Re: REPEATITIS has overcome Mark Thorson

Jan the Accuser said:

Quoted message said:

The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from

Klamath Lake,

Quoted message said:

produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I

characterized

Quoted message said:

asaddictive), and that Cell Tech

***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

Quoted message said:

toxin

THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

Well, Jan, what exactly do the statements referred to
by this statement say? What is the original statement
which is a lie?

You say that there is a lie in the file "An Anatoxin-A Primer".
Let's see that lie. Post a WHOLE ORIGINAL STATEMENT
from that file which is a lie. Not the whole file, just a statement
which is a LIE.

Certainly, you know where that part is, don't you Jan?
Or do you just accuse people of being liars without
regard to whether they've lied or not.

Why don't you post this part, Jan? Then you'd prove
that I'd lied, by posting the actual lie itself, rather than
merely a statement that refers to the (alleged) lie.

Why don't you do that, Jan?

Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement
is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

Is it because if you did, everybody would see the Jan Drew
has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?

Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is
Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

Is that it, Jan?

Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

You are a despicable human being.

In article <[email hidden]>

Mark Thorson said:

Jan the Accuser said:

Quoted message said:

The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from

Klamath Lake,

Quoted message said:

produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I

characterized

Quoted message said:

asaddictive), and that Cell Tech

***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

Quoted message said:

toxin

THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

Well, Jan, what exactly do the statements referred to
by this statement say? What is the original statement
which is a lie?

You say that there is a lie in the file "An Anatoxin-A Primer".
Let's see that lie. Post a WHOLE ORIGINAL STATEMENT
from that file which is a lie. Not the whole file, just a statement
which is a LIE.

Certainly, you know where that part is, don't you Jan?
Or do you just accuse people of being liars without
regard to whether they've lied or not.

Why don't you post this part, Jan? Then you'd prove
that I'd lied, by posting the actual lie itself, rather than
merely a statement that refers to the (alleged) lie.

Why don't you do that, Jan?

Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement
is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

Is it because if you did, everybody would see the Jan Drew
has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?

Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is
Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

Is that it, Jan?

Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

You are a despicable human being.

Yawn.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

This exact pattern is what landed him to make a retraction.

Subject: HEXACHLOROBENZENE found in BING HAN GINSENG

We read it now about 40 times. Please stop wasting band width.

Get help for your OCD.

Said by Jan Drew, usenet's most prolific regurgitator.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: REPEATITIS has overcome Mark Thorson
From: "Mark Probert" [email hidden]
Date: 1/25/2004 7:06 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

This exact pattern is what landed him to make a retraction.

Subject: HEXACHLOROBENZENE found in BING HAN GINSENG

We read it now about 40 times. Please stop wasting band width.

Get help for your OCD.

Said by Jan Drew, usenet's most prolific regurgitator.

I haven't had to make any retractions.

I see the truth brings out name calling for you.

Another example of why you are here.

Jan

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: REPEATITIS has overcome Mark Thorson
From: "Mark Probert" [email hidden]
Date: 1/25/2004 7:06 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

This exact pattern is what landed him to make a retraction.

Subject: HEXACHLOROBENZENE found in BING HAN GINSENG

We read it now about 40 times. Please stop wasting band width.

Get help for your OCD.

Said by Jan Drew, usenet's most prolific regurgitator.

I haven't had to make any retractions.

I see the truth brings out name calling for you.

Another example of why you are here.

Purpose: Identification of hypocrisy.