Repeat Itis From Mark Thorson

Quoted message said:

Subject: The Harm That Anti-Amalgam Liars Do
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 5/8/2004 3:35 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Here's an example of the sort of harm caused by those who
propagate myths about amalgam's alleged harmful effects:

And here is the repeated being repeated again.

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: The Harm That
Anti-Amalgam Liars Do View: Complete Thread (4 articles)
Original Format Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date:
2004-03-20 15:35:10 PST

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: The Harm That
Anti-Amalgam Liars Do View: Complete Thread (2 articles)
Original Format Newsgroups: sci.chem Date: 2003-08-05
00:00:04 PST

This one sent to alt test

Lines: 16 X-Admin: [email hidden] From:
[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) Newsgroups: alt.test
Date: 08 Feb 2003 08:05:26 GMT References:
<[email hidden]> Organization: AOL
aol.comaol.comOpen ↗ Subject: Re: The Harm That Anti-Amalgam
Liars Do by Mark Thorson Message-ID: <20030208030526.23432.00000191@mb-
da.aol.com>

Another one to alt test

Search Result 4 From: Anth ([email hidden]) Subject: Re: The
Harm That Anti-Amalgam Liars Do This is the only article in
this thread View: Original Format Newsgroups: alt.test Date:
2003-08-05 12:20:01 PST

I had all my amalgams removed and I feel greaaat! (I felt
just as great before I had them removed) Anth

"Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Here's an example of the sort of harm caused by those who
propagate myths about amalgam's alleged harmful effects:

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: Terrible Harm
Caused By Anti-Amalgam Liars Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative Date: 2002-12-03 17:50:16 PST

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: The Harm
Caused By Anti-Amalgam Liars Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative, sci.med.dentistry Date: 2002-07-27
19:30:05 PST

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: The Harm
Caused By Anti-Amalgam Liars Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative, sci.med.dentistry Date: 2002-07-27
19:30:05 PST

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: Re: Example
of Harm Caused By Anti-Amalgam Liars View: Complete Thread
(10 articles) Original Format Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative Date: 2003-12-25 14:55:10 PST

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: Anti-Amalgam
Liars Cause Terrible Harm This is the only article in this
thread View: Original Format Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative Date: 2002-11-01 22:45:08 PST

Note this one went to alt test

From: Anth ([email hidden]) Subject: Re: The Harm Caused By
Anti-Amalgam Liars This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format Newsgroups: alt.test Date: 2003-06-29
11:00:23 PST

I had 4-5 amalgams replaced with white composite, and about
6 other white fillings done. I suffered a little pain which
settled down after a few months. Anth

"Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Here's an example of the sort of harm caused by those who
propagate myths about amalgam's alleged harmful effects:

From: Mark Thorson ([email hidden]) Subject: Pain and
Suffering Caused By Anti-Amalgam Liars View: Complete Thread
(2 articles) Original Format Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative Date: 2003-01-03 19:15:01 PST

===

Subject: The Harm That Anti-Amalgam Liars Do

Mark is so desperate to be a lackey for Barrett, he doesn't
realize the problem was in not following correct protocol.

Do NOT have the metal removed by a MAINSTREAM destist who
does NOT follow correct protocol.

Quoted message said:

The other problem is that they talked me into having all 4
quadrants of my

teeth done the same week - in 4 consecutive days. This was
probably the biggest mistake we made.

B I N G O!

Correct Protocol

testfoundation.comamalgremove.htmOpen ↗

zip.com.auAmalRemProc.htmlOpen ↗

curezone.comdental amalgam.aspOpen ↗

ccrlab.comccrlab.comOpen ↗

holisticmed.comiaomt.txtOpen ↗

holisticmed.comamalgamOpen ↗

naturomedbc.comdentistprotocol.htmOpen ↗

envirodental.co.ukiaomtrmv.aspOpen ↗

hugnet.comprotocol.htmlOpen ↗

biologicaldent.comcenter for biological dentistOpen ↗
ry/protocols.html

mercuryfilling.commercuryfilling.comOpen ↗ (bottom of URL and click
protocols)

Dentist: How To Replace Amalgam Fillings, mercury health
risk Once the removal has begun, the mercury vapor will be
continuously released from the tooth. During the removal or
placement of amalgam the patient can be exposed to amounts
which are a thousand times greater than the EPA allowable
concentration.

Protocol for Amalgam-Mercury-Silver Filling Removal

By

International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology HOME -
Health Dental Risk Page - CANCER Page - Amalgam Replacement
Protocol - Disclaimer

PATIENT PROTECTION

First in every concerned doctor's mind is the protection of
the patient from additional exposure to mercury. This is
especially true of the mercury toxic patient. The mercury
toxic patient may have been exposed to varying amounts of
mercury from diet, environment, employment or from
mercury/silver dental fillings. All forms are cumulative and
can contribute to the body burden. The goal of this
preferred procedure is to minimize any additional exposure
of the patient, ourselves, or staff to mercury.

