General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Time to pay?

Started by AMacmil304 · · Last activity · 56 posts · 1,807 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 February 2004
Last activity
4 March 2004
Original author
AMacmil304
Posts
56
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,807
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 56
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In Dave Morris' article (24 Feb.) he asks, what Scottish Labour can do for our wild places and all
    who care for them. Presumably he means in terms of spending taxpayers' money.

    If the Ramblers Association and other users really care about these places, perhaps they should now
    consider contributing to their upkeep and relieve some of the burden of their recreation from those
    who do not participate.

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person would go some way towards care
    and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would be considerably less that most others pay for their
    chosen recreational activities. It would also have the knock-on effect of creating jobs.

    It's time the Ramblers realised that increased access has a cost implication and pay for their
    recreation.

    Nothing worthwhile is free!

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.

  2. "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In Dave Morris' article (24 Feb.) he asks, what Scottish Labour can do for


    our

    Quoted message said:

    wild places and all who care for them. Presumably he means in terms of


    spending

    Quoted message said:

    taxpayers' money.

    If the Ramblers Association and other users really care about these


    places,

    Quoted message said:

    perhaps they should now consider contributing to their upkeep and relieve


    some

    Quoted message said:

    of the burden of their recreation from those who do not participate.

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person would


    go

    Quoted message said:

    some way towards care and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would be considerably less that
    most others pay for their chosen recreational activities. It would also have the knock-on effect
    of creating jobs.

    It's time the Ramblers realised that increased access has a cost


    implication

    Quoted message said:

    and pay for their recreation.

    Nothing worthwhile is free!

    Yes it is, walking is free! So not happy with stirring the [censored] in the Herald you feel it is worth
    trying it here ?

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.


    In other words you're a tree hugging agitator.

    KRO

  3. Quoted message said:

    Nothing worthwhile is free!

    The air that you, unfortunately, breathe?

    Richard Webb Campaign Against the Needless Predation of Billy Goats

  4. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay?
    From: "KRO" [email hidden]
    Date: 25/02/04 17:39 GMT Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040225113020.10061.00000391@mb-
    m17.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:

    In Dave Morris' article (24 Feb.) he asks, what Scottish Labour can do for


    our

    Quoted message said:

    wild places and all who care for them. Presumably he means in terms of


    spending

    Quoted message said:

    taxpayers' money.

    If the Ramblers Association and other users really care about these


    places,

    Quoted message said:

    perhaps they should now consider contributing to their upkeep and relieve


    some

    Quoted message said:

    of the burden of their recreation from those who do not participate.

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person would


    go

    Quoted message said:

    some way towards care and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would be considerably less that
    most others pay for their chosen recreational activities. It would also have the knock-on effect
    of creating jobs.

    It's time the Ramblers realised that increased access has a cost


    implication

    Quoted message said:

    and pay for their recreation.

    Nothing worthwhile is free!

    Yes it is, walking is free! So not happy with stirring the [censored] in the Herald you feel it is worth
    trying it here ?

    Why not? It's a legitimate point.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose". Mahatma
    Gandhi.


    In other words you're a tree hugging agitator.

    KRO

    So I take it from your response that you think others should pay for your recreation?

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.

  5. Quoted message said:

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.

    You seem to have been stuck at stage 2 for a very long time...

  6. In [email hidden]
    RJ Webb mused:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Nothing worthwhile is free!

    The air that you, unfortunately, breathe?

    Richard Webb Campaign Against the Needless Predation of Billy Goats

    C'est vrai!

    --
    A l'eau - c'est l'heure (French Navy Motto)

  7. "Simon Caldwell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose". Mahatma
    Gandhi.

    You seem to have been stuck at stage 2 for a very long time...

    LOL :-). This one's a genuine nutter I think.
    --

    Bernie Get back on the wagon to reply..

  8. "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person would


    go

    Quoted message said:

    some way towards care and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would be considerably less that
    most others pay for their chosen recreational activities. It would also have the knock-on effect
    of creating jobs.

