I want to change the 52,42,30 chainrings I have to a 53,42,30. This is a older bike I use indoors on a trainer with a 12-23 on the rear. It has ultegra 9 drive train but a Suntour front der. I've tried it so far with that but it slides into the 53 chainring rather than over it. Wondering if maybe its reached its max t capacity. Would there be another front that would work? Any ideas?
it appears that upon further research that the shimano has only a 22t capacity which I believe equals a 52t chainring. The campy systems have a 53t capacity. Could I sue a campy FD with the rest being shimano 9. I also have this on a bike with shimano 9 bar end shifters which might be a problem. Are there any mountain bike FD that would work?
"Barbara L" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I want to change the 52,42,30 chainrings I have to a 53,42,30. This is a older bike I use indoors on a trainer with a 12-23 on the rear. It has ultegra 9 drive train but a Suntour front der. I've tried it so far with that but it slides into the 53 chainring rather than over it. Wondering if maybe its reached its max t capacity. Would there be another front that would work? Any ideas?
it appears that upon further research that the shimano has only a 22t capacity which I believe equals a 52t chainring. The campy systems have a 53t capacity. Could I sue a campy FD with the rest being shimano 9. I also have this on a bike with shimano 9 bar end shifters which might be a problem. Are there any mountain bike FD that would work?
"Barbara L" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I want to change the 52,42,30 chainrings I have to a 53,42,30. This is a older bike I use indoors on a trainer with a 12-23 on the rear. It has ultegra 9 drive train but a Suntour front der. I've tried it so far with that but it slides into the 53 chainring rather than over it. Wondering if maybe its reached its max t capacity. Would there be another front that would work? Any ideas?
Two things. One is that the difference between the 52 and the 53 is insignificant. Why bother for such a small change in gearing? Most shifts change the ratio by 10-15%, and you are talking about a change of less than 2% in changing the chainrings.
Secondly, whether or not Shimano lists the capacity of 22 teeth versus Campy's 23, either derailleur will work. Capacity limits are very conservative -- and, again, the difference is insignificant. You will need to adjust the height of the derailleur slightly to clear the big ring, but that should take care of it.
--
David L. Johnson
__o | Let's not escape into mathematics. Let's stay with reality. -- _`\(,_ | Michael Crichton (_)/ (_) |
>> Big S has lawyers that will eat you alive. Stick to sticking it
to
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> Campy.
> Whereas Campagnolo's lawyers are too busy protecting us from > ACCIDENTs, PERSONAL INJURY or DEATH...
Why did you trim the OP's typo ("should I sue my Campy FD..."😉 that prompted my facetious remark?
<snip>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
It's the CPSC's fault!
I actually worked there (two summer internships) in
19beforeyouwereborn (and
Quoted message said:
the one after).
Sigh.
Bill "wonder if the 'Anthrax Lady' (frequent Hotline caller) is still
alive"
Quoted message said:
S.
For those who aren't familiar, CPSC stands for the US Consumer Protection Safety Commission. It was and is a well intended bureaucracy designed to protect us from ourselves....
I remember when CPSC first started up in the mid 1970s. These were the folks responsible for the black rubber caps on pro quality brake bolts and nuts. They also caused Campy to change the beautiful tapered ringed cones on their QRs.
There were questions whether we could sell old stock Campy bikes and components. Campy and other good quality bike brakes didn't meet the CPSC standards while the kid killer department store bikes it was designed to eliminate passed with flying colors!
I used to be some "Dy Yung" tires for kid's bike that were made in Taiwan or Korea. ;-)
Whereas Campagnolo's lawyers are too busy protecting us from ACCIDENTs, PERSONAL INJURY or DEATH...
Quoted message said:
Why did you trim the OP's typo ("should I sue my Campy FD..."😉 that prompted my facetious remark?
Because it wasn't all that relevant to *my* facetious remark. (Take any Campy manual and see how many times the phrase "an accident, personal injury or death" occurs. Then again, I also weigh 82 kg/180 lbs or more, so I'm pretty much screwed anyway.)
it appears that upon further research that the shimano has only a 22t capacity which I believe equals a 52t chainring. The campy systems have a 53t capacity. Could I sue a campy FD with the rest being shimano 9. I also have this on a bike with shimano 9 bar end shifters which might be a problem. Are there any mountain bike FD that would work?
"Barbara L" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I want to change the 52,42,30 chainrings I have to a 53,42,30. This is a older bike I use indoors on a trainer with a 12-23 on the rear. It has ultegra 9 drive train but a Suntour front der. I've tried it so far with that but it slides into the 53 chainring rather than over it. Wondering if maybe its reached its max t capacity. Would there be another front that would work? Any ideas?
TIA
Barb
Get a Ultegra triple FD, the 6500 or 105, 9S, NOT the 10s one, which will only work with a 39t middle ring, which will work great with your shifters and the 53t/42/30. MTB FDs are not compatible with road shimano STI left shifters.
I want to change the 52,42,30 chainrings I have to a 53,42,30. This is a older bike I use indoors on a trainer with a 12-23 on the rear. It has ultegra 9 drive train but a Suntour front der. I've tried it so far with that but it slides into the 53 chainring rather than over it. Wondering if maybe its reached its max t capacity. Would there be another front that would work?
Did it shift well with the 52-42-30? If so, it should work with a 53 tooth ring. Did you remove the right crank when you swapped the ring? Did you re-install it properly?
Since this bike is only used on an indor trainer, you might try using a downtube mounted shifter for the front der. That would give you more control than a "indexed" shifter.
You might also need to replace the Suntour der with a more compatible Shimano unit.
I want to change the 52,42,30 chainrings I have to a 53,42,30. This is a older bike I use indoors on a trainer with a 12-23 on the rear. It has ultegra 9 drive train but a Suntour front der. I've tried it so far with that but it slides into the 53 chainring rather than over it. Wondering if maybe its reached its max t capacity. Would there be another front that would work? Any ideas?
Have you remembered to adjust the height of the front derailleur?
One problem with braze-on front mechs and a big big ring can be that the adjustment range of the braze-on doesn't go high enough, mine is as far up as it goes and it barely clears the 53T ring.
Depends a lot on the front derailleur. I have a Suntour XC Pro that works quite reliably on a 54/34/24 touring triple. Helps to have very long chain stays.