Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Heart Rate Monitors

Started by Brendo · · Last activity · 26 posts · 1,279 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
16 July 2007
Last activity
19 July 2007
Original author
Brendo
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,279
Views / 30 days
5

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. When buying a HRM do you look for a bicycle HRM (that does speed,
    cadence, etc) or would you rather have two devices, one for bike info,
    one for HR info?

    I already have the bike computer, so I figure that buying a HRM that
    does those things as well is just wasting money.

    Looking at a Polar F6 (rrp $249). Are there dodgy brands to look out
    for? Reasonable $$ to spend?

    Cheers

    Brendo

  2. Also, does the chest strap have a size limit? Occasionally I have some
    issues with things that wrap around my torso.

    Hence the HRM. I need to shed additional luggage.

    Brendo

  3. Brendo said:

    When buying a HRM do you look for a bicycle HRM (that does speed,
    cadence, etc) or would you rather have two devices, one for bike info,
    one for HR info?

    I have both, as I move HRM's and power meters around, but want to know
    total distance each bike has been ridden (and I have lots of bikes),
    and it's easy to have both. But my case isn't the usual one.

    The short answer is it depends. Do you want to be able to upload to
    computer and track your mileage etc? If so, an integrated unit like
    the Polar S520 or higher, or the CS200 (or whatever one it is that has
    upload and bike functions?). If you just want to know your HR to
    meter your efforts, then I'd suggest having a cheap HRM on your bars
    that you can also take off and use for other activities (XC ski-ing!
    there's 10cm at TBJ! w00t!) and a computer on your bike for time/speed/
    distance etc.

    Quoted message said:


    I already have the bike computer, so I figure that buying a HRM that
    does those things as well is just wasting money.

    Looking at a Polar F6 (rrp $249). Are there dodgy brands to look out
    for? Reasonable $$ to spend?

    Polar stuff has been, in my experience, pretty reliable. The straps
    are quite adjustable too so it's unlikely that you can't get them to
    fit unless you have a very small chest.

  4. "Brendo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Also, does the chest strap have a size limit? Occasionally I have some
    issues with things that wrap around my torso.

    Hence the HRM. I need to shed additional luggage.

    Well I bought an Echo F2 bike computer for around $50.00 and a Oregon
    Scientific HR318 Heart Rate monitor from $130.00 recently. $180.00 all up,
    both fit on my handlebars easily and I can also strap the HRM to my wrist
    for running or whatever as well and easily transfer it between bikes.
    I'm 130 cm around the chest and the chest strap fits easily. I have to
    tighten it up a fair bit actually.

    For an all in one you'd need something like the Polar CS200cad at around
    $300.00. It does more stuff like "Polar OwnCode®" to prevent interference
    from other heart rate monitors. Great if you're riding with others using
    HRMs that might be on the same frequency. I decided against this one because
    I was a bit irked that it had to go back to Polar for a battery change
    instead of the local jeweller or Mr Minute, and I like being able to use it
    on different bikes easily.

    Eventually I'll probably lash out on a Garmin GPS with HRM built-in and the
    ability to upload routes and training data to http://www.motionbased.com/

    See also my "Which HRM" thread last month - http://tinyurl.com/ynmdn8

    --
    www.ozcableguy.com
    www.oztechnologies.com


  5. Quoted message said:

    The short answer is it depends. Do you want to be able to upload to
    computer and track your mileage etc? If so, an integrated unit like
    the Polar S520 or higher, or the CS200 (or whatever one it is that has
    upload and bike functions?). If you just want to know your HR to
    meter your efforts, then I'd suggest having a cheap HRM on your bars
    that you can also take off and use for other activities (XC ski-ing!
    there's 10cm at TBJ! w00t!) and a computer on your bike for time/speed/
    distance etc.

    I do try to track my efforts, but I don't want to pay for it when I
    can just note my km's speed etc and then whack it into a spreadsheet.