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign

    What about foreigners ? It would increase my holiday expences with 50%. I don't think Scotland could
    manage without tourists.

    Theo (who gave his sons Gaelic names)

  9. (AMacmil304) said:


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose". Mahatma
    Gandhi.


    In other words you're a tree hugging agitator.

    KRO

    So I take it from your response that you think others should pay for your recreation?

    Tell you what - you pay £5 per person for people to read your rubbish and I'll consider £100 for
    hill access in Scotland.

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.

    --
    79.84% of all statistics are made up on the spot. The other 42% are made up later on. In Warwick -
    looking at flat fields and that includes the castle.

  10. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay?
    From: "theo" [email hidden]
    Date: 25/02/04 21:00 GMT Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:20040225113020.10061.00000391@mb-
    m17.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person would


    go

    Quoted message said:

    some way towards care and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would be considerably less that
    most others pay for their chosen recreational activities. It would also have the knock-on effect
    of creating jobs.

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign

    What about foreigners ? It would increase my holiday expences with 50%. I don't think Scotland
    could manage without tourists.

    Theo (who gave his sons Gaelic names)

    Foreigners could buy a licence from the post office for the duration of their stay - say
    £5 per week.

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.

  11. (AMacmil304) said:

    But that not an answer is it? If you care for the outdoors why should you not contribute to its
    maintenance? Or do you just use it and not care at all? Do you think it's fair that taxpayers money
    should be used to finance your recreation whilst hospitals and schools could do with the money?

    I don't know the background to your background on this (it seems you're know to a few of our posters
    ;-) but this is a totally specious approach to a discussion such as this (some might say any
    discussion).

    Why do I say that? Because there are many, many situations that such a trite argument could be
    levelled at, taxpayers -v- smokers for instance, and as such its a fallacious approach because in
    the real world it cannot withstand rigorous scrutiny.

    After having just such a discussion recently with some friends my position is now that it behoves
    "the government" to maintain such resources. (Prior to the above discussion my stance had been that
    the user should pay)

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum; thenmc.org.ukindex.php

    NMC website: thenmc.org.ukthenmc.org.uk

  12. AMacmil304 said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay? From: "Bernie Hughes" [email hidden] Date: 25/02/04
    20:26 GMT Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "Simon Caldwell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    >
    >" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose". Mahatma
    >Gandhi.
    >

    You seem to have been stuck at stage 2 for a very long time...

    LOL :-). This one's a genuine nutter I think.
    --

    Bernie Get back on the wagon to reply..

    You're all very good at insults but not very good at justifying why others should pay for your
    recreation.

    Perhaps, having seen the way in which you and your friends conduct arguments in other newsgroups, we
    just don't want to talk to you.

    I'll just add you to my killfile for this group as well for the other groups you frequent.

    Bye. Pat

    --
    Pat Bennett www.cheshirewildlife.co.uk

  13. "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay? From: "theo" [email hidden] Date: 25/02/04 21:00 GMT Standard
    Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:20040225113020.10061.00000391@mb-
    m17.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person


    would

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    go

    Quoted message said:

    some way towards care and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would


    be

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    considerably less that most others pay for their chosen recreational activities. It would also
    have the knock-on effect of creating jobs.

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign

    What about foreigners ? It would increase my holiday expences with 50%. I don't think Scotland
    could manage without tourists.

    Theo (who gave his sons Gaelic names)

    Foreigners could buy a licence from the post office for the duration of


    their

    Quoted message said:

    stay - say £5 per week.

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign

    And who would check these permits out on the hills? I doubt the revenue from these 'countryside
    enjoyment tax permits' would cover the cost of employing any inspectors. Besides, which politician
    would have the guts to even think about introducing such a daft law? It's also a surefire way to
    discourage tourists, "You can drive in but you can't get out to look at the country unless you pay
    an extra tax".

    Nick

  14. (AMacmil304) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay? From: [email hidden] (Chris Street) Date: 25/02/04 21:03
    GMT Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (AMacmil304) said:


    >
    >> Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk
    >>
    >> " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose". Mahatma
    >> Gandhi.
    >>
    >In other words you're a tree hugging agitator.
    >
    >KRO

    So I take it from your response that you think others should pay for your recreation?

