Interesting link!
But, man, this is complicated!
Seems like you need a g-d college degree just to run around a g-d track!
wow...
I may very well bring my 100 foot tape to the track, just to see if the
track was set up correctly!
Many references in your link to things being off, wrong, non-standard
tracks, etc. Mostly colors, but still...
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY
Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!
entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs
"steve common" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Proctologically Violated©® said:I'll be checking this out fortwit, but on a 440 track (inside lane), there
should only be one line for start/finish, whilst on all the other lanes,
there should be separate start/finish lines--with the finish line *before*
the start line. correct?Correct enough. The start line is usually a single curved line (cascade or
waterfall) to compensate those starting further out, but since runners are
allowed to "break" for the tangent immediately, this doesn't need to
compensate for 4 times round the track * lane length difference.Quoted message said:If it is a 400 m track, calibrated to 1 mile (which would seem reasonable
in
the US), then the inside track should *also* have separate start/finish
lines, where the finish line is taken *past* the start line.Also correct - look around 9 metres before the finish line on the inside
lane for the mile start.Some good pics and explainations here
http://www.trackinfo.org/csunmarks.htmlLast but one pic shows two mile and one mile start lines.
Third pic down from top shoes the common start line for all mutliples of
400m from 1600m up (10000m for example).