    Quoted message said:

    Polar stuff has been, in my experience, pretty reliable. The straps
    are quite adjustable too so it's unlikely that you can't get them to
    fit unless you have a very small chest.

    But the more I look into it, $249 is a lot of clams for a 'simple'
    HRM. I figure I need to monitor 1) heart rate, 2) target zones 3) time
    in those zones & 4) audible alarm when out of those zones.

    Is there anything else that will be useful in this early stage of "The
    Great Getting Fit Campaign'?

    Brendo

  6. Brendo said:
    Quoted message said:

    Polar stuff has been, in my experience, pretty reliable. The straps
    are quite adjustable too so it's unlikely that you can't get them to
    fit unless you have a very small chest.

    But the more I look into it, $249 is a lot of clams for a 'simple'
    HRM. I figure I need to monitor 1) heart rate, 2) target zones 3) time
    in those zones & 4) audible alarm when out of those zones.

    Is there anything else that will be useful in this early stage of "The
    Great Getting Fit Campaign'?

    Brendo

    In relative terms $249 is pretty good compared to what it used to be. I have a polar unit that has about those functions that cost me about that much, but in 1988. I used it a lot for the first five years or so but only occasionally since. most of the rubbery bits have perished but the electronics are still working. In those days the chest units were user-servicable so it as a few dollars doe a battery every now and then.

    So I would certainly certainly reccomend Polar, although their non-servicability of the chest units is a bit of a discouragement.

    RoryW

  7. OzCableguy said:

    I was a bit irked that it had to go back to Polar for a battery change
    instead of the local jeweller or Mr Minute, and I like being able to use it
    on different bikes easily.

    I would not let that go against a polar, I have sent numerous items to pursuit performance and they are excellent, I actually like sending stuff to them, I know it will be fixed and come back within a couple of days.

    I would recommend the polar, I have eventually worked my way to a CS200 and it is great, love the large display, I use my old orginal 520 that I got quite a few years back for running and anything else.

  8. Brendo said:
    Quoted message said:

    The short answer is it depends. Do you want to be able to upload to
    computer and track your mileage etc? If so, an integrated unit like
    the Polar S520 or higher, or the CS200 (or whatever one it is that has
    upload and bike functions?). If you just want to know your HR to
    meter your efforts, then I'd suggest having a cheap HRM on your bars
    that you can also take off and use for other activities (XC ski-ing!
    there's 10cm at TBJ! w00t!) and a computer on your bike for time/speed/
    distance etc.

    I do try to track my efforts, but I don't want to pay for it when I
    can just note my km's speed etc and then whack it into a spreadsheet.

    Quoted message said:

    Polar stuff has been, in my experience, pretty reliable. The straps
    are quite adjustable too so it's unlikely that you can't get them to
    fit unless you have a very small chest.

    But the more I look into it, $249 is a lot of clams for a 'simple'
    HRM. I figure I need to monitor 1) heart rate, 2) target zones 3) time
    in those zones & 4) audible alarm when out of those zones.

    Is there anything else that will be useful in this early stage of "The
    Great Getting Fit Campaign'?

    Brendo

    I recently got a Polar CS100 - decided on it over the CS200 on
    experience that I never stick with good intentions to download, plot
    and monitor detailed data. The CS100 is a nice unit that does the
    things you have specified. I got it at a good price from a UK shop. As
    a previous Polar owner, I agree with MikeyOz's comment on Pursuit
    Performance being good operators who overcome any "issues" with
    servicability.

    Donga

  9. On Jul 16, 3:58 pm, Rory Williams <Rory.Williams.2ts...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    Brendo said:
    Quoted message said:

    Polar stuff has been, in my experience, pretty reliable. The straps
    are quite adjustable too so it's unlikely that you can't get them to
    fit unless you have a very small chest.

    Quoted message said:

    But the more I look into it, $249 is a lot of clams for a 'simple'
    HRM. I figure I need to monitor 1) heart rate, 2) target zones 3) time
    in those zones & 4) audible alarm when out of those zones.

