UK and Europe · Public discussion

CTC error

Started by wafflycat · · Last activity · 67 posts · 1,493 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
25 September 2006
Last activity
27 September 2006
Original author
wafflycat
Posts
67
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,493
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 67
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The CTC has made an unwise move, I think.

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow is the
    new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once Phil Liggett
    steps down.

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on 'Richard &
    Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to take up cycling
    as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should be kept separate
    from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the erroneous view that
    cycling is inherently dangerous. How long is it going to take before this
    comes back and bites the CTC in its organisational backside when the media
    picks up on how the CTC has a president who thinks cyclists should be kept
    off the roads, yet at the same time supporting Daniel Cadden, a CTC member
    who was fined for cycling on the road. Mixed messages from the CTC, anyone?

    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    Cheers, helen s

    --

    ~~

    SUPPORT THE CYCLISTS DEFENCE FUND
    http://www.cyclistsdefencefund.org.uk/

    ~~
    to send reply email - you may need to remove dependence
    on fame & fortune from organisation
    to get correct email address
    ~Noodliness is Good~

  2. wafflycat said:

    The CTC has made an unwise move, I think.

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow
    is the new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once
    Phil Liggett steps down.

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on
    'Richard & Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to
    take up cycling as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists
    should be kept separate from traffic on separate facilities, so
    promoting the erroneous view that cycling is inherently dangerous.
    How long is it going to take before this comes back and bites the CTC
    in its organisational backside when the media picks up on how the CTC
    has a president who thinks cyclists should be kept off the roads, yet
    at the same time supporting Daniel Cadden, a CTC member who was fined
    for cycling on the road. Mixed messages from the CTC, anyone?
    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    Jon with his high media profile should generate a lot of good publicity for
    the CTC and cycling in general. Perhaps he will change his erroneous views
    once the CTC educate him. Though it is weird to hire a president who needs
    such education!

    ~PB

  3. wafflycat said:

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on 'Richard
    & Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to take up
    cycling as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should be
    kept separate from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the
    erroneous view that cycling is inherently dangerous. How long is it
    going to take before this comes back and bites the CTC in its
    organisational backside when the media picks up on how the CTC has a
    president who thinks cyclists should be kept off the roads, yet at the
    same time supporting Daniel Cadden, a CTC member who was fined for
    cycling on the road. Mixed messages from the CTC, anyone?

    People do change their minds, especially when presented with the correct
    information in place of their previous misapprehensions. Let's hope
    that the CTC change Mr. Snow's. In the meantime, write to seek
    assurance that they do their very best to do just that.

    Quoted message said:

    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    I'd wait until he shows evidence of keeping it up before taking such a step.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  4. "Pete Biggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Jon with his high media profile should generate a lot of good publicity
    for the CTC and cycling in general. Perhaps he will change his erroneous
    views once the CTC educate him. Though it is weird to hire a president
    who needs such education!

    ~PB

    Yes, it was that high media profile that got him invited on to the Richard &
    Judy show to discuss cycling, where he took it unpon himself to announce to
    the viewers that when he's asked by anyone about taking up cycling, he tells
    them not to do it... oh, and he admits to pavement cycling as well :-(

    Cheers, helen s

  5. Quoted message said:

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow is the
    new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once Phil Liggett
    steps down.

    Well that's great news, surely. A real (and high profile) cyclist
    helping to represent the views of real cyclists to the wider public.

    What more could you want? Somebody who is highly controlled by the
    organisation, a puppet if you like?

  6. "tom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow is
    the
    new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once Phil Liggett
    steps down.

    Well that's great news, surely. A real (and high profile) cyclist
    helping to represent the views of real cyclists to the wider public.

    What more could you want? Somebody who is highly controlled by the
    organisation, a puppet if you like?

    How about someone who hasn't gone on national TV in February of this year on
    'Richard & Judy' (13th February 2006) and admitted he tells people not to
    take up cycling as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should
    be kept separate from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the
    erroneous view that cycling is inherently dangerous. The CTC will now have a
    president who has publicly said he tells people not to take up cycling.
    Personally I'd much rather the CTC has a president who did not do that as
    part of the role of the CTC is to actively encourage people to take up
    cycling - not attempt to dissuade them of it.

    Cheers, helen s

  7. "wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Pete Biggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Jon with his high media profile should generate a lot of good publicity
    for the CTC and cycling in general. Perhaps he will change his erroneous
    views once the CTC educate him. Though it is weird to hire a president
    who needs such education!

