General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Measuring a mile

Started by Proctologically Violated©® · · Last activity · 27 posts · 449 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 July 2007
Last activity
5 August 2007
Original author
Proctologically Violated©®
Posts
27
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
449
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 27
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Awl--

    I have a couple of local HSs with the red oval rubber track, and it's been
    so long since I've used one, I've forgotten how many times around is a mile,
    and how to use the stop/start markers.
    Are they all the same/standardized?

    I usually run in a part (when I run), but would like to start timing myself
    on a standard mile.

    Clues?
    tia.
    --
    ------
    Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

    Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
    Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
    Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
    to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
    The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

    entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
    all d'numbuhs

  2. Proctologically Violated©® said:

    Awl--

    I have a couple of local HSs with the red oval rubber track, and it's been
    so long since I've used one, I've forgotten how many times around is a mile,
    and how to use the stop/start markers.
    Are they all the same/standardized?

    A standard outdoor track is 400m. You can quickly verify that the distance is
    "about right" by going to gmap-pedometer.com and taking a look at the satellite
    photo.

    Keep in mind that a standard mile is a little longer than 1600m. Therefore you
    need to start about 10m back from where you finish, or add about 2 seconds to
    your finishing time. For the purposes of training/time trialing, I would just
    run the 1600m.

    BTW, if you're serious about running a fast mile, either enter a race or get
    some friends to pace you. Very hard to run a fast time solo.

    Cheers,
    --
    Elflord

  3. Proctologically Violated©® said:

    Awl--

    I have a couple of local HSs with the red oval rubber track, and it's been
    so long since I've used one, I've forgotten how many times around is a mile,
    and how to use the stop/start markers.
    Are they all the same/standardized?

    I usually run in a part (when I run), but would like to start timing myself
    on a standard mile.

    Clues?
    tia.
    --
    ------
    Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

    Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
    Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
    Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
    to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
    The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

    entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
    all d'numbuhs

    Just run at a 10mpm pace, and see how long it takes you.

  4. It seems to me I heard somewhere that Elflord wrote in article
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Proctologically Violated©® said:

    Awl--

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a couple of local HSs with the red oval rubber track, and it's been
    so long since I've used one, I've forgotten how many times around is a mile,
    and how to use the stop/start markers.
    Are they all the same/standardized?

    Quoted message said:

    A standard outdoor track is 400m. You can quickly verify that the distance is
    "about right" by going to gmap-pedometer.com and taking a look at the satellite
    photo.

    Quoted message said:

    Keep in mind that a standard mile is a little longer than 1600m. Therefore you
    need to start about 10m back from where you finish, or add about 2 seconds to
    your finishing time. For the purposes of training/time trialing, I would just
    run the 1600m.

    If any older tracks are surviving in your area they are likely to be 440
    yards rather than 400 meters. You may want to ask someone who should
    know the situation where you live; I've run on a lot of 440 tracks and
    only a handful of 400s, because most of my track workouts were on older
    schoolyard tracks.
    --
    Don Kirkman

  5. Don Kirkman said:

    If any older tracks are surviving in your area they are likely to
    be 440 yards

    ....which is exactly a quarter mile.

    1 mile = 5280 feet = 1760 yards = 4 x 440 = about 1609 metres

  6. It seems to me I heard somewhere that Charlie Pendejo wrote in article
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Don Kirkman said:

    If any older tracks are surviving in your area they are likely to
    be 440 yards

    Quoted message said:

    ...which is exactly a quarter mile.

    Yes, I'm somewhat aware of the mathematics involved.

    Quoted message said:

    1 mile = 5280 feet = 1760 yards = 4 x 440 = about 1609 metres

    Which, AFAIK, nobody has disputed or even mentioned, nor does it help
    with the OP's desire to "start timing [him]self on a standard mile".
    Four laps on a 440 track will do that for him without the need to deal
    with trying to adjust lap times to account for the extra ~9 meters.
    --
    Don Kirkman

  7. Proctologically Violated©® said:

    I have a couple of local HSs with the red oval rubber track, and it's been
    so long since I've used one, I've forgotten how many times around is a mile,
    and how to use the stop/start markers.
    Are they all the same/standardized?

    More or less.

    As long as the track isn't a strange size (some tracks over here are
    300/330 metres cos they didn't have space to fit a full 400m track) then a
    mile is 4 times round the track, near enough.

    - If the track is a 440yds one, then 4x = one mile, exactly (as long as
    you run on the inside lane).

