UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle Lanes

Started by Andyp · · Last activity · 87 posts · 2,489 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
6 December 2003
Last activity
8 December 2003
Original author
Andyp
Posts
87
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,489
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 87
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find a cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

  2. "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find


    a

    Quoted message said:

    cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    There's no quick answer to this AFAIK - for example, around here (in Warwickshire) there are
    numerous "2 way" cycle lanes on just the one side of the road, indeed some share with pedestrians -
    but they are on the pavement.

    If you are talking about the cycle routes that are either a simple white line a metre or so out from
    the kerb, or the coloured (green or red) on road surfaces then logic would prevail that they are
    "with" the traffic unless otherwise signed (e.g. I noticed in Warwick today a street that was one
    way for cars but had a two way coloured surface cycle path - BUT it was clearly marked with the
    usual blue signs)

    If you have a specific question on a particular route the Cycling Officer at the LA should be able
    to answer.

    RG

  3. "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find


    a

    Quoted message said:

    cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    There's no quick answer to this AFAIK - for example, around here (in Warwickshire) there are
    numerous "2 way" cycle lanes on just the one side of the road, indeed some share with pedestrians -
    but they are on the pavement.

    If you are talking about the cycle routes that are either a simple white line a metre or so out from
    the kerb, or the coloured (green or red) on road surfaces then logic would prevail that they are
    "with" the traffic unless otherwise signed (e.g. I noticed in Warwick today a street that was one
    way for cars but had a two way coloured surface cycle path - BUT it was clearly marked with the
    usual blue signs)

    If you have a specific question on a particular route the Cycling Officer at the LA should be able
    to answer.

    RG

  4. On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:47:26 -0000 someone who may be "AndyP" <[email hidden]>
    wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road.

    Yes and no.

    AFAIK there is nothing in law to make it only legal to ride or drive on the left side of the road,
    except where there are islands and the like where there are arrows to keep to the left.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked
    keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.

  5. "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find


    a

    Quoted message said:

    cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    There's no quick answer to this AFAIK - for example, around here (in Warwickshire) there are
    numerous "2 way" cycle lanes on just the one side of the road, indeed some share with pedestrians -
    but they are on the pavement.

    If you are talking about the cycle routes that are either a simple white line a metre or so out from
    the kerb, or the coloured (green or red) on road surfaces then logic would prevail that they are
    "with" the traffic unless otherwise signed (e.g. I noticed in Warwick today a street that was one
    way for cars but had a two way coloured surface cycle path - BUT it was clearly marked with the
    usual blue signs)

    If you have a specific question on a particular route the Cycling Officer at the LA should be able
    to answer.

    RG

  6. On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:47:26 -0000 someone who may be "AndyP" <[email hidden]>
    wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road.

    Yes and no.

    AFAIK there is nothing in law to make it only legal to ride or drive on the left side of the road,
    except where there are islands and the like where there are arrows to keep to the left.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked
    keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.

  7. "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find


    a

    Quoted message said:

    cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    The first time it happened to me I was surprised too. Now it no longer surprises me but it still
    irritates me a lot even when I'm not actually using the lane (generally I prefer to keep out of
    them but they are still occasionally useful for passing stationary traffic). It can't actually be
    illegal to do it but it is, to my mind, stupid to do it. Lanes which are not intended for
    bi-directional traffic are generally not wide enough for it either, so cyclists using the lane with
    flow become involved in head-on conflict with the wrong-way cyclist, not knowing which way to go to
    get around him.

    I see it as just another symptom of POB immaturity - someone who doesn't know how to use the roads
    properly and doesn't care to learn, too selfish to think about how their behaviour affects other
    road users, and too stupid to realise they are causing increased risk to themselves as well by their
    flawed thinking that if it's a cycle lane they must be in it, even if they're going the wrong way
    and it's not intended to be used in that way. Pretty much the same level of idiocy as people who put
    their lights on wrong way round, as remarked in other thread, but perhaps a bit more common.

    Rich

  8. "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find


    a

    Quoted message said:

    cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    The first time it happened to me I was surprised too. Now it no longer surprises me but it still
    irritates me a lot even when I'm not actually using the lane (generally I prefer to keep out of
    them but they are still occasionally useful for passing stationary traffic). It can't actually be
    illegal to do it but it is, to my mind, stupid to do it. Lanes which are not intended for
    bi-directional traffic are generally not wide enough for it either, so cyclists using the lane with
    flow become involved in head-on conflict with the wrong-way cyclist, not knowing which way to go to
    get around him.

