Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

negative drag

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 145 posts · 5,311 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
12 December 2007
Last activity
10 January 2008
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
145
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5,311
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 145
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello all,

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    Regards,

    gaby de wilde

  2. Quoted post said:

    Hello all,

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Do you actually believe this?

    Quoted message said:


    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    Regards,

    gaby de wilde

  3. Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    Regards,

    gaby de wilde

    Of course what would really happen is that the wind would initially blow
    you backwards slightly, the backwards motion causing the fan to rotate
    backwards which would cause you to go backwards faster, causing the fan
    to rotate faster and so on. The effect would snowball until you were
    going backwards at the speed of sound.

    elmo

  4. Eric Gisse said:
    Quoted post said:

    Hello all,

    Quoted message said:

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    Quoted message said:

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Do you actually believe this?

    No it was a joke, I obviously mean wind energy. But you can only "use"
    drag one time. If you put a propeller in front of a bicycle the
    propeller will obviously break part of the drag. This "drag" will then
    be "lost" from the face of the cyclist. Just like when you put up a
    windscreen or have some one cycle in front of you.

    Or do you think the same drag can be fully applied twice? One time to
    the propeller and another time onto the rider? 2 times the same force?

  5. Elmo said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    Quoted message said:

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    Quoted message said:

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    Quoted message said:

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    Quoted message said:

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Quoted message said:

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    Quoted message said:

    Regards,

    Quoted message said:

    gaby de wilde

    Of course what would really happen is that the wind would initially blow
    you backwards slightly, the backwards motion causing the fan to rotate
    backwards which would cause you to go backwards faster, causing the fan
    to rotate faster and so on. The effect would snowball until you were
    going backwards at the speed of sound.

    elmo

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing#The_physics_of_sailing

  6. "Elmo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    And that means what?
    If the drag is hared with the rider, the rider shares that with the car, so
    the drag is on the car anyway.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    Perhaps you mean that a portion of the drag energy has been converted into
    forward propulsion. However, putting a fan into the airstream "increases"
    the drag in the first place, so the energy produced may help to alleviate
    that "extra" drag you just created.

    Quoted message said:

    Of course what would really happen is that the wind would initially blow
    you backwards slightly, the backwards motion causing the fan to rotate

    Errr, what wind? The car isn't moving, so where did this wind come from?

    Quoted message said:

    backwards which would cause you to go backwards faster, causing the fan
    to rotate faster and so on. The effect would snowball until you were
    going backwards at the speed of sound.

    Nope. The fan is in "that" wind, which is coming from the front,
    apparently. Do you realize you are suggesting that the wind will blow the
    car backwards so fast that it will be going backwards faster than the wind
    is blowing? Otherwise the fan keeps going as if the car were moving
    forward, does it not?.

    Perhaps you could extend this to fans blowing onto sails on boats. Or, a
    turbine in the water that generates a current to run the boats electric
    motor thus keeping it moving forward to drive the turbine.

    I imagine free energy, if it's possible, should take just a tad more
    thought.

    Vince

  7. Hello Vince,

    On Dec 12, 9:59 am, "Vince Morgan" <vinharAtHereoptusnet.com.au>

    Quoted message said:

    Perhaps you mean that a portion of the drag energy has been converted into
    forward propulsion.

    yes, you do know what I mean.

    Quoted message said:

    However, putting a fan into the airstream "increases" the drag in the first place,

    Yes, but you cant keep increasing the drag without increasing the
    surface. Like for example inside a car there is no wind.

    Quoted message said:

    so the energy produced may help to alleviate
    that "extra" drag you just created.

    Exactly.

    If we would stack 2 windmills on the front of a bike the second one
    will not generate as much drag as the first one. Of course that means
    it wont spin as fast as the first one either.

    In that same way the rider is not subjected to the full amount of drag
    because the propeller has pre-accelerated some of the air.

    If there is any drag on the propeller anything behind it is suffering
    below maximum drag. It of course makes a world of difference if you
    just try to push the air away or if you use it for propulsion.

    You get the picture.

    I also made a picture to show you can sail close to straight up the
    wind. It means there is still much room for improvement. One should
    imagine the combination of both in case that isn't obvious still. :-)

    The wind will be the propulsion together with the drag but some drag
    is also reduced in my design, you can see the vertical rotors push the
    wind to the sides. This is creating a vacuum at the front, they also
    push the wind inwards at the rear, this creates pressure behind the
    rider.