    Tell you what - you pay £5 per person for people to read your rubbish and I'll consider £100 for
    hill access in Scotland.

    But that not an answer is it?

    Wherever did I pretend it to be so?

    Quoted message said:

    If you care for the outdoors why should you not contribute to its maintenance?

    I do. Now push off and find some RSPCA people to harrass or have you jumped to another bandwagon?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose". Mahatma
    Gandhi.

    I see you are still stuck on the second stage.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    --
    79.84% of all statistics are made up on the spot. The other 42% are made up later on. In Warwick -
    looking at flat fields and that includes the castle.

    That's bright :-(

    Irony is obviously beyond your comprehension as well.
    --
    79.84% of all statistics are made up on the spot. The other 42% are made up later on. In Warwick -
    looking at flat fields and that includes the castle.

  15. (AMacmil304) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay? From: Pat Bennett [email hidden] Date: 25/02/04 21:48
    GMT Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    AMacmil304 said:

    > Subject: Re: Time to pay? From: "Bernie Hughes" [email hidden] Date:
    > 25/02/04 20:26 GMT Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
    >
    > "Simon Caldwell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > "]news:[email hidden]...
    >> >
    >> >" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    >> >Mahatma Gandhi.
    >> >
    >>
    >> You seem to have been stuck at stage 2 for a very long time...
    >
    > LOL :-). This one's a genuine nutter I think.
    > --
    >
    > Bernie Get back on the wagon to reply..

    You're all very good at insults but not very good at justifying why others should pay for your
    recreation.

    Perhaps, having seen the way in which you and your friends conduct arguments in other newsgroups,
    we just don't want to talk to you.

    Perhaps the truth hurts.

    That's why I don't usually call you a gnyragyrff shpxjvg to your face.
    --
    79.84% of all statistics are made up on the spot. The other 42% are made up later on. In Warwick -
    looking at flat fields and that includes the castle.

  16. Quoted message said:

    Foreigners could buy a licence from the post office for the duration of their stay - say £5
    per week.

    Or go somewhere welcoming instead... A country ruled by wee [censored] as yourself would not be the sort
    of place I would want to visit.

    Richard Webb

  17. Quoted message said:

    Perhaps you're just another wildlife killer.

    Yes....

    Proud of it

    Now go away, I have to earn some money to pay taxes to help folk still work the land and provide
    food for [censored] like you.

    Richard Webb

  18. Quoted message said:

    MacMil304 said : So I take it from your response that you think others should pay for your
    recreation?

    When you're out in the countryside hugging trees have a look at the areas where I carry out my
    "recreation". Tell me how much it costs. Tell me how much I voluntarily contribute to the
    maintenance which is required. Then tell me how much I contribute through membership of various
    bodies and purchase of various goods. Now tell me how much I contribute to others choice of
    recreation. Then p*ss off.

    KRO

  19. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Time to pay?
    From: "theo" [email hidden]
    Date: 25/02/04 21:00 GMT Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "AMacmil304" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:20040225113020.10061.00000391@mb-
    m17.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:

    A simple annual access licensing scheme of perhaps £100 per person would


    go

    Quoted message said:

    some way towards care and maintenance and at less that £2 a week would be considerably less that
    most others pay for their chosen recreational activities. It would also have the knock-on effect
    of creating jobs.

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign

    What about foreigners ? It would increase my holiday expences with 50%. I don't think Scotland
    could manage without tourists.

    Can the planet manage with them?

    Quoted message said:


    Theo (who gave his sons Gaelic names)

    A life sentence for them?

    Angus Macmillan Roots-of-Blood Campaign www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org.uk

    " First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they lose".
    Mahatma Gandhi.

  20. "theo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What about foreigners ? It would increase my holiday expences with 50%. I don't think Scotland
    could manage without tourists.

    We wouldn't want to, even if we could.

    --

    Bernie Get back on the wagon to reply..

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.