    Quoted message said:

    Is there anything else that will be useful in this early stage of "The
    Great Getting Fit Campaign'?

    Quoted message said:

    Brendo

    In relative terms $249 is pretty good compared to what it used to be.
    I have a polar unit that has about those functions that cost me about
    that much, but in 1988. I used it a lot for the first five years or so
    but only occasionally since. most of the rubbery bits have perished but
    the electronics are still working. In those days the chest units were
    user-servicable so it as a few dollars doe a battery every now and
    then.

    So I would certainly certainly reccomend Polar, although their
    non-servicability of the chest units is a bit of a discouragement.

    If this is an issue, the 'wearlink' band is user-servicable, and the
    new 2.4GHz band is too - it's the same band as used by Garmin,
    PowerTap etc. A standard by stealth ... heh

  10. Quoted message said:


    I recently got a Polar CS100 - decided on it over the CS200 on
    experience that I never stick with good intentions to download, plot
    and monitor detailed data. The CS100 is a nice unit that does the
    things you have specified. I got it at a good price from a UK shop. As
    a previous Polar owner, I agree with MikeyOz's comment on Pursuit
    Performance being good operators who overcome any "issues" with
    servicability.

    Donga- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    I had a look on eBay. There are CS200cad units for less that $250 (and
    that includes shipping). This would cover all bases, but mean I have
    to assign yet another bike computer to the To Be Used Later bag.

    But if I get one of these, how long till I yearn for a GPS,
    thermometer and built in "frikkin' laser beam".

    Brendo

  11. Brendo said:

    But if I get one of these, how long till I yearn for a GPS,
    thermometer and built in "frikkin' laser beam".
    Brendo

    I guess is a matter of what do you really need ?? I mean what in hell do you need a GPS for ?? I could understand it if you plan on go adventuring or something out in the stix, which would be kind of cool, get from a to b with a GPS.

    I know a couple of people that have them, they seem pretty happy with them, but you would want to be for the money. I think they did complain about the user interface being a bit muddled, something the polars' do not suffer from.

  12. On Jul 16, 5:34 pm, MikeyOz <MikeyOz.2ts...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    Brendo said:

    But if I get one of these, how long till I yearn for a GPS,
    thermometer and built in "frikkin' laser beam".
    Brendo

    I guess is a matter of what do you really need ?? I mean what in hell
    do you need a GPS for ?? I could understand it if you plan on go
    adventuring or something out in the stix, which would be kind of cool,
    get from a to b with a GPS.

    I know a couple of people that have them, they seem pretty happy with
    them, but you would want to be for the money. I think they did
    complain about the user interface being a bit muddled, something the
    polars' do not suffer from.

    --
    MikeyOz

    It has been funny at the cafe asking a couple of GPS owners where they
    rode today. They give the same response as before.

    Donga


  13. Quoted message said:

    I guess is a matter of what do you really need ??

    Does that apply with all cycling related items? <tongue in cheek>

    I agree, a gps would be lost on me, but you always hanker for more...

    Brendo

  14. Donga said:

    It has been funny at the cafe asking a couple of GPS owners where they
    rode today. They give the same response as before.

    I get pretty tired of gadget freaks going on and on about the wonderful
    features of their latest HRM or GPS toy. None of them seem to make it
    any harder to drop their proud owners week after week; they have to work
    such long hours to pay for their toys that they don't ride enough to get
    any faster or stronger. At least with new poseur bikes, once you've admired
    them for a couple of minutes you can usually change the subject without
    any trouble :-)

    I bought a cheap no-name HRM once, used it for a while, and soon got
    so familiar with my HR that I could guess it pretty accurately without
    checking the monitor, so I no longer bother with it.

  15. Brendo said:

    When buying a HRM do you look for a bicycle HRM (that does speed,
    cadence, etc) or would you rather have two devices, one for bike info,
    one for HR info?

    I already have the bike computer, so I figure that buying a HRM that
    does those things as well is just wasting money.