    The total is the sum of the parts.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

  8. Quoted message said:

    Hello Vince,

    On Dec 12, 9:59 am, "Vince Morgan" <vinharAtHereoptusnet.com.au>

    Quoted message said:

    Perhaps you mean that a portion of the drag energy has been converted into
    forward propulsion.

    yes, you do know what I mean.

    Quoted message said:

    However, putting a fan into the airstream "increases" the drag in the first place,

    Yes, but you cant keep increasing the drag without increasing the
    surface. Like for example inside a car there is no wind.

    Quoted message said:

    so the energy produced may help to alleviate
    that "extra" drag you just created.

    Exactly.

    If we would stack 2 windmills on the front of a bike the second one
    will not generate as much drag as the first one. Of course that means
    it wont spin as fast as the first one either.

    In that same way the rider is not subjected to the full amount of drag
    because the propeller has pre-accelerated some of the air.

    If there is any drag on the propeller anything behind it is suffering
    below maximum drag. It of course makes a world of difference if you
    just try to push the air away or if you use it for propulsion.

    You get the picture.

    I also made a picture to show you can sail close to straight up the
    wind. It means there is still much room for improvement. One should
    imagine the combination of both in case that isn't obvious still. :-)

    The wind will be the propulsion together with the drag but some drag
    is also reduced in my design, you can see the vertical rotors push the
    wind to the sides. This is creating a vacuum at the front, they also
    push the wind inwards at the rear, this creates pressure behind the
    rider.

    The total is the sum of the parts.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Land yachts have already been invented I'm afraid.

    Elmo

  9. I took the change out of my left pocket and put it in my right pocket.
    Question: what effect did that have on my net worth?

  10. Quoted post said:


    Hello all,

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    1) "Barbarella" and the ice sled.
    2) Idiot
    3) You won't get to top Jane Fonda, either.
    4) Idiot.

    --
    Uncle Al
    http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
    (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
    http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

  11. Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    That's not even among the more humorous and entertaining 'perpetual
    motion' follies. Get rid of the silly red-line animations and draw in a
    few complex mechanical distractions maybe?
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  12. Transvestite with a bad attitude!

  13. I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    Regards,

    gaby de wilde

  14. On Dec 12, 6:03 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I took the change out of my left pocket and put it in my right pocket.
    Question: what effect did that have on my net worth?

    Hello Leo,

    Lets say there is a big hole in your left pocket.

    Drag presented by the rider is not useful for anything, it's an
    annoyance.

    The surface area of the rider and the fan placed in series is not the
    same thing as when placed parallel. The drag per cm2 has it's
    maximum.

    It's like a screen blocking the wind. You know how a wind screen
    works.

    It's just like cycling behind someone or driving behind a truck.

    The rotors make drag but this drag is not slowing the vehicle down.

    The rider is riding in the slipstream of the windmill.

    five thousand years ago, the Egyptians made sailboats.

    In 1493 Giacomo Caprotti designed a bicycle.

    In 1790 Monsieur Sivrac made the first bicycle.

    In 50 Hero of Alexandria described A wind wheel operating an organ

    In 700 windmills were used in Iran.

    Everything has already been done. They are more then worthy
    technologies.

    If I put the windmill on the bike. You want to pretend it stops
    working??

    Be specific, what stops working. The bike or the windmill?

    They don't just continue to work but they actually compliment another.

    Just look at the spammers trying to obfuscate the topic. That should
    say enough.

    :-)

  15. Quoted message said:

    On Dec 12, 6:03 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I took the change out of my left pocket and put it in my right pocket.
    Question: what effect did that have on my net worth?

    Hello Leo,

    Lets say there is a big hole in your left pocket.

    Drag presented by the rider is not useful for anything, it's an
    annoyance.

    The surface area of the rider and the fan placed in series is not the
    same thing as when placed parallel. The drag per cm2 has it's
    maximum.

    It's like a screen blocking the wind. You know how a wind screen
    works.

    A wind screen spares the person behind it the annoyance of having to
    face into a stiff wind, but it creates a lot of drag.