    I see it as just another symptom of POB immaturity - someone who doesn't know how to use the roads
    properly and doesn't care to learn, too selfish to think about how their behaviour affects other
    road users, and too stupid to realise they are causing increased risk to themselves as well by their
    flawed thinking that if it's a cycle lane they must be in it, even if they're going the wrong way
    and it's not intended to be used in that way. Pretty much the same level of idiocy as people who put
    their lights on wrong way round, as remarked in other thread, but perhaps a bit more common.

    Rich

  9. On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:47:26 -0000 someone who may be "AndyP" <[email hidden]>
    wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road.

    Yes and no.

    AFAIK there is nothing in law to make it only legal to ride or drive on the left side of the road,
    except where there are islands and the like where there are arrows to keep to the left.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked
    keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.

  10. "AndyP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find


    a

    Quoted message said:

    cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    The first time it happened to me I was surprised too. Now it no longer surprises me but it still
    irritates me a lot even when I'm not actually using the lane (generally I prefer to keep out of
    them but they are still occasionally useful for passing stationary traffic). It can't actually be
    illegal to do it but it is, to my mind, stupid to do it. Lanes which are not intended for
    bi-directional traffic are generally not wide enough for it either, so cyclists using the lane with
    flow become involved in head-on conflict with the wrong-way cyclist, not knowing which way to go to
    get around him.

    I see it as just another symptom of POB immaturity - someone who doesn't know how to use the roads
    properly and doesn't care to learn, too selfish to think about how their behaviour affects other
    road users, and too stupid to realise they are causing increased risk to themselves as well by their
    flawed thinking that if it's a cycle lane they must be in it, even if they're going the wrong way
    and it's not intended to be used in that way. Pretty much the same level of idiocy as people who put
    their lights on wrong way round, as remarked in other thread, but perhaps a bit more common.

    Rich

  11. AndyP said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find a cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    This is actually very dangerous (3 times as dangerous as riding on the road in the normal direction
    of travel) according to a Californian study <URL:
    bicyclinglife.comriskfactors.htm >

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) jasmine.org.uk~simon

    Morning had broken. I found a rather battered tube of Araldite resin in the bottom of
    the toolbag.

  12. AndyP said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find a cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    This is actually very dangerous (3 times as dangerous as riding on the road in the normal direction
    of travel) according to a Californian study <URL:
    bicyclinglife.comriskfactors.htm >

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) jasmine.org.uk~simon

    Morning had broken. I found a rather battered tube of Araldite resin in the bottom of
    the toolbag.

  13. AndyP said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road. I was a
    bit surprised to find a cyclist riding one in the opposite direction to everyone else today.

    This is actually very dangerous (3 times as dangerous as riding on the road in the normal direction
    of travel) according to a Californian study <URL:
    bicyclinglife.comriskfactors.htm >

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) jasmine.org.uk~simon

    Morning had broken. I found a rather battered tube of Araldite resin in the bottom of
    the toolbag.

  14. "David Hansen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:47:26 -0000 someone who may be "AndyP"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road.

    Yes and no.

    AFAIK there is nothing in law to make it only legal to ride or drive on the left side of the road,
    except where there are islands and the like where there are arrows to keep to the left.

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

  15. "David Hansen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:47:26 -0000 someone who may be "AndyP"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road.

    Yes and no.

    AFAIK there is nothing in law to make it only legal to ride or drive on the left side of the road,
    except where there are islands and the like where there are arrows to keep to the left.

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

  16. "David Hansen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:47:26 -0000 someone who may be "AndyP"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    If there's a cycle lane marked out on one side of the road only is there anything in the highway
    code to say you should only use it in the same direction as traffic flow on the main road.

    Yes and no.

    AFAIK there is nothing in law to make it only legal to ride or drive on the left side of the road,
    except where there are islands and the like where there are arrows to keep to the left.

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

  17. Nathaniel Porter said:

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

    Left ?

    --
    The Reply & From email addresses are checked rarely. mseries.freeserve.co.ukmseries.freeserve.co.uk

  18. Nathaniel Porter said:

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

    Left ?

    --
    The Reply & From email addresses are checked rarely. mseries.freeserve.co.ukmseries.freeserve.co.uk

  19. Nathaniel Porter said:

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

    Left ?

    --
    The Reply & From email addresses are checked rarely. mseries.freeserve.co.ukmseries.freeserve.co.uk

  20. MSeries said:
    Nathaniel Porter said:

    What he said, but additionally, it is conventional to pass oncoming traffic on the left. I don't
    know if that's a legal requirement

    Left ?

    My left or the on coming traffic's left. Or to the left of the on coming traffic ? (i.e his or my
    right) :-)

    --
    The Reply & From email addresses are checked rarely. mseries.freeserve.co.ukmseries.freeserve.co.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.