    ~PB

    Yes, it was that high media profile that got him invited on to the Richard
    & Judy show to discuss cycling, where he took it unpon himself to announce
    to the viewers that when he's asked by anyone about taking up cycling, he
    tells them not to do it... oh, and he admits to pavement cycling as well
    :-(

    I think that's more than enough reasons to not hire him. I'd certainly hand
    my CTC card back, if I had one.

    The person at the healm doesn't need to be a keen cyclist, but has to
    advocate the good things about it, and be a figurehead for good behaviour.

  8. tom said:

    What more could you want? Somebody who is highly controlled by the
    organisation, a puppet if you like?

    I'm not interested in a puppet, but I'd certainly prefer someone with a
    Clue about both the relative and absolute dangers of cycling.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  9. Following on from wafflycat's message. . .

    Quoted message said:

    The CTC has made an unwise move, I think.

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow is the
    new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once Phil Liggett
    steps down.

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on 'Richard &
    Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to take up cycling
    as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should be kept separate
    from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the erroneous view that
    cycling is inherently dangerous. How long is it going to take before this
    comes back and bites the CTC in its organisational backside when the media
    picks up on how the CTC has a president who thinks cyclists should be kept
    off the roads, yet at the same time supporting Daniel Cadden, a CTC member
    who was fined for cycling on the road. Mixed messages from the CTC, anyone?

    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    Cheers, helen s


    Well said Helen.

    I've already given up with the CTC else I'd want to know who thought
    that somebody off the cab rank of after-dinner speakers was a good bet.
    Let's face it cyclists are by their very nature do-ers and get the knees
    dirty people. And (no offence intended to the large cohort of fit,
    strong, and experienced cyclists) why have somebody who fits the
    'retired old fogey with a basket on the handlebars and cycle clips on
    their tweeds' stereotype when say a 25-y.o. mad red-haired uni-cyclist
    would be better on the telly and better for 'what the hell - everyone
    jump on and off we go'.

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Cycling needs brains not mouthpieces.

    --
    PETER FOX Not the same since the cardboard box company folded
    [email hidden]
    www.eminent.demon.co.uk - Lots for cyclists

  10. "wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The CTC has made an unwise move, I think.

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow is the
    new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once Phil Liggett
    steps down.

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on 'Richard &
    Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to take up cycling
    as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should be kept
    separate from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the erroneous
    view that cycling is inherently dangerous. How long is it going to take
    before this comes back and bites the CTC in its organisational backside
    when the media picks up on how the CTC has a president who thinks cyclists
    should be kept off the roads, yet at the same time supporting Daniel
    Cadden, a CTC member who was fined for cycling on the road. Mixed messages
    from the CTC, anyone?

    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    Cheers, helen s

    --

    ~~

    SUPPORT THE CYCLISTS DEFENCE FUND
    http://www.cyclistsdefencefund.org.uk/

    ~~
    to send reply email - you may need to remove dependence
    on fame & fortune from organisation
    to get correct email address
    ~Noodliness is Good~

  11. Peter Fox said:

    I've already given up with the CTC else I'd want to know who thought
    that somebody off the cab rank of after-dinner speakers was a good bet.
    Let's face it cyclists are by their very nature do-ers and get the knees
    dirty people. And (no offence intended to the large cohort of fit,
    strong, and experienced cyclists) why have somebody who fits the
    'retired old fogey with a basket on the handlebars and cycle clips on
    their tweeds' stereotype when say a 25-y.o. mad red-haired uni-cyclist
    would be better on the telly and better for 'what the hell - everyone
    jump on and off we go'.

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Cycling needs brains not mouthpieces.

    And I'd disagree. Cycling needs ambassadors who can be respected and
    seen as normal by the general public. The positive reasons to have Jon
    Snow are:

    1. He is a well known person.
    2. He is mainstream, hence 'normal'
    3. He has gravitas which commands a degree of respect across the board.
    4. He is a regular utility cyclist.

    Against are the points that Helen has made, ie. it would really help if
    he could provide some degree of accuracy and logic behind his opinions.
    And it really would help if he stuck to the law, like the rest of us
    try to.

    ...d

  12. Sorry the system (or me) lost a long mail

    --
    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.
    www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

    "Pinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The CTC has made an unwise move, I think.

    According to the copy of Cycle which arrived this morning, Jon Snow is
    the new CTC president, having been invited to take the role once Phil
    Liggett steps down.

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on 'Richard &
    Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to take up
    cycling as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should be
    kept separate from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the
    erroneous view that cycling is inherently dangerous. How long is it going
    to take before this comes back and bites the CTC in its organisational
    backside when the media picks up on how the CTC has a president who
    thinks cyclists should be kept off the roads, yet at the same time
    supporting Daniel Cadden, a CTC member who was fined for cycling on the
    road. Mixed messages from the CTC, anyone?