    Quoted message said:

    It's just like cycling behind someone or driving behind a truck.

    Is it, now? Try attaching a garage door to the front of your car and
    tell me if it improves your gas mileage the way drafting behind a truck
    would. (Hint: It won't, because the drag on the garage door will be
    transmitted to your car -- unlike a drafting situation, where the drag
    on the truck in front of you is *not* transmitted to your car.)

    Quoted message said:

    The rotors make drag but this drag is not slowing the vehicle down.

    It most certainly is, unless the windmill is not attached to the bicycle.

    Quoted message said:

    The rider is riding in the slipstream of the windmill.

    But the drag on the windmill acts on the bicycle, and since the rider is
    mechanically connected to the bicycle (i.e., sitting on it), it slows
    the rider down too. The windmill might make it a little more comfortable
    for the rider, the way a windshield would, but it won't help the rider
    go any faster.

    Quoted message said:

    five thousand years ago, the Egyptians made sailboats.

    In 1493 Giacomo Caprotti designed a bicycle.

    In 1790 Monsieur Sivrac made the first bicycle.

    In 50 Hero of Alexandria described A wind wheel operating an organ

    In 700 windmills were used in Iran.

    Everything has already been done.

    I don't know about that, but I DO know that you're not the first person
    to come up with this idea. It's been done to death (though as a concept
    it has its pedagogical uses, namely demonstrating the laws of
    thermodynamics).

    Quoted message said:

    If I put the windmill on the bike. You want to pretend it stops
    working??

    Be specific, what stops working. The bike or the windmill?

    They don't just continue to work but they actually compliment another.

    As another person already pointed out, if you put a windmill on the
    front of a bicycle it will increase the drag on the bicycle. (For
    instance, the air pressure behind the windmill will be less than in
    front of it, creating a net force opposing the motion of the bicycle.)
    The best you could hope to do is use some of the energy from the fan to
    offset the effects of the drag. You will not, however, be able to offset
    all of the drag you add, so the net effect will be that the bicyclist
    will have to pedal harder to maintain the same speed as without the
    windmill.

    If you don't believe me, try your idea out in a wind tunnel. I guarantee
    the drag coefficient increases enough to negate the energy you extract
    from the airstream and then some.

    Quoted message said:

    Just look at the spammers trying to obfuscate the topic. That should
    say enough.

    Oh, that's an *old* chestnut -- if enough people say it doesn't work,
    why then they're covering something up and it MUST work, right?

  16. Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    I took the change out of my left pocket and put it in my right pocket.
    Question: what effect did that have on my net worth?

    Quoted message said:

    Lets say there is a big hole in your left pocket.
    Drag presented by the rider is not useful for anything, it's an
    annoyance.
    The surface area of the rider and the fan placed in series is not the
    same thing as when placed parallel. The drag per cm2 has it's
    maximum.
    It's like a screen blocking the wind. You know how a wind screen
    works.
    It's just like cycling behind someone or driving behind a truck.
    The rotors make drag but this drag is not slowing the vehicle down.
    The rider is riding in the slipstream of the windmill.
    five thousand years ago, the Egyptians made sailboats.
    In 1493 Giacomo Caprotti designed a bicycle.
    In 1790 Monsieur Sivrac made the first bicycle.
    In 50 Hero of Alexandria described A wind wheel operating an organ
    In 700 windmills were used in Iran.
    Everything has already been done. They are more then worthy
    technologies.
    If I put the windmill on the bike. You want to pretend it stops
    working??
    Be specific, what stops working. The bike or the windmill?
    They don't just continue to work but they actually compliment another.
    Just look at the spammers trying to obfuscate the topic. That should
    say enough.

    I'll put some cash on a bet that anything you add to your bicycle's
    frontal area reduces speed for any given constant effort. Magic fans,
    ducts, rotors, ouija boards, windscreens and sails included. Name it.
    How's $100 sound to you??

    Although the Patent Office won't accept applications for perpetual
    motion devices, you'd have bragging rights and my $100 if you succeed.

    p.s. you intended 'complement'
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  17. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    I took the change out of my left pocket and put it in my right pocket.
    Question: what effect did that have on my net worth?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Lets say there is a big hole in your left pocket.
    Drag presented by the rider is not useful for anything, it's an
    annoyance.
    The surface area of the rider and the fan placed in series is not the
    same thing as when placed parallel. The drag per cm2 has it's
    maximum.
    It's like a screen blocking the wind. You know how a wind screen
    works.

