rights" case has not
    been heard and is now unlikely to be heard as Lafarge
    claim to have dropped the idea.

    In parallel with the "human rights" case there was also a
    "planning" case. Lafarge lost this in January
    news.bbc.co.uk3383515.stm and it
    appears that this caused them to retire
    news.bbc.co.uk3594229.stm.

    It's not just this side of the pond. An idiot judge in the
    US a brace of centuries ago declared that a corporation had
    the rights of an individual.

    R.

  14. John B Wilkinson said:

    In message <[email hidden]>, Ian G
    Batten
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, The
    sainted Colin Schiller wrote in ``Which [Motor] Bike?''
    magazine in the mid-eighties that if you see a car in
    which all the occupants are wearing hats, you should
    immediately pull over to the side of the road. And isn't
    that just as true today, laygennulmen?

    Especially trilby's. This was the mark of the complete
    prat in the 60's when people still wore hats.

    Equivalent to 4+ flags today

    I think I may have mentioned earlier the Burberry-pattern
    baseball-stylee cap - chavscum.co.ukhowto.html
    Just say "no", kids.

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  15. "Dave Larrington" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    1 - astonishment subsequently decreased after witnessing a
    different Mrs. Prat asking the cashier in my local
    Sainsbury's whether they sold Prat-Flags. Mercifully, they
    did not.

    A lot of people here seem to have real problems with the
    English flag. Why is that?

  16. Morton Burner said:

    Now the lighter nights are here, we no longer have the
    luxury of "Prat-Warning Lights" (i,e. always-on fog-
    lights) to alert us to the approaching Prat. Fortunately,
    this year, someone has introduced a quantitative Prat-
    Warning system, involving flags of St. George. One flag
    signifies mild Prattism, say, 25% Prat; 2 flags leaps the
    prat factor to 75%. You never see three. Four plus
    indicates Prat factor 13.7, or 100% plus. It's nice of
    them to wear their Prat indicator so prominently.

    Each flag is probably made from 2 L-plates, discarded upon
    each driving test failure.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.