    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    Cheers, helen s

    --

    ~~

    SUPPORT THE CYCLISTS DEFENCE FUND
    http://www.cyclistsdefencefund.org.uk/

    ~~
    to send reply email - you may need to remove dependence
    on fame & fortune from organisation
    to get correct email address
    ~Noodliness is Good~

  13. On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:17:13 +0100 someone who may be "wafflycat"
    <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    This will be Jon Snow, the newsreader, who back in February on 'Richard &
    Judy' (13th February 2006) admitted he tells people not to take up cycling
    as "it's too dangerous out there" and that cyclists should be kept separate
    from traffic on separate facilities, so promoting the erroneous view that
    cycling is inherently dangerous. How long is it going to take before this
    comes back and bites the CTC in its organisational backside when the media
    picks up on how the CTC has a president who thinks cyclists should be kept
    off the roads, yet at the same time supporting Daniel Cadden, a CTC member
    who was fined for cycling on the road. Mixed messages from the CTC, anyone?

    I feel like handing in my CTC membership in disgust.

    I'm not a member. However, they can be jerked into action by a
    suitably worded e-mail. My impression is that the organisation
    consists of two parts. One are the generic organisation bods, who
    move from one organisation to the other at will. The others are
    those interested in cycling.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  14. Peter Fox said:

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Will Mr Snow be requiring a Pedalometer to explain his decisions?

    I think AHD is a particularly good choice though whether he'd fit with David Martin's mainstream (i.e. normal) requirement is debatable.

    Others:

    Chris Boardman? Not utility enough?

    Nicole Cooke? Too young? Not famous enough? (despite being the best female cyclist in the world)

    Sean Yates? Again, not utility? Too bloody busy anyway?

    Christian Wolmar? Too political? Not famous enough? Not mainstream enough?

  15. in message <[email hidden]>, Peter Fox

    (') said:

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Boris Jonstone?

    No, I am vaguely serious. He is a Tory, I know, but he is well known as a
    regular utility cyclist and is media-friendly in his own bizarre way.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; An enamorata is for life, not just for weekends.

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Peter Fox <[email hidden]> writes:
    |>
    |> $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    |> The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    |> qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    |> televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.
    |>
    |> Cycling needs brains not mouthpieces.

    The other television Jeremy? He cycles and he has brains, and is
    not inclined to suffer fools gladly.

    Regards,
    Nick Maclaren.

  17. Nick Maclaren said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Peter Fox <[email hidden]> writes:
    |>
    |> $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    |> The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    |> qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    |> televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.
    |>
    |> Cycling needs brains not mouthpieces.

    The other television Jeremy? He cycles and he has brains, and is
    not inclined to suffer fools gladly.

    Mr Paxman..

    There are a surprising [1] number of high profile types who cycle. Most
    just get on with it.

    I think JS will be a good figurehead for the CTC and will be able to be
    'on message' when necessary. Whether he will ever have a 'Jon and his
    mates' ride like the Ph&F remains to be seen (dodging through city
    centres on the pavement?)

    JP would be somewhat too abrasive a personality for the diplomatic role
    of CTC president?

    ...d

  18. "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Peter Fox

    (') said:

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Boris Jonstone?

    No, I am vaguely serious. He is a Tory, I know, but he is well known as a
    regular utility cyclist and is media-friendly in his own bizarre way.

    You have to be out of your mind! And I am not talking about politics here
    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.
    www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk.

  19. In article <[email hidden]>

    Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Peter Fox

    (') said:

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Boris Jonstone?

    No, I am vaguely serious. He is a Tory, I know, but he is well known as a
    regular utility cyclist and is media-friendly in his own bizarre way.


    We like Boris :-)

  20. Peter Fox said:

    $64,000 question for urc : Who /would be/ a better ambassador?
    The obvious candidate is Adam Hart-Davis who has the 'dirty knees'
    qualification but there must be alternatives which those of you with
    televisions and sporty knowledge would know about.

    Yes, him or the presenter of that recent bbc programs about mapping who went
    over some of the lake district passes on a 100 year old bike ...
    ah yes, Nicholas Crane http://www.tvfactual.co.uk/nicolas_crane.htm though Adam
    Hart's better known.

    --
    Stephen Patterson :: [email hidden] :: http://patter.mine.nu/
    GPG: E3E8E974 :: Jabber: [email hidden]
    "At night, the razor weasels come."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.