    R.H. Allen said:

    A wind screen spares the person behind it the annoyance of having to
    face into a stiff wind, but it creates a lot of drag.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's just like cycling behind someone or driving behind a truck.

    R.H. Allen said:

    Is it, now? Try attaching a garage door to the front of your car and
    tell me if it improves your gas mileage the way drafting behind a truck
    would. (Hint: It won't, because the drag on the garage door will be
    transmitted to your car -- unlike a drafting situation, where the drag
    on the truck in front of you is *not* transmitted to your car.)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The rotors make drag but this drag is not slowing the vehicle down.

    R.H. Allen said:

    It most certainly is, unless the windmill is not attached to the bicycle.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The rider is riding in the slipstream of the windmill.

    R.H. Allen said:

    But the drag on the windmill acts on the bicycle, and since the rider is
    mechanically connected to the bicycle (i.e., sitting on it), it slows
    the rider down too. The windmill might make it a little more comfortable
    for the rider, the way a windshield would, but it won't help the rider
    go any faster.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    five thousand years ago, the Egyptians made sailboats.
    In 1493 Giacomo Caprotti designed a bicycle.
    In 1790 Monsieur Sivrac made the first bicycle.
    In 50 Hero of Alexandria described A wind wheel operating an organ
    In 700 windmills were used in Iran.
    Everything has already been done.

    R.H. Allen said:

    I don't know about that, but I DO know that you're not the first person
    to come up with this idea. It's been done to death (though as a concept
    it has its pedagogical uses, namely demonstrating the laws of
    thermodynamics).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If I put the windmill on the bike. You want to pretend it stops
    working??
    Be specific, what stops working. The bike or the windmill?
    They don't just continue to work but they actually compliment another.

    R.H. Allen said:

    As another person already pointed out, if you put a windmill on the
    front of a bicycle it will increase the drag on the bicycle. (For
    instance, the air pressure behind the windmill will be less than in
    front of it, creating a net force opposing the motion of the bicycle.)
    The best you could hope to do is use some of the energy from the fan to
    offset the effects of the drag. You will not, however, be able to offset
    all of the drag you add, so the net effect will be that the bicyclist
    will have to pedal harder to maintain the same speed as without the
    windmill.
    If you don't believe me, try your idea out in a wind tunnel. I guarantee
    the drag coefficient increases enough to negate the energy you extract
    from the airstream and then some.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Just look at the spammers trying to obfuscate the topic. That should
    say enough.

    R.H. Allen said:

    Oh, that's an *old* chestnut -- if enough people say it doesn't work,
    why then they're covering something up and it MUST work, right?

    Every kid who had a Molor Products "Cosmic Whirl" just _knew_ it made
    the bike go faster:
    http://www.deltiology.com/00000images/cosmic.gif
    (discontinued product AFAIK)
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  18. <[email hidden]> wrote: clip) It's just like cycling behind someone or
    driving behind a truck. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Then please do this thought experiment and report the results:

    Mount your bicycle behind a truck, so that when you pedal you push the
    truck. ;-) I don't know why I am continuing in this argument--every
    proposal to achieve perpectual motion can be put away with this simple
    statement: "It's against the law."

  19. Quoted post said:

    I'm happy to announce that the drag generated by a vehicle may be used
    by a windmill as if it was wind. This of course creates extra drag but
    this drag is partially shared with the rider.

    We thus have a free energy situation on our hands here. :-)

    Drag is limited by the size of the vehicle. If any amount of this drag
    is turned into propulsion then that percentage (just) wont be
    available for slowing the vehicle down. It's not-there anymore.

    I have illustrated the concept here.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag

    Let me think what you hear ok?

    If *you* had to power an array of windmills with your own legs
    pedaling the bike, you wouldn't think that the energy was "free".

    Tom Davidson
    Richmond, VA

  20. On Dec 13, 12:34 am, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know why I am continuing in this argument-

    Hello Leo,

    You posting has words in it but there is not one argument Leo
    Lichtman.

    I'm reading nonsense and you are making me read it.

    http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/negative-drag
    gabydewilde - negative drag

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.