    - If the track is a 400meters one, then 4x = one mile, give or take a
    gnats bollock (-9.[censored] meters in fact), as Charlie mentioned.

    Unless you are an international class runner, just run 4 times round the
    track on the inside lane and your mile is done.

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Don Kirkman said:

    If any older tracks are surviving in your area they are likely to
    be 440 yards

    Pendejo said:

    ...which is exactly a quarter mile.

    Don Kirkman wrote:
    Yes, I'm somewhat aware of the mathematics involved.

    Rest assured, I had no doubt. Just chimed in on the assist in case it
    was a mystery to anyone else. Some of these younger metric-age folks
    might not know a yard from a cubit. :-)

  9. "Proctologically Violated©®" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    PS you have a spectacular "handle" (is there a new word for "handle",
    given that trucker CB radio is no longer /à la mode/ ? )

  10. Charlie Pendejo said:

    might not know a yard from a cubit. :-)

    cul-bite (proncounced like "cubit" with a french accent) means "ass-[censored]"

    so we are quite close to "couldn't tell his ass from his elbow"

    I do so want to go do an etymologie degree somewhere [!seeking sponsors!]

  11. steve common said:

    cul-bite (proncounced like "cubit" with a french accent) means
    "ass-[censored]"

    so we are quite close to "couldn't tell his ass from his elbow"

    Ha!

    My old man (bio-dad, not plain ol' dad, that is - and he happens to be
    a Francophile to an almost embarrassing degree and fancies himself a
    Francophone as well) is teaching English as a Second Language lately,
    and he was excited to introduce the phrase "couldn't tell his ass from
    his elbow" to his class early on. I think he mimed it.

    He'll enjoy cul-bite for sure. Thanks.

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Charlie Pendejo said:

    Some of these younger metric-age folks
    might not know a yard from a cubit. :-)

    The yard is where the prisoners hang out while not indoors. Cubit was a
    video game in the 1980s.

    --
    Crossing the starting line is 90%.
    Crossing the finish line is the other 90%.

  13. "steve common" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Charlie Pendejo said:

    might not know a yard from a cubit. :-)

    cul-bite (proncounced like "cubit" with a french accent) means
    "ass-[censored]"

    I like your disctionary but :

    a.. 6 palms = 24 digits, i.e. ~45.0 cm or 18 inches (1.50 ft)
    b.. 7 palms = 28 digits, i.e. ~52.5 cm or 21 inches (1.75 ft)
    c.. 8 palms = 32 digits, i.e. ~60.0 cm or 24 inches (2.00 ft)
    d.. 9 palms = 36 digits, i.e. ~67.5 cm or 27 inches (2.25 ft)
    From late Antiquity, the Roman ulna, a four-feet-cubit (about 120 cm) is
    also attested. This length is the measure from a man's hip to the
    fingers of the outstretched opposite arm.

    I guess we could conclude their hands were fondling something. And Noah
    built the arc using cubits as Bill Cosby told us. I wonder if Noah had
    two male/female homosexuals and a hermaphrodite. If Fallwell has only
    known this he could have blamed Noah for the "evils" of today. he did
    suggest the Iraqi war was caused by homosexuals. History is so much fun
    along with etymology.

    -Doug

  14. "steve common" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Proctologically Violated©®" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    PS you have a spectacular "handle" (is there a new word for "handle",
    given that trucker CB radio is no longer /à la mode/ ? )

    Instead of handle, how bout num dee plum--for our francophile amigos here.
    Moniker is also used.

    Speaking of amigos, didja know that the Pendejo in Charlie Pendejo is
    spanich for "pubic hair"? You'll routinely hear, Ay, ese pendejito....
    from frustrated spanish parents.

    When the real estate [censored] hits the fan, I'll probably change sed moniker to
    Proctologically Eviscerated®©.

    Many ask me if I'm gay.
    I point out, Dude, the name is Proctologically *Violated*, NOT
    Proctologically Ecstatic, a'ight?

    The Wife is losing patience, however.
    She is no longer physically capable of extracting the massive objects
    regularly inserted, by Wall Street, the Bush-Cheney-Rice cabal, and their
    various nefarious friends.
    --
    ------
    Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

    Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
    Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
    Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
    to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
    The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

    entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
    all d'numbuhs

  15. In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Proctologically Violated©®" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Speaking of amigos, didja know that the Pendejo in Charlie Pendejo is
    spanich for "pubic hair"?

    I believe that it is Spanish for "[censored]".

    --
    Crossing the starting line is 90%.
    Crossing the finish line is the other 90%.