    Looking at a Polar F6 (rrp $249). Are there dodgy brands to look out
    for? Reasonable $$ to spend?

    Cheers

    Brendo

    I prefer to have the two devices, just because then I can use the HRM for activites other than cycling, like gym work or running.

  16. Brendo said:


    Does that apply with all cycling related items? <tongue in cheek>
    Brendo

    sh&t yeah! it all makes me a better person! 🙂

    Actually I can't say much, I just bought a new pair of shoes..... I had to, I asked my wife if I could buy these new shoes and she said "yes ok"..... I was down there in a flash! Comfort has new meaning, compared to what I had previously been using, but given the amount of kms I do, I don't have an issue.... sooooooo comfy.

  17. On Jul 16, 5:34 pm, MikeyOz <MikeyOz.2ts...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    Brendo said:

    But if I get one of these, how long till I yearn for a GPS,
    thermometer and built in "frikkin' laser beam".
    Brendo

    I guess is a matter of what do you really need ?? I mean what in hell
    do you need a GPS for ?? I could understand it if you plan on go
    adventuring or something out in the stix, which would be kind of cool,
    get from a to b with a GPS

    If you like to keep detailed logs/diary, the garmins rock. And
    they're pretty good for trackies too - they (outdoor...) can count
    your laps.

    Quoted message said:

    I know a couple of people that have them, they seem pretty happy with
    them, but you would want to be for the money. I think they did
    complain about the user interface being a bit muddled, something the
    polars' do not suffer from.

    --
    MikeyOz


  18. Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    I guess is a matter of what do you really need ?? I mean what in hell
    do you need a GPS for ?? I could understand it if you plan on go
    adventuring or something out in the stix, which would be kind of cool,
    get from a to b with a GPS

    Looking at the Garmin 205, the GPS would make for a fun device. You
    can save your times over a circuit, or train against a 'ghost' rider.
    So in that regard, maybe GPS would be good. Using it as a geographical
    device would be less good (for want of better English).

    Quoted message said:

    If you like to keep detailed logs/diary, the garmins rock. And
    they're pretty good for trackies too - they (outdoor...) can count
    your laps.

    And looking on eBay, I can get a Garmin 205 from the UK or US for less
    than the RRP of the Polar F6.

    Mmmm....ebay.

    Brendo


  19. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I guess is a matter of what do you really need ?? I mean what in hell
    do you need a GPS for ?? I could understand it if you plan on go
    adventuring or something out in the stix, which would be kind of cool,
    get from a to b with a GPS

    Quoted message said:

    If you like to keep detailed logs/diary, the garmins rock. And
    they're pretty good for trackies too - they (outdoor...) can count
    your laps.

    I just looked at the Garmin Edge 205. The GPS in this is used to
    compare times on a circuit i.e. at point A you were 2 seconds faster,
    at point B you were 4 seconds faster, at end you were 1 second
    faster). This is where it would be useful. As a navigational or
    geographical tool, not much help. You do little exploring on a road
    bike. After all, there are roads. And the roads are on maps.

    But some of the other things would be ... interesting. I guess it's a
    case of how much information do you want? Do you need them? Probably
    no. But then you don't need newsgroups either, but the info in them is
    interesting (except some rants from the odd loon now and then).

    I can find a Garmin Edge 205 on eBay for less that the RRP of the
    Polar F6. It comes from the US or UK, but for the price of the goods
    and an Australian A/C adapter, I'm still in front.

    Mmmmm ... eBay.

    Brendo

  20. Brendo said:

    I can find a Garmin Edge 205 on eBay for less that the RRP of the
    Polar F6. It comes from the US or UK, but for the price of the goods
    and an Australian A/C adapter, I'm still in front.

    Mmmmm ... eBay.

    Brendo

    I assume you will probably be ok, but just check that if you purchase it from overseas the warrarnty is still valid in Australia, I know the Polar stuff is, not sure about Garmin stuff.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.