During chewing the patient is exposed to intraoral levels
which are several times the EPA allowable air concentration.
2 During the removal or placement of amalgam the patient can
be exposed to amounts which are a thousand times greater
than the EPA allowable concentration.3 Once the drill
touches the filling temperature increases immediately
vaporizing the mercury component of the alloy. There are 8
steps to greatly reducing everyone's exposure.

1. Keep the fillings cool

All removal must be done under cold water spray with copious
amounts of water. Once the removal has begun, the mercury
vapor will be continuously released from the tooth.

2. Use a high volume evacuator

Therefore, a high volume evacuator tip should be kept near
the tooth (1/2 inch) at all times to evacuate this vapor
from the area of the patient. Polishing amalgam can create
very dangerous levels of mercury and should be avoided
especially for the mercury toxic patient.

3. Provide an alternative air source

All patients having amalgam removed or placed should be
provided with an alternative air source and instructed to
not breathe through their mouth during treatment. A nasal
hood such as is used with the nitrous oxide analgesia
equipment is excellent. Air is best and oxygen is acceptable
although not required. If just air is used it should be
clean and free of mercury vapor preferably from outside the
dental office.

4. Immediately dispose of the mercury alloy

Particles of mercury alloy should be washed and vacuumed
away as soon as they are generated. The filling should be
sectioned and removed in large pieces to reduce exposure.

At present the International Academy of Oral Medicine and
Toxicology (IAOMT) has approved removal both with and
without the use of a rubber dam. Some evidence exist to
support both views since high levels of mercury and amalgam
particles can be found under the dam. All members are agreed
that whether or not a rubber dam is used the patient should
be instructed to not breathe through their mouth or swallow
the particles. Some experts feel that it is better to remove
the amalgam first and then apply the dam if needed for
restorative procedures.

5. Lavage, and change gloves

After the fillings have been removed, take off the rubber
dam if one was used and lavage the patients mouth for at
least 30 seconds with cold water and vacuum. Remove your
gloves and replace them with a new pair. If a restorative
procedure is next then reapply a new dam and proceed.

6. Immediately clean patient

Immediately change patient's protective wear and clean
their face.

7. Consider nutritional support

Consider appropriate nutritional support before, during and
after removal.

8. Keep room air pure

Install room air purifiers or ionizers and fans for
everyone's well being.

STAFF PROTECTION

OSHA4 5 requires that employees be given written informed
consent before the use of any toxic chemicals of which
mercury is one. Elemental mercury vapor is one of the most
toxic forms of mercury and should not breathed. Women of
child bearing age should be exposed to no more than 10% of
the OSHA MAC6. Women who are pregnant should be exposed to
no mercury.7 If you use mercury or remove mercury in any
form the National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) has recommended that your employees be
medically monitored annually.

ANY MERCURY EXPOSURE REQUIRES THAT THE EMPLOYEE WEAR AN
APPROVED MERCURY FILTER MASK.

An approved mask is appropriate for wearing during all
dental procedures which will expose you or your staff
to mercury.8

The manner in which dentists operate their equipment
dramatically affects the amount of mercury released. Never
drill on mercury high dry. It is hazardous to you, your
staff, and your patient. Levels as high as 4000 m g/M3 have
been measured 18" from the drill when used high dry. Levels
over 1000 m g/M3 are measurable upon opening an amalgam
mixing capsule.

One out of 7 California dental offices tested over the OSHA
TWA of 50 m g/M 3 . 100% of the vacuum cleaner exhaust
tested over 100 m g/M 3 . Any office where mercury is used
should be tested regularly and staff should be monitored for
exposure. Testing services are available and a mercury
sensor badge is available for personnel monitoring. They
should test inside storage areas and along baseboards where
mercury might have dropped. Office spills can go undetected
for years and are extremely hazardous.

------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
------

NEW! DENTAL CLEANSE DISCUSSION AND SUPPORT GROUP

"One of the most important thing

that you can do for your health"--Dr.Hal Higgins

Read the archives of Dentalcleanse Support Group

------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
------

------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
------

REFERENCES

1 IAOMT Standards of Care Preferred Procedure Approved
9/27/92

2 EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office
of Health and Environment Assessment Mercury health effects
update Final Report EPA-600/8-84-019F 1971 EPA

3 Cooley RL, Barkmeier WW: Mercury vapor emitted
during ultraspeed cutting of amalgam. J Indiana Dent
Assoc 57:28-31, 1978

4 OSHA Job Health Series: Mercury.(2234)8/1975

5 Hazard Communication Program Federal Register/ Vol. 52.
No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 1987

6 OSHA MAC is Threshold Limit Value of 100 micrograms/ cubic
meter or 100 PPM This is a never to be exceeded standard.

7 Koos BJ and Lango LD , Mercury Toxicity in the pregnant
woman, fetus, and newborn infant. A review Am J Obstetrics
and Gynecology 126(3):390-409, 1976

8 Mine Safety Association high levels and 3M mercury dust
mask lower levels