TimC said:On 2007-01-04, Stuart Lamble (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
Quoted message said:theage.com.auform.htmlOpen ↗
"Will you be ditching your car in favour of a bicycle in 2007?"
Go forth and vote! :-) As I write this, I'm the sole "yes" vote. *sniff*
Does anyone else feel uneasy about poll stuffing and biased self
(and friends of friends!) selected samples?
And besides, it's a poorly phrased question. I don't have a car to
give up, and I'm not going to stop riding my bike when practicalities
allow.
--
TimC
"Eppur si muove!" (And yet it does move!)
-- Galileo Galilei
as the Age suggest it is hardly a valid scientific approach to run a poll... and rest assured a.b isnt the only "interest" that will respond... or for that matter seek to encourage its brethren to do likewise!
as for the topic limitation, this is so common...the question postulator usually gets it so wrong and rather than offer choices that make sense (or nonsense if thats the aim), limit choices for whatever reason...laziness, agenda, too darn complicated an issue, or their general readership cant differentiate concepts more than on-off anyway, etc.
read between the lines and vote as you wish (even if your aim is to ensure the result is skewed anyway...ah!) remember the 2006 ABS Census?...who is a bicyclist/velocipedist/bentist(?...hmmm verybentist?) by religion?
as at 9:16am Fri 5thJan07
Yes - 63% [img]theage.com.au1pix.gifOpen ↗[/img]
No - 37% [img]theage.com.au1pix.gifOpen ↗[/img]
Total Votes: 1940