  16. Quoted message said:
    PV'd said:

    Pendejo is spanich for "pubic hair"?

    Michelle said:

    I believe that it is Spanish for "[censored]".

    You each get partial credit. steve common gets an A+ with bonus
    points in reserve, from a year or two ago.

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Charlie Pendejo said:
    Michelle said:

    I believe that it is Spanish for "[censored]".

    You each get partial credit.

    Why only partial credit?

    --
    Crossing the starting line is 90%.
    Crossing the finish line is the other 90%.

  18. I'll be checking this out fortwit, but on a 440 track (inside lane), there
    should only be one line for start/finish, whilst on all the other lanes,
    there should be separate start/finish lines--with the finish line *before*
    the start line. correct?

    If it is a 400 m track, calibrated to 1 mile (which would seem reasonable in
    the US), then the inside track should *also* have separate start/finish
    lines, where the finish line is taken *past* the start line.

    If worse comes to worst, I have a 100 foot tape I could fool with.
    Of course, if this gets any more complicated, I'll proly just have an
    aneurism.
    --
    ------
    Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

    Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
    Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
    Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
    to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
    The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

    entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
    all d'numbuhs

    "steve common" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Proctologically Violated©® said:

    I have a couple of local HSs with the red oval rubber track, and it's been
    so long since I've used one, I've forgotten how many times around is a
    mile,
    and how to use the stop/start markers.
    Are they all the same/standardized?

    More or less.

    As long as the track isn't a strange size (some tracks over here are
    300/330 metres cos they didn't have space to fit a full 400m track) then a
    mile is 4 times round the track, near enough.

    - If the track is a 440yds one, then 4x = one mile, exactly (as long as
    you run on the inside lane).

    - If the track is a 400meters one, then 4x = one mile, give or take a
    gnats bollock (-9.[censored] meters in fact), as Charlie mentioned.

    Unless you are an international class runner, just run 4 times round the
    track on the inside lane and your mile is done.

  19. It seems to me I heard somewhere that Doug Freese wrote in article
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    "steve common" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Charlie Pendejo <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    might not know a yard from a cubit. :-)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    cul-bite (proncounced like "cubit" with a french accent) means
    "ass-[censored]"

    Quoted message said:

    I like your disctionary but :

    Quoted message said:

    a.. 6 palms = 24 digits, i.e. ~45.0 cm or 18 inches (1.50 ft)
    b.. 7 palms = 28 digits, i.e. ~52.5 cm or 21 inches (1.75 ft)
    c.. 8 palms = 32 digits, i.e. ~60.0 cm or 24 inches (2.00 ft)
    d.. 9 palms = 36 digits, i.e. ~67.5 cm or 27 inches (2.25 ft)
    From late Antiquity, the Roman ulna, a four-feet-cubit (about 120 cm) is
    also attested. This length is the measure from a man's hip to the
    fingers of the outstretched opposite arm.

    Quoted message said:

    I guess we could conclude their hands were fondling something. And Noah
    built the arc using cubits as Bill Cosby told us. I wonder if Noah had
    two male/female homosexuals and a hermaphrodite. If Fallwell has only
    known this he could have blamed Noah for the "evils" of today. he did
    suggest the Iraqi war was caused by homosexuals. History is so much fun
    along with etymology.

    The standard cubit for arkitecture was the distance from the elbow to
    the tip of the middle finger, something like 18 to 21 inches. There's
    Noah counting for the right number of animals to fill the ship.
    --
    Don Kirkman

  20. Proctologically Violated©® said:

    I'll be checking this out fortwit, but on a 440 track (inside lane), there
    should only be one line for start/finish, whilst on all the other lanes,
    there should be separate start/finish lines--with the finish line *before*
    the start line. correct?

    Correct enough. The start line is usually a single curved line (cascade or
    waterfall) to compensate those starting further out, but since runners are
    allowed to "break" for the tangent immediately, this doesn't need to
    compensate for 4 times round the track * lane length difference.

    Quoted message said:

    If it is a 400 m track, calibrated to 1 mile (which would seem reasonable in
    the US), then the inside track should *also* have separate start/finish
    lines, where the finish line is taken *past* the start line.

    Also correct - look around 9 metres before the finish line on the inside
    lane for the mile start.

    Some good pics and explainations here
    http://www.trackinfo.org/csunmarks.html

    Last but one pic shows two mile and one mile start lines.

    Third pic down from top shoes the common start line for all mutliples of
    400m from 1600m up (10000m for example).

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.